Review: recent progress in fine-structured graphene materials for electromagnetic interference shielding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao B, Deng J, Zhang R et al (2018) Recent advances on the electromagnetic wave absorption properties of Ni based materials. Eng Sci 3:5–40
2. Gurusiddesh M, Madhu BJ, Shankaramurthy GJ (2018) Structural, dielectric, magnetic and electromagnetic interference shielding investigations of polyaniline decorated Co0.5Ni0.5Fe2O4 nanoferrites. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:3502–3509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8285-410.1007/s10854-017-8285-4 ↗
3. Gong S, Zhu ZH, Arjmand M et al (2018) Effect of carbon nanotubes on electromagnetic interference shielding of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Polym Compos 39:E655–E663. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2408410.1002/pc.24084 ↗
4. Zhang L, Mei S, Huang K, Qiu C (2016) Advances in full control of electromagnetic waves with metasurfaces. Adv Opt Mater 4:818–833. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20150069010.1002/adom.201500690 ↗
5. Han Y, Lin J, Liu Y et al (2016) Crackle template based metallic mesh with highly homogeneous light transmission for high-performance transparent EMI shielding. Sci Rep 6:25601. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2560110.1038/srep25601 ↗
6. Dong Y, Yu H, Feng Y, Feng W (2024) Structure, properties and applications of multi-functional thermally conductive polymer composites. J Mater Sci Technol 200:141–16110.1016/j.jmst.2024.02.070 ↗
7. Tiikkaja M, Aro AL, Alanko T et al (2013) Electromagnetic interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from low-frequency electromagnetic fields in vivo. Europace 15:388–39410.1093/europace/eus345 ↗
8. Huang X, Wang Y, Chen Y (2022) Analysis of electromagnetic interference effect of the pulse interference on the navigation receiver. Int J Antennas Propag 2022:e3049899. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/304989910.1155/2022/3049899 ↗
9. Alameri BM (2020) Electromagnetic interference (EMI) produced by high voltage transmission lines. EUREKA: Phys Eng 5:43–5010.21303/2461-4262.2020.001398 ↗
10. Kim MS, Min EH, Koh JG (2009) Comparison of the effects of particle shape on thin FeSiCr electromagnetic wave absorber. J Magn Magn Mater 321:581–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.09.03310.1016/j.jmmm.2008.09.033 ↗
11. Morari C, Balan I, Pintea J et al (2011) Electrical conductivity and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of silicone rubber filled with ferrite and graphite powders. Prog Electromagn Res M 21:93–10410.2528/PIERM11080406 ↗
12. Szczerba P, Ligenza S, Worek C (2023) Measurement and calculation techniques of complex permeability applied to Mn-Zn ferrites based on iterative approximation curve fitting and modified equivalent inductor model. Electronics 12:4002. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics1219400210.3390/electronics12194002 ↗
13. Sugimoto S, Maeda T, Book D et al (2002) GHz microwave absorption of a fine α-Fe structure produced by the disproportionation of Sm2Fe17 in hydrogen. J Alloys Compd 330:301–30610.1016/S0925-8388(01)01504-3 ↗
14. Chung DDL (2001) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials. Carbon 39:279–28510.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-6 ↗
15. Yang Y, Gupta MC, Dudley KL, Lawrence RW (2005) Novel carbon nanotube−polystyrene foam composites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Nano Lett 5:2131–2134. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl051375r10.1021/nl051375r ↗
16. Selzer R, Friedrich K (1997) Mechanical properties and failure behaviour of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites under the influence of moisture. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 28:595–60410.1016/S1359-835X(96)00154-6 ↗
17. Xiang C, Pan Y, Liu X et al (2005) Microwave attenuation of multiwalled carbon nanotube-fused silica composites. Appl Phys Lett 87:12310310.1063/1.2051806 ↗
18. Zou G, Cao M, Lin H et al (2006) Nickel layer deposition on SiC nanoparticles by simple electroless plating and its dielectric behaviors. Powder Technol 168:84–8810.1016/j.powtec.2006.07.002 ↗
