A new texture descriptor for data-driven constitutive modeling of anisotropic plasticity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Constitutive modeling of anisotropic plastic material behavior traditionally follows a deductive scheme, relying on empirical observations that are cast into analytic equations, the so-called phenomenological yield functions. Recently, data-driven constitutive modeling has emerged as an alternative to phenomenological models as it offers a more general way to describe the material behavior with no or fewer assumptions. In data-driven constitutive modeling, methods of statistical learning are applied to infer the yield function directly from a data set generated by experiments or numerical simulations. Currently these data sets solely consist of stresses and strains, considering the microstructure only implicitly. Similar to the phenomenological approach, this limits the generality of the inferred material model, as it is only valid for the specific material employed in the virtual or physical experiments. In this work, we present a new generic descriptor for crystallographic texture that allows an explicit consideration of the microstructure in data-driven constitutive modeling. This descriptor compromises between generality and complexity and is based on an approximately equidistant discretization of the orientation space. We prove its ability to capture the structure–property relationships between a variety of cubic–orthorhombic textures and their anisotropic plastic behavior expressed by the yield function Yld2004-18p. Three different machine learning models trained with the descriptor can predict yield loci as well asr-values of unseen microstructures with sufficient accuracy. The descriptor allows an explicit consideration of crystallographic texture, providing a pathway to microstructure-sensitive data-driven constitutive modeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Bock FE, Aydin RC, Cyron CJ, Huber N, Kalidindi SR, Klusemann B (2019) A review of the application of machine learning and data mining approaches in continuum materials mechanics. Front Mater 6:110–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.0011010.3389/fmats.2019.00110 ↗
2. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW, Karabin ME, Brem JC, Dick RE (2005) Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21(5):1009–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
3. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7(7):693–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
4. Aretz H, Aegerter J, Engler O (2010) Analysis of earing in deep drawn cups. AIP Conf Proc 1252(1):417–424. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.345758510.1063/1.3457585 ↗
5. Fuhg JN, van Wees L, Obstalecki M, Shade P, Bouklas N, Kasemer M (2022) Machine-learning convex and texture-dependent macroscopic yield from crystal plasticity simulations. Materialia 23:101446–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10144610.1016/j.mtla.2022.101446 ↗
6. van den Boogaard T, Havinga J, Belin A, Barlat F (2016) Parameter reduction for the Yld 2004-18p yield criterion. Int J Mater Form 9(2):175–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1221-310.1007/s12289-015-1221-3 ↗
7. Kirchdoerfer T, Ortiz M (2016) Data-driven computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 304:81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.00110.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001 ↗
8. Eggersmann R, Kirchdoerfer T, Reese S, Stainier L, Ortiz M (2019) Model-free data-driven inelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 350:81–99 (2019) arXiv:1808.10859 [physics]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.01610.1016/j.cma.2019.02.016 ↗
9. Chinesta F, Ladeveze P, Ibanez R, Aguado JV, Abisset-Chavanne E, Cueto E (2017) Data-driven computational plasticity. Proc Eng 207:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.76310.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.763 ↗
10. Lefik M, Schrefler BA (2003) Artificial neural network as an incremental non-linear constitutive model for a finite element code. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(28):3265–3283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00350-510.1016/S0045-7825(03)00350-5 ↗
11. Huang D, Fuhg JN, Weißenfels C, Wriggers P (2020) A machine learning based plasticity model using proper orthogonal decomposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 365:113008–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11300810.1016/j.cma.2020.113008 ↗
12. Vlassis NN, Sun W (2021) Sobolev training of thermodynamic-informed neural networks for interpretable elasto-plasticity models with level set hardening. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 377:113695–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11369510.1016/j.cma.2021.113695 ↗
13. Nascimento A, Roongta S, Diehl M, Beyerlein IJ (2023) A machine learning model to predict yield surfaces from crystal plasticity simulations. Int J Plast 161:103507–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10350710.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103507 ↗
14. Hartmaier A (2020) Data-oriented constitutive modeling of plasticity in metals. Materials 13(7):1600–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1307160010.3390/ma13071600 ↗
15. Shoghi R, Hartmaier A (2022) Optimal data-generation strategy for machine learning yield functions in anisotropic plasticity. Front Mater 9:868248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.86824810.3389/fmats.2022.868248 ↗
16. Rocha IBCM, Kerfriden P, van der Meer FP (2021) On-the-fly construction of surrogate constitutive models for concurrent multiscale mechanical analysis through probabilistic machine learning. J Comput Phys X 9:100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpx.2020.10008310.1016/j.jcpx.2020.100083 ↗
17. Fuhg JN, Bouklas N (2022) On physics-informed data-driven isotropic and anisotropic constitutive models through probabilistic machine learning and space-filling sampling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 394:114915–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11491510.1016/j.cma.2022.114915 ↗
18. Raabe D, Roters F, Barlat F, Chen L-Q (2006) Continuum scale simulation of engineering materials: fundamentals—microstructures—process applications. Wiley, Weinheim
19. Ali U, Muhammad W, Brahme A, Skiba O, Inal K (2019) Application of artificial neural networks in micromechanics for polycrystalline metals. Int J Plast 120:205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.001 ↗
20. Luecke K, Pospiech J, Jura J, Hirsch J (1986) On the Presentation of Orientation Distribution Functions by Model Functions. Z Metall 77:312–321
21. Pospiech J, Lücke K, Sztwiertnia K (1993) Orientation distribution and orientation correlation functions for description of microstructures. Acta Metall Mater 41(1):305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(93)90361-U10.1016/0956-7151(93)90361-U ↗
