A review of the latest progress in superhydrophobic surface technology using copper oxide nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Tran TH, Nguyen VT (2014) Copper oxide nanomaterials prepared by solution methods, some properties, and potential applications: a brief review. Int Sch Res Not 2014:856872
2. Reddy RCK, Lin J, Chen Y, Zeng C, Lin X, Cai Y, Su C-Y (2020) Progress of nanostructured metal oxides derived from metal–organic frameworks as anode materials for lithium–ion batteries. Coord Chem Rev 420:21343410.1016/j.ccr.2020.213434 ↗
3. Ou LX, Liu MY, Zhu LY, Zhang DW, Lu HL (2022) Recent progress on flexible room-temperature gas sensors based on metal oxide semiconductor. Nano-Micro Lett 14(1):20610.1007/s40820-022-00956-9 ↗
4. Divakaran AM, Mondal K (2022) Metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing applications. In: Gas Sensors, CRC Press, pp 261–27010.1201/9781003278047-16 ↗
5. Das C, Sinha N, Roy P (2022) Transition Metal Non-Oxides as Electrocatalysts: Advantages and Challenges. Small 18(28):220203310.1002/smll.202202033 ↗
6. Lamiel C, Hussain I, Rabiee H, Ogunsakin OR, Zhang K (2023) Metal-organic framework-derived transition metal chalcogenides (S, Se, and Te): Challenges, recent progress, and future directions in electrochemical energy storage and conversion systems. Coord Chem Rev 480:21503010.1016/j.ccr.2023.215030 ↗
7. Qumar U, Hassan JZ, Bhatti RA, Raza A, Nazir G, Nabgan W, Ikram M (2022) Photocatalysis vs adsorption by metal oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Technol 131:122–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.02010.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.020 ↗
8. Chang C-J, Lai C-W, Jiang W-C, Li Y-S, Choi C, Yu H-C, Chen S-J, Choi Y (2022) Fabrication and characterization of P-type semiconducting copper oxide-based thin-film photoelectrodes for solar water splitting. Coatings 12(8):120610.3390/coatings12081206 ↗
9. Baral SC, Maneesha P, Sen S, Sen S, Sen S (2023) An introduction to metal oxides. In: Optical properties of metal oxide nanostructures, Springer, pp 1–3410.1007/978-981-99-5640-1_1 ↗
10. Okoye P, Azi S, Qahtan T, Owolabi T, Saleh T (2023) Synthesis, properties, and applications of doped and undoped CuO and Cu2O nanomaterials. Mater Today Chem 30:10151310.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101513 ↗
11. Bhosale SR, Ghatage SA, Wahane PN, Bhosale RR, Jagadhane KS, Patil DN, Anbhule PV (2022) Formation of CuO nanostructures via chemical route for biomedical applications. Chem Phys Lett 808:14012210.1016/j.cplett.2022.140122 ↗
12. Kabir MH, Ibrahim H, Ayon SA, Billah MM, Neaz S (2022) Structural, nonlinear optical and antimicrobial properties of sol-gel derived, Fe-doped CuO thin films. Heliyon 8(9):e1060910.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10609 ↗
13. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Amhamed AOA, Yuliwati E, Puteh MH, Kurniawan TA, Rahman MA, Jaafar J, Ismail AF (2023) Robust omniphobic ceramic hollow fibre membrane with leaf-like copper oxide hierarchical structure by membrane distillation. Desalination 564:11681610.1016/j.desal.2023.116816 ↗
14. Sibhatu AK, Weldegebrieal GK, Imteyaz S, Sagadevan S, Tran NN, Hessel V (2022) Synthesis and process parametric effects on the photocatalyst efficiency of CuO nanostructures for decontamination of toxic heavy metal ions. Chem Eng Process-Process Intensif 173:10881410.1016/j.cep.2022.108814 ↗
15. Ayyasamy LR, Mohan A, Rex LK, Sivakumar VL, Dhanasingh SV, Sivasamy P (2022) Enhanced thermal characteristics of CuO embedded lauric acid phase change material. Therm Sci 26(2):1615–162110.2298/TSCI210930019L ↗
16. Madvar HR, Kordrostami Z, Mirzaei A (2022) Sensitivity enhancement of resistive ethanol gas sensor by optimized sputtered-assisted CuO decoration of ZnO nanorods. Sensors 23(1):36510.3390/s23010365 ↗
17. Wang N, Tao W, Gong X, Zhao L, Wang T, Zhao L, Liu F, Liu X, Sun P, Lu G (2022) Highly sensitive and selective NO2 gas sensor fabricated from Cu2O-CuO microflowers. Sens Actuators, B Chem 362:13180310.1016/j.snb.2022.131803 ↗