19. Yang H-J, Cao W-Q, Zhang D-Q et al (2015) NiO hierarchical nanorings on SiC: enhancing relaxation to tune microwave absorption at elevated temperature. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:7073–7077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0112210.1021/acsami.5b01122 ↗
20. Luo X, Chugh R, Biller BC et al (2002) Electronic applications of flexible graphite. J Electron Mater 31:535–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-002-0111-x10.1007/s11664-002-0111-x ↗
21. McCreery RL (2008) Advanced carbon electrode materials for molecular electrochemistry. Chem Rev 108:2646–2687. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068076m10.1021/cr068076m ↗
22. Geim AK (2009) Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324:1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115887710.1126/science.1158877 ↗
23. Wang J, Mu X, Sun M, Mu T (2019) Optoelectronic properties and applications of graphene-based hybrid nanomaterials and van der Waals heterostructures. Appl Mater Today 16:1–2010.1016/j.apmt.2019.03.006 ↗
24. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W et al (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8:902–907. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl073187210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
25. Xie SH, Liu YY, Li JY (2008) Comparison of the effective conductivity between composites reinforced by graphene nanosheets and carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 92:24312110.1063/1.2949074 ↗
26. Cao M, Wang X, Cao W et al (2018) Thermally driven transport and relaxation switching self-powered electromagnetic energy conversion. Small 14:1800987. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20180098710.1002/smll.201800987 ↗
27. Cao M-S, Shu J-C, Wen B et al (2021) Genetic dielectric genes inside 2D carbon-based materials with tunable electromagnetic function at elevated temperature. Small Struct 2:2100104. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.20210010410.1002/sstr.202100104 ↗
28. He Y, Gong R, Nie Y et al (2005) Optimization of two-layer electromagnetic wave absorbers composed of magnetic and dielectric materials in gigahertz frequency band. J Appl Phys 98:08490310.1063/1.2108158 ↗
29. Liu H, Wang Z, Yang Y et al (2022) Thermally conductive MWCNTs/Fe3O4/Ti3C2Tx MXene multi-layer films for broadband electromagnetic interference shielding. J Mater Sci Technol 130:75–8510.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.009 ↗
30. Kumar P, Narayan Maiti U, Sikdar A et al (2019) Recent advances in polymer and polymer composites for electromagnetic interference shielding: review and future prospects. Polym Rev 59:687–73810.1080/15583724.2019.1625058 ↗
31. Kruželák J, Kvasničáková A, Hložeková K, Hudec I (2021) Progress in polymers and polymer composites used as efficient materials for EMI shielding. Nanoscale Adv 3:123–172. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00760A10.1039/D0NA00760A ↗
32. Wang Y-Y, Zhang F, Li N et al (2023) Carbon-based aerogels and foams for electromagnetic interference shielding: a review. Carbon 205:10–2610.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.007 ↗
33. Pandey R, Tekumalla S, Gupta M (2020) EMI shielding of metals, alloys, and composites. Materials for potential EMI shielding applications. Elsevier, pp 341–35510.1016/B978-0-12-817590-3.00021-X ↗
34. Wu Y, Tan S, Zhao Y, Liang L, Zhou M, Ji G (2023) Broadband multispectral compatible absorbers for radar, infrared and visible stealth application. Prog Mater Sci 135:10108810.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101088 ↗
35. Yu M, Huang Y, Liu X et al (2024) Synthetic strategy of biomimetic sea urchin-like Co-NC@ PANI modified MXene-based magnetic aerogels with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption properties. Nano Res 17(3):2025–203710.1007/s12274-023-6130-z ↗
36. Zhou M, Wang J, Tan S, Ji G (2023) Top–down construction strategy toward sustainable cellulose composite paper with tunable electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Today Phys 31:10096210.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100962 ↗
37. Zhang Y, Tan S, Zhou Z et al (2023) Construction of Co2NiO4@MnCo2O4.5 nanoparticles with multiple hetero-interfaces for enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption. Particuology 81:86–9710.1016/j.partic.2022.12.013 ↗
