DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2023-04Open access

Calcium-doped TiO2 microspheres and near-infrared carbazole-based sensitizer for efficient co-sensitized dye-sensitized solar cell

Dheeraj Devadiga, M. Selvakumar, Deepak Devadiga, Selvaraj Paramasivam, T. N. Ahipa, Prakasha Shetty, S. Senthil Kumar

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 13
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

Abstract Here, we synthesized metal-free organic dye (CCPICPB) with two carbazole donor groups and two anchoring groups that exhibit a panchromatic absorption in the near-infrared range of up to 750 nm. To study the photophysical properties of synthesized CCPICPB dye, the UV–Vis and cyclic voltammetric experiments were studied and the obtained results were validated with theoretical simulation studies. After that, the solvothermal approach is used to synthesize pristine anatase and calcium (Ca)-doped TiO2 microspheres with a smooth morphology. These microstructures are examined in depth using XRD, electron microscopy and electrochemical analysis methods. On TiO2 and Ca-doped TiO2 photoanode materials, we first evaluated the performance of CCPICPB dye. Upon our optimized experimental condition, the 3% Ca-TiO2 photoanode-based device exhibits an efficiency of 4.04%, which is greater than that of the pristine TiO2 photoanode-based device (2.93%). Because of the quicker electron transport in the Ca-TiO2 film, the short-circuit current density and efficiency of DSSCs were improved. Moreover, when the CCPICPB dye was used as a co-sensitizer with the common Ru(II) dye (Z907), interestingly it showed the highest efficiency (6.11%) when compared with Z907 alone (5.12%). This improved efficiency of the co-sensitized device resulted from greater VOC conjugated with improved JSC. The JSC was improved because CCPICB dye could compensate for the photocurrent loss caused by redox electrolyte while the VOC was improved because electron recombination was inhibited under the co-sensitization conditions. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Energy storage

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (96)

Show source-provided references
1. Cai K, Wu H, Hua T et al (2022) Molecular engineering of the fused azacycle donors in the D-A-π-A metal-free organic dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Dye Pigment 197:109922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.10992210.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109922 ↗
2. Liu M, Johnston MB, Snaith HJ (2013) Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 501:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1250910.1038/nature12509 ↗
3. Zhang W, Eperon GE, Snaith HJ (2016) Metal halide perovskites for energy applications. Nat Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.4810.1038/nenergy.2016.48 ↗
4. Tzounis L, Stergiopoulos T, Zachariadis A et al (2017) Perovskite solar cells from small scale spin coating process towards roll-to-roll printing: optical and morphological studies. Mater Today Proc 4:5082–5089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.04.11710.1016/j.matpr.2017.04.117 ↗
5. Miles RW, Zoppi G, Forbes I (2007) Inorganic photovoltaic cells The inorganic semiconductor materials used to make photovoltaic cells. Mater Today 10:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70275-410.1016/S1369-7021(07)70275-4 ↗
6. McCandless BE, Sites JR (2011) Cadmium telluride solar cells. In: Handbook of photovoltaic science and engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 600–64110.1002/9780470974704.ch14 ↗
7. Meng L, Zhang Y, Wan X, Li C, Zhang X, Wang Y, Ke X, Xiao Z, Ding L, Xia R, Yip H-L, Cao Y, Chen Y (2018) Organic and solution-processed tandem solar cells with 17.3% efficiency. Science 361(6407):1094–1098. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat261210.1126/science.aat2612 ↗
8. Riede M, Uhrich C, Widmer J et al (2011) Efficient organic tandem solar cells based on small molecules. Adv Funct Mater 21:3019–3028. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20100276010.1002/adfm.201002760 ↗
9. Ameri T, Li N, Brabec CJ (2013) Highly efficient organic tandem solar cells: a follow up review. Energy Environ Sci 6:2390–2413. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40388b10.1039/c3ee40388b ↗
10. Tvrdy K, Kamat PV (2011) Quantum dot solar cells. Compr Nanosci Technol 1–5:257–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374396-1.00129-X10.1016/B978-0-12-374396-1.00129-X ↗
11. Ning Z, Gong X, Comin R et al (2015) Quantum-dot-in-perovskite solids. Nature 523:324–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1456310.1038/nature14563 ↗
