Comparative investigation of surface-electrical properties of functionalized graphene and MXene thin films for CO2 gas sensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Manzoor S, Talib M, Arsenin AV et al (2022) Polyethyleneimine-starch functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for carbon dioxide sensing at room temperature. ACS Omega 8:893–906. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0624310.1021/acsomega.2c06243 ↗
2. Rezk MY, Sharma J, Gartia MR (2020) Nanomaterial-based CO2 sensors. Nanomaterials 10(2251):1–18
3. Schimel D, Stephens BB, Fisher JB (2015) Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. PNAS 112:436–441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.140730211210.1073/pnas.1407302112 ↗
4. Jia X, Roels J, Baets R, Roelkens G (2021) A miniaturised, fully integrated NDIR CO2 sensor on-chip. Sensors 21:1–1410.3390/s21165347 ↗
5. Wang J, Wen Z, Yang B, Yang X (2017) Optical carbon dioxide sensor based on fluorescent capillary array. Results Phys 7:323–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.12.04410.1016/j.rinp.2016.12.044 ↗
6. Ersöz B, Schmitt K, Wöllenstein J (2021) CO2 gas sensing with an electrolyte-gated transistor using impedance spectroscopy. Sens Actuators B Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.12959810.1016/j.snb.2021.129598 ↗
7. Pang J, Le X, Pang K et al (2021) Highly precision carbon dioxide acoustic wave sensor with minimized humidity interference. Sens Actuators B Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.12982410.1016/j.snb.2021.129824 ↗
8. Fatema KN, Sagadevan S, Liu Y et al (2020) New design of mesoporous SiO2 combined In2O3-graphene semiconductor nanocomposite for highly effective and selective gas detection. J Mater Sci 55:13085–13101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04928-510.1007/s10853-020-04928-5 ↗
9. Abdelkarem K, Saad R, Ahmed AM et al (2023) Efficient room temperature carbon dioxide gas sensor based on barium doped CuO thin films. J Mater Sci 58:11568–11584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08687-x10.1007/s10853-023-08687-x ↗
10. Stassen I, Dou JH, Hendon C, Dincǎ M (2019) Chemiresistive sensing of ambient CO2 by an autogenously hydrated Cu3(hexaiminobenzene)2 framework. ACS Cent Sci 5:1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b0048210.1021/acscentsci.9b00482 ↗
11. Srinives S, Sarkar T, Hernandez R, Mulchandani A (2015) A miniature chemiresistor sensor for carbon dioxide. Anal Chim Acta 874:54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.03.02010.1016/j.aca.2015.03.020 ↗
12. Srinivasan P, Ezhilan M, Kulandaisamy AJ et al (2019) Room temperature chemiresistive gas sensors: challenges and strategies—a mini review. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 30:15825–15847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02025-110.1007/s10854-019-02025-1 ↗
13. Wang Z, Bu M, Hu N, Zhao L (2023) An overview on room-temperature chemiresistor gas sensors based on 2D materials: research status and challenge. Compos Part B Eng 248:110378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11037810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110378 ↗
14. Kushwaha A, Kumar R, Goel N (2024) Chemiresistive gas sensors beyond metal oxides: using ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. FlatChem 43:100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2023.10058410.1016/j.flatc.2023.100584 ↗
15. Hashemi Karouei SF, Milani Moghaddam H, Saadat Niavol S (2021) Characterization and gas sensing properties of graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite with long-term stability under high humidity. J Mater Sci 56:4239–4253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05532-310.1007/s10853-020-05532-3 ↗
16. Zito CA, Perfecto TM, Dippel AC et al (2020) Low-temperature carbon dioxide gas sensor based on yolk–shell ceria nanospheres. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:17745–1775110.1021/acsami.0c01641 ↗
17. Joshi S, Jones LA, Sabri YM et al (2019) Facile conversion of zinc hydroxide carbonate to CaO-ZnO for selective CO2 gas detection. J Colloid Interface Sci 558:310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.10310.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.103 ↗
18. Dhawale DS, Lokhande CD (2011) Chemical route to synthesis of mesoporous ZnO thin films and their liquefied petroleum gas sensor performance. J Alloys Compd 509:10092–10097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.04610.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.046 ↗