38. Shahzad F, Alhabeb M, Hatter CB et al (2016) Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 353:1137–1140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag242110.1126/science.aag2421 ↗
39. Shahzad F, Alhabeb M, Hatter CB et al (2016) Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 353:1137–114010.1126/science.aag2421 ↗
40. Iqbal A, Shahzad F, Hantanasirisakul K et al (2020) Anomalous absorption of electromagnetic waves by 2D transition metal carbonitride Ti3CNTx (MXene). Science 369:446–45010.1126/science.aba7977 ↗
41. Shukla V (2019) Review of electromagnetic interference shielding materials fabricated by iron ingredients. Nanoscale Adv 1:1640–167110.1039/C9NA00108E ↗
42. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
43. Parviz D, Irin F, Shah SA et al (2016) Challenges in liquid-phase exfoliation, processing, and assembly of pristine graphene. Adv Mater 28:8796–8818. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160188910.1002/adma.201601889 ↗
44. Wu W, Yu B (2020) Corn flour nano-graphene prepared by the hummers redox method. ACS Omega 5:30252–30256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c0472210.1021/acsomega.0c04722 ↗
45. Liu Y, Wu X, Tian Y et al (2019) Largely enhanced oxidation of graphite flakes via ammonium persulfate-assisted gas expansion for the preparation of graphene oxide sheets. Carbon 146:618–62610.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.052 ↗
46. Gesellschaft DC (1898) Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft. Verlag Chemie
47. Brodie BC (1860) Sur le poids atomique du graphite. Ann Chim Phys 59:e472
48. Hummers W, Offeman R (1958) Graphite oxide (GO) was prepared using the well-known Hummers method described by Hummers. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339–134510.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
49. De Silva KKH, Huang H-H, Joshi R, Yoshimura M (2020) Restoration of the graphitic structure by defect repair during the thermal reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 166:74–9010.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.015 ↗
50. Eda G, Chhowalla M (2010) Chemically derived graphene oxide: towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv Mater 22:2392–2415. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20090368910.1002/adma.200903689 ↗
51. Agarwal V, Zetterlund PB (2021) Strategies for reduction of graphene oxide: a comprehensive review. Chem Eng J 405:127018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12701810.1016/j.cej.2020.127018 ↗
52. Kumar P, Šilhavík M, Zafar ZA, Červenka J (2023) Universal strategy for reversing aging and defects in graphene oxide for highly conductive graphene aerogels. J Phys Chem C 127:10599–10608. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0153410.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01534 ↗
53. Jiang Y, Song S, Mi M et al (2023) Improved electrical and thermal conductivities of graphene-carbon nanotube composite film as an advanced thermal interface material. Energies 16:1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1603137810.3390/en16031378 ↗
54. Jiang W, Wang S, Yan X et al (2023) Electrical, luminescence, and microwave-assisted reduction behaviour of alkali vs. alkaline earth metal ion-modified graphene oxide membranes. Mater Chem Phys 294:12706710.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127067 ↗
55. Yang C, Bi H, Wan D et al (2013) Direct PECVD growth of vertically erected graphene walls on dielectric substrates as excellent multifunctional electrodes. J Mater Chem A 1:770–77510.1039/C2TA00234E ↗
56. Kim H, Ahn J-H (2017) Graphene for flexible and wearable device applications. Carbon 120:244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.04110.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.041 ↗
57. Kim J, Ishihara M, Koga Y et al (2011) Low-temperature synthesis of large-area graphene-based transparent conductive films using surface wave plasma chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett 98:09150210.1063/1.3561747 ↗
58. Lellala K, Chaliyawala HA, Mukhopadhyay I (2021) Graphene sheets from various carbon precursors. Fabrication of graphene from camphor. CRC Press, pp 7–24
59. Wang J, Ren Z, Hou Y et al (2020) A review of graphene synthesisatlow temperatures by CVD methods. New Carbon Mater 35:193–20810.1016/S1872-5805(20)60484-X ↗
