Hydrogen embrittlement studies of hot-stamped boron steel with different prior austenite grain sizes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Miller WS, Zhuang L, Bottema J et al (2000) Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry. Mater Sci Eng A 280:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X ↗
2. Ma M, Li K, Si Y et al (2023) Hydrogen embrittlement of advanced high-strength steel for automobile application: a review. Acta Metall Sin-Engl 36:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-022-01517-010.1007/s40195-022-01517-0 ↗
3. Barrera O, Bombac D, Chen Y et al (2018) Understanding and mitigating hydrogen embrittlement of steels: a review of experimental, modelling and design progress from atomistic to continuum. J Mater Sci Technol 53:6251–6290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1978-510.1007/s10853-017-1978-5 ↗
4. Pichler S, Bendo A, Mori G, Safyari M, Moshtaghi M (2023) Inhibition of grain growth by pearlite improves hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of the ultra-low carbon ferritic steel: the influence of H-assisted crack initiation and propagation mechanisms. J Mater Sci 58:13460–13475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08856-y10.1007/s10853-023-08856-y ↗
5. Liu Y, Chen Y, Yang C, Han X (2022) Study on hydrogen embrittlement and reversibility of hot-stamped aluminized 22MnB5 steel. Mater Sci Eng A 848:143411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14341110.1016/j.msea.2022.143411 ↗
6. Jo KR, Cho L, Sulistiyo DH, Seo EJ, Kim SW, De Cooman BC (2019) Effects of Al–Si coating and Zn coating on the hydrogen uptake and embrittlement of ultra-high strength press-hardened steel. Surf Coat Technol 374:1108–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.04710.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.047 ↗
7. Sun Y, Frank Cheng Y (2022) Hydrogen-induced degradation of high-strength steel pipeline welds: a critical review. Eng Fail Anal 133:105985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10598510.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105985 ↗
8. Silverstein R, Eliezer D, Tal-Gutelmacher E (2018) Hydrogen trapping in alloys studied by thermal desorption spectrometry. J Alloys Compd 747:511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.06610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.066 ↗
9. Yoo J, Jo MC, Jo MC et al (2021) Effects of solid solution and grain-boundary segregation of Mo on hydrogen embrittlement in 32MnB5 hot-stamping steels. Acta Mater 207:116661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11666110.1016/j.actamat.2021.116661 ↗
10. Venezuela J, Zhou Q, Liu Q et al (2018) The influence of microstructure on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of martensitic advanced high strength steels. Mater Today Commun 17:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.07.01110.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.07.011 ↗
11. Drexler A, Helic B, Silvayeh Z, Mraczek K, Sommitsch C, Domitner J (2022) The role of hydrogen diffusion, trapping and desorption in dual phase steels. J Mater Sci 57:4789–4805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06830-010.1007/s10853-021-06830-0 ↗
12. Kim H (2020) Effects of prior austenite grain size on hydrogen delayed fracture of hot-stamped boron martensitic steel. Metall Mater Trans A 51:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05523-310.1007/s11661-019-05523-3 ↗
13. Masoumi M, Santos LPM, Bastos IN, Tavares SSM, da Silva MJG, de Abreu HFG (2016) Texture and grain boundary study in high strength Fe–18Ni–Co steel related to hydrogen embrittlement. Mater Des 91:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.09310.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.093 ↗
14. Latypova R, Seppälä O, Tun Nyo T et al (2023) Influence of prior austenite grain structure on hydrogen-induced fracture in as-quenched martensitic steels. Eng Fract Mech 281:109090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10909010.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109090 ↗
15. Wang Z, Wan Z, Zhou Y et al (2022) Investigation for enhancing the resistance of H-induced delayed cracking for martensitic steel by quenching tempering and quenching partitioning: Influence of microstructure on hydrogen embrittlement and cracking behavior. Int J Hydrog Energy 47:27250–27265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.05910.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.059 ↗
16. Liu Y, Chen Y, Yang C, Lian J, Feng Y, Han X (2022) The effect of charging conditions on hydrogen embrittlement behavior of ultra-high-strength steel 22MnB5. Mater Charact 194:112377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11237710.1016/j.matchar.2022.112377 ↗
17. Morito S, Huang X, Furuhara T, Maki T, Hansen N (2006) The morphology and crystallography of lath martensite in alloy steels. Acta Mater 54:5323–5331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.00910.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.009 ↗
18. Kennett SC, Krauss G, Findley KO (2015) Prior austenite grain size and tempering effects on the dislocation density of low-C Nb–Ti microalloyed lath martensite. Scr Mater 107:123–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.05.03610.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.05.036 ↗
19. Yang J, Huang F, Guo Z, Rong Y, Chen N (2016) Effect of retained austenite on the hydrogen embrittlement of a medium carbon quenching and partitioning steel with refined microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A 665:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.02510.1016/j.msea.2016.04.025 ↗
