Influence of microstructure on the hydrogen diffusion behavior in dual-phase steels: an electrochemical permeation study
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the impact of various microstructural features obtained by heat treatment on the hydrogen diffusion and trapping behavior in dual-phase steel (DP-980). The heat treatment was carried out in the inter-critical (IC) region at two different temperatures followed by water quenching (WQ) (i.e., IC-650 °C-WQ, IC-800 °C-WQ). The microstructural characteristics were examined using a scanning electron microscope equipped with electron backscattered diffraction (SEM-EBSD). The electrochemical hydrogen permeation technique was used to characterize the hydrogen diffusion behavior. Heat treatment led to variation in martensite- and ferrite-phase volume fraction, distribution, morphology, and local misorientation, geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) in the microstructure. EBSD characterization revealed that the overall GNDs density values increase from 1.61 × 1014 to 2.99 × 1014 m−2 with an increase in martensite fraction. The permeation results revealed that the highest apparent diffusion coefficient (Dapp) value of 2.7 ± 0.3 × 10–7 cm2 s−1, the lowest apparent solubility (Capp) 4.4 ± 0.2 × 10–4 mol H cm−3, and trapping sites density of 2.2 ± 0.3 × 1021 cm−3 in IC-650 °C-WQ are compared to other studied microstructures. It could be attributed to the microstructure with lower GNDs and lower martensite volume fraction (38%) with the semi-continuous distribution in IC-650 °C-WQ, whereas in IC-800 °C-WQ, the microstructure consists of martensite with (66%) volume fraction having lath morphology. In the decay transient, the IC-650 °C-WQ specimen shows a slower rate of decay with a lower lattice diffusion coefficient (DL) value of 2.1 ± 0.01 × 10–6 cm2 s−1, higher diffusible hydrogen concentration (Cdiff) value of 8.8 ± 0.09 ppm, and higher reversible trapping sites among the studied microstructures.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanda T, Singh V, Singh V, Chakraborty A, Sharma S (2019) Third generation of advanced high-strength steels: processing routes and properties. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mater Des Appl 233:209–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071666419810.1177/1464420716664198 ↗
2. Tasan CC, Diehl M, Yan D, Bechtold M, Roters F, Schemmann L, Zheng C, Peranio N, Ponge D, Koyama M, Tsuzaki K (2015) An overview of dual-phase steels: advances in microstructure-oriented processing and micro mechanically guided design. Annu Rev Mater Res 45:391–431. https://doi.org/10.1146/annual-matsci-070214-02110310.1146/annual-matsci-070214-021103 ↗
3. Gong Y, Uusitalo J, Hua M, Wu Y, DeArdo AJ (2019) Effects of pre-annealing conditions on the microstructure and properties of vanadium-bearing dual-phase steels produced using continuous galvanizing line simulations. J Mater Sci 54:7211–7230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03338-610.1007/s10853-019-03338-6 ↗
4. Barrera O, Bombac D, Chen Y, Daff TD, Galindo-Nava E, Gong P, Sweeney F (2018) Understanding and mitigating hydrogen embrittlement of steels: a review of experimental, modeling and design progress from atomistic to continuum. J Mater Sci 53:6251–6290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1978-510.1007/s10853-017-1978-5 ↗
5. Dwivedi SK, Vishwakarma M (2019) Effect of hydrogen in advanced high strength steel materials. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:28007–28030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.14910.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.149 ↗
6. Zhu X, Zhang K, Li W, Jin X (2016) Effect of retained austenite stability and morphology on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility in quenching and partitioning treated steels. Mater Sci Eng A 658:400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.02610.1016/j.msea.2016.02.026 ↗
7. Sun B, Krieger W, Rohwerder M, Ponge D, Raabe D (2020) Dependence of hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms on microstructure-driven hydrogen distribution in medium Mn steels. Acta Mater 183:313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.02910.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.029 ↗
