Semitransparent films from low-substituted carboxymethylated cellulose fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellulose-derived films have received attention for possible use in the packaging industry. However, the poor mechanical properties of the biofilm are the main concern. This study aims to mildly carboxymethylate cellulose fibers and esterify the generated carboxymethylated cellulose fibers (CMF) for film production. The physicochemical alteration of cellulose fibers via carboxymethylation and esterification was confirmed by means of solid-state carbon NMR, FTIR, and XPS analyses. The carboxymethylation of cellulose fibers impacted their surface morphology and fiber length dramatically. The results confirmed that the carboxymethylated cellulose fibers (CMF) with a 1.2 mmol/g carboxylate group generated films with the highest mechanical properties. The higher degree of carboxymethylation tended to reduce the mechanical properties but improved the optical properties of the CMF film as smaller CMF could scatter light more effectively. The use of acetic acid (3 wt%) was crucial in the esterification of CMF to generate CMF film with the highest tensile strength (60.8 MPa), but a higher concentration of acetic acid would impair the mechanical properties of the film. The great tensile strength of the CMF derived film (60.8 MPa) and the relatively uncomplicated fabrication procedure of CMF films are promising for some applications, such as bags and agriculture uses. However, the water uptake of the CMF films was relatively high (3–4 g/g), and further research needs to address this challenge.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Hosseinpour Feizi Z, Fatehi P (2020) Carboxymethylated cellulose nanocrystals as clay suspension dispersants: effect of size and surface functional groups. Cellulose 27(7):3759–3772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03024-w10.1007/s10570-020-03024-w ↗
2. Sun B, Zhang M, Shen J, He Z, Fatehi P, Ni Y (2019) Applications of cellulose-based materials in sustained drug delivery systems. Curr Med Chem 26(14):2485–2501. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986732466617070514330810.2174/0929867324666170705143308 ↗
3. Hosseinpour Feizi Z, Fatehi P (2021) Interaction of hairy carboxyalkyl cellulose nanocrystals with cationic surfactant: effect of carbon spacer. Carbohydr Polym 255:117396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11739610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117396 ↗
4. Yang G, Xia Y, Lin Z, Zhang K, Fatehi P, Chen J (2021) Physicochemical impact of cellulose nanocrystal on oxidation of starch and starch based composite films. Int J Biol Marcomol 184:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.00910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.009 ↗
5. Zhao G, Lyu X, Lee J, Cui X, Chen WN (2019) Biodegradable and transparent cellulose film prepared eco-friendly from durian rind for packaging application. Food Packag Shelf Life 21:100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.10034510.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100345 ↗
6. Im W, Oh K, Abhari AR, Youn HJ, Lee HL (2019) Recycling of isopropanol for cost-effective, environmentally friendly production of carboxymethylated cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 208:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.09310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.093 ↗
7. Paunonen S, Berthold F, Immonen K (2020) Poly (lactic acid)/pulp fiber composites: the effect of fiber surface modification and hydrothermal aging on viscoelastic and strength properties. J Appl Polym Sci 137:49617. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4961710.1002/app.49617 ↗
8. Wang J, Dang M, Duan C, Zhao W, Wang K (2017) Carboxymethylated cellulose fibers as low-cost and renewable adsorbent materials. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:14940–14948. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0369710.1021/acs.iecr.7b03697 ↗
9. Chen S, Wu M, Lu P, Gao L, Yan S, Wang S (2020) Development of pH indicator and antimicrobial cellulose nanofibre packaging film based on purple sweet potato anthocyanin and oregano essential oil. Int J Biol Macromol 149:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.23110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.231 ↗
10. Orelma H, Hokkanen A, Leppänen I, Kammiovirta K, Kapulainen M, Harlin A (2020) Optical cellulose fiber made from regenerated cellulose and cellulose acetate for water sensor applications. Cellulose 27:1543–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02882-310.1007/s10570-019-02882-3 ↗
