journal article·2024-01Open access

The effect of high-intensity gamma radiation on PETG and ASA polymer-based fused deposition modelled 3D printed parts

Sam Cressall, Chris O. Phillips, Wafaa Al-Shatty, Davide Deganello

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract There is growing interest in the application of 3D printing for demanding environments subject to gamma radiation in areas such as the nuclear industry and space exploration. In this work, the effect of gamma radiation on fused deposition modelled 3D printed parts composed of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) and acrylic styrene acrylonitrile (ASA) polymers was studied. Dose levels of up to 2.25 MGy were applied to the printed components, doses equivalent to over 1 year operating near spent nuclear fuel cells. Infrared spectroscopy showed the evidence of cross-linking by the formation of peaks corresponding to –OH and C–H bonds. Tensile and hardness testing was used to assess changes in mechanical properties and showed a reduction in ultimate tensile stress and maximum strain in parts made from both polymers, but with PETG retaining greater strength and ductility than ASA, especially at intermediate gamma exposure. Young’s modulus and hardness showed either modest increases or a fairly flat response with exposure. Mechanical properties were heavily dependent on the build structure, with horizontal build samples pulled parallel to the filament direction being several times stronger than vertical build samples pulled normal to the layers. Non-irradiated samples pulled parallel to the filament direction were indicative of ductile failure, with rough surfaces, distinct infill and wall regions and evidence of thinning occurring after fracture, but irradiated fracture surfaces were flatter, smoother and without local thinning, suggesting gamma radiation-induced embrittlement in the material. For samples pulled perpendicular to the filament direction, all fractures occurred between layers, creating flat fracture surfaces with no evidence of necking and indicative of brittle failure regardless of whether the samples were irradiated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8(3):215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-810.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
2. Petrovic V et al (2011) Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. Int J Prod Res 49(4):1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754090347978610.1080/00207540903479786 ↗
3. da Silva Aquino KA (2012) Sterilization by gamma irradiation. Gamma Radiat 9:172–202. https://doi.org/10.5772/3490110.5772/34901 ↗
4. Bhat S (2020) 12–3D printing equipment in medicine. Elsevier, Singapore
5. Martin H, Watson S, Lennox B, Poteau X (2018) Miniature inspection robot for restricted access exploration (MIRRAX), WM2018 Conference, pp 1–9
6. Jones AR et al. (2017) On the design of a remotely-deployed detection system for reactor assessment at fukushima daiichi. In: 2016 IEEE nuclear science symposium, Medical imaging conference and room-temperature semiconductor detector workshop, NSS/MIC/RTSD 2016, pp 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2016.806971310.1109/NSSMIC.2016.8069713 ↗
7. Wong JY, Pfahnl AC (2014) 3D printing of surgical instruments for long-duration space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 85(7):758–763. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3898.201410.3357/ASEM.3898.2014 ↗
8. Rochus P, Plesseria JY, Van Elsen M, Kruth JP, Carrus R, Dormal T (2007) New applications of rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing (RP/RM) technologies for space instrumentation. Acta Astronaut 61(1–6):352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.00410.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.004 ↗
9. O’Donnell JH (1991) Chemistry of radiation degradation of polymers. In: Radiation effects on polymers, American Chemical Society, pp 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1991-0475.ch02410.1021/bk-1991-0475.ch024 ↗
10. Al-Sheikhly M, Christou A (1994) How radiation affects polymeric materials. IEEE Trans Reliab 43(4):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.37022710.1109/24.370227 ↗
11. Bhattacharya A (2000) Radiation and industrial polymers. Progress Polym Sci (Oxford) 25(3):371–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00009-510.1016/S0079-6700(00)00009-5 ↗
12. Makuuchi K, Cheng S (2011) Fundamentals of radiation crosslinking. In: Radiation processing of polymer materials and its industrial applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 26–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118162798.ch210.1002/9781118162798.ch2 ↗
13. Skiens W (1980) Mechanical properties of polymeric packaging films after radiation sterilization. Radiat Phys Chem 15:47–57
14. Shaffer S, Yang K, Vargas J, Di Prima MA, Voit W (2014) On reducing anisotropy in 3D printed polymers via ionizing radiation. Polymer (Guildf) 55(23):5969–5979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.05410.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.054 ↗
15. West C, McTaggart R, Letcher T, Raynie D, Roy R (2019) Effects of gamma irradiation upon the mechanical and chemical properties of 3D-printed samples of polylactic acid. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 141(4):041002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404258110.1115/1.4042581 ↗
16. The ExoMars spacecraft measured radiation in deep space to help keep future astronauts safe. https://www.popsci.com/exomars-radiation-astronauts/. Accessed 25 May 2022
