Effect of α phase morphologies on shear localization behavior of TC4 titanium alloy at high strain rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang YM, Zhu M, Dong LL, Sun GD, Zhang W, Xue H, Fu YQ, Elmarakbi A, Zhang YS (2023) In-situ synthesized TiC/Ti-6Al-4V composites by elemental powder mixing and sqark plasma sintering: Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd 947:169557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.16955710.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169557 ↗
2. Rittel D, Osovski S (2010) Dynamic failure by adiabatic shear banding. Int J Fract 162:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9475-810.1007/s10704-010-9475-8 ↗
3. Ran C, Zhou Q, Chen PW, Chen Q, Zhang WF (2021) Comparative experimental study of the dynamic properties and adiabatic shear susceptibility of titanium alloys. Eur J Mech A-Solid 85:104137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10413710.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104137 ↗
4. Lu ZC, Zhang XH, Ji W, Wei S, Yao CG, Han DF (2021) Investigation on the deformation mechanism of Ti–5Al-2.5Sn ELI titanium alloy at cryogenic and room temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 818:141380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14138010.1016/j.msea.2021.141380 ↗
5. Kuang LJ, Chen ZY, Jiang YH, Wang ZM, Wang RK, Liu CM (2017) Adiabatic shear behaviors in rolled and annealed pure titanium subjected to dynamic impact loading. Mater Sci Eng A 685:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.01110.1016/j.msea.2017.01.011 ↗
6. Zhu XJ, Fan QB, Wang DD, Gong HC, Gao Y, Yuan JJ, Chen K, Qian F (2022) Influence of twins found in adiabatic shear bands on dynamic recrystallization of a near β Ti-5.5Mo-7.2Al-4.5Zr-2.6Sn-2.1Cr alloy. Mater. Mater Sci Eng A 842:143084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14308410.1016/j.msea.2022.143084 ↗
7. Liu XY, Mao PL, Zhou L, Wang Z, Liu Z, Wang F (2023) Microstructure evolution and characterization of the adiabatic shear bands in AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Charact 198:112726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11272610.1016/j.matchar.2023.112726 ↗
8. Mu WP, Wei ZQ, Mao PL, Wang F, Wang Z, Zhou L, Liu Z (2023) Effects of Ni content on solidification behavior and hot tearing susceptibility of LPSO-reinforced Mg–4Y–xNi alloys. Int J Met. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-01200-910.1007/s40962-023-01200-9 ↗
9. Deng SY, Song HW, Zheng C, Zhao TZ, Zhang SH, Nielsen KB (2019) Selection of deformation modes and related texture evolution in Zircaloy-4 during one pass cold pilgering. Mate Sci Eng A 764:138280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13828010.1016/j.msea.2019.138280 ↗
10. Zener C, Hollomon JH (1944) Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J Appl Phys 15(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.170736310.1063/1.1707363 ↗
11. Walley SM (2007) Shear localization: a historical overview. Metall Mater Trans A 38:2629–2654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9271-x10.1007/s11661-007-9271-x ↗
12. Wright TW (1992) Shear band susceptibility: work hardening materials. Int J Plast 8:583–60210.1016/0749-6419(92)90032-8 ↗
13. Wright TW, Walter JW (1987) On stress collapse in adiabatic shear bands. J Mech Phys Solids 35(6):701–72010.1016/0022-5096(87)90051-2 ↗
14. Clifton RJ, Duffy J, Hartley KA, Shawki TG (1984) On critical conditions for shear band formation at high strain rates. Scripta Metall 18:443–44810.1016/0036-9748(84)90418-6 ↗
15. Andrade U, Meyers MA, Vecchio KS, Chokshi AH (1994) Dynamic recrystallization in high-strain-rate plastic deformation of copper. Acta metall mater 42:3183–319510.1016/0956-7151(94)90417-0 ↗
16. Zhu SX, Guo YZ, Ruan QC, Chen HS, Li YL, Fang DN (2020) Formation of adiabatic shear band within Ti-6Al-4V: An in-situ study with high-speed photography and temperature measurement. Int J Mech Sci 171:105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10540110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105401 ↗
17. Longère P (2018) Respective/combined roles of thermal softening and dynamic recrystallization in adiabatic shear banding initiation. Mech Mater 117:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.10.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2017.10.003 ↗
18. Yang Y, Jiang F, Zhou BM, Li XM, Zheng HG, Zhang QM (2011) Microstructural characterization and evolution mechanism of adiabatic shear band in a near beta-Ti alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528:2787–2794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.05310.1016/j.msea.2010.12.053 ↗
19. Yang DK, An Y, Cizek P, Hodgson P (2011) Development of adiabatic shear band in cold-rolled titanium. Mater Sci Eng A 528:3990–3997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.10810.1016/j.msea.2011.01.108 ↗