19. Chaitra C, Kalpana HM, Ananda CM, Lalithamba HS (2022) Green synthesis of tin oxide based nanoparticles using Terminalia bellirica seed extract: impact of operating temperature and antimony dopant on sensitivity for carbon dioxide gas sensing application. Mater Technol 37:2339–2346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2022.203514310.1080/10667857.2022.2035143 ↗
20. Shahrbabaki Z, Farajikhah S, Ghasemian MB et al (2023) A flexible and polymer-based chemiresistive CO2 gas sensor at room temperature. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20220151010.1002/admt.202201510 ↗
21. Kim Y, Kang S, Oh N et al (2019) Improved sensitivity in schottky contacted two-dimensional MoS2 gas sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:38902–38909. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1086110.1021/acsami.9b10861 ↗
22. Ko KY, Park K, Lee S et al (2018) Recovery improvement for large-area tungsten diselenide gas sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:23910–23917. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0703410.1021/acsami.8b07034 ↗
23. Wang X, Xu X, Zhou T, Zhang T (2024) Chemical Nanoscale MOF-74-based QCM gas sensor for CO2 detection at room temperature. Sens Actuators B Chem 413:135874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.13587410.1016/j.snb.2024.135874 ↗
24. Rathi K, Pal K (2020) Ruthenium decorated tungsten disulfide quantum dots for CO2 gas sensor. Nanotechnology 31:135502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab5cd310.1088/1361-6528/ab5cd3 ↗
25. Manzoor S, Talib M, Novikov SM et al (2023) Physisorption-mediated charge transfer in TiS2 nanodiscs: a room temperature sensor for highly sensitive and reversible carbon dioxide detection. ACS Senso 8:3435–3447. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.3c0093110.1021/acssensors.3c00931 ↗
26. Lee E, Vahidmohammadi A, Prorok BC et al (2017) Room temperature gas sensing of two-dimensional titanium carbide (MXene). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:37184–37190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1105510.1021/acsami.7b11055 ↗
27. Jin L, Wu C, Wei K et al (2020) Polymeric Ti3C2Tx MXene composites for room temperature ammonia sensing. ACS Appl Nano Mater 3:12071–12079. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c0257710.1021/acsanm.0c02577 ↗
28. Kwong Hong Tsang D, Lieberthal TJ, Watts C et al (2019) Chemically functionalised graphene FET biosensor for the label-free sensing of exosomes. Sci Rep 9:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50412-910.1038/s41598-019-50412-9 ↗
29. Rojaee R, Shahbazian-Yassar R (2020) Two-dimensional materials to address the lithium battery challenges. ACS Nano 14:2628–2658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0839610.1021/acsnano.9b08396 ↗
30. Xu H, Wu J, Liu J et al (2018) Growth of cobalt–nickel layered double hydroxide on nitrogen-doped graphene by simple co-precipitation method for supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9817-210.1007/s10854-018-9817-2 ↗
31. Kumar R, Jenjeti RN, Sampath S (2019) Bulk and few-layer 2D, p-MnPS3 for sensitive and selective moisture sensing. Adv Mater Interfaces 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20190066610.1002/admi.201900666 ↗
32. Kumar P, Kang CH, Burhanudin ZA et al (2016) Graphene-based hybrid thin films as transparent conductive electrode for optoelectronic devices. In: IEEE international conference on semiconductor electronics (ICSE), pp 216–21910.1109/SMELEC.2016.7573630 ↗
33. Kumar P, Gupta M, Norhakim NN et al (2023) Photonic and optoelectronic applications of graphene: graphene-based transparent conducting electrodes for LED/OLED. In: Recent advances in graphene and graphene-based technologies. IOP Publishing, pp 12-1–12–2710.1088/978-0-7503-3999-5ch12 ↗
34. Chen Y, Shi Y, Song G et al (2025) Compositing MXene with organic coordination frameworks (MOFs, COFs, and HOFs ) for enhanced electrochemical performance. Next Mater 6:100323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.10032310.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100323 ↗
35. Kim SJ, Koh HJ, Ren CE et al (2018) Metallic Ti3C2Tx MXene gas sensors with ultrahigh signal-to-noise ratio. ACS Nano 12:986–993. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b0746010.1021/acsnano.7b07460 ↗
36. Thomas T, Alberto J, Ram R et al (2022) Highly stable, fast responsive Mo2CTx MXene sensors for room temperature carbon dioxide detection. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 336:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.11187210.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111872 ↗