8. Wang Z, Liu J, Huang F, Bi YJ, Zhang SQ (2020) Hydrogen diffusion and its effect on hydrogen embrittlement in DP steels with different martensite content. Front Mater Sci 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.62000010.3389/fmats.2020.620000 ↗
9. Jo JW, Seo HJ, Jung BI, Choi S, Less CS (2021) Effect of bainite fraction on hydrogen embrittlement of bainite/martensite steel. Mater Sci Eng A 814:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14122610.1016/j.msea.2021.141226 ↗
10. Zhang S, Xu D, Huang F, Gao W, Wan J, Liu J (2021) Mitigation of hydrogen embrittlement in ultra-high strength lath martensitic steel via Ta microalloying. Mater Des 210:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11009010.1016/j.matdes.2021.110090 ↗
11. Martiniano GA, Leal JES, Rosa GS, Bose Filho WW (2021) Effect of specific microstructures on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of a modified AISI 4130 steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(73):36539–36556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.14710.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.147 ↗
12. Koyama M, Tasan CC, Akiyama E, Tsuzaki K, Raabe D (2014) Hydrogen-assisted decohesion and localized plasticity in dual-phase steel. Acta Mater 70:174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.04810.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.048 ↗
13. Liu Q, Zhou Q, Venezuela J, Zhang M, Atrens A (2018) The role of the microstructure on the influence of hydrogen on some advanced high-strength steels. Mater Sci Eng A 715:370–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.07910.1016/j.msea.2017.12.079 ↗
14. Depover T, Wallaert E, Verbeken K (2016) Fractographic analysis of the role of hydrogen diffusion on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of DP steel. Mater Sci Eng A 649:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.12410.1016/j.msea.2015.09.124 ↗
15. Duarte MJ, Fang X, Rao J, Krieger W, Brinckmann S, Dehm G (2021) In situ nanoindentation during electrochemical hydrogen charging: a comparison between front-side and a novel back-side charging approach. J Mater Sci 56:8732–8744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05749-210.1007/s10853-020-05749-2 ↗
16. Hallil A, Metsue A, Oudriss A, Bouhattate J, Feaugas X (2018) Segregation energy of the hydrogen at Ni Σ3 grain boundaries: some implications of the atomic volume and the interstitial self-stress. J Mater Sci 53:5356–5363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1941-510.1007/s10853-017-1941-5 ↗
17. Oriani RA (1970) The diffusion and trapping of hydrogen in steel. Acta Metall 18:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-710.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-7 ↗
18. Krom AH, Bakker AD (2000) Hydrogen trapping models in steel. Metall Mater Trans B 31:1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-000-0032-010.1007/s11663-000-0032-0 ↗
19. Lee JY, Lee SM (1986) Hydrogen trapping phenomena in metals with b.c.c. and f.c.c. crystal structures by the desorption thermal analysis technique. Surf Coat Technol 28:301–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0257-8972(86)90087-310.1016/0257-8972(86)90087-3 ↗
20. Skilbred ES, Kappe M, Iannuzzi M, Johnsen R (2021) Hydrogen uptake and diffusivity in steel armor wires with different chemical composition, carbide distribution, grain size, and degree of deformation. Corros Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20211261510.1002/maco.202112615 ↗
21. Devanathan MAV, Stachurski Z (1962) The adsorption and diffusion of electrolytic hydrogen in palladium. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 270:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1962.020510.1098/rspa.1962.0205 ↗
22. ASTM G-148 (2003) Standard practice for evaluation of hydrogen uptake, permeation and transport in metals by an electrochemical technique. ASTM International
23. ISO 17081: 2004 (E) Method of measurement of hydrogen permeation and determination of hydrogen uptake and transport in metals by an electrochemical technique
24. Fallahmohammadi E, Bolzoni F, Lazzari L (2013) Measurement of lattice and apparent diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in X65 and F22 pipeline steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.05910.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.059 ↗
