Mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution of Al/AlCu alloy interface
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, perfect interface model of Al/AlCu alloy and defect interface model of Al/AlCu alloy after cracks were introduced at different positions of the interface were established by using cohesive zone modeling method. Classical molecular dynamics simulation was used to study the deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of Al/AlCu alloy interface model at a strain rate of 0.05 Å/ps and the temperature of 300 K. The simulation results show that perfect interface exhibits a uniform plastic deformation stage due to structural relaxation after yielding, while there is no structural relaxation during the deformation of defect interface and the tensile strength is much lower than that of perfect interface as well. In the process of deformation, stacking faults formed in perfect interface and cracks are generated and expanded in Al matrix, while there was no stacking faults forming along with the expansion and cracking at the position of introduced cracks in defect interface. Massive dislocation nucleation leads to the reduction in stress at the perfect and defect interfaces after yielding. The extension of Shockley partial dislocation and the nucleation of Stair-rod dislocation are the main mechanisms of interface deformation. Densities of Shockley partial dislocation and Stair-rod dislocation decrease with increasing strain before crack propagation. This study enriches the analysis of microstructure evolution of Al/AlCu alloy interface and similar interfaces during deformation.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Küçüktürk G, Atkaya M (2022) Numerical and experimental study for electron beam welding process of Al6061-T6 material[J]. Mater Rese Express 9(4):04650410.1088/2053-1591/ac6236 ↗
2. Moreno A, Rodriguez R, Gomez FR (2021) Bond pad probe marks effect on intermetallic coverage[J]. J Eng Res Rep 1:101–10610.9734/jerr/2021/v20i117253 ↗
3. Grosskopf C (2021) JEDEC’s generation of wire bond pull test methods to address pulling of copper wire bonds[C]//54th international symposium on microelectronics. Int Symp Microelectron 1:000249–00025510.4071/1085-8024-2021.1.000249 ↗
4. Ashok Kumar GI, Lambert A, Caperton J et al (2021) Comparative study of chloride and fluoride induced aluminum pad corrosion in wire-bonded device packaging assembly[J]. Corros Mater Degrad 2(3):447–46010.3390/cmd2030023 ↗
5. Qi J, Hung NC, Li M et al (2006) Effects of process parameters on bondability in ultrasonic ball bonding[J]. Scr Mater 54(2):293–29710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.042 ↗
6. Xu H, Liu C, Silberschmidt VV et al (2010) Growth of intermetallic compounds in thermosonic copper wire bonding on aluminum metallization[J]. J Electron Mater 39(1):124–13110.1007/s11664-009-0951-8 ↗
7. Singh G, Haseeb A (2016) Effect of pedestal temperature on bonding strength and deformation characteristics for 5N copper wire bonding[J]. J Electron Mater 45(6):3244–324810.1007/s11664-016-4403-y ↗
8. Zhang B, Qian K, Wang T, et al. (2009) Behaviors of palladium in palladium coated copper wire bonding process[C]//2009 International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology & High Density Packaging. IEEE, 662–665.10.1109/ICEPT.2009.5270668 ↗
9. Shuang L, Fuxiang H, Cheng P, et al. (2019) Research progress on copper and silver bonding wires or microelectronic packaging technology [J]. J Funct Mater/Gongneng Cailiao, 50(5).
10. Zhong M, Peng C, Huang F et al (2019) Effects of trace elements on the properties of copper from first-principles calculations[C]//IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. IOP Publ 300(2):022010
11. Xiaze LIN, Bianying WEN (2022) Influence of interfacial effect on heat conduction behavior of functional composites[J]. Acta Mater Compos Sin 39(4):1498–1510
12. Dandekar CR, Shin YC (2011) Molecular dynamics based cohesive zone law for describing Al–SiC interface mechanics[J]. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42(4):355–36310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.005 ↗
13. Mehr VY, Toroghinejad MR (2022) Microstructural investigation of an Al–Cu lamellar nanocomposite produced by accumulative roll bonding process under the heat treatment condition: an analytical, experimental, and finite element study[J]. J Market Res 20:1028–1042
14. Lee WB, Bang KS, Jung SB (2005) Effects of intermetallic compound on the electrical and mechanical properties of friction welded Cu/Al bimetallic joints during annealing[J]. J Alloy Compd 390(1–2):212–21910.1016/j.jallcom.2004.07.057 ↗
15. You J, Zhao Y, Dong C et al (2022) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of the Al–Cu dissimilar joint enhanced by stationary-dynamic shoulder friction stir welding[J]. J Mater Process Technol 300:11740210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117402 ↗
16. Shayanpoor AA, Ashtiani HRR (2022) Microstructural and mechanical investigations of powder reinforced interface layer of hot extruded Al/Cu bimetallic composite rods[J]. J Manuf Process 77:313–32810.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.017 ↗
