Hybrid bilayered chitosan-xanthan/PCL scaffolds as artificial periosteum substitutes for bone tissue regeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Cuthbert RJ, Churchman SM, Tan HB et al (2013) Induced periosteum a complex cellular scaffold for the treatment of large bone defects. Bone 57:484–49210.1016/j.bone.2013.08.009 ↗
2. Vidal L, Kampleitner C, Brennan MÁ et al (2020) Reconstruction of large skeletal defects: current clinical therapeutic strategies and future directions using 3D printing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:6110.3389/fbioe.2020.00061 ↗
3. Tejeda-Montes E, Smith KH, Rebollo E et al (2014) Bioactive membranes for bone regeneration applications: effect of physical and biomolecular signals on mesenchymal stem cell behavior. Acta Biomater 10:134–14110.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.001 ↗
4. Baldwin JG, Wagner F, Martine LC et al (2017) Periosteum tissue engineering in an orthotopic in vivo platform. Biomaterials 121:193–20410.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.016 ↗
5. Fan W, Crawford R, Xiao Y (2010) Enhancing in vivo vascularized bone formation by cobalt chloride-treated bone marrow stromal cells in a tissue engineered periosteum model. Biomaterials 31:3580–358910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.083 ↗
6. D’Elía NL, Silva RR, Sartuqui J et al (2020) Development and characterisation of bilayer periosteum-inspired composite membranes based on sodium alginate-hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 572:408–42010.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.086 ↗
7. Zhang Y, Wang T, Li J et al (2021) Bilayer membrane composed of mineralized collagen and chitosan cast film coated with berberine-loaded PCL/PVP electrospun nanofiber promotes bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:68433510.3389/fbioe.2021.684335 ↗
8. Sonderegger J, Grob KR, Kuster MS (2010) Dynamic plate osteosynthesis for fracture stabilization: how to do it. Orthop Rev 2:e4
9. Dan P, Petreus T, Asaftei R et al (2011) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in long bone fractures—biomechanics—design—clinical results. In: Klika V (ed) Biomechanics in applications. InTech
10. Wu P-K, Chen C-F, Chen C-M et al (2018) Grafting for bone defects after curettage of benign bone tumor—analysis of factors influencing the bone healing. J Chin Med Assoc 81:643–64810.1016/j.jcma.2017.08.024 ↗
11. Klaue K, Fengels I, Perren SM (2000) Long-term effects of plate osteosynthesis: comparison of four different plates. Injury 31(Suppl 2):51–6210.1016/S0020-1383(00)80043-1 ↗
12. Mohindra M, Jain JK (2017) Fundamentals of orthopedics. JP Medical Ltd
13. Anuar-Ramdhan IM, Azahari IM, Med Orth M (2014) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with conventional compression plate for diaphyseal tibia fracture. Malays Orthop J 8:33–3610.5704/MOJ.1411.008 ↗
14. Kolambkar YM, Dupont KM, Boerckel JD et al (2011) An alginate-based hybrid system for growth factor delivery in the functional repair of large bone defects. Biomaterials 32:65–7410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.074 ↗
15. Leal AI, Caridade SG, Ma J et al (2013) Asymmetric PDLLA membranes containing Bioglass® for guided tissue regeneration: characterization and in vitro biological behavior. Dent Mater 29:427–43610.1016/j.dental.2013.01.009 ↗
16. Tamburaci S, Tihminlioglu F (2021) Development of Si doped nano hydroxyapatite reinforced bilayer chitosan nanocomposite barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 128:11229810.1016/j.msec.2021.112298 ↗
17. Liu J, Zou Q, Wang C et al (2021) Electrospinning and 3D printed hybrid bi-layer scaffold for guided bone regeneration. Mater Des 210:11004710.1016/j.matdes.2021.110047 ↗
18. Xiao Y, Fan W, Crawford R, Hutmacher DW (2017) Biomimic design of periosteum: construction strategies, scaffold design and cell sources. In: Li Q, Mai Y-W (eds) Biomaterials for implants and scaffolds. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–31810.1007/978-3-662-53574-5_10 ↗
19. Mondal D, Griffith M, Venkatraman SS (2016) Polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering and drug delivery: current scenario and challenges. Int J Polym 65:255–26510.1080/00914037.2015.1103241 ↗
20. Bartnikowski M, Dargaville TR, Ivanovski S, Hutmacher DW (2019) Degradation mechanisms of polycaprolactone in the context of chemistry, geometry and environment. Prog Polym Sci 96:1–2010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.05.004 ↗
21. Bombaldi de Souza RF, Bombaldi de Souza FC, Thorpe A et al (2020) Phosphorylation of chitosan to improve osteoinduction of chitosan/xanthan-based scaffolds for periosteal tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 143:619–63210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.004 ↗
22. Gupta B, Patra S, Ray AR (2012) Preparation of porous polycaprolactone tubular matrix by salt leaching process. J Appl Polym Sci 126:1505–151010.1002/app.36922 ↗
23. Bombaldi de Souza RF, Bombaldi de Souza FC, Rodrigues C et al (2019) Mechanically-enhanced polysaccharide-based scaffolds for tissue engineering of soft tissues. Mater Sci Eng C 94:364–37510.1016/j.msec.2018.09.045 ↗
24. Bombaldi de Souza RF, Bombaldi de Souza FB, Moraes ÂM (2017) Analysis of the performance of polysaccharide membranes in aqueous media as a tool to assist wound-dressing selection. J Appl Polym Sci 134:4538610.1002/app.45386 ↗
25. ASTM International (2012) Test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. ASTM International {D20 Committee}, West Conshohocken
26. ISO (2009) 10993-5: 2009 biological evaluation of medical devices—part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