25. Dong CF, Li XG, Liu ZY, Zhang YR (2009) Hydrogen-induced cracking and healing behavior of X70steel. J Alloys Compd 484:966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.08510.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.085 ↗
26. Schaffner T, Hartmaier V, Kokotin A, Pohl M (2018) Analysis of hydrogen diffusion and trapping in ultra-high-strength steel grades. J Alloys Compd 746:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.26410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.264 ↗
27. Mallick D, Mary N, Raja VS, Normand B (2021) Study of diffusion behavior of hydrogen in the first-generation advanced high strength steels. Metals 11(5):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1105078210.3390/met11050782 ↗
28. Pang X, Fazeli M, Attard M, Shi C (2014) Assessment of hydrogen uptake and permeation in AHSSs. Mater Sci Forum 786:950–955. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.783-786.95010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.783-786.950 ↗
29. Rudomilova D, Prosek T, Salveter P, Knaislova A, Novak P, Kodym R, Schimo-Aichhorn G, Muhr A, Duchaczek H, Luckeneder G (2020) The effect of microstructure on hydrogen permeability of high strength steels. Mater Corros 71:909–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20191135710.1002/maco.201911357 ↗
30. Liu Q, Zhou Q, Venezuela J, Zhang M, Atrens A (2018) Evaluation of the influence of hydrogen on some commercial DP, Q&P, and TWIP advanced high-strength steels during automobile service. Eng Fail Anal 94:249–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.08.01110.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.08.011 ↗
31. Liu Q, Atrens A (2015) Reversible hydrogen trapping in a 3.5NiCrMoV medium strength steel. Corros Sci 96:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.04.0110.1016/j.corsci.2015.04.01 ↗
32. Liu Q, Venezuela J, Zhang M, Zhou Q, Atrens A (2016) Hydrogen trapping in some advanced high strength steels. Corros Sci 111:770–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.04610.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.046 ↗
33. Zhou P, Li W, Zhao H, Jin X (2018) Role of microstructure on electrochemical hydrogen permeation properties in advanced high strength steels. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:10905–10914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.24110.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.241 ↗
34. Wang Y, Hua J, Kong M, Zeng Y, Liu J, Liu Z (2016) Quantitative analysis of martensite and bainite microstructures using electron backscatter diffraction. Microsc Res Tech 79:814–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.2270310.1002/jemt.22703 ↗
35. Ouyang YJ, Yu G, Hu L, Wang XJ, Xu WJ, Zhan YG, Zhang XY (2013) Influence of Ni or Pd coatings on oxidation of permeated hydrogen. Surf Eng 29(4):312–317. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743294413Y.000000013410.1179/1743294413Y.0000000134 ↗
36. Hu B, Luo H (2017) Microstructures and mechanical properties of 7 Mn steel manufacture by different rolling processes. Metals 7:464–475. https://doi.org/10.3390/met711046410.3390/met7110464 ↗
37. Ahmad E, Manzoor T, Hussain N (2009) Thermomechanical processing in the intercritical region and tensile properties of dual-phase steel. Mater Sci Eng A 508:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.05610.1016/j.msea.2009.01.056 ↗
38. Wang HS, Yuan G, Lan MF, Kang J, Zhang YX, Cao GM, Wang GD (2018) Microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel hot-rolled 4% Mn steel processed by intercritical annealing. J Mater Sci 53:12570–12582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2512-010.1007/s10853-018-2512-0 ↗
39. Squires L, Lim YC, Miles MP, Feng Z (2015) Mechanical properties of dissimilar metal joints composed of DP 980 steel and AA 7075–T6. Sci Technol Weld Join 20:242–248. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171815Y.000000001310.1179/1362171815Y.0000000013 ↗
40. Beres G, Weltsch Z (2019) Estimation of strength properties from microhardness results in dual-phase steels with different Martensite volume fractions. Period Polytech Transp Eng 47:206–212. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.1211310.3311/PPtr.12113 ↗
41. Zhao Z, Tong T, Liang J, Yin H, Zhao A, Tang D (2014) Microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of ultra-high strength dual-phase steel. Mater Sci Eng A 618:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.00510.1016/j.msea.2014.09.005 ↗