60. Losurdo M, Giangregorio MM, Capezzuto P, Bruno G (2011) Graphene CVD growth on copper and nickel: role of hydrogen in kinetics and structure. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:20836–20843. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP22347J10.1039/C1CP22347J ↗
61. Wang J, Ren Z, Hou Y et al (2020) A review of graphene synthesisatlow temperatures by CVD methods. New Carbon Mater 35:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(20)60484-X10.1016/S1872-5805(20)60484-X ↗
62. Lin L, Deng B, Sun J et al (2018) Bridging the gap between reality and ideal in chemical vapor deposition growth of graphene. Chem Rev 118:9281–9343. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0032510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00325 ↗
63. Emtsev KV, Bostwick A, Horn K et al (2009) Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide. Nat Mater 8:203–20710.1038/nmat2382 ↗
64. Virojanadara C, Yakimova R, Zakharov AA, Johansson LI (2010) Large homogeneous mono-/bi-layer graphene on 6H–SiC (0 0 0 1) and buffer layer elimination. J Phys Appl Phys 43:37401010.1088/0022-3727/43/37/374010 ↗
65. Wang C, Han X, Xu P et al (2011) The electromagnetic property of chemically reduced graphene oxide and its application as microwave absorbing material. Appl Phys Lett 98:07290610.1063/1.3555436 ↗
66. Ruan M, Hu Y, Guo Z et al (2012) Epitaxial graphene on silicon carbide: introduction to structured graphene. Mrs Bull 37:1138–114710.1557/mrs.2012.231 ↗
67. Berger C, Song Z, Li T et al (2004) Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2D electron gas properties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectronics. J Phys Chem B 108:19912–19916. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp040650f10.1021/jp040650f ↗
68. Zhao X, Deng X, Li M et al (2021) Preparation of large area graphene on SiC (0 0 0–1) by moderate vacuum technology. J Cryst Growth 555:12596810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125968 ↗
69. Kaynak A (1996) Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of galvanostatically synthesized conducting polypyrrole films in the 300–2000 MHz frequency range. Mater Res Bull 31:845–86010.1016/0025-5408(96)00038-4 ↗
70. Li D, Müller MB, Gilje S et al (2008) Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 3:101–10510.1038/nnano.2007.451 ↗
71. Lyu J, Wen X, Kumar U et al (2018) Separation and purification using GO and r-GO membranes. RSC Adv 8:23130–2315110.1039/C8RA03156H ↗
72. Nandy K (2016) The origin of hierarchical structure in self-assembled graphene oxide papers and the effect on mechanical properties. PhD Thesis, Northwestern University
73. Azani M-R, Hassanpour A, Carcelén V et al (2016) Highly concentrated and stable few-layers graphene suspensions in pure and volatile organic solvents. Appl Mater Today 2:17–2310.1016/j.apmt.2015.12.002 ↗
74. Wan S, Fang S, Jiang L et al (2018) Strong, conductive, foldable graphene sheets by sequential ionic and π bridging. Adv Mater 30:1802733. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180273310.1002/adma.201802733 ↗
75. Wan S, Chen Y, Wang Y et al (2019) Ultrastrong graphene films via long-chain π-bridging. Matter 1:389–40110.1016/j.matt.2019.04.006 ↗
76. Yan D, Pang H, Li B et al (2015) Structured reduced graphene oxide/polymer composites for ultra-efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Funct Mater 25:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140380910.1002/adfm.201403809 ↗
77. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗
78. Ding J, Zhao H, Yu H (2022) Bioinspired strategies for making superior graphene composite coatings. Chem Eng J 435:13480810.1016/j.cej.2022.134808 ↗
79. Cheng Y, Pu Y, Zhao D (2020) Two-dimensional membranes: new paradigms for high-performance separation membranes. Chem Asian J 15:2241–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.20200001310.1002/asia.202000013 ↗
80. Shen B, Zhai W, Zheng W (2014) Ultrathin flexible graphene film: an excellent thermal conducting material with efficient EMI shielding. Adv Funct Mater 24:4542–4548. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140007910.1002/adfm.201400079 ↗
81. Zhou E, Xi J, Guo Y et al (2018) Synergistic effect of graphene and carbon nanotube for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding films. Carbon 133:316–32210.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.023 ↗
