In situ forming aldehyde-modified xanthan/gelatin hydrogel for tissue engineering applications: synthesis, characterization, and optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim Y-M, Potta T, Park K-H, Song S-C (2017) Temperature responsive chemical crosslinkable UV pretreated hydrogel for application to injectable tissue regeneration system via differentiations of encapsulated hMSCs. Biomaterials 112:248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.025 ↗
2. Han YL, Yang Y, Liu S, Wu J, Chen Y, Lu TJ, Xu F (2013) Directed self-assembly of microscale hydrogels by electrostatic interaction. Biofabrication 5(3):035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/03500410.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035004 ↗
3. Wei Z, Yang JH, Liu ZQ, Xu F, Zhou JX, Zrínyi M, Osada Y, Chen YM (2015) Novel biocompatible polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogel. Adv Func Mater 25(9):1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140150210.1002/adfm.201401502 ↗
4. Zheng B-D, Ye J, Yang Y-C, Huang Y-Y, Xiao M-T (2022) Self-healing polysaccharide-based injectable hydrogels with antibacterial activity for wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 275:118770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11877010.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118770 ↗
5. Huang J, Deng Y, Ren J, Chen G, Wang G, Wang F, Wu X (2018) Novel in situ forming hydrogel based on xanthan and chitosan re-gelifying in liquids for local drug delivery. Carbohyd Polym 186:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.025 ↗
6. Khodadadi Yazdia M, Zarrintaj P, Khodadadi A et al (2021) Polysaccharide-based electroconductive hydrogels: Structure, properties and applications in biomedical engineering. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11899810.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118998 ↗
7. Mo C, Li X, Chen Y (2021) Advances in Injectable and Self-healing Polysaccharide Hydrogel Based on the Schiff Base Reaction. Macromol Rapid Commun 42(10):2100025. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20210002510.1002/marc.202100025 ↗
8. Hassler RA, Doherty DH (1990) Genetic engineering of polysaccharide structure: production of variants of xanthan gum in Xanthomonas campestris. Biotechnol Prog 6(3):182–187. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00003a00310.1021/bp00003a003 ↗
9. Kumar A, Rao KM, Han SS (2018) Application of xanthan gum as polysaccharide in tissue engineering: a review. Carbohyd Polym 180:128–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.009 ↗
10. Zhong L, Oostrom M, Truex MJ, Vermeu VR, Szecsody JE (2013) Rheological behavior of xanthan gum solution related to shear thinning fluid delivery for subsurface remediation. J Hazard Mater 244:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.02810.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.028 ↗
11. Petri DF (2015) Xanthan gum: a versatile biopolymer for biomedical and technological applications. J Appl Polym Sci 132(23):1548. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4203510.1002/app.42035 ↗
12. Guo J, Gea L, Li X, Mu C, Li D (2014) Periodate oxidation of xanthan gum and its crosslinking effects on gelatin-based edible films. Food Hydrocolloids 39:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.01.02610.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.01.026 ↗
13. Gomez CG, Rinaudo M, Villar MA (2007) Oxidation of sodium alginate and characterization of the oxidized derivatives. Carbohyd Polym 67(3):296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.025 ↗
14. Wei Z, Gerecht S (2018) A self-healing hydrogel as an injectable instructive carrier for cellular morphogenesis. Biomaterials 185:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.003 ↗
15. Ge L, Xu Y, Li X, Yuan L, Tan H, Li D, Mu C (2018) Fabrication of antibacterial collagen-based composite wound dressing. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(7):9153–9166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0148210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01482 ↗
16. Salazar G.M., Sanoh NC, and Penaloza DJP (2019) Synthesis and characterization of a novel polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogel. KIMIKA, 29(2), 44–48. Available from https://kimika.pfcs.org.ph/index.php/kimika/article/view/264
17. Zhao W, Jin X, Cong Y, Liu Y, Fu J (2013) Degradable natural polymer hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88(3):327–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.397010.1002/jctb.3970 ↗
18. Vahedi M, Barzin J, Shokrolahi F, Shorollahi P (2018) Self-healing, injectable gelatin hydrogels cross-linked by dynamic schiff base linkages support cell adhesion and sustained release of antibacterial drugs. Macromol Mater Eng 303(9):1800200. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20180020010.1002/mame.201800200 ↗