11. Suwanprateep S, Kumsapaya C, Sayan P (2019) Structure and thermal properties of rice starch-based film blended with mesocarp cellulose fiber. Mater Today Proc 17:2039–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.25210.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.252 ↗
12. Kalia S, Boufi S, Celli A, Kango S (2014) Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym Sci 292:5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-013-3112-910.1007/s00396-013-3112-9 ↗
13. Nechyporchuk O, Pignon F, Belgacem MN (2015) Morphological properties of nanofibrillated cellulose produced using wet grinding as an ultimate fibrillation process. J Mater Sci 50:531–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8609-110.1007/s10853-014-8609-1 ↗
14. Khalil HA, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN, Mustapha A, Sudesh K, Dungani R, Jawaid M (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99:649–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.06910.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069 ↗
15. Barbash VA, Yaschenko OV, Alushkin SV, Kondratyuk AS, Posudievsky OY, Koshechko VG (2016) The effect of mechanochemical treatment of the cellulose on characteristics of nanocellulose films. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1632-110.1186/s11671-016-1632-1 ↗
16. He M, Yang G, Cho BU, Lee YK, Won JM (2017) Effects of addition method and fibrillation degree of cellulose nanofibrils on furnish drainability and paper properties. Cellulose 24:5657–5669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1495-310.1007/s10570-017-1495-3 ↗
17. Bisht SS, Pandey KK, Joshi G, Naithani S (2017) New route for carboxymethylation of cellulose: synthesis, structural analysis and properties. Cellul Chem Technol 51:609–617
18. Haleem N, Arshad M, Shahid M, Tahir MA (2014) Synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose from waste of cotton ginning industry. Carbohydr Polym 113:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.023 ↗
19. Heinze T, Koschella A (2005) Carboxymethyl ethers of cellulose and starch–a review. Macromol Symp 233:13–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20055050210.1002/masy.200550502 ↗
20. Heydarzadeh HD, Najafpour GD, Nazari-Moghaddam AA (2009) Catalyst-free conversion of alkali cellulose to fine carboxymethyl cellulose at mild conditions. World Appl Sci J 6:564–569
21. Joshi G, Naithani S, Varshney VK, Bisht SS, Rana V, Gupta PK (2015) Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose from office waste paper: a Greener approach towards waste management. Waste Manag 38:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.01510.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.015 ↗
22. Pushpamalar V, Langford SJ, Ahmad M, Lim YY (2006) Optimization of reaction conditions for preparing carboxymethyl cellulose from sago waste. Carbohydr Polym 64:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.003 ↗
23. dos Santos DM, de Lacerda BA, Ascheri DPR, Signini R, de Aquino GLB (2015) Microwave-assisted carboxymethylation of cellulose extracted from Brewer’s spent grain. Carbohydr Polym 131:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.051 ↗
24. Yeasmin MS, Mondal MIH (2015) Synthesis of highly substituted carboxymethyl cellulose depending on cellulose particle size. Int J Biol Macromol 80:725–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.040 ↗
25. Rol F, Belgacem MN, Gandini A, Bras J (2019) Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils. Prog Polym Sci 88:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002 ↗
26. Abushammala H, Mao J (2019) A review of the surface modification of cellulose and nanocellulose using aliphatic and aromatic mono-and di-isocyanates. Molecules 24:2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2415278210.3390/molecules24152782 ↗
27. Luo J, Zhang M, Yang B, Liu G, Tan J, Nie J, Song S (2019) A promising transparent and UV-shielding composite film prepared by aramid nanofibers and nanofibrillated cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 203:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.04010.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.040 ↗
28. Bedane AH, Eić M, Farmahini-Farahani M, Xiao H (2015) Water vapor transport properties of regenerated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose films. J Membr Sci 493:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.00910.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.009 ↗
29. Nunes MR, Castilho MDSM, de Lima Veeck AP, da Rosa CG, Noronha CM, Maciel MV, Barreto PM (2018) Antioxidant and antimicrobial methylcellulose films containing Lippia alba extract and silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 192:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.014 ↗
