DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2023-03

Influence of tensile properties on hole expansion ratio investigated using a generative adversarial imputation network with explainable artificial intelligence

Jeong Ah Lee, Jaejung Park, Yeon Taek Choi, Rae Eon Kim, Jaimyun Jung, Seungchul Lee, Min Hong Seo, Hyoung Seop Kim

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 11
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Nakata T, Xu C, Binti Osman NAS, Geng L, Kamado S (2022) Development of corrosion-resistant Mg-Al-Ca-Mn-Zn alloy sheet with good tensile properties and stretch formability. J Alloys Compd 910:164752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16475210.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164752 ↗
2. Rouxel B, Cayron C, Bornand J, Sanders P, Loge RE (2022) Micro-addition of Fe in highly alloyed Cu-Ti alloys to improve both formability and strength. Mater Des 213:110340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11034010.1016/j.matdes.2021.110340 ↗
3. Xie Y, Wu Y, Jalali A, Zhou H, Khadimallah MA (2022) Effects of thickness reduction in cold rolling process on the formability of sheet metals using ANFIS. Sci Rep 12:10434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13694-010.1038/s41598-022-13694-0 ↗
4. Kim HY, Lim HT, Kim HJ, Lee DJ (2007) The effect of prebending on the formability in the tube hydroforming process of an aluminum rear subframe. Met Mater Int 13(2):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0302755710.1007/BF03027557 ↗
5. Yumi C, Jinwoo L, Hyuk Jong B, Myoung-Gyu L (2023) Hole expansion characteristics of W-Tempered 7075 aluminum alloy sheet in comparison with peak aged T6 tempered alloy sheet. Met Mater Int 29(1):157–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-022-01201-z10.1007/s12540-022-01201-z ↗
6. Prasad K, Ebrahim AS, Krishnaswamy H, Chakkingal U, Banerjee DK (2021) Evaluation of hole expansion formability of high strength AA7075 alloy under varying temper conditions. CIRP-JMST 32:154–169. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1238/1/01203810.1088/1757-899X/1238/1/012038 ↗
7. Anonymous(2009) ISO 16630—Metallic materials—Method of hole expanding test. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Genf
8. Paul SK (2020) A critical review on hole expansion ratio. Materialia 9:100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10056610.1016/j.mtla.2019.100566 ↗
9. Choi Y, Lee J, Bong HJ, Lee MG (2022) Hole expansion characteristics of W-Tempered 7075 aluminum alloy sheet in comparison with peak aged T6 tempered alloy sheet. Met Mater Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-022-01201-z10.1007/s12540-022-01201-z ↗
10. Sadagopan S, Urban D, Wong CK, Huang M, Yan B (2023) Formability characterization of a new generation of high strength steel, DOE report no. 0012
11. Celik F, Colak AB, Yildiz O, Bozkir SM (2022) An experimental investigation on workability and bleeding features. J Mater 119:63–76. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173594910.14359/51735949 ↗
12. Celik F, Yildiz O, Colak AB, Bozkir SM (2022) Analysing of nano-silica usage with fly ash for grouts with artificial neural network models. Adv Cem Res. https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.21.0018010.1680/jadcr.21.00180 ↗
13. Colak AB, Yildiz O, Celik F, Bozkir SM (2022) Developing prediction model on workability parameters of ultrasonicated nano silica (n-SiO ) and fly ash added cement-based grouts by using artificial neural networks. Adv Civ Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1520/ACEM2021012410.1520/ACEM20210124 ↗
14. Celik F, Colak AB, Yildiz O, Bozkir SM (2022) An experimental investigation of the effects of fly ash and nano titanium dioxide (n-TiO2) usage as viscosity modifying agents (VMAs) in cement-based grouts on rheological parameters. J Cem -based Compos 1:5624. https://doi.org/10.36937/cebacom.2022.562410.36937/cebacom.2022.5624 ↗
15. Celik F, Yildiz O, Colak AB, Bozkir SM (2022) An experimental investigation on workability and bleeding behaviors of cement pastes doped with nano titanium oxide (n-TiO2) nanoparticles and fly ash. Fluid Dyn Mater Process 19:135–158. https://doi.org/10.32604/fdmp.2022.02101410.32604/fdmp.2022.021014 ↗
16. Lee JA, Sagong MJ, Jung J, Kim ES, Kim HS (2023) Explainable machine learning for understanding and predicting geometry and defect types in Fe-Ni alloys fabricated by laser metal deposition additive manufacturing. J Mater Res Technol 22:413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.13710.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.137 ↗
17. Tang Y, Wang Y, Wu D, Liu Z, Zhang H, Zhu M, Chen Z, Sun J, Wang X (2022) An experimental investigation and machine learning-based prediction for seismic performance of steel tubular column filled with recycled aggregate concrete. Rev Adv Mater Sci 61:849–872. https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2022-027410.1515/rams-2022-0274 ↗
18. Feng W, Wang Y, Sun J, Tang Y, Wu D, Jiang Z, Wang J, Wang X (2022) Prediction of thermo-mechanical properties of rubber-modified recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 318:125970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12597010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125970 ↗
19. Tang Y, Huang Z, Chen Z, Chen M, Zhou H, Zhang H, Sun J (2023) Novel visual crack width measurement based on backbone double-scale features for improved detection automation. Eng Struct 274:115158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11515810.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115158 ↗
