Experimental study on fatigue crack growth behavior and fracture toughness of SA508-III steel for nuclear reactor pressure vessel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Yan GH, Han LZ, Li CW, Luo XM, Gu JF (2017) Characteristic of retained austenite decomposition during tempering and its effect on impact toughness in SA508 Gr.3 steel. J Nucl Mater 483:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.11.01110.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.11.011 ↗
2. Guo W, Dong SY, Guo W, Francis JA, Li L (2015) Microstructure and mechanical characteristics of a laser welded joint in SA508 nuclear pressure vessel steel. Mater Sci Eng A 625:65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.05610.1016/j.msea.2014.11.056 ↗
3. Sun MY, Hao LH, Li SJ, Li DZ, Li YY (2011) Modeling flow stress constitutive behavior of SA508-3 steel for nuclear reactor pressure vessels. J Nucl Mater 418:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.07.01110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.07.011 ↗
4. Yu MF, Chao YJ, Luo Z (2015) An assessment of mechanical properties of A508-3 steel used in Chinese nuclear reactor pressure vessels. J Press Vessel Technol 137:031402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402943410.1115/1.4029434 ↗
5. Lu CY, He YM, Yang JG, Zheng WJ, Xie ZG, Gao ZL (2018) An investigation of phase transition on the microstructural characteristic and creep behavior for the SA508 Gr.3 steel used for nuclear reactor pressure vessels. Mater Sci Eng A 711:659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.07310.1016/j.msea.2017.11.073 ↗
6. Liu JH, Wang L, Liu Y, Song X, Luo J, Yuan D (2014) Fracture toughness and fracture behavior of SA508-III steel at different temperatures. Int J Miner Metall Mater 21:1187–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-014-1026-210.1007/s12613-014-1026-2 ↗
7. Hyun S-M, Hong S, Kim M-C, Kim J, Sohn SS, Hong S-I (2021) Microstructural changes by controlling austenitizing and tempering conditions on the J-R fracture resistance of SA508 Gr. 1A low alloy steels. Mater Sci Eng A 811:141069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14106910.1016/j.msea.2021.141069 ↗
8. Li XQ, Song YX, Ding ZY, Bao SY, Gao ZL (2018) A modified correlation between KJIC and Charpy V-notch impact energy of Chinese SA508-III steel at the upper shelf. J Nucl Mater 505:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.05610.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.056 ↗
9. Li XQ, Ding ZY, Liu C, Bao SY, Qian H, Xie YC, Gao ZL (2020) Effects of temperature on the local fracture toughness behavior of Chinese SA508-III welded joint. Nucl Eng Technol 52:1732–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.01.02010.1016/j.net.2020.01.020 ↗
10. Jiang YK, Li CW, Wang SX, Mao XF, Guo ZH, Gu JF (2019) Effect of microstructure on fracture mode of SA508 Gr. 3 steel. Trans Mater Heat Treat 40:98–105. https://doi.org/10.13289/j.issn.1009-6264.2018-0524. (in Chinese)10.13289/j.issn.1009-6264.2018-0524 ↗
11. He ZB, Li C, Li YB, Jin WY, Gao ZL (2022) Prediction of fracture toughness scatter based on Weibull stress using crystal plasticity finite element method. Metals 12:872. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1205087210.3390/met12050872 ↗
12. Xu S, Wu XQ, Han EH, Ke W (2009) Effects of dynamic strain aging on mechanical properties of SA508 class 3 reactor pressure vessel steel. J Mater Sci 44:2882–2889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3381-310.1007/s10853-009-3381-3 ↗
13. Kim M-C, Park S-G, Lee K-H, Lee B-S (2015) Comparison of fracture properties in SA508 Gr.3 and Gr.4N high strength low alloy steels for advanced pressure vessel materials. Int J Press Vessel Pip 131:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.04.01010.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.04.010 ↗
14. Ozturk A (1996) The influence of cyclic fatigue damage on the fracture toughness of carbon carbon composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27:641–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(96)00035-810.1016/1359-835X(96)00035-8 ↗
15. Sivaprasad S, Tarafder S, Ranganath VR, Ray KK (2000) Effect of prestrain on fracture toughness of HSLA steels. Mater Sci Eng A 284:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00739-510.1016/S0921-5093(00)00739-5 ↗
16. Moskovic R, Lingham IJ, Crocker AG, Smith GE, Flewitt PEJ (2004) An experimental and theoretical consideration of the effect of prior creep damage on the heat affected zone fracture toughness of CrMoV steel. Eng Fract Mech 71:587–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00028-610.1016/S0013-7944(03)00028-6 ↗
17. Rubio-González C, Gallardo-González JA, Mesmacque G, Sanchez-Santana U (2008) Dynamic fracture toughness of pre-fatigued materials. Int J Fatigue 30:1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.007 ↗
18. Erarslan N, Williams DJ (2012) The damage mechanism of rock fatigue and its relationship to the fracture toughness of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 56:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.01510.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.015 ↗
19. Mehmanparast A, Davies CM, Dean DW, Nikbin KM (2014) Plastic pre-compression and creep damage effects on the fracture toughness behaviour of Type 316H stainless steel. Eng Fract Mech 131:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.005 ↗
