Surface hardening of biocompatible ultrafine-grained niobium zirconium alloy by two-stage oxidation treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study reports on an optimized surface hardening process for biocompatible ultrafine-grained (UFG) niobium 2.3 wt% zirconium (NbZr) alloy, a promising candidate implant material. The as-received material of conventional grain size (CG) was processed using multipass equal channel angular processing at room temperature to obtain an UFG microstructure featuring high strength and ductility. Subsequent surface hardening was performed by a heat treatment leading to internal oxidation. Using a thermogravimetric system, the influence of temperatures, time, and partial pressure of oxygen ( $$ p_{{\text{O}}_2} $$ ) on the oxidation kinetics were investigated. Metallographic and microscopic analyses and hardness measurements were employed to evaluate maximum hardness, penetration-depth and scale formation under various conditions. Heat treatment at 620 °C for 6 h at a $$ p_{{\text{O}}_2} $$ of 0.2 hPa led to sufficiently rapid oxidation kinetics yielding a relatively high depth of penetration without formation of loose Nb2O5 on the surface, which was observed at higher $$ p_{{\text{O}}_2} $$ . As compared to CG material, improved hardness profiles were reached using the same heat treatment parameters, since the UFG structure significantly changes diffusion conditions and therefore oxidation kinetics. After a second heat treatment in high vacuum the high maximum hardness of 820 HV0.01 in the UFG material was reduced effectively and a less steep hardness gradient was achieved, both contributing to a less brittle behavior under mechanical loading. High-cycle fatigue tests performed on surface-hardened UFG NbZr samples showed a substantial improvement of fatigue life in tests conducted near the endurance limit. Especially when high fatigue and wear resistance are key issues for a given application, the internal oxidation process offers an effective way to further improve the properties of UFG NbZr.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Niendorf T, Canadinc D, Maier HJ, Karaman I, Yapici GG (2007) Acta Mater 55:659610.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.015 ↗
2. Rubitschek F, Niendorf T, Karaman I, Maier HJ (2012) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 5:181. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.02310.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.023 ↗
3. Eisenbarth E (2004) Biomaterials 25:5705. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.021 ↗
4. Gradinger R, Gollwitzer H (2006) Ossäre Integration. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-35687-5 ↗
5. Rabenseifner L (1986) Tantal und Niob als Implantatwerkstoff. Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart
6. Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Progress Mater Sci 51:88110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
7. Segal VM (1995) Mater Sci Eng A 197:15710.1016/0921-5093(95)09705-8 ↗
8. Niinomi M (2007) Int J Fatigue 29:992. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.021 ↗
9. Fleck C, Eifler D (2010) Int J Fatigue 32:929. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.009 ↗
10. Styles CM, Evans SL, Gregson PJ (1998) Biomaterials 19:1057. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00031-310.1016/S0142-9612(98)00031-3 ↗
11. Niendorf T, Canadinc D, Maier HJ, Karaman I, Yapici GG (2008) Scr Mater 58:57110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.015 ↗
12. Purcek G, Saray O, Rubitschek F, Niendorf T, Maier HJ, Karaman I (2011) Acta Mater 59:7683. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.02810.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.028 ↗
13. Undisz A, Zeigmeister U, Rettenmayr M, Oechsle M (2007) J Alloys Compd 438:178. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.03610.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.036 ↗
14. Gegner J (2006) Komplexe Diffusionsprozesse in Metallen. Expert, Renningen
15. Schimmel G, Rettenmayr M, Kempf B, Fischer-Buehner J (2008) Oxid Met 70:25. doi: 10.1007/s11085-008-9109-y10.1007/s11085-008-9109-y ↗
16. Divinski SV, Reglitz G, Rösner H, Estrin Y, Wilde G (2011) Acta Mater 59:1974. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.06310.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.063 ↗
17. Nazarov AA, Romanov AE, Valiev RZ (1993) Acta Metall Mater 41:1033. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90152-I10.1016/0956-7151(93)90152-I ↗
18. DiStefano JR, Pint BA, DeVan JH (2000) Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 18:23710.1016/S0263-4368(00)00026-3 ↗
19. DiStefano JR, Chitwood LD (2001) J Nucl Mater 295:4210.1016/S0022-3115(01)00495-0 ↗
20. Dickerson SL, Gibeling JC (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 278:12110.1016/S0921-5093(99)00591-2 ↗
21. Titran RH, Uz M (1993) NASA Technical Memorandum 107207
22. Uz M, Titran RH (1991) NASA Technical Memorandum 103647
23. Segal VM, Goforth RR, Hartwig KT (1995) US Patent No. 5,400,633
24. Niendorf T, Maier HJ, Canadinc D, Karaman I (2008) Key Eng Mater 378–379:3910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.378-379.39 ↗
25. Barber R, Dudo T, Yasskin P, Hartwig KT (2004) Scr Mater 51:373. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.022 ↗
26. Tietz TE, Wilson JW (1965) Behavior and properties of refractory metals. Stanford University Press, Palo alto
27. Bürgel R, Maier HJ, Niendorf T (2011) Handbuch Hochtemperatur-Werkstofftechnik. Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden10.1007/978-3-8348-9907-1 ↗
28. Rubitschek F, Niendorf T, Karaman I, Maier HJ (2012) J Alloys Compd. 517:61. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.15010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.150 ↗