37. Seekaew Y, Wongchoosuk C (2019) A novel graphene-based electroluminescent gas sensor for carbon dioxide detection. Appl Surf Sci 479:525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.10010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.100 ↗
38. Andrić S, Sarajlić M, Frantlović M et al (2021) Carbon dioxide sensing with langmuir–blodgett graphene films. Chemosensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors912034210.3390/chemosensors9120342 ↗
39. Parangusan H, Bhadra J, Al-Qudah RA et al (2022) Comparative study on gas-sensing properties of 2D (MoS2, WS2)/PANI nanocomposites-based sensor. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1224442310.3390/nano12244423 ↗
40. Wang C, Yin L, Zhang L et al (2010) Metal oxide gas sensors: sensitivity and influencing factors. Sensors 10:2088–2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/s10030208810.3390/s100302088 ↗
41. Hwang SH, Kim YK, Hong SH, Lim SK (2020) Effect of the morphology and electrical property of metal-deposited ZnO nanostructures on CO gas sensitivity. Nanomaterials 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1011212410.3390/nano10112124 ↗
42. Saruhan B, Lontio Fomekong R, Nahirniak S (2021) Review: influences of semiconductor metal oxide properties on gas sensing characteristics. Front Sens 2:1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsens.2021.65793110.3389/fsens.2021.657931 ↗
43. Vargas-Bernal R (2019) Electrical properties of two-dimensional materials used in gas sensors. Sensors (Switzerland) 19:100–107. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1906129510.3390/s19061295 ↗
44. Gupta M, Hawari HF, Kumar P, Burhanudin ZA (2022) Copper oxide/functionalized graphene hybrid nanostructures for room temperature gas sensing applications. Crystals. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1202026410.3390/cryst12020264 ↗
45. Gupta M, Hawari HF, Kumar P et al (2021) Functionalized reduced graphene oxide thin films for ultrahigh CO2 gas sensing performance at room temperature. Nanomaterials 11:1–1810.3390/nano11030623 ↗
46. Wang L, Chen L, Song P et al (2019) Fabrication on the annealed Ti3C2Tx MXene/Epoxy nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding application. Compos Part B Eng 171:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.05010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.050 ↗
47. Zhou H, Wang F, Wang Y et al (2021) Study on contact angles and surface energy of MXene films. RSC Adv 11:5512–5520. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09125a10.1039/d0ra09125a ↗
48. Wu W, Zhao W, Sun Q et al (2021) Surface treatment of two dimensional MXene for poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanocomposites with tunable dielectric permittivity. Compos Commun 23:100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.10056210.1016/j.coco.2020.100562 ↗
49. Mashtalir O, Naguib M, Mochalin VN et al (2013) Intercalation and delamination of layered carbides and carbonitrides. Nat Commun 4:1716. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms266410.1038/ncomms2664 ↗
50. Sangu SS, Illias NM, Ong CC et al (2021) MXene-based aptasensor: characterization and high-performance voltammetry detection of deoxynivalenol. Bionanoscience 11:314–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-021-00847-010.1007/s12668-021-00847-0 ↗
51. Manna B, Raha H, Chakrabarti I, Guha PK (2018) Selective reduction of oxygen functional groups to improve the response characteristics of graphene oxide-based formaldehyde sensor device: a first principle study. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 65:5045–5052. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2018.287217910.1109/TED.2018.2872179 ↗
52. Liu J, Lai CY, Zhang YY et al (2018) Water wettability of graphene: interplay between the interfacial water structure and the electronic structure. RSC Adv 8:16918–16926. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra03509a10.1039/c8ra03509a ↗
53. Da SX, Wang J, Geng HZ et al (2017) High adhesion transparent conducting films using graphene oxide hybrid carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 392:1117–112510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.143 ↗
54. Kumar P, Saheed MSM, Ling HC et al (2022) Surface-treatment process related sheet resistance variations in graphene-based thin-film electrodes. Surf Interfaces 32:102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.10216110.1016/j.surfin.2022.102161 ↗
55. Rafiee J, Mi X, Gullapalli H et al (2012) Wetting transparency of graphene. Nat Mater 11:217–22210.1038/nmat3228 ↗
