Time-resolved 3D characterisation of early-age microstructural development of Portland cement
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Time-resolved in-situ synchrotron X-ray microtomography reveals new levels of detail about the chemical and physical processes that take place as Portland cement hardens. The conversion of a fluid paste into a hardened product can be monitored on a sub-minute time-scale, and with sample movement/settlement corrections applied to enable individual particles to be tracked as they react, hydrate, and become interconnected into a single strong monolith. The growth of the strength-giving hydrate phases surrounding cement grains, and of the fluid-filled pore network that surrounds them, is able to be directly viewed at the level of individual cement particles through the application of this tracking protocol. When cement is brought into contact with water, a layer which differs in density from the bulk of the cement grains becomes observable on the grain surfaces during the induction period (during which time the heat evolution from the paste is relatively low). As hydration continues, reaction products grow both from particle surfaces into the initially fluid-filled region, and also into the space originally occupied by the cement particles, forming a density gradient within the microstructure. As the reaction accelerates and larger volumes of solid phases precipitate, the newly-formed solid structure percolates via interconnection of agglomerated low-density outer hydrates, which then densify as hydration continues. This eventually leads to solidification of the structure into a hardened porous matrix. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Scrivener K, Ouzia A, Juilland P, Kunhi Mohamed A (2019) Advances in understanding cement hydration mechanisms. Cem Concr Res 124:105–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10582310.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105823 ↗
2. Thomas JJ, Jennings HM (2006) A colloidal interpretation of chemical aging of the C–S–H gel and its effects on the properties of cement paste. Cem Concr Res 36:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.02210.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.022 ↗
3. Pustovgar E, Sangodkar RP, Andreev AS, Palacios M, Chmelka BF, Flatt RJ, d’Espinose de Lacaillerie J-B (2016) Understanding silicate hydration from quantitative analyses of hydrating tricalcium silicates. Nat Commun 7:10952. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1095210.1038/ncomms10952 ↗
4. Ioannidou K, Kanduč M, Li L, Frenkel D, Dobnikar J, Del Gado E (2016) The crucial effect of early-stage gelation on the mechanical properties of cement hydrates. Nat Commun 7:12106. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1210610.1038/ncomms12106 ↗
5. Thompson SP, Parker JE, Potter J, Hill TP, Birt A, Cobb TM, Yuan F, Tang CC (2009) Beamline I11 at Diamond: a new instrument for high resolution powder diffraction. Rev Sci Instrum 80(7):075107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.316721710.1063/1.3167217 ↗
6. Thompson SP, Parker JE, Marchal J, Potter J, Birt A, Yuan F, Fearn RD, Lennie AR, Street SR, Tang CC (2011) Fast X-ray powder diffraction on I11 at Diamond. J Synchrotron Radiat 18:637–648. https://doi.org/10.1107/S090904951101364110.1107/S0909049511013641 ↗
7. Fusseis F, Xiao X, Schrank C, De Carlo F (2014) A brief guide to synchrotron radiation-based microtomography in (structural) geology and rock mechanics. J Struct Geol 65:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.00510.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.005 ↗
8. Buffiere JY, Maire E, Adrien J, Masse JP, Boller E (2010) In situ experiments with X ray tomography: an attractive tool for experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 50:289–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9333-710.1007/s11340-010-9333-7 ↗
9. Snellings R, Mertens G, Adriaens R, Elsen J (2013) In situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction study of the early age hydration of cements blended with zeolitite and quartzite fines and water-reducing agent. Appl Clay Sci 72:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.12.00210.1016/j.clay.2012.12.002 ↗
10. Aranda MAG (2016) Recent studies of cements and concretes by synchrotron radiation crystallographic and cognate methods. Crystallogr Rev 22:150–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0889311X.2015.107026010.1080/0889311X.2015.1070260 ↗
11. Bullard JW, Jennings HM, Livingston RA, Nonat A, Scherer GW, Schweitzer JS, Scrivener KL, Thomas JJ (2011) Mechanisms of cement hydration. Cem Concr Res 41:1208–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.011 ↗
12. Moradian M, Hu Q, Aboustait M, Ley MT, Hanan JC, Xiao X, Rose V, Winarski R, Scherer GW (2019) Multi-scale observations of structure and chemical composition changes of portland cement systems during hydration. Constr Build Mater 212:486–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.013 ↗
13. Liu K, Cheng X, Ma Y, Gao X, Yu Y, Zhang C, Guo X, Zhuang J (2020) Visualization and quantification of pore structure of oil-well cement slurry in liquid-solid transition stage using high-resolution computed tomography. Cem Concr Compos 111:103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10363310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103633 ↗