19. Das S, Dalei G (2023) In situ forming dialdehyde xanthan gum-gelatin Schiff-base hydrogels as potent controlled release fertilizers. Sci Total Environ 2023:162660–162716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16266010.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162660 ↗
20. Khorshidi S, Karkhaneh A, Bonakdar S, Omidian M (2020) High-strength functionalized pectin/fibroin hydrogel with tunable properties: a structure–property relationship study. J Appl Polym Sci 137(28):48859. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4885910.1002/app.48859 ↗
21. Yao Y, Wang P, Li X et al (2020) A di-self-crosslinking hyaluronan-based hydrogel combined with type I collagen to construct a biomimetic injectable cartilage-filling scaffold. Acta Biomater 111:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.00710.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.007 ↗
22. Han Y, Zeng Q, Li H, Chang J (2013) The calcium silicate/alginate composite: preparation and evaluation of its behavior as bioactive injectable hydrogels. Acta Biomater 9(11):9107–9117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.02210.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.022 ↗
23. Standardization., IOf (1992) ISO/EN 10993‐5: Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 5. Test for cytotoxicity: In Vitro Methods. 8.2. Tests on Extracts.
24. Zhang S, Huang D, Lin H, Xiao Y, Zhang X (2020) Cellulose nanocrystal reinforced collagen-based nanocomposite hydrogel with self-healing and stress-relaxation properties for cell delivery. Biomacromol 21(6):2400–2408. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0034510.1021/acs.biomac.0c00345 ↗
25. Basu S, Pacelli S, Paul A (2020) Self-healing DNA-based injectable hydrogels with reversible covalent linkages for controlled drug delivery. Acta Biomater 105:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.02110.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.021 ↗
26. Chena H, Cheng J, Ran L et al (2018) An injectable self-healing hydrogel with adhesive and antibacterial properties effectively promotes wound healing. Carbohyd Polym 201:522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.09010.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.090 ↗
27. Xu J, Liu Y, Hsu S-h (2019) Hydrogels based on Schiff base linkages for biomedical applications. Molecules 24(16):3005. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2416300510.3390/molecules24163005 ↗
28. Emami Z, Ehsani M, Zandi M, Foudazi R (2018) Controlling alginate oxidation conditions for making alginate-gelatin hydrogels. Carbohyd Polym 198:509–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.08010.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.080 ↗
29. Peivandi A, Jackson K, He L et al (2021) Inducing microscale structural order in phage nanofilament hydrogels with globular proteins. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0111210.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01112 ↗
30. Majchera MJ, Babar A, Lofts A et al (2021) In situ-gelling starch nanoparticle (SNP)/O-carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCh) nanoparticle network hydrogels for the intranasal delivery of an antipsychotic peptide. J Controll Release 330:738–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.05010.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.050 ↗
31. Khorshidi S, Karkhaneh A (2016) A self-crosslinking tri-component hydrogel based on functionalized polysaccharides and gelatin for tissue engineering applications. Mater Lett 164:468–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.04110.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.041 ↗
32. Qian L (2018) Cellulose-based composite hydrogels: preparation, structures, and applications, in Cellulose-Based Hydrogels. Springer International Publishing AG New York. p. 1–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76573-0_23-110.1007/978-3-319-76573-0_23-1 ↗
33. Ngwabebhoh FA, Zandraa O, Patwa R, Saha N, Capakova Z, Saha P (2021) Self-crosslinked chitosan/dialdehyde xanthan gum blended hypromellose hydrogel for the controlled delivery of ampicillin, minocycline and rifampicin. Int J Biol Macromol 167:1468–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.10010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.100 ↗
34. Tao Y, Liu S, Zhanf Y, Chi Z, Xu J (2018) A pH-responsive polymer based on dynamic imine bonds as a drug delivery material with pseudo target release behavior. Polym Chem 9(7):878–884. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7PY02108A10.1039/C7PY02108A ↗
