Critical path-driven property and performance transitions in heterogeneous microstructures
Source abstract
Abstract
Structure–property relationships are usually discussed in the context of optimization of the equilibrium properties of heterogeneous materials. The logic and consequences of the effects of grain size and shape in metals and ceramics, porosity and particle size distributions in aggregates, and fiber/matrix arrangement details in fibrous composites are familiar examples. However, for generalized force-flux problems that may not be equilibrium systems, multiphysical property and performance transitions are sometimes observed as a function of microstructure variations, including transitions in electrochemical response (e.g., corrosion), electrical and dielectric response (e.g., conduction) and mechanical response (including brittle transitions and fracture initiation). The present paper constructs a “critical path” concept that generalizes the familiar concept of percolation to create a broad foundation for predicting transitions in physical properties and performance that often define design boundaries or performance transitions that signal the onset of unsteady behavior such as fracture or chemical breakdown. A broad range of applications to diverse technologies such as structural composites, ceramic membranes and heterogeneous containment materials are discussed, supported by a new foundation of conformal, multiphysics, multiscale modeling that unifies the philosophy of the subject.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11(2):127–14010.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7 ↗
2. Brisard S, Dormieux L, Kondo D (2010) Hashin–Shtrikman bounds on the bulk modulus of a nanocomposite with spherical inclusions and interface effects. Comput Mater Sci 48(3):589–59610.1016/j.commatsci.2010.02.027 ↗
3. Nur A, Mavko G, Dvorkin J, Galmudi D (1998) Critical porosity: a key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. Lead Edge 17(3):357–36210.1190/1.1437977 ↗
4. Dvorkin J, Nur A (1996) Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics 61(5):1363–137010.1190/1.1444059 ↗
5. Stevens DR, Skau EW, Downen LN, Roman MP, Clarke LI (2011) Finite-size effects in nanocomposite thin films and fibers. Phys Rev E 84(2):021126. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.02112610.1103/PhysRevE.84.021126 ↗
6. Shekhawat A, Zapperi S, Sethna JP (2013) From damage percolation to crack nucleation through finite size criticality. Phys Rev Lett 110(18):185505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.18550510.1103/PhysRevLett.110.185505 ↗
7. Yi YB, Sastry AM (2004) Analytical approximation of the percolation threshold for overlapping ellipsoids of revolution. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol 460, No. 2048. The Royal Society, pp 2353–2380
8. Reifsnider K (1982) Damage in composite materials. ASTM International, Conshohocken
9. Reifsnider KL, Case SW (2002) Durability and damage tolerance of material systems. Wiley, New York
10. Raihan R, Reifsnider K, Cacuci D, Liu Q (2015) Dielectric signatures and interpretive analysis for changes of state in composite materials. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech 95(10):1037–1045. doi: 10.1002/zamm.20140022610.1002/zamm.201400226 ↗
11. Weissgraeber P, Leguillon D, Becker W (2016) A review of finite fracture mechanics: crack initiation at singular and non-singular stress raisers. Arch Appl Mech 86:375–40110.1007/s00419-015-1091-7 ↗
12. Reifsnider K, Raihan R, Vadlamudi V (2016) Heterogeneous fracture mechanics for multi-defect analysis. Compos Struct 156:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.008 ↗
13. Frizon F, Lorente S, Ollivier JP, Thouvenot P (2003) Transport model for the nuclear decontamination of cementitious materials. Comput Mater Sci 27(4):507–51610.1016/S0927-0256(03)00051-X ↗
14. Amoroso J, Marra JC, Tang M, Lin Y, Chen F, Su D, Brinkman KS (2014) Melt processed multiphase ceramic waste forms for nuclear waste immobilization. J Nucl Mater 454(1):12–2110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.07.035 ↗
15. Angeli F, McGlinn P, Frugier P (2008) Chemical durability of hollandite ceramic for conditioning cesium. J Nucl Mater 380(1):59–6910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.07.003 ↗
16. Shaw HF (1998) Determination of the open and closed porosity in an immobilized Pu ceramic waste form (No. UCRL-ID-132605). UCRL-ID-132605, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA10.2172/7984 ↗
17. Hong C, Han J, Du S, Meng S, Zhang X (2012) Synthesis, microstructure and properties of high-strength porous ceramics. INTECH Open Access Publisher, Rijeka, pp 109–128
18. Aleksyuk MM (2001) A method for the strength prediction of porous ceramics. Strength Mater 33(2):188–19210.1023/A:1010444701958 ↗
19. Xu Y, Wen Y, Grote R, Amoroso J, Nickles LS, Brinkman KS (2016) A-site compositional effects in Ga-doped hollandite materials of the form BaxCsyGa2x + yTi8 − 2x − yO16: implications for Cs immobilization in crystalline ceramic waste forms. Sci Rep 6:27412. doi: 10.1038/srep2741210.1038/srep27412 ↗
20. Gellings PJ, Bouwmeester HJ (1997) Handbook of solid state electrochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton
21. Harris WM, Brinkman KS, Lin Y, Su D, Cocco AP, Nakajo A, DeGostin MB, Chen-Wiegart YCK, Wang J, Chen F, Chu YS (2014) Characterization of 3D interconnected microstructural network in mixed ionic and electronic conducting ceramic composites. Nanoscale 6(9):4480–4485. doi: 10.1039/C3NR06684C10.1039/c3nr06684c ↗
22. Lin Y, Fang S, Su D, Brinkman KS, Chen F (2015) Enhancing grain boundary ionic conductivity in mixed ionic-electronic conductors. Nat Commun 6:6824. doi: 10.1038/ncomms782410.1038/ncomms7824 ↗