12. Pan Z, Rao H, Mora-Seró I et al (2018) Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Chem Soc Rev 47:7659–7702. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00431e10.1039/c8cs00431e ↗
13. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Shetty P, Santosh MS (2022) The integration of flexible dye-sensitized solar cells and storage devices towards wearable self-charging power systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 159:112252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.11225210.1016/j.rser.2022.112252 ↗
14. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Shetty P, Santosh MS (2021) Recent progress in dye sensitized solar cell materials and photo-supercapacitors: a review. J Power Sources 493:229698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22969810.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229698 ↗
15. Kavan L (2017) Electrochemistry and dye-sensitized solar cells. Curr Opin Electrochem 2:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2017.03.00810.1016/j.coelec.2017.03.008 ↗
16. Feldt SM, Gibson EA, Gabrielsson E et al (2010) Design of organic dyes and cobalt polypyridine redox mediators for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 132:16714–16724. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja108886910.1021/ja1088869 ↗
17. Dette C, Pérez-Osorio MA, Kley CS et al (2014) TiO2 anatase with a bandgap in the visible region. Nano Lett 14:6533–6538. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503131s10.1021/nl503131s ↗
18. Woronowicz K, Ahmed S, Biradar AA et al (2012) Near-IR absorbing solar cell sensitized with bacterial photosynthetic membranes. Photochem Photobiol 88:1467–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01190.x10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01190.x ↗
19. Tan B, Toman E, Li Y, Wu Y (2007) Zinc stannate (Zn2SnO4) dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 129:4162–4163. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja070804f10.1021/ja070804f ↗
20. Kumar D, Wong KT (2017) Organic dianchor dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater Today Energy 5:243–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2017.05.00710.1016/j.mtener.2017.05.007 ↗
21. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Shetty P, Santosh MS (2021) Dye-sensitized solar cell for indoor applications: a mini-review. J Electron Mater 50:3187–3206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-08854-310.1007/s11664-021-08854-3 ↗
22. Regan BO, Gratzelt M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353:737–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/353737a010.1038/353737a0 ↗
23. Ilaiyaraja P, Kumar Das T, Mocherla PSV, Sudakar C (2017) Well-connected microsphere-nanoparticulate TiO2 composites as high performance photoanode for dye sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 169:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.00110.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.001 ↗
24. Fan K, Yu J, Ho W (2017) Improving photoanodes to obtain highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: a brief review. Mater Horizons 4:319–344. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6mh00511j10.1039/c6mh00511j ↗
25. Rajkumar S, Venkatraman MR, Suguna K et al (2022) Synthesis of Ag-incorporated TiO2 nanoparticles by simple green approach as working electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 33:4965–4973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-07685-610.1007/s10854-021-07685-6 ↗
26. Singh S, Maurya IC, Tiwari A et al (2022) Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Citrus limon juice extract as a bio-capping agent for enhanced performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Surf Interf 28:101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10165210.1016/j.surfin.2021.101652 ↗
27. Albu DF, Lungu J, Popescu-Pelin G et al (2022) Thin film fabrication by pulsed laser deposition from TiO2 Targets in O2, N2, He, or Ar for dye-sensitized solar cells. Coatings 12:293. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1203029310.3390/coatings12030293 ↗
28. Xu Y, Li X, Xiao M, Xiong X (2018) Growth of hierarchical TiO2 flower-like microspheres/oriented nanosheet arrays on a titanium mesh for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. CrystEngComm 20:6280–6290. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ce01028e10.1039/c8ce01028e ↗
29. Mo LE, Li ZQ, Ding YC et al (2019) Facile synthesis of TiO2 microspheres via solvothermal alcoholysis method for high performance dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 177:448–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.01310.1016/j.solener.2018.10.013 ↗