35. Iftime MM, Morariu S, Marin L (2017) Salicyl-imine-chitosan hydrogels: Supramolecular architecturing as a crosslinking method toward multifunctional hydrogels. Carbohyd Polym 165:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.027 ↗
36. Fedorovich NE, Kuipers E, Gawlitta D, Dhert WJA, Alblas J (2011) Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors. Tissue Eng Part A 17(19–20):2473–2486. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.000110.1089/ten.tea.2011.0001 ↗
37. Chang H-I, Wang Y (2011) Cell responses to surface and architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds: Med. Tissue Eng.—Cells Biomater, in: Regen, InTechOpen : p. 569–588. https://doi.org/10.5772/2198310.5772/21983 ↗
38. France KJD, Xu F, Hoare T (2018) Structured macroporous hydrogels: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Adv Healthcare Mater 7(1):1700927. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20170092710.1002/adhm.201700927 ↗
39. Bueno VB, Bentini R, Catalani LH, Petri DFS (2013) Synthesis and swelling behavior of xanthan-based hydrogels. Carbohyd Polym 92(2):1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.06210.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.062 ↗
40. Ward D (2021) The development of novel hydrogel composites for use in bone tissue engineering Lancaster University (United Kingdom) 28447705. Available from https://www.proquest.com/openview/243ef9ce3d46e77ea09ead3b05db2162/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
41. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19(6):485–502. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
42. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26(27):5474–5491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
43. Madden LR, Mortisen DJ, Sussman EM, Ratner BD (2010) Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(34):15211–15216. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100644210710.1073/pnas.1006442107 ↗
44. Oliviero O, Ventre M, Netti P (2012) Functional porous hydrogels to study angiogenesis under the effect of controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor. Acta Biomater 8(9):3294–3301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.01910.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.019 ↗
45. Artel A, Mehdizadeh H, Chiu Y-C, Brey EM, Cinar A (2011) An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 17(17–18):2133–2141. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.057110.1089/ten.tea.2010.0571 ↗
46. Jang HY, Zhang K, Chon BH, Choi H-J (2015) Enhanced oil recovery performance and viscosity characteristics of polysaccharide xanthan gum solution. J Ind Eng Chem 21:741–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.00510.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.005 ↗
47. Yan S, Wang T, Feng L et al (2014) Injectable in situ self-cross-linking hydrogels based on poly (L-glutamic acid) and alginate for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomacromol 15(12):4495–4508. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501313t10.1021/bm501313t ↗
48. Tan H, Li H, Rubin JP, Marra KG (2011) Controlled gelation and degradation rates of injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels through a double crosslinking strategy. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 5(10):790–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.37810.1002/term.378 ↗
49. Qu J, Zhao X, Ma XP, Guo B (2017) pH-responsive self-healing injectable hydrogel based on N-carboxyethyl chitosan for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Acta Biomater 58:168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.00110.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.001 ↗
50. Bittner SM, Pearce HA, Hogan KJ et al (2021) Swelling behaviors of 3D printed hydrogel and hydrogel-microcarrier composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 27(11–12):665–678. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.037710.1089/ten.tea.2020.0377 ↗
51. Gupta V, Singh AK (2018) Stress relaxation at a gelatin hydrogel–glass interface in direct shear sliding. Mod Phys Lett B 32(02):1750345. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021798491750345610.1142/S0217984917503456 ↗
52. Caccavo D, Cascone S, Poto S, Lamberti G, Barba AA (2017) Mechanics and transport phenomena in agarose-based hydrogels studied by compression-relaxation tests. Carbohyd Polym 167:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.027 ↗
53. Hanna DH, Lotfy VF, Basta AH, Saad GR (2020) Comparative evaluation for controlling release of niacin from protein-and cellulose-chitosan based hydrogels. Int J Biol Macromol 150:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.05610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.056 ↗
