Computational screening of metal–organic frameworks for separation of CO2 and N2 from wet flue gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Bae Y, Snurr RQ (2011) Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:11586–11596. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20110189110.1002/anie.201101891 ↗
2. Xiang S, He Y, Zhang Z et al (2012) Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions. Nat Commun 3:954. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms195610.1038/ncomms1956 ↗
3. Koizumi K, Nobusada K, Boero M (2019) Hydrogen storage mechanism and diffusion in metal–organic frameworks. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:7756–7764. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP07467D10.1039/C8CP07467D ↗
4. Rosi NL, Eckert J, Eddaoudi M et al (2003) Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 300:1127–1129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108344010.1126/science.1083440 ↗
5. DeCoste JB, Weston MH, Fuller PE et al (2014) Metal-organic frameworks for oxygen storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:14092–14095. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20140846410.1002/anie.201408464 ↗
6. Düren T, Sarkisov L, Yaghi OM, Snurr RQ (2004) Design of new materials for methane storage. Langmuir 20:2683–2689. https://doi.org/10.1021/la035550010.1021/la0355500 ↗
7. Zhao X, Wang Y, Li D et al (2018) Metal-organic frameworks for separation. Adv Mater 30:1705189. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170518910.1002/adma.201705189 ↗
8. Li J-R, Sculley J, Zhou H-C (2012) Metal-organic frameworks for separations. Chem Rev 112:869–932. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200190s10.1021/cr200190s ↗
9. Chen L, Xu Q (2019) Metal-organic framework composites for catalysis. Matter 1:57–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.01810.1016/j.matt.2019.05.018 ↗
10. Lee J, Farha OK, Roberts J et al (2009) Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 38:1450. https://doi.org/10.1039/b807080f10.1039/b807080f ↗
11. Jiao L, Wang Y, Jiang H, Xu Q (2018) Metal-organic frameworks as platforms for catalytic applications. Adv Mater 30:1703663. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170366310.1002/adma.201703663 ↗
12. Orellana-Tavra C, Marshall RJ, Baxter EF et al (2016) Drug delivery and controlled release from biocompatible metal–organic frameworks using mechanical amorphization. J Mater Chem B 4:7697–7707. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB02025A10.1039/C6TB02025A ↗
13. Bernini MC, Fairen-Jimenez D, Pasinetti M et al (2014) Screening of bio-compatible metal–organic frameworks as potential drug carriers using Monte Carlo simulations. J Mater Chem B 2:766–774. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB21328E10.1039/C3TB21328E ↗
14. Wang X, Nakamoto T, Dulińska-Molak I et al (2016) Regulating the stemness of mesenchymal stem cells by tuning micropattern features. J Mater Chem B 4:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB02215K10.1039/C5TB02215K ↗
15. Lustig WP, Mukherjee S, Rudd ND et al (2017) Metal–organic frameworks: functional luminescent and photonic materials for sensing applications. Chem Soc Rev 46:3242–3285. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00930A10.1039/C6CS00930A ↗
16. Campbell MG, Liu SF, Swager TM, Dincă M (2015) Chemiresistive sensor arrays from conductive 2D metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 137:13780–13783. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b0960010.1021/jacs.5b09600 ↗
17. Kreno LE, Leong K, Farha OK et al (2012) Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem Rev 112:1105–1125. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200324t10.1021/cr200324t ↗
18. Kadri E, Dhahri K, Zaafouri A et al (2017) Ac conductivity and dielectric behavior of a−Si: H/c−Si1−y Gey/p−Si thin films synthesized by molecular beam epitaxial method. J Alloys Compd 705:708–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.11710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.117 ↗
19. Rasheed M, Mohammed OY, Shihab S, Al-Adili A (2021) Explicit numerical model of solar cells to determine current and voltage. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 1795, p 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/01204310.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/012043 ↗
20. Enneffatia M, Rasheed M, Louatia B et al (2021) Investigation of structural, morphology, optical properties and electrical transport conduction of Li0.25 Na0.75 CdVO4 compound. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 1795, p 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/01205010.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/012050 ↗
21. Kadri E, Messaoudi O, Krichen M et al (2017) Optical and electrical properties of SiGe/Si solar cell heterostructures: ellipsometric study. J Alloy Compd 721:779–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.02510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.025 ↗
22. Phan A, Doonan CJ, Uribe-Romo FJ et al (2010) Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Acc Chem Res 43:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900116g10.1021/ar900116g ↗
23. Britt D, Furukawa H, Wang B et al (2009) Highly efficient separation of carbon dioxide by a metal-organic framework replete with open metal sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20637–20640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090971810610.1073/pnas.0909718106 ↗
24. Banerjee R, Furukawa H, Britt D et al (2009) Control of pore size and functionality in isoreticular zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and their carbon dioxide selective capture properties. J Am Chem Soc 131:3875–3877. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja809459e10.1021/ja809459e ↗
25. Kaye SS, Dailly A, Yaghi OM, Long JR (2007) Impact of preparation and handling on the hydrogen storage properties of Zn4 O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)3 (MOF-5). J Am Chem Soc 129:14176–14177. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja076877g10.1021/ja076877g ↗
26. Zhou Q, Luo D, Hua D et al (2022) Design and characterization of metallic glass/graphene multilayer with excellent nanowear properties. Friction 10:1913–1926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-021-0581-610.1007/s40544-021-0581-6 ↗
27. Hua D, Zhou Q, Shi Y et al (2023) Revealing the deformation mechanisms of 〈110〉 symmetric tilt grain boundaries in CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy. Int J Plast 171:103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10383210.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103832 ↗
28. Ren Y, Zhou Q, Hua D et al (2024) Wear-resistant CoCrNi multi-principal element alloy at cryogenic temperature. Sci Bull 69:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.12.00310.1016/j.scib.2023.12.003 ↗