30. Li ZQ, Ding Y, Mo LE et al (2015) Fine tuning of nanocrystal and pore sizes of TiO2 submicrospheres toward high performance dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interf 7:22277–22283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0655610.1021/acsami.5b06556 ↗
31. Li ZQ, Chen WC, Guo FL et al (2015) Mesoporous TiO2 yolk-shell microspheres for dye-sensitized solar cells with a high efficiency exceeding 11%. Sci Rep 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1417810.1038/srep14178 ↗
32. Li ZQ, Que YP, Mo LE et al (2015) One-pot synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 micropheres and its application for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interf 7:10928–10934. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0219510.1021/acsami.5b02195 ↗
33. Wang K, Niu L, Tao L et al (2021) Fabrication of TiO2 microspheres with continuously distributed sizes from nanometer to micronmeter: the increasing light scattering ability and the enhanced photovoltaic performance. Sol Energy 230:935–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.11.01010.1016/j.solener.2021.11.010 ↗
34. Gowthambabu V, Deshpande M, Govindaraj R et al (2021) Synthesis of anatase TiO2 microspheres and their efficient performance in dye-sensitized solar cell. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 32:26306–26317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06923-110.1007/s10854-021-06923-1 ↗
35. Dong YX, Wang XL, Jin EM et al (2019) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of Ag decorated TiO2 nanoparticles for dye-sensitized solar cell application. Renew Energy 135:1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.06210.1016/j.renene.2018.12.062 ↗
36. Li W, Yang J, Zhang J et al (2014) Improve photovoltaic performance of titanium dioxide nanorods based dye-sensitized solar cells by Ca-doping. Mater Res Bull 57:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.05.03410.1016/j.materresbull.2014.05.034 ↗
37. Dahlan D, Md Saad SK, Berli AU et al (2017) Synthesis of two-dimensional nanowall of Cu-Doped TiO2 and its application as photoanode in DSSCs. Phys E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostruct 91:185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2017.05.00310.1016/j.physe.2017.05.003 ↗
38. Gayathri V, John Peter I, Rajamanickam N, Ramachandran K (2019) Improved performance of dye-sensitized solar cells by Cr doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.38110.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.381 ↗
39. Prabavathy N, Balasundaraprabhu R, Balaji G et al (2019) Investigations on the photo catalytic activity of calcium doped TiO2 photo electrode for enhanced efficiency of anthocyanins based dye sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 377:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.03.03810.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.03.038 ↗
40. Nguyen DT, Kurokawa Y, Taguchi K (2020) Enhancing DSSC photoanode performance by using Ni-Doped TiO2 to fabricate scattering layers. J Electron Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-020-07965-710.1007/s11664-020-07965-7 ↗
41. Ünlü B, Özacar M (2020) Effect of Cu and Mn amounts doped to TiO2 on the performance of DSSCs. Sol Energy 196:448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.04310.1016/j.solener.2019.12.043 ↗
42. Arshad Z, Shakir S, Khoja AH et al (2022) Performance analysis of calcium-doped titania (TiO2) as an effective electron transport layer (ETL) for perovskite solar cells. Energies 15:1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1504140810.3390/en15041408 ↗
43. Ji JM, Zhou H, Kim HK (2018) Rational design criteria for D-π-A structured organic and porphyrin sensitizers for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 6:14518–14545. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta02281j10.1039/c8ta02281j ↗
44. Han L, Islam A, Chen H et al (2012) High-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell with a novel co-adsorbent. Energy Environ Sci 5:6057–6060. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee03418b10.1039/c2ee03418b ↗
45. Kang SH, Jeong MJ, Eom YK et al (2017) Porphyrin sensitizers with donor structural engineering for superior performance dye-sensitized solar cells and tandem solar cells for water splitting applications. Adv Energy Mater 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20160211710.1002/aenm.201602117 ↗
46. Humphry-Baker R, Rothlisberger U, Nazeeruddin MK et al (2014) Dye-sensitized solar cells with 13% efficiency achieved through the molecular engineering of porphyrin sensitizers. Nat Chem 6:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.186110.1038/nchem.1861 ↗
