journal article·2023-11Open access

Pathways of hydrogen atom diffusion at fcc Cu: Σ9 and Σ5 grain boundaries vs single crystal

Cláudio M. Lousada, Pavel A. Korzhavyi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 44

Abstract

Abstract The diffusion of H-atoms is relevant for innumerous physical–chemical processes in metals. A detailed understanding of diffusion in a polycrystalline material requires the knowledge of the activation energies (ΔEa’s) for diffusion at different defects. Here, we report a study of the diffusion of H-atoms at the Σ9 and Σ5 grain boundaries (GBs) of fcc Cu that are relevant for practical applications of the material. The complete set of possible diffusion pathways was determined for each GB and we compared the ΔEa at bulk fcc Cu with the landscape of ΔEa’s at these defects. We found that while a number of diffusion pathways at the GBs have high tortuosity, there are also many paths with very low tortuosity because of specific structural features of the interstitial GB sites. These data show that the diffusion of H-atoms at these GBs is highly directional but can be fast because at certain paths the ΔEa can be as low as 0.05 eV. The lowest energy paths for diffusion of H-atoms through the whole GB models are ΔEa = 0.05 eV for the Σ9 and ΔEa = 0.20 eV at Σ5 which compare with ΔEa = 0.42 eV for the bulk fcc crystal. This shows that H-atoms will be able to diffuse very fast at these defects. With the Laguerre–Voronoi tessellation method, we studied how the local atomic structure of the interstitial sites of the GBs leads to different ΔEa’s for diffusion of H-atoms. We found that the volume expansions and the coordination numbers alone cannot account for the magnitude of the ΔEa’s. Hence, we developed a symmetry quantifying parameter that measures the deviation of symmetry of the GB sites from that of the bulk octahedral site and hence accounts for the distortion at the GB site. Only when this parameter is introduced together with the volume expansions and the coordination numbers, it is possible to correlate the local structure with the ΔEa’s and to obtain descriptors of diffusion. The complete set of data shows that the extrapolation of diffusion data for H-atoms between different types of GBs is non-trivial and should be done with care.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Mehrer H (2007) Diffusion in solids: fundamentals methods materials, diffusion-controlled processes. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-540-71488-0 ↗
2. Mehrer H (1990) Atomistic mechanisms of diffusion: Datasheet from Landolt-Börnstein - Group III Condensed Matter. In: “Diffusion in Solid Metals and Alloys” in Springer Materials, vol 26. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg10.1007/b37801 ↗
3. Völkl J, Alefeld G (1978). In: Alefeld G, Völkl J (eds) Hydrogen in metals I: basic properties. Springer, Heidelberg
4. Vökl J, Wipf H (1981) Hyperfine Interact 8:631. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0103753810.1007/BF01037538 ↗
5. Kirchheim R, Pundt A (2014) In: DE Laughlin, K Hono (eds) Physical metallurgy (5th edn) Elsevier, Oxford
6. Was GS (2017) Fundamentals of radiation materials science: metals and alloys. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4939-3438-6 ↗
7. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2020) J Mater Sci 55:6623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04459-z10.1007/s10853-020-04459-z ↗
8. Korzhavyi PA, Sandström R (2014) Comput Mater Sci 84:122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.06510.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.065 ↗
9. Turnbull A (2012). In: Gangloff RP, Somerday BP (eds) Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston
10. van Erp T, Trinh T, Kjelstrup S, Glavatskiy K (2014). Front Phys. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2013.0003610.3389/fphy.2013.00036 ↗
11. Cabrini M, Coppola L, Lorenzi S et al (2020) Materials (Basel) 13:2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1310230910.3390/ma13102309 ↗
12. Van den Eeckhout E, Depover T, Verbeken K (2018) Metals 8:77910.3390/met8100779 ↗
13. Cabrini M, Lorenzi S, Pastore T, Bucella DP (2019) Corros Rev 37:459. https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2019-000810.1515/corrrev-2019-0008 ↗
14. Piskulich ZA, Mesele OO, Thompson WH (2019) J Phys Chem A 123:7185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0396710.1021/acs.jpca.9b03967 ↗
15. Kidson GV (1990). In: Mehrer H (ed) Diffusion in solid metals and alloys. Springer-Verlag, NY
16. Wang L-F, Shu X, Lin D-Y, Lu G-H, Song H-F (2020) Int J Hydrog Energy 45:822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.151 ↗
17. Du J-P, Geng WT, Arakawa K, Li J, Ogata S (2020) J Phys Chem Lett 11:7015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0179810.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01798 ↗
18. Polfus JM, Løvvik OM, Bredesen R, Peters T (2020) Acta Mater 195:708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.00710.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.007 ↗