42. Yoon JI, Jung J, Lee HH, Kim JY, Kim HS (2019) Relationships between stretch-frangibility and microstructure-mechanical properties in ultra-high-strength dual-phase steels. Met Mater Int 25:1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00270-x10.1007/s12540-019-00270-x ↗
43. Gao B, Chen X, Pan Z, Li J, Ma Y, Cao Y, Zhou H (2019) A high-strength heterogeneous structural dual-phase steel. J Mater Sci 54:12898–12910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03785110.1007/s10853-019-037851 ↗
44. Chabok A, Galinmoghaddam E, De Hosson JT, Pei YT (2019) Micromechanical evaluation of DP1000-GI dual-phase high-strength steel resistance spot weld. J Mater Sci 54:1703–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2886-z10.1007/s10853-018-2886-z ↗
45. Fan S, Hao H, Zhang H, Han Q (2020) Improvement in mechanical properties of a surface-carburized ferrite–martensite dual-phase steel by intercritical annealing. J Mater Eng Perform 29:7034–7044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05196-910.1007/s11665-020-05196-9 ↗
46. Guo C, Hao L, Li S, Kang Y, An Y (2019) Effect of microstructure quenched around Ac3 point on the damage behavior in 0.087 C–1.35 Mn steel. J Mater Res Technol 8(6):5103–5113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.03210.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.032 ↗
47. Wu J, Wray PJ, Garcia CI, Hua M, De Ardo AJ (2005) Image quality analysis: a new method of characterizing microstructures. ISIJ Int 45:254–262. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.45.25410.2355/isijinternational.45.254 ↗
48. Ozdirik B, Suter T, Hans U, Depover T, Verbeken K, Schmutz P, De Grae I (2019) Study of the hydrogen uptake in deformed steel using the microcapillary cell technique. Corros Sci 155:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.02910.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.029 ↗
49. Banerjee A, Hossain R, Pahlevani F, Zhu Q, Sahajwalla V, Prusty BG (2019) Strain-rate-dependent deformation behaviour of high-carbon steel in compression: mechanical and structural. J Mater Sci 54:6594–6607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03301-x10.1007/s10853-018-03301-x ↗
50. Gurao NP, Suwas S (2014) Generalized scaling of misorientation angle distributions at mesoscale in deformed materials. Sci Rep 4:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0564110.1038/srep05641 ↗
51. Depover T, Hajilou T, Wa D, Wang D, Barnoush A, Verbeken K (2019) Assessment of the potential of hydrogen plasma charging as compared to conventional electrochemical hydrogen charging on a dual-phase steel. Mater Sci Eng A 754:613–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.03.09710.1016/j.msea.2019.03.097 ↗
52. Kadkhodapour J, Schmauder S, Raabe D, Ziaei-Rad S, Weber U, Calcagnotto M (2011) Experimental and numerical study on geometrically necessary dislocations and non-homogeneous mechanical properties of the ferrite phase in dual-phase steels. Acta Mater 59:4387–4394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.06210.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.062 ↗
53. Ramazani A, Mukherjee K, Schwedt A, Goravanchi P, Prahl U, Bleck W (2013) Quantification of the effect of transformation-induced geometrically necessary dislocations on the flow-curve modeling of dual-phase steels. Int J Plast 43:128–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.003 ↗
54. Wang J, Li W, Zhu X, Zhang L (2022) Effect of martensite morphology and volume fraction on the low-temperature impact toughness of dual-phase steels. Mater Sci Eng A 832:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14242410.1016/j.msea.2021.142424 ↗
55. Shi R, ChenL WZ, Yang XS, Qiao L, Pang X (2021) Quantitative investigation on deep hydrogen trapping in tempered martensitic steel. J Alloys Compd 854:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15721810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157218 ↗
56. Shi R, Ma Y, Wang Z, Gao L, Yang XS, Qiao L, Pang X (2020) Atomic-scale investigation of deep hydrogen trapping in NbC/α-Fe semi-coherent interfaces. Acta Mater 200:686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.03110.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.031 ↗