18. Han D, Lougou BG, Shuai Y, Wang W, Jiang B, Shagdar E (2022) Study of thermophysical properties of chloride salts doped with CuO nanoparticles for solar thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 234:11143210.1016/j.solmat.2021.111432 ↗
19. Mallakpour S, Azadi E, Hussain CM (2020) Environmentally benign production of cupric oxide nanoparticles and various utilizations of their polymeric hybrids in different technologies. Coord Chem Rev 419:21337810.1016/j.ccr.2020.213378 ↗
20. Zhao J, Liu Z, Low SC, Xu Z, Tan SH (2023) Biomimetic hydrophilic CuO-nanocluster/nanofibrous thin-film skeleton/hydrophilic CuO-nanocluster architecture membrane for efficient and stable solar water evaporation. J Alloys Compd 969:17237710.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172377 ↗
21. Lu R, Yu Y, Adkhamjon G, Gong W, Sun X, Liu L (2020) Bio-inspired cotton fabric with superhydrophobicity for high-efficiency self-cleaning and oil/water separation. Cellulose 27:7283–729610.1007/s10570-020-03281-9 ↗
22. Zhang Q, Zhang K, Xu D, Yang G, Huang H, Nie F, Liu C, Yang S (2014) CuO nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. Prog Mater Sci 60:208–33710.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.003 ↗
23. Lv Z, Yu S, Song K, Zhou X, Yin X (2020) Fabrication of a leaf-like superhydrophobic CuO coating on 6061Al with good self-cleaning, mechanical and chemical stability. Ceram Int 46(10):14872–1488310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.013 ↗
24. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Rabuni MF, Amhamed AOA, Puteh MH, Jaafar J, Rahman MA, Kurniawan TA (2024) Overcoming challenges in water purification by nanocomposite ceramic membranes: a review of limitations and technical solutions. J Water Process Eng 57:10461310.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104613 ↗
25. Cao C, Wang F, Lu M (2020) Superhydrophobic CuO coating fabricated on cotton fabric for oil/water separation and photocatalytic degradation. Colloids Surf, A 601:12503310.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125033 ↗
26. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Amhamed AOA, Kurniawan TA, Puteh MH, Sokri MNM (2023) Recent progress, bottlenecks, improvement strategies and the way forward of membrane distillation technology for arsenic removal from water: a review. J Water Process Eng 52:10350410.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103504 ↗
27. Bouafia A, Laouini SE, Ouahrani MR (2020) A review on green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using plant extract and evaluation of antimicrobial activity. Asian J Res Chem 13(1):65–7010.5958/0974-4150.2020.00014.0 ↗
28. Wang S, Fan B, Lv C, Jia X, Wang T (2020) Influence of adhesives on the construction of a robust superamphiphobic surface. J Alloy Compd 831:15474110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154741 ↗
29. Xu CL, Song F, Wang XL, Wang YZ (2017) Surface modification with hierarchical CuO arrays toward a flexible, durable superhydrophobic and self-cleaning material. Chem Eng J 313:1328–133410.1016/j.cej.2016.11.024 ↗
30. Rasouli S, Rezaei N, Hamedi H, Zendehboudi S, Duan X (2021) Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic membranes for oil-water separation application: a comprehensive review. Mater Des 204:10959910.1016/j.matdes.2021.109599 ↗
31. Park S, Kim J, Park CH (2015) Superhydrophobic textiles: review of theoretical definitions, fabrication and functional evaluation. J Eng Fibers Fabr 10(4):155892501501000420
32. Sadeghi MS, Dogonchi A, Ghodrat M, Chamkha AJ, Alhumade H, Karimi N (2021) Natural convection of CuO-water nanofluid in a conventional oil/water separator cavity: application to combined-cycle power plants. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 124:307–31910.1016/j.jtice.2021.03.031 ↗
33. Jillani SMS, Baig U, Waheed A, Ansari MA (2022) NH2-CuO-MCM-41 covalently cross-linked multipurpose membrane for applications in water treatment: Removal of hazardous pollutants from water, water desalination and anti-biofouling performance. Chemosphere 307:13559210.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135592 ↗
34. Román LE, Amézquita MJ, Uribe CL, Maurtua DJ, Costa SA, Costa SM, Keiski R, Solís JL, Gómez MM (2020) In situ growth of CuO nanoparticles onto cotton textiles. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(2):025009