22. Schmidt J, Biswas A, Vajragupta N, Hartmaier A (2022) Data-oriented description of texture-dependent anisotropic material behavior. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 30:065001–28. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ac773910.1088/1361-651X/ac7739 ↗
23. Bunge H-J (2013) Texture analysis in materials science: mathematical methods. Elsevier, Berlin
24. Wenk H-R, Houtte PV (2004) Texture and anisotropy. Rep Prog Phys 67(8):1367–1428. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R0210.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R02 ↗
25. de Oca-Zapiain DM, Lim H, Park T, Pourboghrat F (2022) Predicting plastic anisotropy using crystal plasticity and Bayesian neural network surrogate models. Mater Sci Eng A 833:142472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14247210.1016/j.msea.2021.142472 ↗
26. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.004510.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
27. Helming K (1995) Texturapproximation durch modellkomponenten. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität Clausthal, Clausthal
28. Helming K (1997) A nearly equal distant grid of orientations for quantitative texture analysis. Texture Stress Microstruct 28(3–4):219–230. https://doi.org/10.1155/TSM.28.21910.1155/TSM.28.219 ↗
29. Górski KM, Hivon E, Banday AJ, Wandelt BD, Hansen FK, Reinecke M, Bartelmann M (2005) HEALPix: A framework for high-resolution discretization and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere. Astrophys J 622(2):759–771. https://doi.org/10.1086/42797610.1086/427976 ↗
30. Yershova A, Jain S, LaValle SM, Mitchell JC (2010) Generating uniform incremental grids on $$SO(3)$$ using the hopf fibration. Int J Robot Res 29(7):801–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836490935270010.1177/0278364909352700 ↗
31. Roşca D, Morawiec A, Graef MD (2014) A new method of constructing a grid in the space of 3d rotations and its applications to texture analysis. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 22(7):075013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/22/7/07501310.1088/0965-0393/22/7/075013 ↗
32. Bachmann F, Hielscher R, Schaeben H (2010) Texture analysis with MTEX—free and open source software toolbox. Solid State Phenom 160:63–68. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
33. Biswas A, Vajragupta N, Hielscher R, Hartmaier A (2020) Optimized reconstruction of the crystallographic orientation density function based on a reduced set of orientations. J Appl Crystallogr 53(1):178–187. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671901713810.1107/S1600576719017138 ↗
34. Biswas A, Kalidindi SR, Hartmaier A (2022) A hybrid approach for the efficient computation of polycrystalline yield loci with the accuracy of the crystal plasticity finite element method. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 30(2):025015–23. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ac4a2410.1088/1361-651X/ac4a24 ↗
35. Zhang H, Diehl M, Roters F, Raabe D (2016) A virtual laboratory using high resolution crystal plasticity simulations to determine the initial yield surface for sheet metal forming operations. Int J Plast 80:111–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.01.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2016.01.002 ↗
36. Van Houtte P, Cauwenberg G, Aernoudt E (1987) Analysis of the earing behaviour of aluminium 3004 alloys by means of a single model based on yield loci calculated from orientation distribution functions. Mater Sci Eng 95:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(87)90503-910.1016/0025-5416(87)90503-9 ↗
37. Boeff M (December 2016) Micromechanical modelling of fatigue crack initiation and growth. PhD Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum
38. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P (2001) SciPy: Open Source Scietific Tools for Python. https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/optimize.minimize-trustconstr.html (2001)
39. Yuan, Y.-X.: A review of trust region algorithms for optimization. In: ICM99: Proceedings of the fourth international congress on industrial and applied mathematics, pp 271–282 (1999)10.1093/oso/9780198505143.003.0023 ↗
40. Vapnik V (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory, 2nd edn. In: Information Science and Statistics. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-110.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 ↗
41. Xu S, An X, Qiao X, Zhu L, Li L (2013) Multi-output least-squares support vector regression machines. Pattern Recogn Lett 34(9):1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.01.01510.1016/j.patrec.2013.01.015 ↗
42. De’ath G (2001) Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. Ecology 83:1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.2307/307191710.2307/3071917 ↗
43. Borchani H, Varando G, Bielza C, Larrañaga P (2015) A survey on multi-output regression. WIREs Data Min Knowl Discov 5(5):216–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.115710.1002/widm.1157 ↗
44. Aretz H, Barlat F (2013) New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity. Int J Non-Linear Mech 51:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.12.00710.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.12.007 ↗
45. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2021) An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1 ↗
46. Dornheim J, Morand L, Zeitvogel S, Iraki T, Link N, Helm D (2022) Deep reinforcement learning methods for structure-guided processing path optimization. J Intell Manuf 33(1):333–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01805-z10.1007/s10845-021-01805-z ↗
47. Morand L, Link N, Iraki T, Dornheim J, Helm D (2022) Efficient exploration of microstructure-property spaces via active learning. Front Mater 8:824441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.82444110.3389/fmats.2021.824441 ↗
48. Lee EH, Liu DT (1967) Finite-strain elastic plastic theory with application to plane-wave analysis. J Appl Phys 38(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.170895310.1063/1.1708953 ↗
49. Roters F, Eisenlohr P, Bieler TR, Raabe D (2011) Crystal plasticity finite element methods: in materials science and engineering. Wiley10.1002/9783527631483 ↗
50. Rice JR (1971) Inelastic constitutive relations for solids: an internal-variable theory and its application to metal plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 19(6):433–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X ↗
51. Hutchinson JW, Hill R (1976) Bounds and self-consistent estimates for creep of polycrystalline materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 348(1652):101–127 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1976.002710.1098/rspa.1976.0027 ↗
52. Anand L (2004) Single-crystal elasto-viscoplasticity: application to texture evolution in polycrystalline metals at large strains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(48):5359–5383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.06810.1016/j.cma.2003.12.068 ↗