47. Eom YK, Kang SH, Choi IT et al (2017) Significant light absorption enhancement by a single heterocyclic unit change in the π-bridge moiety from thieno[3,2-b]benzothiophene to thieno[3,2-b]indole for high performance dye-sensitized and tandem solar cells. J Mater Chem A 5:2297–2308. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta09836c10.1039/c6ta09836c ↗
48. Kakiage K, Aoyama Y, Yano T et al (2015) Highly-efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy-anchor dyes. Chem Commun 51:15894–15897. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cc06759f10.1039/c5cc06759f ↗
49. Mishra A, Fischer MKR, Büuerle P (2009) Metal-free organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: from structure: property relationships to design rules. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 48:2474–2499. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20080470910.1002/anie.200804709 ↗
50. Han L, Liu J, Liu Y, Cui Y (2019) Novel D-A-π-A type benzocarbazole sensitizers for dye sensitized solar cells. J Mol Struct 1180:651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.12.05210.1016/j.molstruc.2018.12.052 ↗
51. Jiang H, Ren Y, Zhang W et al (2020) Phenanthrene-fused-quinoxaline as a key building block for highly efficient and stable sensitizers in copper-electrolyte-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chemie Int Ed 59:9324–9329. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20200089210.1002/anie.202000892 ↗
52. Wu Y, Zhu WH, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M (2015) Insight into D-A-π-A structured sensitizers: a promising route to highly efficient and stable dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:9307–9318. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0247510.1021/acsami.5b02475 ↗
53. Naik P, Elmorsy MR, Su R et al (2017) New carbazole based metal-free organic dyes with D-Π-A-Π-A architecture for DSSCs: synthesis, theoretical and cell performance studies. Sol Energy 153:600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.08810.1016/j.solener.2017.05.088 ↗
54. Chiykowski VA, Lam B, Du C, Berlinguette CP (2017) Comparative analysis of triarylamine and phenothiazine sensitizer donor units in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Commun 53:2367–2370. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc09178d10.1039/c6cc09178d ↗
55. Ohta N, Awasthi K, Okoshi K et al (2016) Stark spectroscopy of absorption and emission of indoline sensitizers: a correlation with the performance of photovoltaic cells. J Phys Chem C 120:26206–26216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0853110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08531 ↗
56. Kumar D, Justin Thomas KR, Lee CP, Ho KC (2014) Organic dyes containing fluorene decorated with imidazole units for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Org Chem 79:3159–3172. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo500330r10.1021/jo500330r ↗
57. Han ML, Zhu YZ, Liu S et al (2018) The improved photovoltaic performance of phenothiazine-dithienopyrrole based dyes with auxiliary acceptors. J Power Sources 387:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.059 ↗
58. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Shetty P et al (2021) Recent developments in metal-free organic sensitizers derived from carbazole, triphenylamine, and phenothiazine for dye-sensitized solar cells. Int J Energy Res 45:6584–6643. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.634810.1002/er.6348 ↗
59. Naik P, Su R, Elmorsy MR et al (2018) New carbazole based dyes as effective co-sensitizers for DSSCs sensitized with ruthenium (II) complex (NCSU-10). J Energy Chem 27:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.12.01310.1016/j.jechem.2017.12.013 ↗
60. Elsherbiny D, Yildirim E, El-Essawy F et al (2017) Structure-property relationships: Influence of number of anchoring groups in triphenylamine-carbazole motifs on light harvesting and photovoltaic performance for dye-sensitized solar cells. Dye Pigment 147:491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.08.02210.1016/j.dyepig.2017.08.022 ↗
61. Zhang K, Zhang W, Huang J et al (2017) Metal-free photosensitizers based on benzodithienothiophene as π-conjugated spacer for dye-sensitized solar cells. Org Electron 42:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2016.12.04410.1016/j.orgel.2016.12.044 ↗
62. Ramasamy S (2020) Organic photosensitizers containing fused indole-imidazole ancillary acceptor with triphenylamine donor moieties for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.24810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.248 ↗
63. Liao X, Zhang H, Huang J et al (2018) (D−π−A)3−Type metal-free organic dye for dye-sensitized solar cells application. Dye Pigment 158:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.03.07510.1016/j.dyepig.2018.03.075 ↗