35. Siddiqui H, Parra MR, Pandey P, Qureshi M, Haque FZ (2020) Performance evaluation of optimized leaf-shaped two-dimension (2D) potassium doped CuO nanostructures with enhanced structural, optical and electronic properties. Ceram Int 46(12):20404–2041410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.131 ↗
36. Raizada P, Sudhaik A, Patial S, Hasija V, Khan AAP, Singh P, Gautam S, Kaur M, Nguyen V-H (2020) Engineering nanostructures of CuO-based photocatalysts for water treatment: current progress and future challenges. Arab J Chem 13(11):8424–845710.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.031 ↗
37. Mekla V, Tipparach U (2013) Synthesis and characterization of CuO nanorods by hydrothermal method. Adv Mater Res 785:417–41910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.785-786.417 ↗
38. Musa A, Farhad S, Gafur M, Jamil A (2021) Effects of withdrawal speed on the structural, morphological, electrical, and optical properties of CuO thin films synthesized by dip-coating for CO2 gas sensing. AIP Adv. https://doi.org/10.1063/5006047110.1063/50060471 ↗
39. Nguyen-Dinh M-T, Bui TS, Lee BK, Masoumi Z (2022) Superhydrophobic MS@ CuO@ SA sponge for oil/water separation with excellent durability and reusability. Chemosphere 292:13332810.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133328 ↗
40. Siavash Moakhar R, Hosseini Hosseinabad SM, Masudy-Panah S, Seza A, Jalali M, Fallah Arani H, Dabir F, Gholipour S, Abdi Y, Bagheri-Hariri M (2021) Photoelectrochemical water-splitting using CuO-based electrodes for hydrogen production: a review. Adv Mater 33(33):200728510.1002/adma.202007285 ↗
41. Cuong HN, Pansambal S, Ghotekar S, Oza R, Hai NTT, Viet NM, Nguyen V-H (2022) New frontiers in the plant extract mediated biosynthesis of copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles and their potential applications: a review. Environ Res 203:11185810.1016/j.envres.2021.111858 ↗
42. ur Rehman A, Aadil M, Zulfiqar S, Agboola PO, Shakir I, Aboud MFA, Haider S, Warsi MF (2021) Fabrication of binary metal doped CuO nanocatalyst and their application for the industrial effluents treatment. Ceram Int 47(5):5929–593710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.064 ↗
43. Grigore ME, Biscu ER, Holban AM, Gestal MC, Grumezescu AM (2016) Methods of synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of CuO nanoparticles. Pharmaceuticals 9(4):7510.3390/ph9040075 ↗
44. Rajput V, Minkina T, Suskova S, Mandzhieva S, Tsitsuashvili V, Chapligin V, Fedorenko A (2018) Effects of copper nanoparticles (CuO NPs) on crop plants: a mini review. BioNanoScience 8:36–4210.1007/s12668-017-0466-3 ↗
45. Velsankar K, Aswin Kumar RM, Preethi R, Muthulakshmi V, Sudhahar S (2020) Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles via Allium sativum extract and its characterizations on antimicrobial, antioxidant, antilarvicidal activities. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):10412310.1016/j.jece.2020.104123 ↗
46. Akintelu SA, Folorunso AS, Folorunso FA, Oyebamiji AK (2020) Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles for biomedical application and environmental remediation. Heliyon 6(7):450810.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04508 ↗
47. Ighalo JO, Sagboye PA, Umenweke G, Ajala OJ, Omoarukhe FO, Adeyanju CA, Ogunniyi S, Adeniyi AG (2021) CuO nanoparticles (CuO NPs) for water treatment: a review of recent advances. Environ Nanotechnol, Monit Manag 15:100443
48. Rajabi M, Albadi J, Momeni A (2020) Click synthesis of 1, 4-disubstituted-1, 2, 3-triazoles catalyzed by melamine-supported CuO nanoparticles as an efficient recyclable catalyst in water. Res Chem Intermed 46:3879–388910.1007/s11164-020-04178-9 ↗
49. Mustafa G, Tahir H, Sultan M, Akhtar N (2013) Synthesis and characterization of cupric oxide (CuO) nanoparticles and their application for the removal of dyes. Afr J Biotech 12(47):6650–666010.5897/AJB2013.13058 ↗
50. Sahooli M, Sabbaghi S, Saboori R (2012) Synthesis and characterization of mono sized CuO nanoparticles. Mater Lett 81:169–17210.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.148 ↗