29. Ben Azaza N, Elleuch S, Rasheed M et al (2019) 3-(p-nitrophenyl)Coumarin derivatives: synthesis, linear and nonlinear optical properties. Opt Mater 96:109328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10932810.1016/j.optmat.2019.109328 ↗
30. Colón YJ, Snurr RQ (2014) High-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 43:5735–5749. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00070F10.1039/C4CS00070F ↗
31. Qiao Z, Zhang K, Jiang J (2016) In silico screening of 4764 computation-ready, experimental metal–organic frameworks for CO2 separation. J Mater Chem A 4:2105–2114. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA08984K10.1039/C5TA08984K ↗
32. Demir H, Keskin S (2022) Hypothetical yet effective: computational identification of high-performing MOFs for CO2 capture. Comput Chem Eng 160:107705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.10770510.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107705 ↗
33. Qiao Z, Peng C, Zhou J, Jiang J (2016) High-throughput computational screening of 137953 metal–organic frameworks for membrane separation of a CO2 /N2 /CH4 mixture. J Mater Chem A 4:15904–15912. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA06262H10.1039/C6TA06262H ↗
34. Kancharlapalli S, Snurr RQ (2023) High-throughput screening of the CoRE-MOF-2019 database for CO2 capture from wet flue gas: a multi-scale modeling strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:28084–28092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c0407910.1021/acsami.3c04079 ↗
35. Mohamed SA, Zhao D, Jiang J (2023) Integrating stability metrics with high-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture. Commun Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-023-00409-910.1038/s43246-023-00409-9 ↗
36. Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Gong Q, Wang Z (2023) Graph transformer with convolution parallel networks for predicting single and binary component adsorption performance of metal-organic frameworks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:49527–49537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c1095110.1021/acsami.3c10951 ↗
37. Zhang X, Zhang K, Lee Y (2020) Machine learning enabled tailor-made design of application-specific metal-organic frameworks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:734–743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1786710.1021/acsami.9b17867 ↗
38. Chung YG, Haldoupis E, Bucior BJ et al (2019) Advances, updates, and analytics for the computation-ready, experimental metal-organic framework database: CoRE MOF 2019. J Chem Eng Data 64:5985–5998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b0083510.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
39. Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS et al (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114:10024–10035. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
40. Addicoat MA, Vankova N, Akter IF, Heine T (2014) Extension of the universal force field to metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput 10:880–891. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400952t10.1021/ct400952t ↗
41. Kancharlapalli S, Gopalan A, Haranczyk M, Snurr RQ (2021) Fast and accurate machine learning strategy for calculating partial atomic charges in metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput 17:3052–3064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c0122910.1021/acs.jctc.0c01229 ↗
42. Limas NG, Manz TA (2018) Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 4. Efficient parallel computation of net atomic charges, atomic spin moments, bond orders, and more. RSC Adv 8:2678–2707. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA11829E10.1039/C7RA11829E ↗
43. Limas NG, Manz TA (2016) Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 2. Computed results for a wide range of periodic and nonperiodic materials. RSC Adv 6:45727–45747. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA05507A10.1039/C6RA05507A ↗
44. Manz TA, Limas NG (2016) Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 1. Charge partitioning theory and methodology. RSC Adv 6:47771–47801. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA04656H10.1039/C6RA04656H ↗
45. Potoff JJ, Siepmann JI (2001) Vapor–liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. AIChE J 47:1676–1682. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69047071910.1002/aic.690470719 ↗
46. Horn HW, Swope WC, Pitera JW et al (2004) Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J Chem Phys 120:9665–9678. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.168307510.1063/1.1683075 ↗
47. Willems TF, Rycroft CH, Kazi M et al (2012) Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 149:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
48. Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Ellis DE, Snurr RQ (2016) RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials. Mol Simul 42:81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
49. Matito-Martos I, Moghadam PZ, Li A et al (2018) Discovery of an optimal porous crystalline material for the capture of chemical warfare agents. Chem Mater 30:4571–4579. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0084310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00843 ↗
50. Pedregosa F. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python
51. Liu S, Wang M, Wei S et al (2023) Enhanced CO2 capture in partially interpenetrated MOFs: synergistic effects from functional group, pore size, and steric-hindrance. J Colloid Interface Sci 650:1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.05810.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.058 ↗
52. Li S, Chung YG, Snurr RQ (2016) High-throughput screening of metal-organic frameworks for CO2 capture in the presence of water. Langmuir 32:10368–10376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0280310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02803 ↗
53. Shang S, Yang C, Sun M et al (2022) CO2 capture from wet flue gas using transition metal inserted porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks as efficient adsorbents. Sep Purif Technol 301:122058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12205810.1016/j.seppur.2022.122058 ↗
54. Lee K, Howe JD, Lin L-C et al (2015) Small-molecule adsorption in open-site metal-organic frameworks: a systematic density functional theory study for rational design. Chem Mater 27:668–678. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm502760q10.1021/cm502760q ↗
55. Liu Y, Liu J, Lin YS, Chang M (2014) Effects of water vapor and trace gas impurities in flue gas on CO2 /N2 separation using ZIF-68. J Phys Chem C 118:6744–6751. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp411396910.1021/jp4113969 ↗