27. Agrawal CM, McKinney JS, Lanctot D, Athanasiou KA (2000) Effects of fluid flow on the in vitro degradation kinetics of biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21:2443–245210.1016/S0142-9612(00)00112-5 ↗
28. Bencherif SA, Braschler TM, Renaud P (2013) Advances in the design of macroporous polymer scaffolds for potential applications in dentistry. J Periodontal Implant Sci 43:251–26110.5051/jpis.2013.43.6.251 ↗
29. Berg JC (2002) Semi-empirical strategies for predicting adhesion. In: Adhesion science and engineering. Elsevier, pp 1–7310.1016/B978-044451140-9/50001-9 ↗
30. Sadiasa A, Nguyen TH, Lee B-T (2014) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of porous PCL-PLLA 3D polymer scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching method for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 25:150–16710.1080/09205063.2013.846633 ↗
31. Macedo FA, Nunes EHM, Vasconcelos WL et al (2012) A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PCL/BCP containing Ang-(1–7) for bone tissue engineering. Cerâmica 58:481–48810.1590/S0366-69132012000400011 ↗
32. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–549110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
33. Intranuovo F, Gristina R, Brun F (2014) Plasma modification of PCL porous scaffolds fabricated by solvent-casting/particulate-leaching for tissue engineering. Plasma Process Polym 11:184–19510.1002/ppap.201300149 ↗
34. Holzapfel BM, Reichert JC, Schantz J-T et al (2013) How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:581–60310.1016/j.addr.2012.07.009 ↗
35. Laijun L, Yu Z, Chaojing L et al (2021) An enhanced periosteum structure/function dual mimicking membrane for in-situ restorations of periosteum and bone. Biofabrication 13:03504110.1088/1758-5090/abf9b0 ↗
36. Augustin G, Antabak A, Davila S (2007) The periosteum. Part 1: anatomy, histology and molecular biology. Injury 38:1115–113010.1016/j.injury.2007.05.017 ↗
37. Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS et al (2007) Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? Injury 38:358–36410.1016/j.injury.2006.08.058 ↗
38. Boyan BD, Lossdörfer S, Wang L et al (2003) Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mater 6:22–2710.22203/eCM.v006a03 ↗
39. Gadelmawla ES, Koura MM, Maksoud TMA et al (2002) Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 123:133–14510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2 ↗
40. Fukuda N, Kanazawa M, Tsuru K et al (2018) Synergistic effect of surface phosphorylation and micro-roughness on enhanced osseointegration ability of poly(ether ether ketone) in the rabbit tibia. Sci Rep 8:1688710.1038/s41598-018-35313-7 ↗
41. Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M et al (2011) Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol Adv 29:739–76710.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 ↗
42. Boyan BD, Lotz EM, Schwartz Z (2017) Roughness and hydrophilicity as osteogenic biomimetic surface properties. Tissue Eng Part A 23:1479–148910.1089/ten.tea.2017.0048 ↗
43. Wei J, Igarashi T, Okumori N et al (2009) Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts. Biomed Mater 4:04500210.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045002 ↗
44. Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV (2012) The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med 10:8110.1186/1741-7015-10-81 ↗
45. Marques MS, Zepon KM, Petronilho FC et al (2017) Characterization of membranes based on cellulose acetate butyrate/poly(caprolactone)triol/doxycycline and their potential for guided bone regeneration application. Mater Sci Eng C 76:365–37310.1016/j.msec.2017.03.095 ↗
46. Santos AR Jr (2010) Bioresorbable polymers for tissue engineering. In: Eberli D (ed) Tissue engineering. InTech
47. Osathanon T, Chanjavanakul P, Kongdecha P et al (2017) Polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for guided tissue regeneration membrane periodontitis—a useful reference successful. InTech, pp 171–188
48. Zhang Q, Jiang Y, Zhang Y et al (2013) Effect of porosity on long-term degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds and their cellular response. Polym Degrad Stab 98:209–21810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.10.008 ↗
49. Kuo SM, Chang SJ, Cheng-Chie Niu G et al (2009) Guided tissue regeneration with use of β-TCP/chitosan composite membrane. J Appl Polym Sci 112:3127–313410.1002/app.29664 ↗
50. Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, Koyano K (2013) Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res 57:3–1410.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001 ↗
51. Zhang S, Huang Y, Yang X et al (2009) Gelatin nanofibrous membrane fabricated by electrospinning of aqueous gelatin solution for guided tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 90:671–67910.1002/jbm.a.32136 ↗
52. Westin CB, Trinca RB, Zuliani C et al (2017) Differentiation of dental pulp stem cells into chondrocytes upon culture on porous chitosan-xanthan scaffolds in the presence of kartogenin. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 80:594–60210.1016/j.msec.2017.07.005 ↗
53. Gupta S, Teotia AK, Qayoom I et al (2021) Periosteum-mimicking tissue-engineered composite for treating periosteum damage in critical-sized bone defects. Biomacromol 22:3237–325010.1021/acs.biomac.1c00319 ↗
54. Bertram JE, Polevoy Y, Cullinane DM (1998) Mechanics of avian fibrous periosteum: tensile and adhesion properties during growth. Bone 22:669–67510.1016/S8756-3282(98)00035-0 ↗
55. Mortada I, Mortada R (2018) Dental pulp stem cells and osteogenesis: an update. Cytotechnology 70:1479–148610.1007/s10616-018-0225-5 ↗