54. Vedadghavami A, Minooei F, Mohammadi MH et al (2017) Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 62:42–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.02810.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028 ↗
55. Liu C, Wu J, Ganet D et al (2020) The characteristics of mussel-inspired nHA/OSA injectable hydrogel and repaired bone defect in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 108(5):1814–1825. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3452410.1002/jbm.b.34524 ↗
56. Wilson MA (2015) Structure and rheological properties of self-associating polymer networks San Diego State University. 3721326. Available from https://www.proquest.com/openview/38a7101f2f157a1dea91f7cff7c87cd2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
57. Tommasi G, Perni S, Prokopovich P (2016) An injectable hydrogel as bone graft material with added antimicrobial properties. Tissue Eng Part A 22(11–12):862–872. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.001410.1089/ten.tea.2016.0014 ↗
58. Giannoni P, Villa F, Cordazzo C et al (2016) Rheological properties, biocompatibility and in vivo performance of new hydrogel-based bone fillers. Biomater Sci 4(11):1691–1703. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6BM00478D10.1039/C6BM00478D ↗
59. Hu C, Hahn L, Yang M, Altmann A, Stahlhut P, Groll J, Luxenhofer R (2021) Improving printability of a thermoresponsive hydrogel biomaterial ink by nanoclay addition. J Mater Sci 56(1):691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05190-510.1007/s10853-020-05190-5 ↗
60. Chen MH, Wang LL, Chung JJ, Kim Y-H, Atluri P, Burdick JA (2017) Methods to assess shear-thinning hydrogels for application as injectable biomaterials. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3(12):3146–3160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0073410.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00734 ↗
61. Suna Y, Nan D, Jin H, Qu X (2020) Recent advances of injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Polym Testing 81:106283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10628310.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106283 ↗
62. Saunders L, Ma PX (2019) Self-healing supramolecular hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Macromol Biosci 19(1):1800313. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20180031310.1002/mabi.201800313 ↗
63. Wang H, Heilshorn SC (2015) Adaptable hydrogel networks with reversible linkages for tissue engineering. Adv Mater 27(25):3717–3736. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150155810.1002/adma.201501558 ↗
64. Rosales AM, Anseth KS (2016) The design of reversible hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics. Nat Rev Mater 1(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2015.1210.1038/natrevmats.2015.12 ↗
65. Adzima BJ, Kloxin CJ, Bowman CN (2010) Externally triggered healing of a thermoreversible covalent network via self-limited hysteresis heating. Adv Mater 22(25):2784–2787. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20090413810.1002/adma.200904138 ↗
66. Xia NN, Xiong XM, Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Kong F (2017) Self-healing of polymer in acidic water toward strength restoration through the synergistic effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(42):37300–37309. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1123010.1021/acsami.7b11230 ↗
67. Fairbanks BD, Singh SP, Bowman CN, Anseth KS (2011) Photodegradable, photoadaptable hydrogels via radical-mediated disulfide fragmentation reaction. Macromolecules 44(8):2444–2450. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma200202w10.1021/ma200202w ↗
68. Quan L, Xin Y, Wu X, Ao Q (2022) Mechanism of self-healing hydrogels and application in tissue engineering. Polymers 14(11):2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1411218410.3390/polym14112184 ↗
69. Billiau A, Edy VG, Heremans H, Damme JV, Desmyter J, Georgiades JA, Somer PD (1977) Human interferon: mass production in a newly established cell line, MG-63. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 12(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.12.1.1110.1128/AAC.12.1.11 ↗
70. Czekanska EM, Stoddart MJ, Richards RG, Hayes JS (2012) In search of an osteoblast cell model for in vitro research. Eur Cell Mater 24(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v024a0110.22203/ecm.v024a01 ↗
71. Jahan K, Manickam G, Tabrizian M, Murshed M (2020) In vitro and in vivo investigation of osteogenic properties of self-contained phosphate-releasing injectable purine-crosslinked chitosan-hydroxyapatite constructs. Sci Rep 10(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67886-710.1038/s41598-020-67886-7 ↗