57. Shi R, Wang ZD, Qiao LJ, Pang XL (2021) Effect of in-situ nanoparticles on the mechanical properties and hydrogen embrittlement of high-strength steel. J Miner Metall 28(4):644–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2157-210.1007/s12613-020-2157-2 ↗
58. Oudriss A, Creus J, Bouhattate J, Conforto E, Berziou C, Savall C, Feaugas X (2012) Grain size and grain-boundary effects on diffusion and trapping of hydrogen in pure nickel. Acta Mater 60:6814–6828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.004 ↗
59. Koyama M, Yamasaki D, Nagashima T, Tasan CC, Tsuzaki K (2017) In situ observations of silver-decoration evolution under hydrogen permeation: Effects of grain boundary misorientation on hydrogen flux in pure iron. Scr Mater 129:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.027 ↗
60. Van den Eeckhout E, Laureys A, IngelgemY V, Verbeken K (2017) Hydrogen permeation through deformed and heat-treated Armco pure iron. Mater Sci Technol 33:1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2017.134201510.1080/02670836.2017.1342015 ↗
61. Cheng YF (2007) Analysis of electrochemical hydrogen permeation through X-65 pipeline steel and its implications on pipeline stress corrosion cracking. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.07.01810.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.07.018 ↗
62. Huang F, Li XG, Liu J, Qu YM, Jia J, Du CW (2011) Hydrogen-induced cracking susceptibility and hydrogen trapping efficiency of different microstructure X80 pipeline steel. J Mater Sci 46:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4799-310.1007/s10853-010-4799-3 ↗
63. Araújo DF, Vilar EO, Carrasco JP (2014) A critical review of mathematical models used to determine the density of hydrogen trapping sites in steels and alloys. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:12194–12200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.03610.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.036 ↗
64. Dong CF, Liu ZY, Li XG, Cheng YF (2009) Effects of hydrogen-charging on the susceptibility of X100 pipeline steel to hydrogen-induced cracking. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:9879–9884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.09010.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.090 ↗
65. BegicHadzipasic A, Malina J, Malina M (2011) The influence of microstructure on hydrogen diffusion and embrittlement of fine-grained high strength dual-phase steels. Chem Biochem Eng Q 2:159–169
66. Lan L, Kong X, Hu Z, Qiu C, Zhao D, Du L (2016) Hydrogen permeation behavior in relation to microstructural evolution of low carbon bainitic steel weldments. Corros Sci 112:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.02510.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.025 ↗
67. Olden V, Thaulow C, Johnsen R (2008) Modelling of hydrogen diffusion and hydrogen-induced cracking in super martensitic and duplex stainless steels. Mater Des 29:1934–1948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.02610.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.026 ↗
68. Zakroczymski T (2006) Adaptation of the electrochemical permeation technique for studying entry, transport and trapping of hydrogen in metals. Electrochim Acta 51:2261–2266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.15110.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.151 ↗
69. Fumagalli G, Bolzoni F, Fallahmohammadi E, Re G, Lazzari L (2015) Electrochemical methods for determining diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in steels. Corros Eng Sci Technol 50:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743278215Y.00000010.1179/1743278215Y.000000 ↗
70. Boes N, Züchner H (1976) Electrochemical methods for studying diffusion, permeation and solubility of hydrogen in metals. J Less Common Met 49:223–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(76)90037-010.1016/0022-5088(76)90037-0 ↗
71. Iwaoka H, Arita M, Horita Z (2017) Hydrogen diffusion in ultrafine-grained iron with the body-centered cubic crystal structure. Philos Mag Lett 97:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500839.2017.130070210.1080/09500839.2017.1300702 ↗
72. Van den Eeckhout E, De Baer I, Depover T, Verbeken K (2020) The effect of a constant tensile load on the hydrogen diffusivity in dual-phase steel by electrochemical permeation experiments. Mater Sci Eng A 773:138872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13887210.1016/j.msea.2019.138872 ↗