64. Zhang W, Dai X, Liao X et al (2020) Phenothiazine (or phenoxazine) based (D–π–A)-L2-(A–π–D–π–A)2-type organic dyes with five anchors for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 212:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.00810.1016/j.solener.2020.11.008 ↗
65. Badawy SA, Su R, Fadda AA et al (2022) Highly efficient (N-benzothiazolyl)-cyanoacetamide based co-sensitizers for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Optik (Stuttg) 249:168274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.16827410.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168274 ↗
66. Koteshwar D, Prasanthkumar S, Singh SP et al (2022) Effects of methoxy group(s) on D-π-A porphyrin based DSSCs: efficiency enhanced by co-sensitization. Mater Chem Front 6:580–592. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1qm01450a10.1039/d1qm01450a ↗
67. Watson J, Rodrigues RR, Delcamp JH (2022) Near-infrared unsymmetrical squaraine core-based sensitizers for co-sensitized high-photocurrent dye-sensitized solar cells. Cell Reports Phys Sci 3:100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10070110.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100701 ↗
68. Eltoukhi M, Fadda AA, Abdel-Latif E, Elmorsy MR (2022) Low cost carbazole-based organic dyes bearing the acrylamide and 2-pyridone moieties for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 426:113760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.11376010.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113760 ↗
69. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Shetty P et al (2021) Novel photosensitizer for dye-sensitized solar cell based on ionic liquid–doped blend polymer electrolyte. J Solid State Electrochem 25:1461–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-021-04920-210.1007/s10008-021-04920-2 ↗
70. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Devadiga D et al (2022) Synthesis and characterization of a new phenothiazine-based sensitizer/co-sensitizer for efficient dye-sensitized solar cell performance using a gel polymer electrolyte and Ni–TiO2 as a photoanode. New J Chem 46:21373–21385. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ03589H10.1039/D2NJ03589H ↗
71. Wang Z, Sugihara H (2006) N3-sensitized TiO2 films. In situ proton exchange toward open-circuit photovoltage enhancement. Langmuir 22:9718–9722. https://doi.org/10.1021/la061315g10.1021/la061315g ↗
72. Wielopolski M, Marszalek M, Brunetti FG et al (2016) Synthesis and optoelectronic properties of chemically modified bi-fluorenylidenes. J Mater Chem C 4:3798–3808. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TC03501E10.1039/C5TC03501E ↗
73. Zhang W, Wu Y, Zhu H et al (2015) Rational molecular engineering of indoline-based D-A-π-A organic sensitizers for long-wavelength-responsive dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interf 7:26802–26810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0888810.1021/acsami.5b08888 ↗
74. Jia HL, Li SS, Gong BQ et al (2019) Efficient cosensitization of new organic dyes containing bipyridine anchors with porphyrins for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sustain Energy Fuels 4:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9se00810a10.1039/c9se00810a ↗
75. Lokhande PKM, Sonigara KK, Jadhav MM et al (2019) Multi-dentate carbazole based schiff base dyes with chlorovinylene group in spacer for dye-sensitized solar cells: a combined theoretical and experimental study. ChemistrySelect 4:4044–4056. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20180394010.1002/slct.201803940 ↗
76. Salimi Beni A, Zarandi M, Hosseinzadeh B, Najafi Chermahini A (2018) Density functional theory study of carbazole dyes: potential application of carbazole dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mol Struct 1164:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.02.09410.1016/j.molstruc.2018.02.094 ↗
77. Rafieh AI, Ekanayake P, Tan AL, Lim CM (2017) Effects of ionic radii of co-dopants (Mg, Ca, Al and La) in TiO2 on performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 141:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.11.05210.1016/j.solener.2016.11.052 ↗
78. Li Y, Peng S, Jiang F et al (2007) Effect of doping TiO2 with alkaline-earth metal ions on its photocatalytic activity. J Serbian Chem Soc 72:393–402. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC0704393L10.2298/JSC0704393L ↗
79. Santos LM, Machado WA, França MD et al (2015) Structural characterization of Ag-doped TiO2 with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 5:103752–103759. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra22647c10.1039/c5ra22647c ↗