30. Borges JP, Godinho MH, Martins AF, Stamatialis DF, De Pinho MN, Belgacem MN (2004) Tensile properties of cellulose fiber reinforced hydroxypropylcellulose films. Polym Compos 25:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2000810.1002/pc.20008 ↗
31. Villalobos R, Chanona J, Hernández P, Gutiérrez G, Chiralt A (2005) Gloss and transparency of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films containing surfactants as affected by their microstructure. Food Hydrocoll 19:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2004.04.01410.1016/j.foodhyd.2004.04.014 ↗
32. Cazón P, Velazquez G, Ramírez JA, Vázquez M (2017) Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: a review. Food Hydrocoll 68:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.00910.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.009 ↗
33. Kumar N, Neeraj, (2019) Polysaccharide-based component and their relevance in edible film/coating: a review. Nutr Food Sci 49:793–823. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-10-2018-029410.1108/NFS-10-2018-0294 ↗
34. Oun AA, Rhim JW (2015) Preparation and characterization of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/cotton linter cellulose nanofibril composite films. Carbohydr Polym 127:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.073 ↗
35. Paunonen S (2013) Strength and barrier enhancements of cellophane and cellulose derivative films: a review. BioResources 8(2):3098–312110.15376/biores.8.2.3098-3121 ↗
36. Shahbazi M, Ahmadi SJ, Seif A, Rajabzadeh G (2016) Carboxymethyl cellulose film modification through surface photo-crosslinking and chemical crosslinking for food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll 61:378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.04.02110.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.04.021 ↗
37. Garavand F, Rouhi M, Razavi SH, Cacciotti I, Mohammadi R (2017) Improving the integrity of natural biopolymer films used in food packaging by crosslinking approach: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 104:687–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.09310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.093 ↗
38. Rouhi M, Razavi SH, Mousavi SM (2017) Optimization of crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite films for mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng C 71:1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.13510.1016/j.msec.2016.11.135 ↗
39. Šešlija S, Nešić A, Škorić ML, Krušić MK, Santagata G, Malinconico M (2018) Pectin/carboxymethylcellulose films as a potential food packaging material. Macromol Symp 378:1600163. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20160016310.1002/masy.201600163 ↗
40. Tang A, Yan C, Li D, Chen S (2018) Acid-catalyzed crosslinking of cellulose nanofibers with glutaraldehyde to improve the water resistance of nanopaper. J Bioresour Bioprod 3:59–64. https://doi.org/10.21967/jbb.v3i2.9710.21967/jbb.v3i2.97 ↗
41. Azeredo HM, Waldron KW (2016) Crosslinking in polysaccharide and protein films and coatings for food contact—a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 52:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.04.00810.1016/j.tifs.2016.04.008 ↗
42. Borůvková K, Wiener J, Kukreja S (2012) Thermal self crosslinking of carboxymethylcellulose. ACC J XVIII/1, 6–13
43. Fan J, Zhang S, Li F, Yang Y, Du M (2020) Recent advances in cellulose-based membranes for their sensing applications. Cellulose 27:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03445-710.1007/s10570-020-03445-7 ↗
44. Hassan SH, Voon LH, Velayutham TS, Zhai L, Kim HC, Kim J (2018) Review of cellulose smart material: biomass conversion process and progress on cellulose-based electroactive paper. J Renew Mater 6:1–25. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.63417310.7569/JRM.2017.634173 ↗
45. Santos RF, Ribeiro JCL, de Carvalho JMF, Magalhães WLE, Pedroti LG, Nalon GH, de Lima GES (2021) Nanofibrillated cellulose and its applications in cement-based composites: a review. Constr Build Mater 288:123122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12312210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123122 ↗
46. Yang H, Tejado A, Alam N, Antal M, van de Ven TG (2012) Films prepared from electrostatically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose. Langmuir 28(20):7834–7842. https://doi.org/10.1021/la204966310.1021/la2049663 ↗
47. Fechter C, Heinze T (2019) Influence of wood pulp quality on the structure of carboxymethyl cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 136:47862. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4786210.1002/app.47862 ↗
48. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23:93–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0798-510.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 ↗