20. Que Y, Dai Y, Ji X, Leung AK, Chen Z, Jiang Z (2023) Automatic classification of asphalt pavement cracks using a novel integrated generative adversarial networks and improved VGG model. Eng Struct 277:115406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11540610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115406 ↗
21. Li W, Vittorietti M, Jongbloed G, Sietsma J (2021) Microstructure-property relation and machine learning prediction of hole expansion capacity of high-strength steels. J Mater Sci 56:19228–19243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06496-810.1007/s10853-021-06496-8 ↗
22. Shuai C (2016) Feasibility of estimation programs for hole expansion test on sheet steel, Dissertation. Tampere university, Tampere
23. Yoon J, Jordon J, Schaar M (2018) GAIN: missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets, PMLR, vol 80, pp 5689–5698
24. Jager S, Allhorn A, Biebmann F (2021) A benchmark for data imputation methods. Front Big Data 4:693674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.69367410.3389/fdata.2021.693674 ↗
25. Yan X, Lee S, Li N (2009) Missing data handling methods in medical device clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 19:1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/1054340090324300910.1080/10543400903243009 ↗
26. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR (2009) Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research:potential and pitfalls. BMJ 338:157–160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj/b239310.1136/bmj/b2393 ↗
27. Huang SF, Cheng CH (2020) A safe-region imputation method for handling medical data with missing values. Symmetry 12:1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym1211179210.3390/sym12111792 ↗
28. Hu W, Wang T, Chu F (2022) Fault feature recovery with Wasserstein generative adversarial imputation network with gradient penalty for rotating machine health monitoring under signal loss condition. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 71:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.316889810.1109/TIM.2022.3168898 ↗
29. Hussein D, Jain A, Bhat G (2022) Robust human activity recognition using Generative Adversarial Imputation Networks.In: Design, automation & test in Europe conference & exhibition (DATE): 84–87. https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE54114.2022.977454810.23919/DATE54114.2022.9774548 ↗
30. Chen L, Kim J, Kim SK, Chin KG, De Cooman BC (2010) On the stretch-flangeability of high Mn TWIP steels. Mater Sci Forum 654–656:278–281. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.27810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.278 ↗
31. Kim JH, Kwon YJ, Lee T, Lee K, Kim HS, Lee CS (2018) Prediction of hole expansion ratio for various steel sheets based on uniaxial tensile properties. Met Mater Int 24:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-017-7288-210.1007/s12540-017-7288-2 ↗
32. Chung K, Ma N, Park T, Kim D, Yoo D, Kim C (2011) A modified damage model for advanced high strength steel sheets. Int J Plast 27:1485–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.007 ↗
33. Yoon JI, Jung J, Joo SH, Song TJ, Chin KG, Seo MH, Kim SJ, Lee S, Kim HS (2016) Correlation between fracture toughness and stretch-flangeability of advanced high strength steels. Mater Lett 180:322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.14510.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.145 ↗
34. Yoon JI, Jung J, Kim JG, Sohn SS, Lee S, Kim HS (2017) Key factors of stretch-flangeability of sheet materials. J Mater Sci 52:7808–7823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1012-y10.1007/s10853-017-1012-y ↗
35. Casellas D, Lara A, Frometa D, Gutierrez D, Molas S, Perez L, Rehrl J, Suppan C (2017) Fracture toughness to understand stretch-flangeability and edge cracking resistance in AHSS. Metall Mater Trans A 48:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3815-x10.1007/s11661-016-3815-x ↗
36. Pathak N, Butcher C, Worswick M, Gao J (2013) Characterizing the stretch-flangeability of hot rolled multiphase steels. AIP Conf Proc 1567:603. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.485004610.1063/1.4850046 ↗
37. Kim JH, Lee T, Lee CS (2020) Microstructural influence on stretch flangeability of Ferrite–Martensite dual-phase steels. Curr Comput-Aided Drug Des 10:1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1011102210.3390/cryst10111022 ↗
38. Park J, Won C, Lee HJ, Yoon J (2022) Integrated machine vision system for evaluating hole expansion ratio of advanced high-strength steels. Materials 15:553. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1502055310.3390/ma15020553 ↗
39. Nallasivam V, Misra S (2016) Effect of microstructure on the hole expansion properties of advanced high-strength steels In: Conference: iron and steel technology conference proceedings, AIST vol 10, pp 2703–2709. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5157.528410.13140/RG.2.1.5157.5284 ↗
40. Chen X, Jiang H, Cui Z, Lian C, Lu C (2014) Hole expansion characteristics of ultra high strength steels. Procedia Eng 81:718–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.06610.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.066 ↗
41. Barnwal VK, Lee SY, Yoon SY, Kim JH, Barlat F (2020) Fracture characteristics of advanced high strength steels during hole expansion test. Int J Fract 224:217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00458-y10.1007/s10704-020-00458-y ↗