80. Huang J, Guo X, Wang B et al (2015) Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of Mo-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J Spectrosc 2015:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/68185010.1155/2015/681850 ↗
81. Devadiga D, Selvakumar M, Shetty P et al (2021) Novel photosensitizer for dye-sensitized solar cell based on ionic liquid–doped blend polymer electrolyte. J Solid State Electrochem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-021-04920-210.1007/s10008-021-04920-2 ↗
82. Wang F, Zhang S, Li C et al (2014) Catalytic behavior of supported Ru nanoparticles on the (101) and (001) facets of anatase TiO2. RSC Adv 4:10834–10840. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra47076h10.1039/c3ra47076h ↗
83. Ren R, Wen Z, Cui S et al (2015) Controllable synthesis and tunable photocatalytic properties of Ti3+-doped TiO2. Sci Rep 5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1071410.1038/srep10714 ↗
84. Qian X, Han H, Chen Y, Yuan Y (2018) Sol–gel solvothermal route to synthesize anatase/brookite/rutile TiO2 nanocomposites with highly photocatalytic activity. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 85:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-017-4544-310.1007/s10971-017-4544-3 ↗
85. Neetu SS, Srivastava P, Bahadur L (2020) Hydrothermal synthesized Nd-doped TiO2 with Anatase and Brookite phases as highly improved photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy 208:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.08510.1016/j.solener.2020.07.085 ↗
86. Szkoda M, Lisowska-Oleksiak A, Siuzdak K (2016) Optimization of boron-doping process of titania nanotubes via electrochemical method toward enhanced photoactivity. J Solid State Electrochem 20:1765–1774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3185-810.1007/s10008-016-3185-8 ↗
87. Surendra BS (2018) Green engineered synthesis of Ag-doped CuFe2O4: Characterization, cyclic voltammetry and photocatalytic studies. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.01.00510.1016/j.jsamd.2018.01.005 ↗
88. Huamán A, Quintana M (2018) Surface modification of TiO2 nanostructured films by inserting Mg 2+ ions applied to dye sensitized solar cells. J Phys Conf Ser 1143:12019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1143/1/01201910.1088/1742-6596/1143/1/012019 ↗
89. Ran H, Fan J, Zhang X et al (2018) Enhanced performances of dye-sensitized solar cells based on Au-TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 plasmonic hybrid nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 430:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.10710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.107 ↗
90. Sakthivel T, Kumar KA, Senthilselvan J, Jagannathan K (2018) Effect of Ni dopant in TiO2 matrix on its interfacial charge transportation and efficiency of DSSCs. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:2228–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8137-210.1007/s10854-017-8137-2 ↗
91. Feng X, Shankar K, Paulose M, Grimes CA (2009) Tantalum-doped titanium dioxide nanowire arrays for dye-sensitized solar cells with high open-circuit voltage. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 48:8095–8098. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20090311410.1002/anie.200903114 ↗
92. Shaikh SF, Mane RS, Joo OS (2015) La2O3-encapsulated SnO2 nanocrystallite-based photoanodes for enhanced DSSCs performance. Dalt Trans 44:3075–3081. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt03564j10.1039/c4dt03564j ↗
93. Zhang H, Lv Y, Guo Y et al (2018) Fully-air processed Al-doped TiO2 nanorods perovskite solar cell using commercial available carbon instead of hole transport materials and noble metal electrode. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:3759–3766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8310-710.1007/s10854-017-8310-7 ↗
94. Chiappara C, Figà V, Di Marco G et al (2016) Investigation of recovery mechanisms in dye sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 127:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.01.01010.1016/j.solener.2016.01.010 ↗
95. Bramhankar TS, Pawar SS, Shaikh JS et al (2020) Effect of nickel-zinc Co-doped TiO2 blocking layer on performance of DSSCs. J Alloys Compd 817:152810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15281010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152810 ↗
96. Ji JM, Zhou H, Eom YK et al (2020) 14.2% efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells by co-sensitizing novel thieno[3,2-b]indole-based organic dyes with a promising porphyrin sensitizer. Adv Energy Mater 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200012410.1002/aenm.202000124 ↗