The effect of physical aging on the embrittlement of steam-sterilized polycarbonate
Source abstract
Abstract
Polycarbonate is known to suffer from dramatic reductions in ductility upon exposure to hot, humid environments, such as during steam sterilization. Two phenomena have been proposed to be the main causes of this embrittlement: hydrolysis and microcavity formation. The present study focuses on a third phenomenon, whose contribution to the embrittlement has until now been considered insignificant: (physical) aging. By studying the influence of steam sterilization on the tensile deformation behavior of polycarbonate, it is shown that aging actually is one of the dominant factors in the embrittlement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Legrand DG (1969) J Appl Polym Sci 13:212910.1002/app.1969.070131010 ↗
2. Engels TAP, Van Breemen LCA, Govaert LE, Meijer HEH (2011) Polymer 52:181110.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.027 ↗
3. Robeson LM, Crisafulli ST (1983) J Appl Polym Sci 28:292510.1002/app.1983.070280920 ↗
4. Gardner RJ, Martin JR (1979) J Appl Polym Sci 24:126910.1002/app.1979.070240512 ↗
5. Ghorbel I, Thominette F, Spiteri P, Verdu J (1995) J Appl Polym Sci 55:16310.1002/app.1995.070550118 ↗
6. Joseph EA, Paul DR, Barlow JW (1982) J Appl Polym Sci 27:480710.1002/app.1982.070271225 ↗
7. Golovoy A, Zinbo M (1989) Polym Eng Sci 29:173310.1002/pen.760292402 ↗
8. Flory PJ (1945) J Am Chem Soc 67:204810.1021/ja01227a506 ↗
9. Gent AN, Thomas AG (1972) J Polym Sci A2 Polym Phys 10:57110.1002/pol.1972.160100314 ↗
10. Bersted BH, Anderson TG (1990) J Appl Polym Sci 39:49910.1002/app.1990.070390302 ↗
11. Vincent PI (1960) Polymer 1:42510.1016/0032-3861(60)90059-8 ↗
12. Li C, Zhang Y, Zhang Y (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:58910.1002/app.11825 ↗
13. Narkis M, Bell JP (1982) J Appl Polym Sci 27:280910.1002/app.1982.070270807 ↗
14. Narkis M, Nicolais L, Apicella A, Bell JP (1984) Polym Eng Sci 24:211–21710.1002/pen.760240308 ↗
15. Qayyum MM, White JR (1991) J Appl Polym Sci 43:12910.1002/app.1991.070430111 ↗
16. Van Melick HGH, Govaert LE, Meijer HEH (2003) Polymer 44:357910.1016/S0032-3861(03)00089-2 ↗
17. Golden JH, Hammant BL, Hazell EA (1967) J Appl Polym Sci 11:157110.1002/app.1967.070110818 ↗
18. Bauwens-Crowet C, Bauwens J-C (1982) Polymer 23:159910.1016/0032-3861(82)90178-1 ↗
19. Hutchinson JM, Smith S, Horne B, Gourlay GM (1999) Macromolecules 32:504610.1021/ma981391t ↗
20. Klompen ETJ, Engels TAP, Govaert LE, Meijer HEH (2005) Macromolecules 38:699710.1021/ma050498v ↗
21. Van Melick HGH, Bressers OFJT, Den Toonder JMJ, Govaert LE, Meijer HEH (2003) Polymer 44:248110.1016/S0032-3861(03)00110-1 ↗
22. Kramer EJ (1983) In: Kausch HH (ed) Crazing in polymers. Advances in polymer science, vol 91/92, Berlin, Springer, pp 1–56
23. Pryde CA, Hellman MY (1980) J Appl Polym Sci 25:257310.1002/app.1980.070251114 ↗
24. Schilling FC, Ringo WM Jr, Sloane NJA, Bovey FA (1981) Macromolecules 14:53210.1021/ma50004a014 ↗
25. Van Melick HGH, Govaert LE, Meijer HEH (2003) Polymer 44:45710.1016/S0032-3861(02)00770-X ↗