49. Im W, Lee S, Abhari AR, Youn HJ, Lee HL (2018) Optimization of carboxymethylation reaction as a pretreatment for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 25:3873–3883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1853-910.1007/s10570-018-1853-9 ↗
50. Ismail NM, Bono A, Valintinus ACR, Nilus S, Chng LM (2010) Optimization of reaction conditions for preparing carboxymethyl cellulose. J Appl Sci 10:2530–253610.3923/jas.2010.2530.2536 ↗
51. Chen JH, Liu JG, Su YQ, Xu ZH, Li MC, Ying RF, Wu JQ (2019) Preparation and properties of microfibrillated cellulose with different carboxyethyl content. Carbohydr Polym 206:616–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.02410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.024 ↗
52. Naderi A, Lindström T, Erlandsson J, Sundström J, Flodberg G (2016) A comparative study of the properties of three nano-fibrillated cellulose systems that have been produced at about the same energy consumption levels in the mechanical delamination step. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 31:364–371. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2016-31-03-p364-37110.3183/npprj-2016-31-03-p364-371 ↗
53. Naderi A, Lindström T, Pettersson T (2014) The state of carboxymethylated nanofibrils after homogenization-aided dilution from concentrated suspensions: a rheological perspective. Cellulose 21:2357–2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0329-910.1007/s10570-014-0329-9 ↗
54. Su L, Ou Y, Feng X, Lin M, Li J, Liu D, Qi H (2019) Integrated production of cellulose nanofibers and sodium carboxymethylcellulose through controllable eco-carboxymethylation under mild conditions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:3792–3800. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0449210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04492 ↗
55. Xie H, Du H, Yang X, Si C (2018) Recent strategies in preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils derived from raw cellulose materials. Int J Polym Sci 2018:7923068. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/792306810.1155/2018/7923068 ↗
56. Wang Y, Wang X, Xie Y, Zhang K (2018) Functional nanomaterials through esterification of cellulose: a review of chemistry and application. Cellulose 25:3703–3731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1830-310.1007/s10570-018-1830-3 ↗
57. Rojas J, Azevedo E (2011) Functionalization and crosslinking of microcrystalline cellulose in aqueous media: a safe and economic approach. Int J Pharma Sci Rev Res 8:28–36
58. Sahu A, Pandit AB (2019) Kinetic study of homogeneous catalyzed esterification of a series of aliphatic acids with different alcohols. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:2672–2682. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0478110.1021/acs.iecr.8b04781 ↗
59. Ghorpade VS, Dias RJ, Mali KK, Mulla SI (2019) Citric acid crosslinked carboxymethylcellulose-polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel films for extended release of water soluble basic drugs. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 52:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.05.01310.1016/j.jddst.2019.05.013 ↗
60. Reddy KO, Maheswari CU, Dhlamini MS, Mothudi BM, Zhang J, Zhang J, Rajulu AV (2017) Preparation and characterization of regenerated cellulose films using borassus fruit fibers and an ionic liquid. Carbohydr Polym 160:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.051 ↗
61. Tang R, Yu Z, Renneckar S, Zhang Y (2018) Coupling chitosan and TEMPO-oxidized nanofibrilliated cellulose by electrostatic attraction and chemical reaction. Carbohydr Polym 202:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.09710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.097 ↗
62. Abouloula CN, Rizwan M, Selvanathan V, Abdullah CI, Hassan A, Yahya R, Oueriagli A (2018) A novel application for oil palm empty fruit bunch: extraction and modification of cellulose for solid polymer electrolyte. Ionics 24:3827–3836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2558-710.1007/s11581-018-2558-7 ↗
63. Guo T, Gu L, Zhang Y, Chen H, Jiang B, Zhao H, Xiao H (2019) Bioinspired self-assembled films of carboxymethyl cellulose–dopamine/montmorillonite. J Mat Chem A 7:14033–14041. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA00998A10.1039/C9TA00998A ↗
64. Kong X, Zhang S, Wang Y, Liu Y, Li R, Ren X, Huang TS (2019) Antibacterial polyvinyl alcohol films incorporated with N-halamine grafted oxidized microcrystalline cellulose. Compos Commun 15:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2019.06.00510.1016/j.coco.2019.06.005 ↗
