The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Besides wood, the most widely used natural structural material, dicotyledonous fibre plants such as flax or hemp, and monocotyledonous grasses such as cereal straw or bamboo have been shown to be suitable for application in materials. Common reed is a less well-characterised plant resource in this regard. Therefore, common reed stems were characterised in uniaxial tension in the present study, aiming at acquiring basic information about the mechanical characteristics of this material. Furthermore, laboratory-scale composite beams were manufactured and tested in bending. Compared to wood species with similar density, common reed stem walls showed a comparable average modulus of elasticity of 8 GPa and a very good average tensile strength of 150 MPa. After a mild alkali pre-treatment, reed showed excellent adhesive bonding, enabling the manufacture of high-density composite beams with roughly 130 MPa bending strength and 12–13 GPa modulus of elasticity. Same as untreated common reed stem walls, also reed biocomposite beams compared very favourably with established wood-based materials of similar structure, density, and adhesive content. In summary, it was thus demonstrated that common reed is a highly suitable raw material for bio-based load-bearing structural materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Bamboo properties and applications · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Ramage MH, Burridge H, Busse-Wicher M, Fereday G, Reynolds T, Shah DU, Wu G, Yu L, Fleming P, Densley-Tingley D, Allwood J, Dupree P, Linden PF, Scherman O (2017) The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:333–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.10710.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107 ↗
2. Mishra A, Humpenöder F, Churkina G, Reyer CPO, Beier F, Bodirsky BL, Schellnhuber HJ, Lotze-Campen H, Popp A (2022) Land use change and carbon emissions of a transformation to timber cities. Nat Commun 13:4889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32244-w10.1038/s41467-022-32244-w ↗
3. Orhon AV, Altin M (2020) Utilization of alternative building materials for sustainable construction. In: Dincer I, Colpan CO, Ezan MA (eds) Environmentally-benign energy solutions. Springer, Cham, pp 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_3610.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_36 ↗
4. Bourmaud A, Beaugrand J, Shah DU, Placet V, Baley C (2018) Towards the design of high-performance plant fibre composites. Prog Mater Sci 97:347–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.05.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.05.005 ↗
5. Shah DU (2013) Developing plant fibre composites for structural applications by optimising composite parameters: a critical review. J Mater Sci 48:6083–6107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7458-710.1007/s10853-013-7458-7 ↗
6. Li Z, Chen C, Mi R, Gan W, Dai J, Jiao M, Xie H, Yao Y, Xiao S, Hu L (2020) A strong, tough, and scalable structural material from fast-growing bamboo. Adv Mater 32:1906308. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190630810.1002/adma.201906308 ↗
7. Sharma B, Gatóo A, Bock M, Ramage M (2015) Engineered bamboo for structural applications. Constr Build Mater 81:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.077 ↗
8. Chougan M, Ghaffar SH, Al-Kheetan MJ, Gecevicius M (2020) Wheat straw pre-treatments using eco-friendly strategies for enhancing the tensile properties of bio-based polylactic acid composites. Ind Crops Prod 155:112836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11283610.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112836 ↗
9. Neudecker F, Jakob M, Bodner SC, Keckes J, Buerstmayr H, Gindl-Altmutter W (2023) Delignification and densification as a route to enable the use of wheat straw for structural materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11:7596–7604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c0137510.1021/acssuschemeng.3c01375 ↗
10. El-Ramady HR, Abdalla N, Alshaal T, Fári M, Prokisch J, Pilon-Smits EAH, Domokos-Szabolcsy É (2015) Selenium phytoremediation by Giant Reed. In: Lichtfouse E, Schwarzbauer J, Robert D (eds) Hydrogen production and remediation of carbon and pollutants. Springer, Cham, pp 133–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19375-5_410.1007/978-3-319-19375-5_4 ↗
11. Rodewald-Rudescu L (1974) Das Schilfrohr. Phragmites communis Trinius. Die Binnengewasser Band 27. E. Schweizerbart’sche, Stuttgart, ix + 302 p. + 11 plates. DM97.50. Limnol Oceanogr 20:1059–1059. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1975.20.6.1059a10.4319/lo.1975.20.6.1059a ↗
12. Csaplovics E (2019) Der Schilfgürtel des Neusiedler Sees. Oesterr Wasser Abfallwirtsch 71(11):494–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-019-00622-210.1007/s00506-019-00622-2 ↗
13. Srivastava J, Kalra SJS, Naraian R (2014) Environmental perspectives of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Appl Water Sci 4:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0142-x10.1007/s13201-013-0142-x ↗
14. Ostendorp W, Iseli C, Krauss M, Krumscheid-Plankert P, Moret J-L, Rollier M, Schanz F (1995) Lake shore deterioration, reed management and bank restoration in some Central European lakes. Ecol Eng 5:51–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(95)00014-A10.1016/0925-8574(95)00014-A ↗
15. Malheiro R, Ansolin A, Guarnier C, Fernandes J, Amorim MT, Silva SM, Mateus R (2021) The potential of the reed as a regenerative building material—characterisation of its durability, physical, and thermal performances. Energies 14(14):4276. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1414427610.3390/en14144276 ↗
16. Bakatovich A, Gaspar F, Boltrushevich N (2022) Thermal insulation material based on reed and straw fibres bonded with sodium silicate and rosin. Constr Build Mater 352:129055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12905510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129055 ↗
17. Karademir A, Yetis F, Imamoglu S, Varlıbas H (2013) Utilization of water reed in production of various insulation panels. Sci Eng Compos Mater 20:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2013-001410.1515/secm-2013-0014 ↗
18. Shuai W, Chen N, Li B, Zhou D, Gao J (2016) Life cycle assessment of common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav) Trin. ex Steud) cellulosic bioethanol in Jiangsu Province, China. Biomass Bioenergy 92:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.00210.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.002 ↗