20. Martin ML, Fenske JA, Liu GS, Sofronis P, Robertson IM (2011) On the formation and nature of quasi-cleavage fracture surfaces in hydrogen embrittled steels. Acta Mater 59:1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.02410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.024 ↗
21. Merson E, Kudrya AV, Trachenko VA, Merson D, Danilov V, Vinogradov A (2016) Quantitative characterization of cleavage and hydrogen-assisted quasi-cleavage fracture surfaces with the use of confocal laser scanning microscopy. Mater Sci Eng A 665:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.02310.1016/j.msea.2016.04.023 ↗
22. Kan B, Yang ZX, Wang Z et al (2017) Hydrogen redistribution under stress-induced diffusion and corresponding fracture behaviour of a structural steel. Mater Sci Technol 33:1539–1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2017.132556210.1080/02670836.2017.1325562 ↗
23. Djukic MB, Bakic GM, Sijacki Zeravcic V, Sedmak A, Rajicic B (2019) The synergistic action and interplay of hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms in steels and iron: localized plasticity and decohesion. Eng Fract Mech 216:106528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10652810.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106528 ↗
24. Wang T, Fang X, Lv W et al (2022) Effect of hydrogen on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of annealed 430 ferritic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 832:142491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14249110.1016/j.msea.2021.142491 ↗
25. Nagao A, Smith CD, Dadfarnia M, Sofronis P, Robertson IM (2012) The role of hydrogen in hydrogen embrittlement fracture of lath martensitic steel. Acta Mater 60:5182–5189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.04010.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.040 ↗
26. Iwaoka H, Arita M, Horita Z (2016) Hydrogen diffusion in ultrafine-grained palladium: roles of dislocations and grain boundaries. Acta Mater 107:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.06910.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.069 ↗
27. Mine Y, Tachibana K, Horita Z (2011) Grain-boundary diffusion and precipitate trapping of hydrogen in ultrafine-grained austenitic stainless steels processed by high-pressure torsion. Mater Sci Eng A 528:8100–8105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.03110.1016/j.msea.2011.07.031 ↗
28. Oudriss A, Creus J, Bouhattate J et al (2012) Grain size and grain-boundary effects on diffusion and trapping of hydrogen in pure nickel. Acta Mater 60:6814–6828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.004 ↗
29. Zan N, Ding H, Guo X, Tang Z, Bleck W (2015) Effects of grain size on hydrogen embrittlement in a Fe-22Mn-0.6C TWIP steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:10687–10696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.11210.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.112 ↗
30. Momotani Y, Shibata A, Terada D, Tsuji N (2017) Effect of strain rate on hydrogen embrittlement in low-carbon martensitic steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:3371–3379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.18810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.188 ↗
31. Teus SM, Mazanko VF, Olive JM, Gavriljuk VG (2014) Grain boundary migration of substitutional and interstitial atoms in α-iron. Acta Mater 69:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.04910.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.049 ↗
32. Das T, Chakrabarty R, Song J, Yue S (2022) Understanding microstructural influences on hydrogen diffusion characteristics in martensitic steels using finite element analysis (FEA). Int J Hydrog Energy 47:1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.04810.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.048 ↗
33. Nagao A, Dadfarnia M, Somerday BP, Sofronis P, Ritchie RO (2018) Hydrogen-enhanced-plasticity mediated decohesion for hydrogen-induced intergranular and “quasi-cleavage” fracture of lath martensitic steels. J Mech Phys Solids 112:403–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.12.01610.1016/j.jmps.2017.12.016 ↗
34. Cheng X, Wang L, Li X (2022) Effect of tempering temperature and hydrogen on deformation during tensile tests in a V-added high strength low alloy steel. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14292010.1016/j.msea.2022.142920 ↗
35. Takaki S, Ngo-huynh K-L, Nakada N, Tsuchiyama T (2012) Strengthening mechanism in ultra low carbon martensitic steel. ISIJ Int 52:710–716. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.71010.2355/isijinternational.52.710 ↗
36. Takasawa K, Ikeda R, Ishikawa N, Ishigaki R (2012) Effects of grain size and dislocation density on the susceptibility to high-pressure hydrogen environment embrittlement of high-strength low-alloy steels. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:2669–2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.09910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.099 ↗
37. Zhao Y, Park J-M, Lee D-H et al (2019) Influences of hydrogen charging method on the hydrogen distribution and nanomechanical properties of face-centered cubic high-entropy alloy: a comparative study. Scr Mater 168:76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.04.02510.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.04.025 ↗
38. Momotani Y, Shibata A, Yonemura T, Bai Y, Tsuji N (2020) Effect of initial dislocation density on hydrogen accumulation behavior in martensitic steel. Scr Mater 178:318–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.11.05110.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.11.051 ↗
39. Nazarov R, Hickel T, Neugebauer J (2010) First-principles study of the thermodynamics of hydrogen-vacancy interaction in fcc iron. Phys Rev B 82:224104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.82.224104 ↗