journal article·2022-09Open access

The effect of the strain rate on the longitudinal modulus of cellulosic fibres

Marko Zizek, Caterina Czibula, Ulrich Hirn

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 36

Abstract

Abstract The longitudinal stiffness of cellulosic fibres plays an important role in the mechanical performance of many products these fibres are used for. Especially, the fibres’ viscoelastic properties are having an influence on the product performance. In this work, tensile testing at different strain rates was performed on single fibres to investigate the rate dependence of their moduli. Four different fibre types were tested: chemi-thermomechanical softwood pulp (CTMP), bleached chemical softwood pulp (CP), unbleached softwood kraft pulp (UKP), and viscose (VIS). For each fibre sample, ten strain rates ranging from 0.113% s−1 to 800% s−1 were applied. The rate-dependent modulus $$Er$$ of each fibre at each strain rate was calculated by linearly fitting the stress–strain curves. By obtaining the values of the normalized modulus, a slope value per decade was calculated to quantify the rate dependence. To exclude possible plastic and relaxation effects, two additional experiments were used: a force-controlled loading–unloading experiment and a reverse rate protocol. All cellulosic fibres tested exhibited rate-dependent behaviour with a log-linear relationship between loading rate and modulus. For each tenfold increase in loading rate we found an increase in modulus up to nearly 20%—depending on the fibre type. Viscose fibres exhibit the highest rate dependence, whereas chemical softwood pulp fibres exhibit the lowest.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Wood Treatment and Properties · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Page DH, El-Hosseiny F, Winkler K (1971) Behaviour of single wood fibres under axial tensile strain. Nature 229:252–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/229252a010.1038/229252a0 ↗
2. Page DH, El-Hosseiny F, Winkler K, Bain R (1972) The mechanical properties of single wood-pulp fibres. Part I: a new approach. Pulp Pap Mag Canada 73:72–77
3. Hardacker KW (1970) Effects of loading rate, span and beating on individual wood fiber tensile properties. In Page D.H (Ed) the Physics and Chemistry of Wood Pulp Fibers. TAPPI STAP No. 8, pp 201–216
4. Coffin DW, Boese SB (1997) Tensile creep behavior of single fibers and paper in a cyclic humidity environment. In: 3rd International Symposium on Moisture and Creep Effects on Paper and Containers. Rotorua, New Zealand
5. Page DH, El-Hosseiny F (1983) The mechanical properties of single wood pulp fibres. Part VI. Fibril angle and the shape of the stress-strain curve. J Pulp Pap Sci 9:99–100
6. Ehrnrooth EML, Kolseth P (1984) The tensile testing of single wood pulp fibers in air and in water. Wood fiber Sci 16:549–566
7. Hardacker KW, Brezinski JP (1973) The individual fiber properties of commercial pulps. Tappi 56:154–157
8. Salmén L (2018) Wood cell wall structure and organisation in relation to mechanics. In: Geitmann A, Gril J (eds) plant biomechanics. Springer, Cham, pp 3–1910.1007/978-3-319-79099-2_1 ↗
9. Gibson LJ (2012) The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials. J R Soc Interface 9:2749–2766. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.034110.1098/rsif.2012.0341 ↗
10. Niskanen K Paper Physics. Fapet Oy Helsinki (1998)
11. Mark RE, Habeger CC, Borch J, Lyne MB (2002) Handbook of physical testing of paper. CRC Press, Boca Raton
12. Burgert I, Frühmann K, Keckes J et al (2003) microtensile testing of wood fibers combined with video extensometry for efficient strain detection. Holzforschung 57:661–664. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2003.09910.1515/HF.2003.099 ↗
13. Olsson AM, Salmén L, Eder M, Burgert I (2007) Mechano-sorptive creep in wood fibres. Wood Sci Technol 41:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00226-006-0086-510.1007/S00226-006-0086-5 ↗
14. Jajcinovic M, Fischer WJ, Mautner A et al (2018) Influence of relative humidity on the strength of hardwood and softwood pulp fibres and fibre to fibre joints. Cellulose 25:2681–2690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1720-810.1007/s10570-018-1720-8 ↗
15. Kouko J, Jajcinovic M, Fischer W et al (2019) Effect of mechanically induced micro deformations on extensibility and strength of individual softwood pulp fibers and sheets. Cellulose 26:1995–2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2163-y10.1007/s10570-018-2163-y ↗
16. Saketi P, Von Essen M, Mikczinski M et al (2012) A flexible microrobotic platform for handling microscale specimens of fibrous materials for microscopic studies. J Microscop 248:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03660.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03660.x ↗
17. Lakes R (2009) viscoelastic materials. Cambridge University Press, New York10.1017/CBO9780511626722 ↗
18. Roylance D, McElroy P, McGarry F (1980) Viscoelastic properties of paper. Fibre Sci Technol 13:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0015-0568(80)90032-910.1016/0015-0568(80)90032-9 ↗
19. Coffin DW (2005) The creep response of paper. In: L'Anson SJ
20. (Ed) Trans. of the XIIIth Fund. Res. Symp. FRC, Manchester, 2018 Cambridge, pp 651-747
21. Czibula C, Seidlhofer T, Ganser C et al (2021) Longitudinal and transverse low frequency viscoelastic characterization of wood pulp fibers at different relative humidity. Materialia 16:101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTLA.2021.10109410.1016/J.MTLA.2021.101094 ↗
22. McCrum NG, Buckley CP, Bucknall CB (2003) Principles of polymer engineering, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, USA
23. Salmén L (2004) Micromechanical understanding of the cell-wall structure. C R Biol 327:873–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2004.03.01010.1016/j.crvi.2004.03.010 ↗
24. Sedlachek K (1995) The effect of hemicelluloses and cyclic humidity on the creep of single fibers. Georgia Inst Technol
25. Fioravanti M, Sodini N, Navi P (2006) Investigation of the influence of hemicelluloses on time dependent behaviour of wood. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Approach to Wood Structure, Behaviour and Applications. pp 190–95
26. Jajcinovic M, Fischer WJ, Hirn U, Bauer W (2016) Strength of individual hardwood fibres and fibre to fibre joints. Cellulose 23:2049–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0895-010.1007/s10570-016-0895-0 ↗
27. Wiltsche M, Donoser M, Kritzinger J, Bauer W (2011) Automated serial sectioning applied to 3D paper structure analysis. J Microsc 242:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03459.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03459.x ↗
28. Dauer M, Wolfbauer A, Seidlhofer T, Hirn U (2021) Shear modulus of single wood pulp fibers from torsion tests. Cellulose 28:8043–8054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04027-x10.1007/s10570-021-04027-x ↗
29. Xue Y, Du Y, Elder S et al (2009) Temperature and loading rate effects on tensile properties of kenaf bast fiber bundles and composites. Compos Part B Eng 40:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.009 ↗
30. Hartler N (1995) Aspects on curled and microcompressed fibers. Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal 10(1):4–710.3183/npprj-1995-10-01-p004-007 ↗
31. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-PP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
32. Czibula C, Brandberg A, Cordill MJ et al (2021) The transverse and longitudinal elastic constants of pulp fibers in paper sheets. Sci Rep 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01515-910.1038/s41598-021-01515-9 ↗