17. Benton ER, Benton EV (2001) Space radiation dosimetry in low-Earth orbit and beyond. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 184(1–2):255–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00748-010.1016/S0168-583X(01)00748-0 ↗
18. Berger T (2008) Radiation dosimetry onboard the international space station ISS. Z Med Phys 18(4):265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2008.06.01410.1016/j.zemedi.2008.06.014 ↗
19. International Organization for Standardization BS EN ISO 11137-2-2013
20. TEPCO (2022) Recent Topics: Tepco holdings sent robot into Fukushima Daiichi unit 2 reactor to clear path for later investigation with ‘Scorpion’ robot. https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/2017/1375551_10469.html. Accessed 25 May 2022
21. Backgrounder on radioactive waste|NRC.gov. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/radwaste.html#stor. Accessed 25 May 2022
22. Lloyd WR, Sheaffer MK, Sutcliffe WG (1994) Dose rate estimates from irradiated light-water reactor fuel assemblies in air. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1013738210.2172/10137382 ↗
23. Wady P et al (2020) Effect of ionising radiation on the mechanical and structural properties of 3D printed plastics. Addit Manuf 31:100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10090710.1016/j.addma.2019.100907 ↗
24. Kim E, Shin YJ, Ahn SH (2016) The effects of moisture and temperature on the mechanical properties of additive manufacturing components: fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 22(6):887–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-009510.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0095 ↗
25. Benyathiar P (2014) Effect of ionizing irradiation techniques on biodegradable packaging materials. PhD thesis Michigan State University, p 253. https://doi.org/10.25335/M5ST6R10.25335/M5ST6R ↗
26. Rankouhi B, Delfanian F, McTaggart R, Letcher T (2016) An experimental investigation of the effects of gamma radiation on 3D printed ABS for in-space manufacturing purposes. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2016-6774510.1115/imece2016-67745 ↗
27. Rankouhi B, Javadpour S, Delfanian F, McTaggart R, Letcher T (2018) Experimental investigation of mechanical performance and printability of gamma-irradiated additively manufactured ABS. J Mater Eng Perform 27(7):3643–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3463-y10.1007/s11665-018-3463-y ↗
28. Kabanov VY, Feldman VI, Ershov BG, Polikarpov AI, Kiryukhin DP, Apel’ PY (2009) Radiation chemistry of polymers. High Energy Chem 43(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001814390901001910.1134/S0018143909010019 ↗
29. Geon Kim D et al (2020) Performance of 3D printed plastic scintillators for gamma-ray detection. Nucl Eng Technol 52(12):2910–2917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.05.03010.1016/j.net.2020.05.030 ↗
30. Statista (2023) Worldwide most used 3D printing materials, as of July 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/800454/worldwide-most-used-3d-printing-materials/. Accessed 7 Jun 2023
31. International Organization for Standardization (2018) BS EN ISO 527-3:2018
32. International Organization for Standardization (2018) BS EN ISO 6507–1:2018
33. International Organization for Standardization (2019) ISO-TS 19278-2019
34. Dispenza C, Alessi S, Spadaro J (2017) Radiation processing of polymers in aqueous media. Appl Ioniz Radiat Mater Process 2:291–326
35. Al-Sheikhly M, Christou A (1994) Tutorial how radiation affects polymeric materials. IEEE Trans Reliab 43(4):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.37022710.1109/24.370227 ↗
36. Guessasma S, Belhabib S, Nouri H (2019) Microstructure, thermal and mechanical behavior of 3D printed acrylonitrile styrene acrylate. Macromol Mater Eng 304(7):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20180079310.1002/mame.201800793 ↗
37. Szykiedans K, Credo W, Osiński D (2017) Selected mechanical properties of PETG 3-D prints. Procedia Eng 177:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.24510.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.245 ↗
38. Santana L, Alves JL, Sabino Netto ADC, Merlini C (2018) A comparative study between PETG and PLA for 3D printing through thermal, chemical and mechanical characterization. Revista Materia 23(4):e22167. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620180004.060110.1590/s1517-707620180004.0601 ↗
39. Algarni M, Ghazali S (2021) Comparative study of the sensitivity of pla, abs, peek, and petg’s mechanical properties to fdm printing process parameters. Crystals (Basel) 11(8):995. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1108099510.3390/cryst11080995 ↗
40. Modeling D et al (2021) Effect of printing parameters on the thermal and mechanical properties of 3D-printed PLA and PETG, using fused. Polymers 13:1–11
41. Polymer additive manufacturing of ASA structure Influence of printing.pdf
42. Grabowik C, Kalinowski K, Ćwikła G, Paprocka I, Kogut P (2017) Tensile tests of specimens made of selected group of the filament materials manufactured with FDM method. MATEC Web Conf 112:04017. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20171120401710.1051/matecconf/201711204017 ↗
43. Almeida JS, Villani D, Potiens MPA, Willegaigon J (2021) Dosimetric characterization of 3D printed for 137Cs gamma rays. J Phys: Conf Ser 1826:012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1826/1/01204210.1088/1742-6596/1826/1/012042 ↗