51. Yu XY, Xu RX, Gao C, Luo T, Jia Y, Liu JH, Huang XJ (2012) Novel 3D hierarchical cotton-candy-like CuO: surfactant-free solvothermal synthesis and application in As (III) removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(4):1954–196210.1021/am201663d ↗
52. Darwish A, Rashad M, Al-Aoh HA (2019) Methyl orange adsorption comparison on nanoparticles: Isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. Dyes Pigment 160:563–57110.1016/j.dyepig.2018.08.045 ↗
53. Farghali A, Bahgat M, Allah AE, Khedr M (2013) Adsorption of Pb (II) ions from aqueous solutions using copper oxide nanostructures. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 2(2):61–71
54. Fakhri A (2015) Investigation of mercury (II) adsorption from aqueous solution onto copper oxide nanoparticles: optimization using response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ Prot 93:1–810.1016/j.psep.2014.06.003 ↗
55. Amokrane S, Aid A, Nibou D, Trari M (2015) Adsorption of methyl orange on nanoparticles of a synthetic zeolite NaA/CuO. C R Chim 18(3):336–34410.1016/j.crci.2014.09.009 ↗
56. Kim JW, Ki CS, Um IC, Park YH (2017) A facile fabrication method and the boosted adsorption and photodegradation activity of CuO nanoparticles synthesized using a silk fibroin template. J Ind Eng Chem 56:335–34110.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.029 ↗
57. Sharifpour E, Alipanahpour Dil E, Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Goudarzi A (2019) Optimizing adsorptive removal of malachite green and methyl orange dyes from simulated wastewater by Mn-doped CuO-Nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon using CCD-RSM: Mechanism, regeneration, isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Appl Organomet Chem 33(3):476810.1002/aoc.4768 ↗
58. Bouazizi N, Bargougui R, Oueslati A, Benslama R (2015) Effect of synthesis time on structural, optical and electrical properties of CuO nanoparticles synthesized by reflux condensation method. Adv Mater Lett 6(2):158–16410.5185/amlett.2015.5656 ↗
59. Gupta D, Thakur A, Gupta TK (2023) Green and sustainable synthesis of nanomaterials: recent advancements and limitations. Environ Res 231:11631610.1016/j.envres.2023.116316 ↗
60. Sukul PK, Kar C (2023) Green conversion methods to prepare nanoparticle. In: Bioinspired and green synthesis of nanostructures: a sustainable approach, pp 115–13910.1002/9781394174928.ch5 ↗
61. Küyükoğlu M, Bülter MB, Köse DA (2023) Green chemistry assisted nanoscale synthesis and structural characterization of some transition metal cations. MANAS J Eng 11(1):92–10410.51354/mjen.1279695 ↗
62. El-Trass A, ElShamy H, El-Mehasseb I, El-Kemary M (2012) CuO nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, optical properties and interaction with amino acids. Appl Surf Sci 258(7):2997–300110.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.025 ↗
63. Al-Niaimi AFD, Abdulateef D, Atiya G (2018) Thermodynamics and kinetic study of eosin dye adsorption on CuO nanoparticles. Int J Res Pharm Chem 8(2):281–293
64. Martinson CA, Reddy K (2009) Adsorption of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) by cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 336(2):406–41110.1016/j.jcis.2009.04.075 ↗
65. Nekouei F, Nekouei S, Tyagi I, Gupta VK (2015) Kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm studies for acid blue 129 removal from liquids using copper oxide nanoparticle-modified activated carbon as a novel adsorbent. J Mol Liq 201:124–13310.1016/j.molliq.2014.09.027 ↗
66. Mohan S, Singh Y, Verma DK, Hasan SH (2015) Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles through green route using Citrus limon juice and its application as nanosorbent for Cr (VI) remediation: process optimization with RSM and ANN-GA based model. Process Saf Environ Prot 96:156–16610.1016/j.psep.2015.05.005 ↗
67. Verma M, Tyagi I, Chandra R, Gupta VK (2017) Adsorptive removal of Pb (II) ions from aqueous solution using CuO nanoparticles synthesized by sputtering method. J Mol Liq 225:936–94410.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.045 ↗