56. Wang S, Zhang Y, Abidi N, Cabrales L (2009) Wettability and surface free energy of graphene films. Langmuir 25:11078–1108110.1021/la901402f ↗
57. Khanal R, Irle S (2023) Effect of surface functional groups on MXene conductivity. J Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.014158910.1063/5.0141589 ↗
58. Verma R, Sharma A, Dutta V et al (2024) Recent trends in synthesis of 2D MXene—based materials for sustainable environmental applications. Emerg Mater 7:35–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-023-00591-z10.1007/s42247-023-00591-z ↗
59. Philip B, Jewell E, Worsley D (2016) The impact of solvent characteristics on performance and process stability of printed carbon resistive materials. J Coat Technol Res 113:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-016-9802-810.1007/s11998-016-9802-8 ↗
60. Carter JL, Kelly CA, Marshall JE, Jenkins MJ (2024) Effect of thickness on the electrical properties of PEDOT: PSS/Tween 80 films. Polym J 56:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-023-00854-w10.1038/s41428-023-00854-w ↗
61. Sapkota R, Duan P, Kumar T et al (2021) Thin film gas sensors based on planetary ball-milled zinc oxide nanoinks: effect of milling parameters on sensing performance. Appl Sci 11:9676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1120967610.3390/app11209676 ↗
62. Mao YZ, Ma SY, Li WQ et al (2015) Synthesis of porous small-sized ZnO nanoparticles and their gas-sensing performance. Mater Lett 157:151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.02810.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.028 ↗
63. Wang X, Summers CJ, Wang ZL (2004) Large-scale hexagonal-patterned growth of aligned ZnO nanorods for nano-optoelectronics and nanosensor arrays. Nano Lett 4:423–426. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl035102c10.1021/nl035102c ↗
64. Habib T, Zhao X, Shah SA et al (2019) Oxidation stability of Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets in solvents and composite films. NPJ 2D Mater Appl 3:8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-019-0089-310.1038/s41699-019-0089-3 ↗
65. Minitha CR, Anithaa VS, Subramaniam V, Rajendra Kumar RT (2018) Impact of oxygen functional groups on reduced graphene oxide-based sensors for ammonia and toluene detection at room temperature. ACS Omega 3:4105–4112. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b0208510.1021/acsomega.7b02085 ↗
66. Zaki SE, Basyooni MA, Shaban M et al (2019) Role of oxygen vacancies in vanadium oxide and oxygen functional groups in graphene oxide for room temperature CO2 gas sensors. Sens Actuators A Phys 294:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.04.03710.1016/j.sna.2019.04.037 ↗
67. John RAB, Vijayan K, Luh N et al (2023) Gas-sensing mechanisms and performances of MXenes and MXene-based heterostructures. Sensors 23:8674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2321867410.3390/s23218674 ↗
68. Wang Y, Wang Y, Jian M et al (2024) MXene key composites : a new arena for gas sensors. Nano Micro Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01430-410.1007/s40820-024-01430-4 ↗
69. Wu G, Du H, Pakravan K et al (2023) Polyaniline/Ti3C2Tx functionalized mask sensors for monitoring of CO2 and human respiration rate. Chem Eng J 475:146228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14622810.1016/j.cej.2023.146228 ↗
70. Cho S, Anasori B, Kim C et al (2018) Metallic Ti3C2Tx MXene gas sensors with ultrahigh signal-to-noise ratio. ACS Nano 12:986–993. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b0746010.1021/acsnano.7b07460 ↗
71. Han D, Liu L, Liu Z et al (2023) Polyethyleneimine/polyethylene-glycol/Ti3C2Tx composites for ultrasensitive room-temperature CO2 sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 393:134221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.13422110.1016/j.snb.2023.134221 ↗
72. Mardare D, Cornei N, Mita C et al (2016) Low temperature TiO2 based gas sensors for CO2. Ceram Int 42:7353–7359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.13710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.137 ↗
73. Smith AD, Elgammal K, Fan X et al (2017) Graphene-based CO2 sensing and its cross-sensitivity with humidity. RSC Adv 7:22329–22339. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra02821k10.1039/c7ra02821k ↗
74. Abdali H, Heli B, Ajji A (2019) Cellulose nanopaper cross-linked amino graphene/polyaniline sensors to detect CO2 gas at room temperature. Sensors (Switzerland) 19:5215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1923521510.3390/s19235215 ↗