journal article·2023-12Open access

Biodegradation of N-fertilizer loaded on cellulose nanofibres to assess their potential use as a controlled-release fertilizer

Neha Sharma, Mandira Kochar, Benjamin James Allardyce, Rangam Rajkhowa, Ruchi Agrawal

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 47

Abstract

Cellulose nanofibres (CNF) have emerged as advanced systems for controlled, smart delivery of N-fertilizer owing to their surface modification properties. However, to realize the true potential of this nanomaterial, its biodegradation analysis would be crucial to understanding its impact and fate when exposed to the environment. In this study, the main focus was to investigate the effect of N-fertilizer loaded CNF (electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged COO– group on CNF and the positively charged ammonium ion) on the microflora of the soil. The per cent weight loss of unloaded CNF and N-fertilizer loaded CNF in the soil indicated 54–62% decay within 36 days. The morphological changes during biodegradation, as estimated through SEM, indicated the formation of micro-cracks on the fibres. The cracks facilitate the colonization of microbes for their metabolic activities. Contrary to the unloaded CNF, the N-fertilizer loaded CNF was found to support microbial growth when subjected to burial in the soil, which is indicative of the ammonium chloride serving as the nitrogen supplement for the microflora. The content of available nitrogen remained constant in the case of the soil with the unloaded CNF (0.014%), whereas a slight variation was observed in the soil with the N-fertilizer loaded CNF (0.6%), which therefore indicates the controlled release of nitrogen after 36 days. Thus, this study is the first of its kind where the degradation of unloaded and N-fertilizer loaded CNF and their environmental impact have been investigated.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Hamid SBA, Zain SK, Das R, Centi G (2016) Synergic effect of tungstophosphoric acid and sonication for rapid synthesis of crystalline nanocellulose. Carbohydr Polym 138:349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.023 ↗
2. Phanthong P, Karnjanakom S, Reubroycharoen P, Hao X, Abudula A, Guan G (2017) A facile one-step way for extraction of nanocellulose with high yield by ball milling with ionic liquid. Cellulose 24(5):2083–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1238-510.1007/s10570-017-1238-5 ↗
3. Ummartyotin S, Manuspiya H (2015) A critical review on cellulose: from fundamental to an pproach on sensor technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:402–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.08.05010.1016/J.RSER.2014.08.050 ↗
4. Mohammed N, Grishkewich N, Tam KC (2018) Cellulose nanomaterials: promising sustainable nanomaterials for application in water/wastewater treatment processes. Environ Sci Nano 5(3):623–658. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EN01029J10.1039/C7EN01029J ↗
5. Phanthong P, Reubroycharoen P, Hao X, Xu G, Abudula A, Guan G (2018) Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Conv 1(1):32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.00410.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004 ↗
6. Nasseri R, Deutschman CP, Han L, Pope MA, Tam KC (2020) Cellulose nanocrystals in smart and stimuli-responsive materials: a review. Mater Today Adv 5:100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.10005510.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100055 ↗
7. Brun V, Hansen F, Turpin D, Bennett K (2016) Cellulose nanomaterials research roadmap. Agenda 2020 Technology Alliance.
8. Filer J, Ding HH, Chang S (2019) Biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay method for anaerobic digestion research. Water 11(5):921. https://doi.org/10.3390/w1105092110.3390/w11050921 ↗
9. Singh G, Chandoha-Lee C, Zhang W, Renneckar S, Vikesland PJ, Pruden A (2016) Biodegradation of nanocrystalline cellulose by two environmentally-relevant consortia. Water Res 104:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.07310.1016/j.watres.2016.07.073 ↗
10. Puls J, Wilson SA, Holter D (2011) Degradation of cellulose acetate-based materials: a review. J Polym Environ 19(1):152–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0258-010.1007/s10924-010-0258-0 ↗