42. Xu X, Xu BY, Chen P, Liu RD, Wang GD, Yi HL (2020) Effect of austenite stability on the hole expansion behavior of δ-TRIP steels. Mater Today Commun 24:101034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10103410.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101034 ↗
43. Park BC, Bae KU, Gu SM, Jang SH, Hong SH, Kim YS (2010) A study of automobile product design using hole expansion testing of high strength steels. Trans Mater Process 19:337–343. https://doi.org/10.5228/KSTP.2010.19.6.33710.5228/KSTP.2010.19.6.337 ↗
44. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011) Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statist Med 30:377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.406710.1002/sim.4067 ↗
45. Stekhoven DJ, Buhlmann P (2012) MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr59710.1093/bioinformatics/btr597 ↗
46. Kim M, Park S, Lee J, Joo Y, Choi JK (2017) Learning-based adaptive imputation method with kNN algorithm for missing power data. Energies 10:1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1010166810.3390/en10101668 ↗
47. Hu W, Hu W, Maybank S (2008) Adaboost-based algorithm for network intrusion detection. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 38:577–583. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2007.91469510.1109/TSMCB.2007.914695 ↗
48. Cutler A, Cutler DR, Stevens JR (2012) Random forests: ensemble machine learning. Springer, New York, pp 157–17510.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5 ↗
49. Aggarwal A, Mittal M, Battineni G (2021) Generative adversarial Network: an overview of theory and applications. IJIM 1:100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2020.10000410.1016/j.jjimei.2020.100004 ↗
50. Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006) Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn 63:3–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-110.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
51. scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, https://scikit-learn.org/, Accessed 31st Jan 2022
52. Lundberg SM, Lee SI (2017) Consistent feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv preprent arXiv:1706.06060. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.0606010.48550/arXiv.1706.06060 ↗
53. Liu W, Lian J, Aravas N, Munstermann S (2020) A strategy for synthetic microstructure generation and crystal plasticity parameter calibration of fine-grain-structured dual-phase steel. Int J Plast 126:102614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10.002 ↗
54. Wang Y, Xu Y, Wang X, Zhang J, Peng F, Gu X, Wang U, Zhao W (2022) Improving the stretch flangeability of ultra-high strength TRIP-assisted steels by introducing banded structure. Mater Sci Eng 852:143722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14372210.1016/j.msea.2022.143722 ↗
55. Ryoo DY, Kang N, Kang CY (2011) Effect of Ni content on the tensile properties and strain-induced martensite transformation for 304 stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng 528:2277–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.02210.1016/j.msea.2010.12.022 ↗
56. Fang S, Zheng X, Zheng G, Zhang B, Guo B, Yang L (2021) A new and direct R-value measurement method of sheet metal based on multi-camera DIC system. Metals 11:1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1109140110.3390/met11091401 ↗
57. Xia J, Won C, Kim H, Lee W, Yoon J (2022) Artificial neural networks for predicting plastic anisotropy of sheet metals based on indentation test. Metals 15:1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/mal1505171410.3390/mal15051714 ↗
58. Das B, Singh A, Arora KS, Shome M, Paul SK (2019) Influence of pre-straining path on high cycle fatigue performance of DP 600 steel. Int J Fatigue 126:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.017 ↗
59. Wang NM, Wenner ML (1974) An analytical and experimental study of stretch flanging. Int J Mech Sci 16:135–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(74)90082-410.1016/0020-7403(74)90082-4 ↗
60. Wang CT, Kinzel G, Altan T (1994) Wrinkling criterion for an anisoropic shell with compound curvatures in sheet forming. Int J Mech Sci 36:945–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(94)90056-610.1016/0020-7403(94)90056-6 ↗
61. Paul SK (2014) Non-linear correlation between uniaxial tensile properties and shear-edge hole expansion ratio. J Mater Eng Perform 23:3610–3619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1161-y10.1007/s11665-014-1161-y ↗
62. Chen L, Kim JK, Kim SK, Kim GS, Chin KG, De Cooman BC (2010) Stretch-flangeability of high Mn TWIP steel. Steel Res Int 81:552–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20100004410.1002/srin.201000044 ↗
63. Lee JY, Lee KJ, Lee MG, Kuwabara T, Barlat F (2019) Numerical modeling for accurate prediction of strain localization in hole expansion of a steel sheet. Int J of Solids Struct 156–157:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.005 ↗
64. Karelova A, Krempaszky C, Werner E, Tsipouridis P, Hebesberger T, Pichler A (2009) Hole expansion of dual-phase and complex-phase AHS steels. Steel Res Int 80:71–77. https://doi.org/10.2374/SRI08SP11010.2374/SRI08SP110 ↗
65. Paul SK, Mukherjee M, Kundu S, Chandra S (2014) Prediction of hole expansion ratio for automotive grade steels. Comput Mater Sci 89:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.04010.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.040 ↗
66. Yoon JI, Hung J, Lee HH, Kim GS, Kim HS (2016) Factors governing hole expansion ratio of steel sheets with smooth sheared edge. Met Mater Int 22:1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-016-6346-510.1007/s12540-016-6346-5 ↗