17. Zhang X, Zhang L, Zeng L et al (2022) Tensile properties optimization of Al/electroplating-Cu composites fabricated by accumulative roll bonding (ARB)[J]. J Manuf Process 84:713–71710.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.044 ↗
18. Chen SY, Wu ZW, Liu KX et al (2013) Atomic diffusion behavior in Cu-Al explosive welding process[J]. J Appl Phys 113(4):04490110.1063/1.4775788 ↗
19. Mypati O, Kumar PP, Pal SK et al (2022) TEM analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of graphene coated Al-Cu micro joints[J]. Carbon Trends 9:10022310.1016/j.cartre.2022.100223 ↗
20. Mypati O, Pavan Kumar P, Iqbal P et al (2021) Molecular dynamics simulation of atomic diffusion in friction stir spot welded Al to Cu joints[J]. Mech Adv Mater Struct 29(27):605310.1080/15376494.2021.1972188 ↗
21. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics[J]. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
22. Dandekar CR, Shin YC (2011) Effect of porosity on the interface behavior of an Al2O3–aluminum composite: a molecular dynamics study[J]. Compos Sci Technol 71(3):350–35610.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.029 ↗
23. Al-Saawani MA, Al-Negheimish AI, El-Sayed AK et al (2022) Finite element modeling of debonding failures in FRP-strengthened concrete beams using cohesive zone model[J]. Polymers 14(9):188910.3390/polym14091889 ↗
24. Wciślik W, Pała T (2021) Selected aspects of cohesive zone modeling in fracture mechanics[J]. Metals 11(2):30210.3390/met11020302 ↗
25. Li Q, Dong Z, Ji S et al (2021) Effects of welding parameter on atom-scale interfacial diffusion behavior of Al/Cu dissimilar friction stir welding[J]. Phys Status Solid (B) 258(10):210012310.1002/pssb.202100123 ↗
26. Wang SG, Liu CX, Jian ZY (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation of diffusion coefficient of Al-Cu alloy[J]. J Xi’’an Technol Univ 38(6):559–564
27. Gall K, Horstemeyer MF, Van Schilfgaarde M et al (2000) Atomistic simulations on the tensile debonding of an aluminum–silicon interface[J]. J Mech Phys Solid 48(10):2183–221210.1016/S0022-5096(99)00086-1 ↗
28. Thompson AP, Plimpton SJ, Mattson W (2009) General formulation of pressure and stress tensor for arbitrary many-body interaction potentials under periodic boundary conditions[J]. J Chem Phys 131(15):15410710.1063/1.3245303 ↗
29. Liu XY, Liu CL, Borucki LJ (1999) A new investigation of copper’s role in enhancing Al–Cu interconnect electromigration resistance from an atomistic view[J]. Acta Mater 47(11):3227–323110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00186-X ↗
30. Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool[J]. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 18(1):01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
31. Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation[J]. Phys Rev B 58(17):1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
32. Stukowski A, Bulatov VV, Arsenlis A (2012) Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces[J]. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 20(8):08500710.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
33. Gupta P, Pal S, Yedla N (2016) Molecular dynamics based cohesive zone modeling of Al (metal)–Cu50Zr50 (metallic glass) interfacial mechanical behavior and investigation of dissipative mechanisms[J]. Mater Des 105:41–5010.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.054 ↗
34. Gupta P, Yedla N (2017) Dislocation and structural studies at metal–metallic glass interface at low temperature[J]. J Mater Eng Perform 26(12):5694–570410.1007/s11665-017-3026-7 ↗
35. Koh SJA, Lee HP, Lu C et al (2005) Molecular dynamics simulation of a solid platinum nanowire under uniaxial tensile strain: temperature and strain-rate effects[J]. Phys Rev B 72(8):08541410.1103/PhysRevB.72.085414 ↗
36. Jiang S, Li SC (2014) Valence electron structure calculation and interface reaction prediction of Al/Cu system [J]. Trans Mater Heat Treat 35(8):213–218
37. Sarkar J (2018) Investigation of mechanical properties and deformation behavior of single-crystal Al–Cu core-shell nanowire generated using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation[J]. J Nanopart Res 20(6):1–710.1007/s11051-018-4258-7 ↗
38. Zhou Y, Yang W, Hu M et al (2016) The typical manners of dynamic crack propagation along the metal/ceramics interfaces: a molecular dynamics study[J]. Comput Mater Sci 112:27–3310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.012 ↗
39. Ma Q, Song C, Zhou J et al (2021) Dynamic weld evolution during ultrasonic welding of Cu–Al joints[J]. Mater Sci Eng A 823:14172410.1016/j.msea.2021.141724 ↗
40. Su H, Zhao Q, Chen J et al (2022) Homogenizing the intermetallic compounds distribution in Al/Cu dissimilar friction stir welding joint with the assistance of ultrasonic vibration[J]. Mater Today Commun 31:10364310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103643 ↗
41. Wang J, Zhang RF, Zhou CZ et al (2014) Interface dislocation patterns and dislocation nucleation in face-centered-cubic and body-centered-cubic bicrystal interfaces[J]. Int J Plast 53:40–5510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.07.002 ↗
42. Van Swygenhoven H, Derlet PM, Frøseth AG (2004) Stacking fault energies and slip in nanocrystalline metals[J]. Nat Mater 3(6):399–40310.1038/nmat1136 ↗