19. Cotana F, Cavalaglio G, Pisello AL, Gelosia M, Ingles D, Pompili E (2015) Sustainable ethanol production from common Reed (Phragmites australis) through simultaneuos saccharification and fermentation. Sustainability 7:12149–12163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7091214910.3390/su70912149 ↗
20. Szijártó N, Kádár Z, Varga E, Thomsen AB, Costa-Ferreira M, Réczey K (2009) Pretreatment of Reed by wet oxidation and subsequent utilization of the pretreated fibers for ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 155:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8549-410.1007/s12010-009-8549-4 ↗
21. Wang X, Deng Y, Wang S, Liao C, Meng Y, Pham T (2013) Nanoscale characterization of reed stalk fiber cell walls. BioResources 8(2):1986–1996. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.2.1986-199610.15376/biores.8.2.1986-1996 ↗
22. Scherzinger M, Kaltschmitt M, Thoma M (2021) Effects of vapothermal pretreatment on anaerobic degradability of common Reed. Energy Technol 9:2001046. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20200104610.1002/ente.202001046 ↗
23. Arufe S, Hellouin de Menibus A, Leblanc N, Lenormand H (2021) Physico-chemical characterisation of plant particles with potential to produce biobased building materials. Ind Crops Prod 171:113901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11390110.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113901 ↗
24. Başaran Kankılıç G, Metin AÜ (2020) Phragmites australis as a new cellulose source: extraction, characterization and adsorption of methylene blue. J Mol Liquids 312:113313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11331310.1016/j.molliq.2020.113313 ↗
25. Pandiarajan P, Kathiresan M (2018) Physicochemical and mechanical properties of a novel fiber extracted from the stem of common reed plant. Int J Polym Anal Charact 23(5):442–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2018.147432710.1080/1023666X.2018.1474327 ↗
26. Wöhler-Geske A, Moschner CR, Gellerich A, Militz H, Greef JM, Hartung E (2016) Provenances and properties of thatching reed (Phragmites australis). Appl Agric For Res 66:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3220/LBF145768675000010.3220/LBF1457686750000 ↗
27. Han G, Kawai S, Umemura K, Zhang M, Honda T (2001) Development of high-performance UF-bonded reed and wheat straw medium-density fiberboard. J Wood Sci 47:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0076678410.1007/BF00766784 ↗
28. Han G, Umemura K, Kawai S, Kajita H (1999) Improvement mechanism of bondability in UF-bonded reed and wheat straw boards by silane coupling agent and extraction treatments. J Wood Sci 45:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0083349410.1007/BF00833494 ↗
29. Xiao L, Ding Y, Yan G (2021) Effect of hot-pressing temperature on characteristics of alkali pretreated reed straw bio-board. J Wood Chem Technol 41:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2021.194935110.1080/02773813.2021.1949351 ↗
30. Ortega Z, Bolaji I, Suárez L, Cunningham E (2023) A review of the use of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in the biorefineries context. Rev Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2022-006910.1515/revce-2022-0069 ↗
31. Keijsers E, van den Oever M, Dam JV, Lansbergen A, Koning C, van den Akker H (2020) The development of reed composite fiber boards using partially bio-based, formaldehyde- and monomeric isocyanate-free resins. Reinf Plast 64:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repl.2019.10.00710.1016/j.repl.2019.10.007 ↗
32. Kraiem D, Pimbert S, Ayadi A, Bradai C (2013) Effect of low content reed (Phragmite australis) fibers on the mechanical properties of recycled HDPE composites. Compos B Eng 44:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.06210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.062 ↗
33. Suárez L, Ortega Z, Barczewski M, Cunningham E (2023) Use of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) for polymer composites obtaining: a mapping review. Cellulose 30:4793–4812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05176-x10.1007/s10570-023-05176-x ↗
34. Shon C-S, Mukashev T, Lee D, Zhang D, Kim JR (2019) Can common reed fiber become an effective construction material? Physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of mortar mixture containing common reed fiber. Sustainability 11:903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1103090310.3390/su11030903 ↗
35. Jiménez-Espada M, Herrero-Adán D, González-Escobar R (2021) Characterization of mechanical and hygroscopic properties of individual canes of reed. Materials 14:2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1409219310.3390/ma14092193 ↗
36. Ghaffar SH, Fan M, McVicar B (2017) Interfacial properties with bonding and failure mechanisms of wheat straw node and internode. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 99:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.005 ↗
37. Obersriebnig M, Konnerth J, Gindl-Altmutter W (2013) Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 40:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.011 ↗
38. Ghaffar SH, Fan M (2015) Differential behaviour of nodes and internodes of wheat straw with various pre-treatments. Biomass Bioenergy 83:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.02010.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.020 ↗
39. Jakob M, Mahendran AR, Gindl-Altmutter W, Bliem P, Konnerth J, Müller U, Veigel S (2022) The strength and stiffness of oriented wood and cellulose-fibre materials: a review. Prog Mater Sci 125:100916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10091610.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100916 ↗
40. Reiterer A, Lichtenegger H, Tschegg S, Fratzl P (1999) Experimental evidence for a mechanical function of the cellulose microfibril angle in wood cell walls. Philos Mag A 79:2173–2184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141861990821041510.1080/01418619908210415 ↗
41. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. JACS 124:9074–9082. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja025731910.1021/ja0257319 ↗
42. Alexander GB, Heston WM, Iler RK (1954) The solubility of amorphous silica in water. J Phys Chem 58:453–455. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150516a00210.1021/j150516a002 ↗
43. Joščák T, Teischinger A, Müller U, Mauritz R (2006) Production and material performance of long—strand wood composites. Wood Res 51:37–50