65. Vuoti S, Laatikainen E, Heikkinen H, Johansson LS, Saharinen E, Retulainen E (2013) Chemical modification of cellulosic fibers for better convertibility in packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym 96:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.05310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.053 ↗
66. Yang CQ (1991) FT-IR spectroscopy study of the ester crosslinking mechanism of cotton cellulose. Text Res J 61:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175910610080110.1177/004051759106100801 ↗
67. Abe M, Enomoto Y, Seki M, Miki T (2020) Esterification of solid wood for plastic forming. BioResour 15:6282–629810.15376/biores.15.3.6282-6298 ↗
68. Lu K, Zhu J, Bao X, Liu H, Yu L, Chen L (2020) Effect of starch microstructure on microwave-assisted esterification. Int J Biol Macromol 164:2550–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.09910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.099 ↗
69. Oun AA, Rhim JW (2016) Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from grain straws and their use for the preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 150:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.02010.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.020 ↗
70. Chen Y, Long Y, Li Q, Chen X, Xu X (2019) Synthesis of high-performance sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-based adsorbent for effective removal of methylene blue and Pb (II). Int J Biol Macromol 126:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.11910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.119 ↗
71. Le Gars M, Roger P, Belgacem N, Bras J (2020) Role of solvent exchange in dispersion of cellulose nanocrystals and their esterification using fatty acids as solvents. Cellulose 27:4319–4336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03101-010.1007/s10570-020-03101-0 ↗
72. Arun V, Perumal EM, Prakash KA, Rajesh M, Tamilarasan K (2020) Sequential fractionation and characterization of lignin and cellulose fiber from waste rice bran. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.10412410.1016/j.jece.2020.104124 ↗
73. Leszczyńska A, Radzik P, Szefer E, Mičušík M, Omastová M, Pielichowski K (2019) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals with succinic anhydride. Polymers 11:866. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1105086610.3390/polym11050866 ↗
74. Lin C, Wang Q, Deng Q, Huang H, Huang F, Huang L, Ma X (2019) Preparation of highly hazy transparent cellulose film from dissolving pulp. Cellulose 26:4061–4069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02367-310.1007/s10570-019-02367-3 ↗
75. Liu W, Mohanty AK, Askeland P, Drzal LT, Misra M (2004) Influence of fiber surface treatment on properties of Indian grass fiber reinforced soy protein based biocomposites. Polymers 45:7589–7596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.00910.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.009 ↗
76. Li W, Wang S, Wang W, Qin C, Wu M (2019) Facile preparation of reactive hydrophobic cellulose nanofibril film for reducing water vapor permeability (WVP) in packaging applications. Cellulose 26:3271–3284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02270-x10.1007/s10570-019-02270-x ↗
77. Gadhave RV, Das A, Mahanwar PA, Gadekar PT (2018) Starch based bio-plastics: the future of sustainable packaging. Open J Polym Chem 8:21–33. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpchem.2018.8200310.4236/ojpchem.2018.82003 ↗
78. Sim G, Liu Y, van de Ven T (2016) Transparent composite films prepared from chemically modified cellulose fibers. Cellulose 23:2011–2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0923-010.1007/s10570-016-0923-0 ↗
79. Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H, Entezami AA (2011) Improving the barrier and mechanical properties of cornstarch-based edible films: effect of citric acid and carboxymethyl cellulose. Ind Crop Prod 33:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.016 ↗
80. Ning W, Jiugao Y, Xiaofei M, Ying W (2007) The influence of citric acid on the properties of thermoplastic starch/linear low-density polyethylene blends. Carbohydr Polym 67:446–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.014 ↗
81. Kang IS, Yang CQ, Wei W, Lickfield GC (1998) Mechanical strength of durable press finished cotton fabrics: part I: effects of acid degradation and crosslinking of cellulose by polycarboxylic acids. Text Res J 68:865–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175980680111210.1177/004051759806801112 ↗
82. Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21:1595–1598. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080317410.1002/adma.200803174 ↗
83. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8:2485–2491. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm070397010.1021/bm0703970 ↗
