Biofunctionalized bacterial cellulose grafted with bacitracin for wound healing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Silk-based biomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Ren H, Zhao F, Zhang Q, Huang X, Wang Z (2022) Autophagy and skin wound healing. Burns Trauma 10:tkac003. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac00310.1093/burnst/tkac003 ↗
2. Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U (2016) Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res 58(1–2):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/00045491910.1159/000454919 ↗
3. Zhang H, Lin X, Cao X, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhao Y (2024) Developing natural polymers for skin wound healing. Bioact Mater 33:355–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.11.01210.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.11.012 ↗
4. Dong R, Guo B (2021) Smart wound dressings for wound healing. Nano Today 41:101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.10129010.1016/j.nantod.2021.101290 ↗
5. Ambekar RS, Kandasubramanian B (2019) Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: a review. Eur Polym J 117:304–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020 ↗
6. Nguyen TTT, Ghosh C, Hwang SG, Tran LD, Park JS (2013) Characteristics of curcumin-loaded poly (lactic acid) nanofibers for wound healing. J Mater Sci 48(20):7125–7133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7527-y10.1007/s10853-013-7527-y ↗
7. Mandal SM, Roy A, Mahata D, Migliolo L, Nolasco DO, Franco OL (2014) Functional and structural insights on self-assembled nanofiber-based novel antibacterial ointment from antimicrobial peptides, bacitracin and gramicidin S. J Antibiot 67(11):771–775. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2014.7010.1038/ja.2014.70 ↗
8. Ai X, Luo R, Wang H, Yan B, Li K, Yu X, Dong W, Tan Y et al (2023) Vascular endothelial growth factor a modified mRNA engineered cellular electrospun membrane complexes promotes mouse skin wound repair. Mater Today Bio 22:100776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.10077610.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100776 ↗
9. Zhou C, Yang Z, Xun X, Ma L, Chen Z, Hu X, Wu X, Wan Y et al (2022) De novo strategy with engineering a multifunctional bacterial cellulose-based dressing for rapid healing of infected wounds. Bioact Mater 13:212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.04310.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.043 ↗
10. Wang YY, Zhao XQ, Li DM, Wu YM, Wahid F, Xie YY, Zhong C (2023) Review on the strategies for enhancing mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 58(39):15265–15293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08803-x10.1007/s10853-023-08803-x ↗
11. He W, Wang X, Hang T, Chen J, Wang Z, Mosselhy DA, Xu J, Wang S et al (2023) Fabrication of Cu2+-loaded phase-transited lysozyme nanofilm on bacterial cellulose: antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and pro-angiogenesis for bacteria-infected wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 309:120681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12068110.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120681 ↗
12. Sulaeva I, Henniges U, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2015) Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: properties and modifications. rev Biotechnol Adv 33(8):1547–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.07.00910.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.07.009 ↗
13. Guzun AS, Stroescu M, Jinga SI, Voicu G, Grumezescu AM, Holban AM (2014) Plackett-burman experimental design for bacterial cellulose-silica composites synthesis. Mater Sci Eng C 42:280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.05.03110.1016/j.msec.2014.05.031 ↗
14. Zhou S, Peng H, Zhao A, Zhang R, Li T, Yang X, Lin D (2024) Synthesis of bacterial cellulose nanofibers/Ag nanoparticles: Structure, characterization and antibacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol 259:129392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.12939210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129392 ↗
15. Sun M, Li D, Xi Y, Qin X, Liao Y, Liu X, Jia S, Xie Y et al (2024) NIR-triggered bacterial cellulose-based wound dressings for multiple synergistic therapy of infected wound. Int J Biol Macromol 259:129033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12903310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.129033 ↗
16. Fernandes SC, Sadocco P, Alonso-Varona A, Palomares T, Eceiza A, Silvestre AJ, Mondragon I, Freire CS (2013) Bioinspired antimicrobial and biocompatible bacterial cellulose membranes obtained by surface functionalization with aminoalkyl groups. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(8):3290–3297. https://doi.org/10.1021/am400338n10.1021/am400338n ↗
17. Shahriari-Khalaji M, Li G, Liu L, Sattar M, Chen L, Zhong C, Hong FF (2022) A poly-l-lysine-bonded TEMPO-oxidized bacterial nanocellulose-based antibacterial dressing for infected wound treatment. Carbohydr Polym 287:119266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11926610.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119266 ↗