14. Brisard S, Serdar M, Monteiro PJM (2020) Multiscale X-ray tomography of cementitious materials: a review. Cem Concr Res 128:105824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10582410.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105824 ↗
15. Hu Q, Aboustait M, Kim T, Ley MT, Hanan JC, Bullard J, Winarski R, Rose V (2016) Direct three-dimensional observation of the microstructure and chemistry of C3S hydration. Cem Concr Res 88:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.006 ↗
16. Bentz D, Martys NS, Stutzman P, Levenson M, Garboczi E, Dunsmuir J, Schwartz L (1994) X-ray microtomography of an ASTM C109 mortar exposed to sulfate attack. MRS Sympos Proc 370:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-370-7710.1557/PROC-370-77 ↗
17. Shah SP, Choi S (1999) Nondestructive techniques for studying fracture processes in concrete. Int J Fract 98:351–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101862000878010.1023/A:1018620008780 ↗
18. Burlion N, Bernard D, Chen D (2006) X-ray microtomography: application to microstructure analysis of a cementitious material during leaching process. Cem Concr Res 36:346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.008 ↗
19. Bultreys T, De Boever W, Cnudde V (2016) Imaging and image-based fluid transport modeling at the pore scale in geological materials: a practical introduction to the current state-of-the-art. Earth-Sci Rev 155:93–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.00110.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.001 ↗
20. Faulwetter S, Vasileiadou A, Kouratoras M, Dailianis T, Arvanitidis C (2013) Micro-computed tomography: introducing new dimensions to taxonomy. ZooKeys 263:1–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.263.426110.3897/zookeys.263.4261 ↗
21. Walker SM, Schwyn DA, Mokso R, Wicklein M, Müller T, Doube M, Stampanoni M, Krapp HG, Taylor GK (2014) In vivo time-resolved microtomography reveals the mechanics of the blowfly flight motor. PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.100182310.1371/journal.pbio.1001823 ↗
22. Lowe T, Garwood RJ, Simonsen TJ, Bradley RS, Withers PJ (2013) Metamorphosis revealed: time-lapse three-dimensional imaging inside a living chrysalis. J R Soc Interface 10(84):20130304. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.030410.1098/rsif.2013.0304 ↗
23. Vigor JE, Bernal SA, Xiao X, Provis JL (2020) Automated correction for the movement of suspended particulate in microtomographic data. Chem Eng Sci 223:115736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.11573610.1016/j.ces.2020.115736 ↗
24. Schlegel M-C, Sarfraz A, Müller U, Panne U, Emmerling F (2012) First seconds in a building’s life: in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of cement hydration on the millisecond timescale. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:4993–4996. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120099310.1002/anie.201200993 ↗
25. British Standard Institute (2011) BS EN 197-1: Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. London, UK
26. British Standards Institute (2015) BS 8500: Complementary British standard to BS EN 206. London, UK
27. De Carlo F, Xiao X, Tieman B (2006) X-ray tomography system, automation, and remote access at beamline 2-BM of the Advanced Photon Source. SPIE Opt Photon 6318:63180K. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.68103710.1117/12.681037 ↗
28. Gursoy D, De Carlo F, Xiao X, Jacobsen C (2014) TomoPy: a framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data. J Synchrotron Radiat 21:1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057751401393910.1107/S1600577514013939 ↗
29. Münch B, Trtik P, Marone F, Stampanoni M (2009) Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet: Fourier filtering. Opt Express 17:8567–8591. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.00856710.1364/OE.17.008567 ↗
30. Paganin D, Mayo SC, Gureyev TE, Miller PR, Wilkins SW (2002) Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J Microsc 206:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x ↗
31. Dowd B, Campbell G, Marr R, Nagarkar V, Tipnis S, Axe L, Siddons D (1999) Developments in synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography at the National Synchrotron Light Source. SPIE’s Int Sym Opt Sci Eng Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.36372510.1117/12.363725 ↗
32. Deboodt T, Wildenschild D, Ideker JH, Isgor OB (2021) Comparison of thresholding techniques for quantifying portland cement hydrates using synchrotron microtomography. Constr Build Mater 266:121109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12110910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121109 ↗
33. Scrivener KL (2004) Backscattered electron imaging of cementitious microstructures: understanding and quantification. Cem Concr Compos 26:935–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.02910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.029 ↗
34. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
35. Schmid B, Schindelin J, Cardona A, Longair M, Heisenberg M (2010) A high-level 3D visualization API for Java and ImageJ. BMC Bioinform 11:274. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-27410.1186/1471-2105-11-274 ↗