20. Mehmanparast A, Davies CM (2018) The influence of inelastic pre-straining on fracture toughness behaviour of Type 316H stainless steel. Eng Fract Mech 188:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.001 ↗
21. Wang XD, Qu RT, Wu SJ, Liu ZQ, Zhang ZF (2018) Fatigue damage and fracture behavior of metallic glass under cyclic compression. Mater Sci Eng A 717:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.05610.1016/j.msea.2018.01.056 ↗
22. Marinelli MC, Balbi M, Krupp U (2021) Influence of plastic deformation in fatigue crack behavior in bainitic steel. Int J Fatigue 143:106014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10601410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106014 ↗
23. Song YX, Ma Y, Chen HF, He ZB, Chen H, Zhang TH, Gao ZL (2021) The effects of tensile and compressive dwells on creep-fatigue behavior and fracture mechanism in welded joint of P92 steel. Mater Sci Eng A 813:141129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14112910.1016/j.msea.2021.141129 ↗
24. Cadenas-Herrera P, Amrouche A, Mesmacque G, Jozwiak K, Puchi-Cabrera ES (2010) Influence of residual fatigue damage on the fracture toughness parameters of an AA6082-T6 aluminium alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 33:54–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01415.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01415.x ↗
25. Talukdar P, Sen SK, Ghosh AK (2001) Effect of fatigue damage on the dynamic fracture toughness of En-8-grade steel. Metall Mater Trans A 32:2547–2552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0044-710.1007/s11661-001-0044-7 ↗
26. Chen Frank X, Sokolov MA, Robertson J, Ando M, Geringer JW, Tanigawa H, Katoh Y (2020) Effects of HFIR neutron irradiation on fracture toughness properties of standard and Ni-doped F82H. J Nucl Mater 542:152501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.15250110.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152501 ↗
27. Ye DY, Xu YD, Xiao L, Cha HB (2010) Effects of low-cycle fatigue on static mechanical properties, microstructures and fracture behavior of 304 stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527:4092–4102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.02710.1016/j.msea.2010.03.027 ↗
28. Suzuki K (1982) Neutron irradiation embrittlement of ASME SA508, C1.3 steel. J Nucl Mater 108–109:443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(82)90515-310.1016/0022-3115(82)90515-3 ↗
29. ASTM E1820-19 (2019) Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. Annual Books of ASTM Standards ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. http://www.astm.org
30. Osage DA, Prager M (2012) Technical basis of material toughness requirements in the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, section VIII, division 2. J Press Vessel Technol. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400585410.1115/1.4005854 ↗
31. ASTM E8/E8M-21 (2021) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. Annual Books of ASTM Standards ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. http://www.astm.org
32. ASTM E647-15 (2015) Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. Annual Books of ASTM Standards ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. http://www.astm.org
33. Ding ZY, Gao ZL, Wang XG, Jiang YY (2015) Modeling of fatigue crack growth in a pressure vessel steel Q345R. Eng Fract Mech 135:245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.01.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.01.011 ↗
34. Ding ZY, Wang XG, Gao ZL, Bao SY (2017) An experimental investigation and prediction of fatigue crack growth under overload/underload in Q345R steel. Int J Fatigue 98:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.02410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.024 ↗
35. Wang XG, Gao ZL, Zhao TW, Jiang YY (2008) An experimental study of the crack growth behavior of 16MnR pressure vessel steel. J Press Vessel Technol 131:021402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.300803410.1115/1.3008034 ↗
36. Wang XG, Yin DH, Xu F, Qiu BX, Gao ZL (2012) Fatigue crack initiation and growth of 16MnR steel with stress ratio effects. Int J Fatigue 35:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.007 ↗
37. Wang YG, Ding ZY, Gao ZL, Wang XG (2022) Fabrication and mechanical properties of fully austenitic gradient nanostructured 310S stainless steel. J Mater Sci 57:15530–15548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07562-510.1007/s10853-022-07562-5 ↗
38. Creed JH, Gerke TA, Berglund AE (2020) MatSurv: survival analysis and visualization in MATLAB. J Open Source Softw 5:1830. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0183010.21105/joss.01830 ↗
39. Kamaya M (2011) Assessment of local deformation using EBSD: quantification of accuracy of measurement and definition of local gradient. Ultramicroscopy 111:1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.02.00410.1016/j.ultramic.2011.02.004 ↗
40. Li HY, Sun HL, Bowen P, Knott JF (2018) Effects of compressive residual stress on short fatigue crack growth in a nickel-based superalloy. Int J Fatigue 108:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.11.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.11.010 ↗