84. Sun X, Wu Q, Zhang X, Ren S, Lei T, Li W, Zhang Q (2018) Nanocellulose films with combined cellulose nanofibers and nanocrystals: tailored thermal, optical and mechanical properties. Cellulose 25:1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1627-910.1007/s10570-017-1627-9 ↗
85. Cai J, Chen J, Zhang Q, Lei M, He J, Xiao A, Xiong H (2016) Well-aligned cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polyvinyl alcohol composite film: mechanical and optical properties. Carbohydr Polym 140:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.03910.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.039 ↗
86. Cuadri AA, Romero A, Bengoechea C, Guerrero A (2018) The effect of carboxyl group content on water uptake capacity and tensile properties of functionalized soy protein-based superabsorbent plastics. J Polym Environ 26:2934–2944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1183-x10.1007/s10924-018-1183-x ↗
87. Poussard L, Burel F, Couvercelle JP, Merhi Y, Tabrizian M, Bunel C (2004) Hemocompatibilty of new ionic polyurethanes: influence of carboxylic group insertion modes. Biomaterials 25:3473–3483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.06910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.069 ↗
88. Sim G (2016) Carboxylated cellulose pulp fibers: from fundamentals to applications. Dissertation, McGill University
89. Tosh B (2014) Synthesis and sustainable applications of cellulose esters and ethers: a review. Intl J Energy Sustain Env Eng 1:56–78
90. Sabzalian Z (2012) Cross-linking and hydrophobization of chemically modified cellulose fibers. Dissertation, McGill University
91. Basu P, Narendrakumar U, Arunachalam R, Devi S, Manjubala I (2018) Characterization and evaluation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based films for healing of full-thickness wounds in normal and diabetic rats. ACS Omega 3:12622–12632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0201510.1021/acsomega.8b02015 ↗
92. Goetz L, Mathew A, Oksman K, Gatenholm P, Ragauskas AJ (2009) A novel nanocomposite film prepared from crosslinked cellulosic whiskers. Carbohydr Polym 75:85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.01710.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.017 ↗
93. Kanafi NM, Rahman NA, Rosdi NH (2019) Citric acid cross-linking of highly porous carboxymethyl cellulose/poly (ethylene oxide) composite hydrogel films for controlled release applications. Mater Today Proc 7:721–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.12.06710.1016/j.matpr.2018.12.067 ↗
94. Kowalczyk D, Pytka M, Szymanowska U, Skrzypek T, Łupina K, Biendl M (2020) Release kinetics and antibacterial activity of potassium salts of iso-α-acids loaded into the films based on gelatin, carboxymethyl cellulose and their blends. Food Hydrocoll 109:106104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10610410.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106104 ↗
95. Wang W, Zhang X, Li C, Du G, Zhang H, Ni Y (2018) Using carboxylated cellulose nanofibers to enhance mechanical and barrier properties of collagen fiber film by electrostatic interaction. J Sci Food Agric 98:3089–3097. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.880910.1002/jsfa.8809 ↗
96. Biddeci G, Cavallaro G, Di Blasi F, Lazzara G, Massaro M, Milioto S, Spinelli G (2016) Halloysite nanotubes loaded with peppermint essential oil as filler for functional biopolymer film. Carbohydr Polym 152:548–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.04110.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.041 ↗
97. Castro PM, Fonte P, Oliveira A, Madureira AR, Sarmento B, Pintado ME (2017) Optimization of two biopolymer-based oral films for the delivery of bioactive molecules. Mater Sci Eng C 76:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.17310.1016/j.msec.2017.02.173 ↗
98. Condés MC, Añón MC, Dufresne A, Mauri AN (2018) Composite and nanocomposite films based on amaranth biopolymers. Food Hydrocoll 74:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.07.01310.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.07.013 ↗
99. Rivadeneira J, Audisio MC, Gorustovich A (2018) Films based on soy protein-agar blends for wound dressing: Effect of different biopolymer proportions on the drug release rate and the physical and antibacterial properties of the films. J Biomater Appl 32:1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532821875665310.1177/0885328218756653 ↗
100. Sultan NFK, Johari WLW (2017) The development of banana peel/corn starch bioplastic film: a preliminary study. Bioremediat Sci Technol Res 5:12–17. https://doi.org/10.54987/bstr.v5i1.35210.54987/bstr.v5i1.352 ↗