68. Raul PK, Senapati S, Sahoo AK, Umlong IM, Devi RR, Thakur AJ, Veer V (2014) CuO nanorods: a potential and efficient adsorbent in water purification. RSC Adv 4(76):40580–4058710.1039/C4RA04619F ↗
69. Yang C, Xiao F, Wang J, Su X (2014) Synthesis and microwave modification of CuO nanoparticles: crystallinity and morphological variations, catalysis, and gas sensing. J Colloid Interface Sci 435:34–4210.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.044 ↗
70. Baylan N, İlalan İ, İnci İ (2020) Copper oxide nanoparticles as a novel adsorbent for separation of acrylic acid from aqueous solution: synthesis, characterization, and application. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:1–1510.1007/s11270-020-04832-3 ↗
71. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Puteh MH, Wong KY, Tan H, Kurniawan TA, Ooi BS, Nomura M, Iwamoto Y (2024) Development of superhydrophobic ceramic membrane decorated with flake-like structure by two-step synthesis for seawater desalination by membrane distillation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 155:10527710.1016/j.jtice.2023.105277 ↗
72. Gou X, Wang G, Yang J, Park J, Wexler D (2008) Chemical synthesis, characterisation and gas sensing performance of copper oxide nanoribbons. J Mater Chem 18(9):965–96910.1039/b716745h ↗
73. Prajapati AK, Mondal MK (2020) Comprehensive kinetic and mass transfer modeling for methylene blue dye adsorption onto CuO nanoparticles loaded on nanoporous activated carbon prepared from waste coconut shell. J Mol Liq 307:11294910.1016/j.molliq.2020.112949 ↗
74. Dashamiri S, Ghaedi M, Dashtian K, Rahimi MR, Goudarzi A, Jannesar R (2016) Ultrasonic enhancement of the simultaneous removal of quaternary toxic organic dyes by CuO nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: central composite design, kinetic and isotherm study. Ultrason Sonochem 31:546–55710.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.02.008 ↗
75. He X, Yang D-P, Zhang X, Liu M, Kang Z, Lin C, Jia N, Luque R (2019) Waste eggshell membrane-templated CuO–ZnO nanocomposites with enhanced adsorption, catalysis and antibacterial properties for water purification. Chem Eng J 369:621–63310.1016/j.cej.2019.03.047 ↗
76. Kim DH, Jung Y, Tak HJ, Kwak DH, Ahn S, Ko JS (2024) Superhydrophobic, mechanically durable, highly transparent surface covered with CuO/PDMS composite nano-tips using one-step wet oxidation process of Cu/PDMS multilayer. Appl Surf Sci 649:15916510.1016/j.apsusc.2023.159165 ↗
77. Jais J, Park JH, Kang B (2023) Additive manufacturing of digitally programmable hierarchical biomimetic surfaces for hydrodynamic informatics. Addit Manuf 76:103763
78. Zheng L, Luo S, Yang S (2023) Preparation of Cu/CuO@Stearic acid layer with superhydrophobicity to provide multiple barriers for corrosion protection of carbon steel. Mater Chem Phys 306:12804810.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128048 ↗
79. Li X, Wang M, Tao H, Ge B, Liu S, Liu J, Ren G, Zhang Z (2023) Constructing of efficient interface solar evaporator: In-situ colloid foaming strategy for solar desalination and visible light response sewage purification. J Colloid Interface Sci 649:107–11710.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.071 ↗
80. He S, Liu W, Zheng H, Guo R, Liu N, Mo Z (2023) Endowing versatility and antibacterial ability to composite coating via a spraying strategy. Ceram Int 49(12):20929–2093810.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.226 ↗
81. Sethi SK, Manik G (2018) Recent progress in super hydrophobic/hydrophilic self-cleaning surfaces for various industrial applications: a review. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 57(18):1932–195210.1080/03602559.2018.1447128 ↗
82. Farzam M, Beitollahpoor M, Solomon SE, Ashbaugh HS, Pesika NS (2022) Advances in the fabrication and characterization of superhydrophobic surfaces inspired by the Lotus leaf. Biomimetics 7(4):19610.3390/biomimetics7040196 ↗
83. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Jaafar J, Rahman MA, Puteh MH, Abu Bakar S, Kurniawan TA, Li T (2023) Fabrication and characterization of a novel mullite-stainless steel composed hollow fibre membrane for oil/water separation. Ain Shams Eng J 15:10226010.1016/j.asej.2023.102260 ↗
84. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Puteh MH, Jaafar J, Rahman MA, Ismail AF, Wong KY (2023) Effect of sintering temperature on functional properties of mullite kaolinite and stainless steel composed hollow fibre membrane for oil in water emulsion separation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 146:10485910.1016/j.jtice.2023.104859 ↗
85. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Kurniawan TA, El-badawy T, Goh PS, Othman NH, Rahman MA, Jaafar J, Ismail AF (2022) Bottlenecks and recent improvement strategies of ceramic membranes in membrane distillation applications: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc 42(13):5179–519410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.019 ↗
86. Omar NMA, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Milad M, Sokri MNM, Puteh MH (2023) Recent progress and technical improvement strategies for mitigating ceramic membranes bottlenecks in water purification processes: a review. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 20(6):3327–335610.1111/ijac.14503 ↗
87. Baklan D (2023) Determination of the resistance of water-repellent properties to ultraviolet radiation on self-hydrophobized surface textures of AISI 304 steel. Technol Audit Prod Reserv 2(3):610.15587/2706-5448.2023.277986 ↗
88. Chen Y, Ao J, Zhang J, Gao J, Hao L, Jiang R, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Zhao J, Ren L (2023) Bioinspired superhydrophobic surfaces, inhibiting or promoting microbial contamination. Mater Today 67:468–49410.1016/j.mattod.2023.06.006 ↗
89. Getaneh SA, Temam AG, Nwanya AC, Ejikeme PM, Ezema FI (2023) Advances in bioinspired superhydrophobic surface materials: a review on preparation, characterization and applications. Hybrid Adv 3:10007710.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100077 ↗
90. Tsibidis GD, Stratakis E (2023) Ultrafast laser biomimetic micro-/nanostructuring. In: Ultrafast laser nanostructuring: the pursuit of extreme scales, pp 921–94910.1007/978-3-031-14752-4_25 ↗
91. Liu Y, Wu M, Guo C, Zhou D, Wu Y, Wu Z, Lu H, Zhang H, Zhang Z (2023) A review on preparation of superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surface by laser micromachining and its hybrid methods. Crystals 13(1):2010.3390/cryst13010020 ↗
92. Liu L, Li L, Guo C, Ge Y, Chen Y, Zhang L (2023) The design of a biomimetic Hierarchical thin-walled structure inspired by a Lotus Leaf and its mechanical performance analysis. Materials 16(11):411610.3390/ma16114116 ↗
93. Ensikat HJ, Ditsche-Kuru P, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (2011) Superhydrophobicity in perfection: the outstanding properties of the lotus leaf. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2(1):152–16110.3762/bjnano.2.19 ↗
94. Xiu Y (2008) Fabrication of surface micro-and nanostructures for superhydrophobic surfaces in electric and electronic applications. GT Digital Repository
95. Hansson PM (2012) Hydrophobic surfaces: Effect of surface structure on wetting and interaction forces, vol 28, no 30. Langmuir, p 11121–1113010.1021/la302036d ↗
96. Z Yu, M Wang, X Qiu, J Xiao (2015) Synthesis and characterization of super-hydrophobic coating materials. In: 2nd international conference on green materials and environmental engineering, pp 16–1910.2991/gmee-15.2015.5 ↗
97. Ensikat H, Ditsche P, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (2011) Superhydrophobicity in perfection: the outstanding properties of the lotus leaf. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2:152–16110.3762/bjnano.2.19 ↗
98. Guo Z, Liu W (2007) Biomimic from the superhydrophobic plant leaves in nature: binary structure and unitary structure. Plant Sci 172(6):1103–111210.1016/j.plantsci.2007.03.005 ↗
99. Prakash M, Bush JWM (2011) Interfacial propulsion by directional adhesion. Int J Non-Linear Mech 46(4):607–61510.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2010.12.003 ↗
100. Bober BA, Ogata JK, Martinez VE, Hallinan JJ, Leach TA, Negru B (2018) Investigating nanoscopic structures on a butterfly wing to explore solvation and coloration. J Chem Educ 95(6):1004–101110.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00463 ↗