journal article·2023-07

Magnetization reversal and coercivity mechanism in truncated conical nanowires of permalloy

Akhila Priya Kotti, Rahul Sahu, Amaresh Chandra Mishra

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 27
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Shi KL, Wang Z, Jiang W (2023a) Monte carlo simulation of magnetic and thermodynamic properties of hexagonal decorated nanoparticle in a magnetic field. Journal of Materials Science pp 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08504-510.1007/s10853-023-08504-5 ↗
2. Shi KL, Quan XW, Jiang W (2023) Study on the magnetic and hysteresis behaviors in a bilayer graphene-like ring with edge decorated. Phys Scr 98(1):015,822. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aca2f110.1088/1402-4896/aca2f1 ↗
3. Blasing R, Khan AA, Filippou PC et al (2020) Magnetic racetrack memory: From physics to the cusp of applications within a decade. Proc IEEE 108(8):1303–1321. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2020.297571910.1109/JPROC.2020.2975719 ↗
4. Allwood DA, Xiong G, Faulkner CC et al (2005) Magnetic domain-wall logic. Science 309(5741):1688–1692. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110881310.1126/science.1108813 ↗
5. Lin WS, Lin HM, Chen HH et al (2013) (2013) Shape effects of iron nanowires on hyperthermia treatment. J Nanomater 237:439. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/23743910.1155/2013/237439 ↗
6. Sharma M, Kuanr BK (2019) Microwave devices based on template-assisted nife nanowires: fabrication and characterization. J Phys D Appl Phys 53(6):065,001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab55a410.1088/1361-6463/ab55a4 ↗
7. Ren Y, Wang J, Liu Q et al (2011) Tailoring coercivity and magnetic anisotropy of co nanowire arrays by microstructure. J Mater Sci 46(23):7545–7550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5727-x10.1007/s10853-011-5727-x ↗
8. Hertel R (2016) Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires. J Phys Condens Matter 28(48):483,002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/48300210.1088/0953-8984/28/48/483002 ↗
9. Moreno JA, Bran C, Vazquez M et al (2021) Cylindrical magnetic nanowires applications. IEEE Trans Magn 57(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2021.305533810.1109/TMAG.2021.3055338 ↗
10. Ramirez-Villegas R, Huynen I, Piraux L et al (2016) Configurable microwave filter for signal processing based on arrays of bistable magnetic nanowires. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 65(1):72–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2016.261492610.1109/TMTT.2016.2614926 ↗
11. Forster H, Schrefl T, Scholz W et al (2002) Micromagnetic simulation of domain wall motion in magnetic nano-wires. J Magn Magn Mater 249(1–2):181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00528-010.1016/S0304-8853(02)00528-0 ↗
12. Yang H, Li Y, Zeng M et al (2016) Static and dynamic magnetization of gradient feni alloy nanowire. Sci Rep 6(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2042710.1038/srep20427 ↗
13. Garcia J, Fernandez-Roldan JA, Gonzalez R et al (2021) Narrow segment driven multistep magnetization reversal process in sharp diameter modulated fe67co33 nanowires. Nanomaterials 11(11):3077. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1111307710.3390/nano11113077 ↗
14. Berganza E, Jaafar M, Bran C et al (2017) Multisegmented nanowires: a step towards the control of the domain wall configuration. Sci Rep 7(1):11,576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11902-w10.1038/s41598-017-11902-w ↗
15. Salem MS, Tejo F, Zierold R et al (2018) Composition and diameter modulation of magnetic nanowire arrays fabricated by a novel approach. Nanotechnology 29(6):065,602. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aaa09510.1088/1361-6528/aaa095 ↗
16. Saez G, Diaz P, Cisternas E et al (2021) Information storage in permalloy modulated magnetic nanowires. Sci Rep 11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00165-110.1038/s41598-021-00165-1 ↗
17. Arzuza L, Lopez-Ruiz R, Salazar-Aravena D et al (2017) Domain wall propagation tuning in magnetic nanowires through geometric modulation. J Magn Magn Mater 432:309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.07110.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.071 ↗
18. Rodriguez LA, Bran C, Reyes D et al (2016) Quantitative nanoscale magnetic study of isolated diameter-modulated fecocu nanowires. ACS Nano 10(10):9669–9678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0549610.1021/acsnano.6b05496 ↗
19. Fernandez-Roldan JA, Perez del Real R, Bran C et al (2018) Magnetization pinning in modulated nanowires: from topological protection to the “corkscrew’’ mechanism. Nanoscale 10(13):5923–5927. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR00024G10.1039/C8NR00024G ↗
20. Saez G, Cisternas E, Diaz P et al (2020) Tuning the coercive field by controlling the magnetization reversal process in permalloy modulated nanowires. J Magn Magn Mater 512(167):045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16704510.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167045 ↗
21. Saavedra E, Saez G, Diaz P et al (2019) Dynamic susceptibility of modulated magnetic nanowires. AIP Adv 9(6):065,007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509181310.1063/1.5091813 ↗
22. Burn DM, Arac E, Atkinson D (2013) Magnetization switching and domain-wall propagation behavior in edge-modulated ferromagnetic nanowire structures. Phys Rev B 88(10):104,422. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.10442210.1103/PhysRevB.88.104422 ↗