36. Fan M, Chen Y, Wan K (2021) Representative elementary volume analysis of hardened cement paste during hydration using X-ray computed tomography. Constr Build Mater 277:122268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12226810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122268 ↗
37. Ghanbarian B, Hunt AG, Ewing RP, Sahimi M (2013) Tortuosity in porous media: a critical review. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1461–1477. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.043510.2136/sssaj2012.0435 ↗
38. Aït-Mokhtar A, Amiri O, Dumargue P, Sammartino S (2002) A new model to calculate water permeability of cement-based materials from MIP results. Adv Cem Res 14:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2002.14.2.4310.1680/adcr.2002.14.2.43 ↗
39. Debnath B, Sarkar PP (2019) Permeability prediction and pore structure feature of pervious concrete using brick as aggregate. Constr Build Mater 213:643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.09910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.099 ↗
40. Guo Y, Zhang T, Du J, Wang C, Wei J, Yu Q (2021) Evaluating the chloride diffusion coefficient of cement mortars based on the tortuosity of pore structurally-designed cement pastes. Microporous Microporous Mater 317:111018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.11101810.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111018 ↗
41. Tranter TG, Kok MDR, Lam M, Gostick JT (2019) pytrax: a simple and efficient random walk implementation for calculating the directional tortuosity of images. SoftwareX 10:100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.10027710.1016/j.softx.2019.100277 ↗
42. Provis JL, Myers RJ, White CE, Rose V, van Deventer JSJ (2012) X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders. Cem Concr Res 42:855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.004 ↗
43. Promentilla MAB, Sugiyama T, Hitomi T, Takeda N (2009) Quantification of tortuosity in hardened cement pastes using synchrotron-based X-ray computed microtomography. Cem Concr Res 39:548–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.03.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2009.03.005 ↗
44. Bogue RH (1929) Calculation of the compounds in Portland cement. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 1:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50068a00610.1021/ac50068a006 ↗
45. Lerch W (1946) The influence of gypsum on the hydration and properties of portland cement pastes. Proc Am Soc Test Mater 46:1252–1291
46. Odler I, Wonnemann R (1983) Effect of alkalies on portland cement hydration II: alkalies present in form of sulphates. Cem Concr Res 13:771–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(83)90078-910.1016/0008-8846(83)90078-9 ↗
47. Juilland P, Nicoleau L, Arvidson RS, Gallucci E (2017) Advances in dissolution understanding and their implications for cement hydration. RILEM Tech Lett 2:90–98. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.4710.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.47 ↗
48. Birchall JD, Howard AJ, Double DD (1980) Some general considerations of a membrane/osmosis model for portland cement hydration. Cem Concr Res 10:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(80)90071-X10.1016/0008-8846(80)90071-X ↗
49. Stein HN, Stevels JM (1964) Influence of silica on the hydration of 3CaO, SiO2. J Appl Chem 14:338–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.501014080510.1002/jctb.5010140805 ↗
50. Brown PW, Pommersheim J, Frohnsdorff G (1985) A kinetic model for the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Cem Concr Res 15:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(85)90006-710.1016/0008-8846(85)90006-7 ↗
51. Nicoleau L, Nonat A (2016) A new view on the kinetics of tricalcium silicate hydration. Cem Concr Res 86:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.04.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2016.04.009 ↗
52. Deboodt T, Wildenschild D, Ideker JH, Isgor OB (2019) Use of iodine for improving phase quantification using X-ray tomography. Cem Concr Res 116:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.004 ↗
53. Juilland P, Gallucci E, Flatt R, Scrivener K (2010) Dissolution theory applied to the induction period in alite hydration. Cem Concr Res 40:831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.01.01210.1016/j.cemconres.2010.01.012 ↗
54. Bellmann F, Sowoidnich T, Ludwig H-M, Damidot D (2015) Dissolution rates during the early hydration of tricalcium silicate. Cem Concr Res 72:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.002 ↗
55. Richardson IG (2008) The calcium silicate hydrates. Cem Concr Res 38:137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.005 ↗
56. Bentz DP, Garboczi EJ (1991) Percolation of phases in a three-dimensional cement paste microstructural model. Cem Concr Res 21:325–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(91)90014-910.1016/0008-8846(91)90014-9 ↗
57. Gallucci E, Mathur P, Scrivener K (2010) Microstructural development of early age hydration shells around cement grains. Cem Concr Res 40:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.015 ↗