Unravelling densification during sintering by multiscale modelling of grain motion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The resulting microstructure after the sintering process determines many materials properties of interest. In order to understand the microstructural evolution, simulations are often employed. One such simulation method is the phase-field method, which has garnered much interest in recent decades. However, the method lacks a complete model for sintering, as previous works could show unphysical effects and the inability to reach representative volume elements. Thus the present paper aims to close this gap by employing molecular dynamics and determining rules of motion which can be translated to a phase-field model. The key realization is that vacancy absorption induced motion of grains travels through a grain structure without resistance. Hence the total displacement field of a green body is simply the superposition of all grains reacting in isolation to local vacancy absorption events. The resulting phase-field model is shown to be representative starting from particle counts between 97 and 262 and contains the qualitative correct dependence of sintering rate on particle size.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Cardona Cristina G, Tikare V, Plimpton SJ (2011) Parallel simulation of 3D sintering. Int J Comput Mater Sci Surf Eng 4(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCMSSE.2011.037351http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=3735110.1504/IJCMSSE.2011.037351 ↗
2. Zhang Y, Xiao X, Zhang J (2019) Kinetic monte carlo simulation of sintering behavior of additively manufactured stainless steel powder particles using reconstructed microstructures from synchrotron x-ray microtomography. Res Phys 13:102336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102336. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221137971931290210.1016/j.rinp.2019.102336 ↗
3. Wang YU (2006) Computer modeling and simulation of solid-state sintering: a phase field approach. Acta Materialia 54(4):953–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.03210.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.032 ↗
4. Biswas S, Schwen D, Singh J, Tomar V (2016) A study of the evolution of microstructure and consolidation kinetics during sintering using a phase field modeling based approach. Extr Mech Lett, 7:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.017. URL http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235243161630043810.1016/j.eml.2016.02.017 ↗
5. Hötzer J, Seiz M, Kellner M, Rheinheimer W, Nestler B (2019) Phase-field simulation of solid state sintering. Acta Materialia 164:184–195. ISSN 1359-6454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.021. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135964541830813910.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.021 ↗
6. Greenquist I, Tonks MR, Aagesen LK, Zhang Y (2020) Development of a microstructural grand potential-based sintering model. Comput Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10928810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109288 ↗
7. Seiz M, Hierl H, Nestler B (2023) An improved grand-potential phase-field model of solid-state sintering for many particles. Modell Simulat Mater Sci Eng, 31(5):055006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/acd56d. URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-651X/acd56d10.1088/1361-651X/acd56d ↗
8. Hawa T, Zachariah MR (2007) Development of a phenomenological scaling law for fractal aggregate sintering from molecular dynamics simulation. J Aerosol Sci 38:793–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.05.00810.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.05.008 ↗
9. Hawa T, Zachariah M R (2007) Molecular dynamics simulation and continuum modeling of straight-chain aggregate sintering: Development of a phenomenological scaling law. Phys Rev B - Condens Matt Mater Phy10.1103/PhysRevB.76.054109 ↗
10. Bingqing C, Ngan Alfonso HW (2013) The sintering and densification behaviour of many copper nanoparticles:a molecular dynamics study. Computat Mater Sci 74:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.01410.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.014 ↗
11. Ding L, Davidchack RL, Pan J (2009) A molecular dynamics study of sintering between nanoparticles. Computat Mater Sci 45(2):247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.02110.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.021 ↗
12. Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R, Bolintineanu DS, Brown WM, Crozier PS, in’t Veld PJ, Kohlmeyer A, Moore SG, Nguyen TD, Shan R (2022) LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic , meso, and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
13. Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS (1986) Embedded-atom-method functions for the FCC metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 33:7983–7991. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
14. Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
15. Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: a 2d graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.5510.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
16. Larsen PM, Schmidt Søren, Schiøtz J (2016) Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 24(5):055007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/05500710.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007 ↗
17. DeHoff RT (1984) A cell model for microstructural evolution during sintering. In: Materials science research, pp. 23–34. Plenum Press, New York10.1007/978-1-4613-2761-5_2 ↗
18. DeHoff RT (1989) Stereological theory of sintering. In: Science of sintering, Spinger, Berlin10.1007/978-1-4899-0933-6_3 ↗
19. Lawson A, Ledbetter H (2011) Coupled temperature dependences of volume and compressibility. Philosoph Magaz 91:1425–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2010.53770210.1080/14786435.2010.537702 ↗
20. Hötzer J, Reiter A, Hierl H, Steinmetz P, Selzer M, Nestler B (2018) The parallel multi-physics phase-field framework pace3d. J Comput Sci, 26:1 – 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2018.02.011. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187775031731011610.1016/j.jocs.2018.02.011 ↗
21. Uberuaga BP, Vernon LJ, Martinez E, Voter AF (2015) The relationship between grain boundary structure, defect mobility, and grain boundary sink efficiency. Scient Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0909510.1038/srep09095 ↗
22. Marco S (2022) Effect of rigid body motion in phase-field models of solid-state sintering. Comput Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11175610.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111756 ↗
23. Boyd S (2010) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends® Mach Learn, 3(1):1–122. https://doi.org/10.1561/220000001610.1561/2200000016 ↗
24. Ji H, Li Y (2017) Block conjugate gradient algorithms for least squares problems. J Computat Appl Math, 317:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2016.11.031. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037704271630573810.1016/j.cam.2016.11.031 ↗
25. Paige CC, Saunders MA (1982) LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Trans Math Softw 8(1):43–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/355984.35598910.1145/355984.355989 ↗
26. Shi R, Wood M, Heo TW, Wood BC, Ye J (2021) Towards understanding particle rigid-body motion during solid-state sintering. J Eur Ceram Soci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.09.039. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095522192100682810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.09.039 ↗
27. Silversmith W (2022) Connected components on multilabel 3d images. https://pypi.org/project/connected-components-3d/
28. Tange O (2022) GNU Parallel is a general parallelizer to run multiple serial command line programs in parallel without changing them. Gnu parallel 1222 (’chatgpt’), URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7465517
29. Squillacote AH, Ahrens J, Law C, Geveci B, Moreland K, King B (2007) The paraview guide, volume 366. Kitware Clifton Park, NY
30. Coble R L (1961) Sintering crystalline solids. I. intermediate and final state diffusion models. J Appl Phys, 32(5):787–792. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1736107. URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/32/5/787-792/16331510.1063/1.1736107 ↗
31. German Randall M (February 2014) Coordination number changes during powder densification. Powd Technol, 253:368–376 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.12.006. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S003259101300771710.1016/j.powtec.2013.12.006 ↗