18. Yang Z, Feng F, Jiang W, Ma L, Liu M, Li K, Wan Y, Ao H (2022) Designment of polydopamine/bacterial cellulose incorporating copper (II) sulfate as an antibacterial wound dressing. Biomater Adv 134:112591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.11259110.1016/j.msec.2021.112591 ↗
19. Ma L, Jiang W, Xun X, Liu M, Han X, Xie J, Wang M, Zhang Q et al (2023) Homogeneous silver nanoparticle loaded polydopamine/polyethyleneimine-coated bacterial cellulose nanofibers for wound dressing. Int J Biol Macromol 246:125658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12565810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125658 ↗
20. Hong W, Gao X, Qiu P, Yang J, Qiao M, Shi H, Zhang D, Tian C et al (2017) Synthesis, construction, and evaluation of self-assembled nano-bacitracin a as an efficient antibacterial agent in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine 12:4691–4708. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S13699810.2147/IJN.S136998 ↗
21. Chen J, Gao M, Wang L, Li S, He J, Qin A, Ren L, Wang Y et al (2018) Aggregation-induced emission probe for study of the bactericidal mechanism of antimicrobial peptides. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(14):11436–11442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1822110.1021/acsami.7b18221 ↗
22. Be N, Ao H, Zhou J, Tang T, Yue B (2016) Biofunctionalization of titanium with bacitracin immobilization shows potential for anti-bacteria, osteogenesis and reduction of macrophage inflammation. Colloid Surface B 145:728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.08910.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.089 ↗
23. Lemnaru GM, Truşcă RD, Ilie CI, Țiplea RE, Ficai D, Oprea O, Stoica-Guzun A, Ficai A et al (2020) Antibacterial activity of bacterial cellulose loaded with bacitracin and amoxicillin: in vitro studies. Molecules 25(18):4069. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2518406910.3390/molecules25184069 ↗
24. Zhang C, Cao J, Zhao S, Luo H, Yang Z, Gama M, Zhang Q, Su D et al (2020) Biocompatibility evaluation of bacterial cellulose as a scaffold material for tissue-engineered corneal stroma. Cellulose 27(5):2775–2784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-02979-010.1007/s10570-020-02979-0 ↗
25. Cristina C, Robin Z, Jean-L P, Gloria C, Inaki M, Piedad G (2011) Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr Polym 84:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.072 ↗
26. Tatagar AM, Moodi JI, Vanti GL, Murgunde B (2024) Development of sustainable ternary bionanocomposite film reinforced with nanocellulose and nanoclay for microbial efficacy. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09568-710.1007/s10853-024-09568-7 ↗
27. Yang HC, Wu MB, Li YJ, Chen YF, Wan LS, Xu ZK (2016) Effects of polyethyleneimine molecular weight and proportion on the membrane hydrophilization by codepositing with dopamine. J Appl Polym Sci 133(32):43792. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4379210.1002/app.43792 ↗
28. Khodabakhshi D, Eskandarinia A, Kefayat A, Rafienia M, Navid S, Karbasi S, Moshtaghian J (2019) In vitro and in vivo performance of a propolis-coated polyurethane wound dressing with high porosity and antibacterial efficacy. Colloid Surface B 178:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.01010.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.010 ↗
29. Farhana ZF, Kamarudin H, Rahmat A, Al Bakri AMM (2015) The relationship between water absorption and porosity for geopolymer paste. Mater Sci Forum 803:166–172. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.803.16610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.803.166 ↗
30. Shao Z, Yin T, Jiang J, He Y, Xiang T, Zhou S (2023) Wound microenvironment self-adaptive hydrogel with efficient angiogenesis for promoting diabetic wound healing. Bioact Mater 20:561–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.01810.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.018 ↗
31. Feng X, Zhang X, Li S, Zheng Y, Shi X, Li F, Guo S, Yang J (2020) Preparation of aminated fish scale collagen and oxidized sodium alginate hybrid hydrogel for enhanced full-thickness wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 164:626–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.05810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.058 ↗
32. Zhang Z, Guo J, He Y, Han J, Chen M, Zheng Y, Zhang S, Guo S et al (2022) An injectable double network hydrogel with hemostasis and antibacterial activity for promoting multidrug-resistant bacteria infected wound healing. Biomater Sci 10(12):3268–3281. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2bm00347c10.1039/d2bm00347c ↗
33. Xun X, Li Y, Zhu X, Zhang Q, Lu Y, Yang Z, Wan Y, Yao F et al (2021) Fabrication of robust, shape recoverable, macroporous bacterial cellulose scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 21(11):2100167. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20210016710.1002/mabi.202100167 ↗