73. Ifergane S, Ben David R, Sabatani E, Carmeli B, Beeri O, Eliaz N (2018) Hydrogen diffusivity and trapping in custom 465 stainless steel. J Electrochem Soc 165:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0261803jes10.1149/2.0261803jes ↗
74. Venezuela J, Zhou Q, Liu Q, Zhang M, Atrens A (2018) Hydrogen trapping in some automotive martensitic advanced high-strength steels. Adv Eng Mater 20:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170046810.1002/adem.201700468 ↗
75. Chen L, Antonov S, Su Y, Qiao L (2021) Dislocation cell walls with high dislocation density as effective hydrogen traps in Armco iron. Mater Corros. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20211266210.1002/maco.202112662 ↗
76. Chen L, Xiong X, Tao X, Su Y, Qia L (2020) Effect of dislocation cell walls on hydrogen adsorption, hydrogen trapping and hydrogen embrittlement resistance. Corros Sci 166:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10842810.1016/j.corsci.2020.108428 ↗
77. Garcia DCS, Carvalho RN, Lins VFC, Rezende DM, Dos Santos DS (2015) Influence of microstructure in the hydrogen permeation in martensitic-ferritic stainless steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(47):17102–17109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.10210.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.102 ↗
78. Zhu X, Li W, Zhao H, Wang L, Jin X (2014) Hydrogen trapping sites and hydrogen-induced cracking in high strength quenching & partitioning (Q&P) treated steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(24):13031–13040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.07910.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.079 ↗
79. Chan SLI, Lee HL, Yang JR (1991) Effect of retained austenite on the hydrogen content and effective diffusivity of martensitic structure. Metall Mater Trans 22(11):2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0285135110.1007/BF02851351 ↗
80. Escobar DP, Depover T, Duprez L, Verbeken K, Verhaege M (2012) Combined thermal desorption spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction study of hydrogen trapping in cold deformed TRIP steel. Acta Mater 60:2593–2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.02610.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.026 ↗
81. Gu JL, Chang KD, Fang HS, Bai BZ (2002) Delayed fracture properties of 1500 MPa bainite/martensite dual-phase high strength steel and its hydrogen traps. ISIJ Int 42(12):1560–1564. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.42.156010.2355/isijinternational.42.1560 ↗
82. Kim HJ, Lee MG (2022) Analysis of hydrogen trapping behavior in plastically deformed quenching and partitioning steel in relation to microstructure evolution by phase transformation. J Alloys Compd 90:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16401810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164018 ↗
83. Park YD, Maroef IS, Landa A, Olson DL (2002) Retained austenite as a hydrogen trap in steel welds. Welding J N Y 81(2):27-S
84. Wei FG, Tsuzaki K (2012) Hydrogen trapping phenomena in martensitic steels. In: Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies. Woodhead Publishing, pp 493–52510.1533/9780857093899.3.493 ↗
85. Chan SLI (1999) Hydrogen trapping ability of steels with different microstructures. J Chin Inst Eng 1:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.1999.967044010.1080/02533839.1999.9670440 ↗
86. Chan SLI, Charles JA (1986) Effect of carbon content on hydrogen occlusivity and embrittlement of ferrite–pearlite steels. Mater Sci Technol 2(9):956–962. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1986.2.9.95610.1179/mst.1986.2.9.956 ↗
87. Frappart S, Feaugas X, Creus J, Thebault F, Delattre L, Marchebois H (2010) Study of the hydrogen diffusion and segregation into Fe–C–Mo martensitic HSLA steel using electrochemical permeation test. J Phys Chem Solids 71(10):1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.07.01710.1016/j.jpcs.2010.07.017 ↗
88. Parvathavarthini N, Saroja S, Dayal RK, Khatak HS (2001) Studies on hydrogen permeability of 2.25% Cr–1% Mo ferritic steel: correlation with microstructure. J Nucl Mater 288:87–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00706-610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00706-6 ↗