19. Magnusson H, Frisk K (2013) In: Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (ed) Self-diffusion and impurity diffusion of hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur and phosphorus in copper. Swerea KIMAB AB, Stockholm
20. Forsström A, Becker R, Hänninen H, Yagodzinskyy Y, Heikkilä M (2021) Mater Corros 72:317. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20201169510.1002/maco.202011695 ↗
21. Bell RP (1980) The tunnel effect in chemistry. Chapman & Hall, London10.1007/978-1-4899-2891-7 ↗
22. Benderskii DVA, Wight CA (1994) Chemical dynamics at low temperatures. Wiley, New York10.1002/9780470141472 ↗
23. Fang W, Richardson JO, Chen J, Li X-Z, Michaelides A (2017) Phys Rev Lett 119:126001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.12600110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.126001 ↗
24. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Phys Rev B 54:1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Phys Rev Lett 78:139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
27. Blöchl PE (1994) Phys Rev B 50:1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
28. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) Phys Rev B 59:175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
29. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2020) Metals 10:1362. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1010136210.3390/met10101362 ↗
30. Sandström R, Lousada CM (2021) J Nucl Mater 544:152682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.15268210.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152682 ↗
31. Methfessel M, Paxton AT (1989) Phys Rev B 40:3616. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
32. You Y-W, Kong X-S, Wu X-B et al (2013) AIP Adv 3:012118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478954710.1063/1.4789547 ↗
33. Lousada CM, Sophonrat N, Yang W (2018) J Phys Chem C 122:12168. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0217310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02173 ↗
34. Heinola K, Ahlgren T, Nordlund K, Keinonen J (2010) Phys Rev B 82:094102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.09410210.1103/PhysRevB.82.094102 ↗
35. Randle V (2001) Mater Charact 47:411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00193-610.1016/S1044-5803(02)00193-6 ↗
36. Fortes MA (1972) Physica Status Solidi 54:311. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.222054013110.1002/pssb.2220540131 ↗
37. Henkelman G, Jóhannesson G, Jónsson H (2002). In: Schwartz SD (ed) Theoretical methods in condensed phase chemistry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46949-9_1010.1007/0-306-46949-9_10 ↗
38. Jónsson H, Mills G, Jacobsen KW (1998) Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions. In: Classical and quantum dynamics in condensed phase simulations. Proceedings of the International School of Physics, LERICI, Villa Marigola, 7 – 18 July 1997. https://doi.org/10.1142/381610.1142/3816 ↗
39. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2022) J Phys Chem Solids 169:110833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.11083310.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110833 ↗
40. Cotton FA (2003) Chemical applications of group theory. Wiley
41. Quey R, Renversade L (2018) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.10.02910.1016/j.cma.2017.10.029 ↗
42. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2022) Sci Rep 12:19872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23535-910.1038/s41598-022-23535-9 ↗
43. Wigner E, Seitz F (1933) Phys Rev 43:804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.43.80410.1103/PhysRev.43.804 ↗
44. Tschopp MA, Coleman SP, McDowell DL (2015) Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4:176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0040-110.1186/s40192-015-0040-1 ↗
45. César M, Liu D, Gall D, Guo H (2014) Phys Rev Appl 2:044007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.04400710.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044007 ↗
46. Wan L, Wang S (2010) Phys Rev B 82:214112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.21411210.1103/PhysRevB.82.214112 ↗
47. Katz L, Guinan M, Borg RJ (1971) Phys Rev B 4:330. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.33010.1103/PhysRevB.4.330 ↗
48. Li L, Trepte K, Jackson KA, Johnson JK (2020) J Phys Chem A 124:8223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c0648510.1021/acs.jpca.0c06485 ↗
49. Manz TA, Sholl DS (2010) J Comput Chem 31:1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2144010.1002/jcc.21440 ↗
50. Li J, Hallil A, Metsue A, Oudriss A, Bouhattate J, Feaugas X (2021) Sci Rep 11:15533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94107-610.1038/s41598-021-94107-6 ↗
51. Jaseliunaite J, Galdikas A (2020) Materials (Basel) 13:1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1305105110.3390/ma13051051 ↗
52. Shen L, Chen Z (2007) Chem Eng Sci 62:3748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.04110.1016/j.ces.2007.03.041 ↗
53. Huang J, Xiao F, Dong H, Yin X (2019) Comput Fluids 183:66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.03.01810.1016/j.compfluid.2019.03.018 ↗