Carboxymethyl cellulose foams: fabrication, aqueous stability, and water capture
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes the fabrication of biopolymer foams from aqueous solutions of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), as well as effective methods for stabilizing CMC foams in aqueous environments so as to prevent their conversion to gels that results from pore collapse. CMC foams were produced easily by lyophilization of aqueous solutions of high molecular weight CMC, but the considerable hydrophilicity of this anionic polyelectrolyte led to rapid pore collapse and gelation of the material upon its contact with liquid water. However, the porous structure of the CMC foam was stabilized in the presence of aqueous solutions of CaCl2. Mechanical measurements showed the foams to be stiffer in the presence of higher salt concentrations. In addition, CMC foams crosslinked with poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), via the residual hydroxyl groups on the CMC scaffold, were stable in liquid water. When covalent crosslinking was combined with the presence of CaCl2, and/or cellulose additives, the resultant CMC foams exhibited excellent aqueous stability for months or longer and withstood multiple compression cycles without loss of mechanical performance (i.e., by maintaining their porous foam structure). These hydrophilic foams absorbed many times their own weight of water (> 30 g of liquid water per gram of foam) and were amenable to ion exchange, absorption/desorption of organic substances and heavy metals, and water uptake at levels that make them attractive materials for applications in water recovery.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Hunter D (1978) Papermaking: the history and technique of an ancient craft; Courier Corporation
2. Politzer A, Teng JC, Singh T (1960) The method of producing a regenerate cellulose sponge. US Patent NO. 3110602
3. Blanc PD (2016) Fake Silk: the lethal history of viscose rayon. Yale University Press10.12987/yale/9780300204667.001.0001 ↗
4. Song J, Chen C, Zhu S, Zhu M, Dai J, Ray U, Li Y, Kuang Y, Li Y, Quispe N, Yao Y, Gong A, Leiste UH, Bruck HA, Zhu JY, Vellore A, Li H, Minus ML, Jia Z, Martini A, Li T, Hu L (2018) processing bulk natural wood into a high-performance structural material. Nature 554(7691):224–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2547610.1038/nature25476 ↗
5. Wang S, Lu A, Zhang L (2016) Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog Polym Sci 53:169–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.003 ↗
6. Sayyed AJ, Deshmukh NA, Pinjari DV (2019) A critical review of manufacturing processes used in regenerated cellulosic fibres: viscose, cellulose acetate, cuprammonium, LiCl/DMAc, ionic liquids, and NMMO based lyocell. Cellulose 26:2913–2940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02318-y10.1007/s10570-019-02318-y ↗
7. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y ↗
8. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:815–827
9. Cui J, Cueto C, Bien C, Preda D, Gamliel D, Emrick T (2022) Robust polymer foams from 2-hydroxyethyl cellulose: fabrication, stability, and chemical functionalization. Polymer (Guildf) 256:125131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12513110.1016/j.polymer.2022.125131 ↗
10. Hollabaugh CB, Burt LH, Walsh AP (1945) Carboxymethylcellulose. Uses and applications. Ind Eng Chem 37(10):943–947. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50430a01510.1021/ie50430a015 ↗
11. Grant GT, Morris ER, Rees DA, Smith PJC, Thom D (1973) Biological interactions between polysaccharides and divalent cations: the egg-box model. FEBS Lett 32(1):195–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(73)80770-710.1016/0014-5793(73)80770-7 ↗
12. Hua M, Wu S, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Chen Z, Frenkel I, Strzalka J, Zhou H, Zhu X, He X (2021) Strong tough hydrogels via the synergy of freeze-casting and salting out. Nature 590(7847):594–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03212-z10.1038/s41586-021-03212-z ↗
13. Wu S, Hua M, Alsaid Y, Du Y, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Lo C, Wang C, Wu D, Yao B, Strzalka J, Zhou H, Zhu X, He X (2021) Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with broad-range tunable mechanical properties via the hofmeister effect. Adv Mater 33(11):2007829. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200782910.1002/adma.202007829 ↗
14. Hosny WM, Hadi AKA, El-Saied H, Basta AH (1995) Metal chelates with some cellulose derivatives. Part III. Synthesis and structural chemistry of nickel (II) and copper (II) complexes with carboxymethyl cellulose. Polym Int 37(2):93–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1995.21037020210.1002/pi.1995.210370202 ↗
15. Basta AH, El-Saied H, Hasanin MS, El-Deftar MM (2018) Green carboxymethyl cellulose-silver complex versus cellulose origins in biological activity applications. Int J Biol Macromol 107:1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.06110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.061 ↗
16. Hsiao P-Y, Luijten E (2006) Salt-induced collapse and reexpansion of highly charged flexible polyelectrolytes. Phys Rev Lett 97(14):148301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.14830110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.148301 ↗
17. Hua J, Mitra MK, Muthukumar M (2012) Theory of volume transition in polyelectrolyte gels with charge regularization. J Chem Phys 136(13):134901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369816810.1063/1.3698168 ↗
18. Peterson EA, Sober HA (1956) Chromatography of proteins. I. Cellulose ion-exchange adsorbents. J Am Chem Soc 78(4):751–755. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01585a01610.1021/ja01585a016 ↗
19. Mann AW, Deutscher RL (1977) Solution geochemistry of copper in water containing carbonate, sulphate and chloride ions. Chem Geol 19(1–4):253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90018-310.1016/0009-2541(77)90018-3 ↗
20. Gregor HP (1951) Gibbs-donnan equilibria in ion exchange resin systems. J Am Chem Soc 73(2):642–650. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01146a04210.1021/ja01146a042 ↗
21. Turse R, Rieman W (1961) Kinetics of ion exchange in a chelating resin. J Phys Chem 65(10):1821–1824. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100827a03110.1021/j100827a031 ↗
22. Katchalsky A (1954) Problems in the physical chemistry of polyelectrolytes. J Polym Sci 12(1):159–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1954.12012011410.1002/pol.1954.120120114 ↗
23. Zhulina EB, Rubinstein M (2012) Ionic strength dependence of polyelectrolyte brush thickness. Soft Matter 8(36):9376. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25863c10.1039/c2sm25863c ↗
24. Tanaka T (1978) Collapse of gels and the critical endpoint. Phys Rev Lett 40(12):820–823. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.82010.1103/PhysRevLett.40.820 ↗
25. Katchalsky A, Michaeli I (1955) Polyelectrolyte gels in salt solutions. J Polym Sci 15(79):69–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1955.12015790610.1002/pol.1955.120157906 ↗
26. Horkay F, Tasaki I, Basser PJ (2000) Osmotic swelling of polyacrylate hydrogels in physiological salt solutions. Biomacromol 1(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm990503110.1021/bm9905031 ↗
27. Marshall TJ (1958) A relation between permeability and size distribution of pores. J Soil Sci 9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1958.tb01892.x10.1111/j.1365-2389.1958.tb01892.x ↗
28. Beebe DJ, Moore JS, Bauer JM, Yu Q, Liu RH, Devadoss C, Jo B-H (2000) Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 404(6778):588–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/3500704710.1038/35007047 ↗
29. Zwieniecki MA, Melcher PJ, Michele Holbrook N (2001) Hydrogel control of xylem hydraulic resistance in plants. Science (1979) 291(5506):1059–1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.105717510.1126/science.1057175 ↗