82. Paliotta L, De Bellis G, Tamburrano A et al (2015) Highly conductive multilayer-graphene paper as a flexible lightweight electromagnetic shield. Carbon 89:260–27110.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.043 ↗
83. Zhang L, Alvarez NT, Zhang M et al (2015) Preparation and characterization of graphene paper for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 82:353–35910.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.080 ↗
84. Wang Z, Shen H, Luo K et al (2022) Synthesis of vertical graphene nanowalls on substrates by PECVD as effective EMI shielding materials. ACS Appl Electron Mater 4:4023–4032. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c0067010.1021/acsaelm.2c00670 ↗
85. Chen Z, Jin L, Hao W et al (2019) Synthesis and applications of three-dimensional graphene network structures. Mater Today Nano 5:10002710.1016/j.mtnano.2019.01.002 ↗
86. Li C, Shi G (2012) Three-dimensional graphene architectures. Nanoscale 4:5549–556310.1039/c2nr31467c ↗
87. Xi J, Li Y, Zhou E et al (2018) Graphene aerogel films with expansion enhancement effect of high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 135:44–5110.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.041 ↗
88. Bi S, Zhang L, Mu C et al (2017) Electromagnetic interference shielding properties and mechanisms of chemically reduced graphene aerogels. Appl Surf Sci 412:529–53610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.293 ↗
89. Li C-B, Li Y-J, Zhao Q et al (2020) Electromagnetic interference shielding of graphene aerogel with layered microstructure fabricated via mechanical compression. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:30686–30694. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0568810.1021/acsami.0c05688 ↗
90. Yang SJ, Kang JH, Jung H et al (2013) Preparation of a freestanding, macroporous reduced graphene oxide film as an efficient and recyclable sorbent for oils and organic solvents. J Mater Chem A 1:9427–943210.1039/c3ta10663b ↗
91. Niu Z, Chen J, Hng HH et al (2012) A leavening strategy to prepare reduced graphene oxide foams. Adv Mater 24:4144–4150. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120019710.1002/adma.201200197 ↗
92. Ma Y, Chen Y (2015) Three-dimensional graphene networks: synthesis, properties and applications. Natl Sci Rev 2:40–5310.1093/nsr/nwu072 ↗
93. Goodman R, Blank M (2002) Insights into electromagnetic interaction mechanisms. J Cell Physiol 192:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1009810.1002/jcp.10098 ↗
94. Wang M, Tang X-H, Cai J-H et al (2021) Construction, mechanism and prospective of conductive polymer composites with multiple interfaces for electromagnetic interference shielding: a review. Carbon 177:377–40210.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.047 ↗
95. Shen B, Li Y, Yi D et al (2016) Microcellular graphene foam for improved broadband electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 102:154–16010.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.040 ↗
96. Huang M, Wang C, Quan L et al (2020) CVD growth of porous graphene foam in film form. Matter 3:487–49710.1016/j.matt.2020.06.012 ↗
97. Fan B, Xing L, Yang K et al (2023) Salt-templated graphene nanosheet foams filled in silicon rubber toward prominent EMI shielding effectiveness and high thermal conductivity. Carbon 207:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.03.02210.1016/j.carbon.2023.03.022 ↗
98. Huang Y, Chen M, Xie A et al (2021) Recent advances in design and fabrication of nanocomposites for electromagnetic wave shielding and absorbing. Materials 14:414810.3390/ma14154148 ↗
99. Xu X, Jiang X-Y, Jiao F-P et al (2018) Tunable assembly of porous three-dimensional graphene oxide-corn zein composites with strong mechanical properties for adsorption of rare earth elements. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 85:106–11410.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.024 ↗
100. Panahi-Sarmad M, Noroozi M, Xiao X, Park CB (2022) Recent advances in graphene-based polymer nanocomposites and foams for electromagnetic interference shielding applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 61:1545–1568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0411610.1021/acs.iecr.1c04116 ↗