11. Frank BP, Durkin DP, Caudill ER, Zhu L, White DH, Curry ML, Pedersen JA, Fairbrother DH (2018) Impact of silanization on the structure, dispersion properties, and biodegradability of nanocellulose as a nanocomposite filler. ACS Applied Nano Mater 1(12):7025–7038. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0181910.1021/acsanm.8b01819 ↗
12. Abushammala H, Mao J (2019) A review of the surface modification of cellulose and nanocellulose using aliphatic and aromatic mono- and di-isocyanates. Molecules 24(15):2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2415278210.3390/molecules24152782 ↗
13. Hayakawa C, Funakawa S, Fujii K, Kadono A, Kosaki T (2014) Effects of climatic and soil properties on cellulose decomposition rates in temperate and tropical forests. Biol Fertil Soils 50(4):633–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0885-410.1007/s00374-013-0885-4 ↗
14. Zumstein MT, Schintlmeister A, Nelson TF, Baumgartner R, Woebken D, Wagner M, Kohler HPE, McNeill K, Sander M (2018) Biodegradation of synthetic polymers in soils: tracking carbon into CO2 and microbial biomass. Sci Adv 4(7):9024–9024. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aas902410.1126/sciadv.aas9024 ↗
15. Li Z, Zhang M (2023) Progress in the preparation of stimulus-responsive cellulose hydrogels and their application in slow-release fertilizers. Polymers 15(17):3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1517364310.3390/polym15173643 ↗
16. Sharma N, Allardyce BJ, Rajkhowa R, Agrawal R (2023) Rice straw-derived cellulose: a comparative study of various pre-treatment technologies and its conversion to nanofibres. Sci Rep 13:16327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43535-710.1038/s41598-023-43535-7 ↗
17. Levanic J, Senk VP, Nadrah P, Poljansek I, Oven P, Haapala A (2020) Analyzing TEMPO-oxidized cellulose fiber morphology: new insights into optimization of the oxidation process and nanocellulose dispersion quality. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:17752–17762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0598910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05989 ↗
18. Sim K, Lee J, Lee H, Youn HJ (2015) Flocculation behaviorof cellulose nanofibrils under different salt conditionsand its impact on network strength and dewatering abil-ity. Cellulose 22:3689–3700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0784-y10.1007/s10570-015-0784-y ↗
19. Yuvaraj M, Subramanian KS (2017) Development of slow release Zn fertilizer using nano-zeolite as carrier. J Plant Nutr 41(3):311–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2017.138172910.1080/01904167.2017.1381729 ↗
20. Ponjavic M, Nikolic MS, Nikodinovic-Runic J, Jeremic S, Stevanovic S, Djonlagic J (2017) Degradation behaviour of PCL/PEO/PCL and PCL/PEO block copolymers under controlled hydrolytic, enzymatic and composting conditions. Polym Test 57:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.01810.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.018 ↗
21. Sharma N, Lavania M, Kukreti V, Rana DP, Lal B (2018) Laboratory investigation of indigenous consortia TERIJ-188 for incremental oil recovery. Front Microbiol 9:2357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.0235710.3389/fmicb.2018.02357 ↗
22. Julie CCS, George N, Narayanankutty SK (2016) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut husk fibre. Carbohyd Polym 142:158–16610.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.015 ↗
23. Lee J, Kim H-S, Jo HY, Kwon MJ (2021) Revisiting soil bacterial counting methods: optimal soil storage and pretreatment methods and comparison of culture-dependent and -independent methods. PLoS ONE 16:e0246142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.024614210.1371/journal.pone.0246142 ↗
24. Sharma N, Lavania M, Lal B (2020) Development and demonstration of membrane to control potential pathogen (Legionella sp.) associated with cooling towers. Front Environ Sci 8:198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.57090410.3389/fenvs.2020.570904 ↗
25. Revati P, Potdar Mandar M, Shirolkar Alok J, Verma Pravin S, More AK (2021) Determination of soil nutrients (NPK) using optical methods: a mini review. J Plant Nutr 44(12):1826–1839. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.188470210.1080/01904167.2021.1884702 ↗
26. Jonasson S, Bunder A, Niittyla T et al (2020) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from aspen wood using derivatizing and non-derivatizing pretreatments. Cellulose 27:185–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02754-w10.1007/s10570-019-02754-w ↗