41. Seo S, Huang EW, Woo W, Lee SY (2017) Neutron diffraction residual stress analysis during fatigue crack growth retardation of stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 104:408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.007 ↗
42. Bikdeloo R, Farrahi GH, Mehmanparast A, Mahdavi SM (2020) Multiple laser shock peening effects on residual stress distribution and fatigue crack growth behaviour of 316L stainless steel. Theor Appl Fract Mech 105:102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10242910.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102429 ↗
43. Xin H, Veljkovic M (2020) Residual stress effects on fatigue crack growth rate of mild steel S355 exposed to air and seawater environments. Mater Des 193:108732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10873210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108732 ↗
44. Zhu X-K (2016) Review of fracture toughness test methods for ductile materials in low-constraint conditions. Int J Press Vessel Pip 139–140:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.00610.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.006 ↗
45. Li XQ, Ding ZY, Liu C, Bao SY, Gao ZL (2020) Evaluation and comparison of fracture toughness for metallic materials in different conditions by ASTM and ISO standards. Int J Press Vessel Pip 187:104189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.10418910.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104189 ↗
46. Lacroix G, Pardoen T, Jacques PJ (2008) The fracture toughness of TRIP-assisted multiphase steels. Acta Mater 56:3900–3913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.03510.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.035 ↗
47. Li YF, Lu CY, Li HX et al (2021) Uncovering the critical factor governing the fatigue crack propagation under the coexistence of multi-interfaces in AlCoCrFeNi2.1 eutectic high-entropy alloy. Eng Fract Mech 258:108132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10813210.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108132 ↗
48. Nohava J, Haušild P, Karlık M, Bompard P (2002) Electron backscattering diffraction analysis of secondary cleavage cracks in a reactor pressure vessel steel. Mater Charact 49:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00360-110.1016/S1044-5803(02)00360-1 ↗
49. Zhang Y, Wang SY, Xu GT, Wang G, Zhao MH (2022) Effect of microstructure on fatigue-crack propagation of 18CrNiMo7-6 high-strength steel. Int J Fatigue 163:107027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10702710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107027 ↗
50. Rui SS, Shang YB, Su Y, Qiu WH, Niu LS, Shi HJ, Matsumoto S, Chuman Y (2018) EBSD analysis of cyclic load effect on final misorientation distribution of post-mortem low alloy steel: a new method for fatigue crack tip driving force prediction. Int J Fatigue 113:264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.016 ↗
51. Liang XZ, Dodge MF, Jiang J, Dong HB (2019) Using transmission Kikuchi diffraction in a scanning electron microscope to quantify geometrically necessary dislocation density at the nanoscale. Ultramicroscopy 197:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.11.01110.1016/j.ultramic.2018.11.011 ↗
52. Bouquerel J, Verbeken K, De Cooman B (2006) Microstructure-based model for the static mechanical behaviour of multiphase steels. Acta Mater 54:1443–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.05910.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.059 ↗
53. Ateba Betanda Y, Helbert A-L, Brisset F, Mathon M-H, Waeckerlé T, Baudin T (2014) Measurement of stored energy in Fe-48%Ni alloys strongly cold-rolled using three approaches: neutron diffraction, Dillamore and KAM approaches. Mater Sci Eng A 614:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.03710.1016/j.msea.2014.07.037 ↗
54. Sowards JW, McCowan CN, Drexler ES (2012) Interpretation and significance of reverse chevron-shaped markings on fracture surfaces of API X100 pipeline steels. Mater Sci Eng A 551:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.10810.1016/j.msea.2012.04.108 ↗
55. Bannister AC, Ruiz Ocejo J, Gutierrez-Solana F (2000) Implications of the yield stress/tensile stress ratio to the SINTAP failure assessment diagrams for homogeneous materials. Eng Fract Mech 67:547–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00073-410.1016/S0013-7944(00)00073-4 ↗
56. Zhang PH, Zeng WD, Zheng YP, Xu JW, Liang XB, Zhao YQ (2020) Fracture toughness of Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy at room and high temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 796:140009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14000910.1016/j.msea.2020.140009 ↗
57. Scheid A, Félix LM, Martinazzi D, Renck T, Fortis Kwietniewski CE (2016) The microstructure effect on the fracture toughness of ferritic Ni-alloyed steels. Mater Sci Eng A 661:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.01910.1016/j.msea.2016.03.019 ↗
58. Ding ZY, Gao ZL, Wang XG (2015) Study on influence factors of crack growth behavior of Q345R steel subjected to a single tensile overload. J Mech Eng 51:42–49. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2013.16.084. (in Chinese)10.3901/JME.2013.16.084 ↗