20. Ran C, Sheng ZM, Chen PW, Zhang WF, Chen Q (2020) Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 773:138728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13872810.1016/j.msea.2019.138728 ↗
21. Yang Y, Li XM, Tong XL, Zhang QM, Xu CY (2011) Effects of microstructure on the adiabatic shearing behaviors of titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528:3130–3133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.06810.1016/j.msea.2010.12.068 ↗
22. Peirs J, Verleysen P, Degrieck J, Coghe F (2010) The use of hat-shaped specimens to study the high strain rate shear behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Impact Eng 37(6):703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.08.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.08.002 ↗
23. Bai YL (1981). In: Meyers MA, Murr LE (eds) Shock wave and high-strain-rate phenomena in metals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 277–28410.1007/978-1-4613-3219-0_17 ↗
24. Chen W, Huan Z, Mu J, Zhu ZW, Zhang HF, Wang YD (2022) Effect of microstructure and strain rate on dynamic mechanical properties and adiabatic shear band of TC4 alloy. Acta Metall Sin 58:1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.11900/0412.1961.2021.0053010.11900/0412.1961.2021.00530 ↗
25. Alaghmandfard R, Dharmendra C, Odeshi AG, Mohammadi M (2020) Dynamic mechanical properties and failure characteristics of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V under high strain rate impact loadings. Mater Sci Eng A 793:139794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13979410.1016/j.msea.2020.139794 ↗
26. He ST, Zeng WD, Jia RC, Xu JW, Zhang X (2021) The mechanical response and failure mechanism of a near α titanium alloy under high-strain-rate compression at different temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 814:140749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14074910.1016/j.msea.2021.140749 ↗
27. Wang BF, Yao XR, Liu LY, Zhang XY, Ding X (2018) Mechanical properties and microstructure in a fine grained Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe titanium alloy deformed at a high strain rate. Mater Sci Eng A 08:36871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.10010.1016/j.msea.2018.08.100 ↗
28. Grady DE (1994) Dissipation in adiabatic shear bands. Mech Mater 17:289–29310.1016/0167-6636(94)90066-3 ↗
29. Jiang YH, Chen ZY, Zhan CK, Chen T, Wang RK, Liu CM (2015) Adiabatic shear localization in pure titanium deformed by dynamic loading: Microstructure and microtexture characteristic. Mater Sci Eng A 640:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.02810.1016/j.msea.2015.06.028 ↗
30. Zhang HB, Zhang KF, Zhou HP, Lu Z, Zhao CH, Yang XL (2015) Effect of strain rate on microstructure evolution of a nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. Mater Design 80:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.00410.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.004 ↗
31. Zong Y, Wen D, Liu Z, Shan D (2016) γ-Phase transformation, dynamic recrystallization and texture of a forged TiAl-based alloy based on plane strain compression at elevated temperature. Mater Design 91:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.12010.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.120 ↗
32. Yuqing E, Mao P, Liu X, Wu X, Wang F, Wang Z, Zhou L, Liu Z (2022) Adiabatic shear behaviour of AZ31 alloy with different grain size under high-strain-rate. Mater Sci Tech-lond. 34:1070–7080. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2022.207010910.1080/02670836.2022.2070109 ↗
33. Xu N, Mao PL, Wang XX, Zhou L, Wang Z, Wang F, Liu Z (2022) Detwinning of AZ31 magnesium alloy during in situ tension. J Mater Sci 57:15121–15136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07563-410.1007/s10853-022-07563-4 ↗
34. Chen Z, Zhong DL, Sun Q, Ma XK (2021) Effect of α phase fraction on the dynamic mechanical behavior of a dual-phase metastable β titanium alloy Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al. Mater Sci Eng A 816:141322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14132210.1016/j.msea.2021.141322 ↗
35. Fatemi-Varzaneh SM, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Vaghar R et al (2012) The origin of microstructure inhomogeneity in mg-3Al-1Zn processed by severe plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 551:128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.10710.1016/j.msea.2012.04.107 ↗
36. Lv BJ, Peng J, Wang YJ, An XQ, Zhong LP, Tang AT, Pan FS (2014) Dynamic recrystallization behavior and hot workability of Mg-2.0Zn-0.3Zr-0.9Y alloy by using hot compression test. Mater Des 53:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.01610.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.016 ↗
37. Semiatin SL, Knisley SL, Fagin PN et al (2003) Microstructure evolution during alpha-beta heat treatment of Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Mater Trans A 34:2377–2386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0300-010.1007/s11661-003-0300-0 ↗