27. Sharma N, Aallardyce B, Rajkhowa R, Agrawal R (2023) Controlled release fertilizer delivery system derived from rice straw cellulose nanofibres: a circular economy based solution for sustainable development. Bioengineered 14:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2023.224212410.1080/21655979.2023.2242124 ↗
28. He W, Jiang S, Zhang Q, Pan M (2013) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from Bambusa rigida. BioResources 8(4):5678–568910.15376/biores.8.4.5678-5689 ↗
29. Chaturbhuj K, Saurabh Asniza Mustapha M, Mohd Masri AF, Owolabi MI, Syakir Rudi Dungani MT, Paridah M, Jawaid HPS, Abdul K (2016) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from Gigantochloa scortechinii as a reinforcement material. J Nanomater 2016:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/402452710.1155/2016/4024527 ↗
30. Shakiba S, Astete C, Paudel S, Sabliov CM, Rodrigues DF, Louie SM (2020) Emerging investigator series: polymeric nanocarriers for agricultural applications: synthesis, characterization, and environmental and biological interactions. Environ Sci Nano 7:37–67. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9en01127g10.1039/c9en01127g ↗
31. Yaacob ND, Ismail H, Sung Ting S (2016) Soil burial of polylactic acid/paddy straw powder biocomposite. Bio Resour 11:1255–1269. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.1255-126910.15376/biores.11.1.1255-1269 ↗
32. Sular V, Devrim G (2019) Biodegradation behaviour of different textile fibres: visual, morphological, structural properties and soil analyses. Fibres Text East Eur 27:100–111. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.775110.5604/01.3001.0012.7751 ↗
33. Smith S, Ozturk M, Frey M (2021) Soil biodegradation of cotton fabrics treated with common finishes. Cellulose 28:4485–4494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03666-w10.1007/s10570-020-03666-w ↗
34. Lazic V, Radoicic M, Saponjic Z, Radetic T, Vodnik V, Nikolic S, Dimitrijevic S, Radetic M (2015) Negative influence of Ag and TiO2 nanoparticles on biodegradation of cotton fabrics. Cellulose 22:1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0549-710.1007/s10570-015-0549-7 ↗
35. Arshad K, Skrifvars M, Vivod V, Volmajer Valh J, Voncina B (2014) Biodegradation of natural textile materials in soil. Tekstilec 57:118–132. https://doi.org/10.14502/Tekstilec2014.57.118-13210.14502/Tekstilec2014.57.118-132 ↗
36. Bras A, Rozman T, Gramc K, Tomsic B, Gorjanc M, Kert M, Simoncic B (2017) Influence of the nanotechnological process of chemical modification on the antimicrobial activity and biodegradability of textile fibers. Tekstilec 60:14–24. https://doi.org/10.14502/Tekstilec2017.60.14-2410.14502/Tekstilec2017.60.14-24 ↗
37. Tomsic B, Markovic D, Jankovic V, Simoncic B, Nikodinovic-Runic J, Ilic-Tomic T, Radetic M (2022) Biodegradation of cellulose fibres functionalized with CuO/Cu2O nanoparticles in combination with polycarboxylic acids. Cellulose 29:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04296-610.1007/s10570-021-04296-6 ↗
38. Lamb JA, Fernandez FG, Kaiser DE (2014) Understanding Nitrogen in Soils. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, pp 1–5
39. Bottomley P, Taylor AE, Myrold DD (2012) A Consideration of the relative contributions of different microbial subpopulations to the soil N cycle. Front Microbiol 3:373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.0037310.3389/fmicb.2012.00373 ↗
40. Sainju UM, Allen BL, Caesar-TonThat T, Lenssen AW (2015) Dryland soil chemical properties and crop yields affected by long-term tillage and cropping sequence. Springerplus 4:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1122-410.1186/s40064-015-1122-4 ↗
41. Mirzakhaninafchi H, Mani Mishra I, Mirzakhani Nafchi A (2017) Study on soil nitrogen and electrical conductivity relationship for site-specific nitrogen application. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Washington. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.20170089210.13031/aim.201700892 ↗
42. Salem MA, Bedade DK, Al-Ethawi L, Al-waleed Samira M (2020) Assessment of physiochemical properties and concentration of heavy metals in agricultural soils fertilized with chemical fertilizers. Heliyon 6(10):e0522410.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05224 ↗