23. Fernandez-Roldan JA, De Riz A, Trapp B et al (2019) Modeling magnetic-field-induced domain wall propagation in modulated-diameter cylindrical nanowires. Sci Rep 9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40794-110.1038/s41598-019-40794-1 ↗
24. Liu D, Zhao T, Zhang M et al (2021) Exploration of nontrivial topological domain structures in the equilibrium state of magnetic nanodisks. J Mater Sci 56:4677–4685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05569-410.1007/s10853-020-05569-4 ↗
25. Schoberl J (1997) Netgen an advancing front 2d/3d-mesh generator based on abstract rules. Comput Vis Sci 1(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791005000410.1007/s007910050004 ↗
26. Venkat G, Venkateswarlu D, Joshi R et al (2018) Enhanced spin wave propagation in magnonic rings by bias field modulation. AIP Adv 8(5):056,006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500657610.1063/1.5006576 ↗
27. Fischbacher T, Franchin M, Bordignon G et al (2007) A systematic approach to multiphysics extensions of finite-element-based micromagnetic simulations: Nmag. IEEE Trans Magn 43(6):2896–2898. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2007.89384310.1109/TMAG.2007.893843 ↗
28. Ramachandran P, Varoquaux G (2011) Mayavi: 3d visualization of scientific data. Comput Sci Eng 13(2):40–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.3510.1109/MCSE.2011.35 ↗
29. Ivanov YP, Vazquez M, Chubykalo-Fesenko O (2013) Magnetic reversal modes in cylindrical nanowires. J Phys D Appl Phys 46(48):485,001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/48/48500110.1088/0022-3727/46/48/485001 ↗
30. Yan M, Wang H, Campbell CE (2008) Unconventional magnetic vortex structures observed in micromagnetic simulations. J Magn Magn Mater 320(13):1937–1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.17010.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.170 ↗
31. Dao N, Donahue M, Dumitru I et al (2004) Dynamic susceptibility of nanopillars. Nanotechnology 15(10):S634. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/15/10/02210.1088/0957-4484/15/10/022 ↗
32. Ross C, Farhoud M, Hwang M et al (2001) Micromagnetic behavior of conical ferromagnetic particles. J Appl Phys 89(2):1310–1319. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.133165610.1063/1.1331656 ↗
33. Bran C, Fernandez-Roldan JA, Del Real RP et al (2021) Magnetic configurations in modulated cylindrical nanowires. Nanomaterials 11(3):600. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1103060010.3390/nano11030600 ↗
34. Feldtkeller E, Thomas H (1965) Struktur und energie von blochlinien in dünnen ferromagnetischen schichten. Physik der kondensierten Materie 4(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0242325610.1007/BF02423256 ↗
35. Sahu R, Mishra AC (2022) Magnetization reversal and ground states in thin truncated conical nanodisks: analytical and micromagnetic modelling approach. J Magn Magn Mater 556(169):356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16935610.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169356 ↗
36. Raviolo S, Tejo F, Bajales N et al (2018) Angular dependence of the magnetic properties of permalloy and nickel nanowires as a function of their diameters. Mater Res Exp 5(1):015,043. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaa53710.1088/2053-1591/aaa537 ↗
37. Tejo F, Vidal-Silva N, Espejo A et al (2014) Angular dependence of the magnetic properties of cylindrical diameter modulated ni80fe20 nanowires. J Appl Phys 115(17):17D136. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486577710.1063/1.4865777 ↗
38. Elk K, Jahn L (1991) Angular dependence and competition of coercivity mechanisms. J Magn Magn Mater 102(1–2):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(91)90282-F10.1016/0304-8853(91)90282-F ↗
39. Harres A, Mallmann TA, Gamino M et al (2022) Magnetization reversal processes in amorphous cofeb thin films. J Magn Magn Mater 552(169):135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16913510.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169135 ↗
40. Bernasconi J, Strassler S, Perkins RS (1975) Simple models for the coercivity of hard magnetic materials. AIP Conf Proc 24(1):761–762. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3027810.1063/1.30278 ↗
41. Ratnam D, Buessem W (1972) Angular variation of coercive force in barium ferrite. J Appl Phys 43(3):1291–1293. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166126010.1063/1.1661260 ↗
42. Tu H, You B, Gao Y et al (2016) The thickness-dependent in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in amorphous cofeb films on gaas (001) substrates. J Supercond Novel Magn 29:2843–2848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-016-3615-y10.1007/s10948-016-3615-y ↗
43. Schumacher F (1991) On the modification of the kondorsky function. J Appl Phys 70(6):3184–3187. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34930110.1063/1.349301 ↗
44. Delalande M, de Vries J, Abelmann L et al (2012) Measurement of the nucleation and domain depinning field in a single co/pt multilayer dot by anomalous hall effect. J Magn Magn Mater 324(7):1277–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.09.03710.1016/j.jmmm.2011.09.037 ↗
45. Huang HL, Sobolev VL (1993) Domain wall structure and the re-modified Kondorsky function. IEEE Trans Magn 29(6):2539–2541. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.28096110.1109/20.280961 ↗