A hybrid coating of polydopamine and nano-hydroxyapatite enhances surface properties of 3D printed poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
Polydopamine (pDA)-based surface modification is a promising method to enhance the surface conditions of biomaterials and facilitate cell-material interactions. Traditionally, the pDA is coated before anchoring secondary bioactive factors, which requires an extra step and limits the availability of pDA on the surface, impeding the efficacy of pDA itself in enhancing cell function. In this study, for the first time, nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) particles were immobilized on 3D printed poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds with a single step during dopamine polymerization. Unique micro-/nano-pores were produced during incubation of the PLGA substrate with Tris-HCl. Surprisingly, PLGA controls and pDA demonstrated higher surface roughness than nHA and pDA-nHA groups. The coating processes did not alter the strut width (cross-sectional area from top view). No visible differences in coating thickness were observed among groups. Both nHA and pDA alone increased the hydrophilicity of the PLGA surface, and the hybrid pDA-nHA coating further improved the hydrophilicity. The mechanical properties were not different between groups. Only the hybrid pDA-nHA coating showed increasing cell numbers from day 1 to 3 and day 3 to 5. Cell number on hybrid pDA-nHA scaffolds on day 5 was greatest among experimental groups, while cell number on pDA was the lowest at all timepoints. These results collectively highlight a novel, single-step method of self-polymerized, dopamine-induced nHA deposition for enhancing the surface properties of and cell-material interactions with 3D printed PLGA scaffolds, demonstrating the efficacy of pDA-based hybrid coatings in functionalizing polymer substrates for bone tissue engineering.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Guo T, Lim CG, Noshin M et al (2018) 3D printing bioactive PLGA scaffolds using DMSO as a removable solvent. Bioprinting 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e0003810.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00038 ↗
2. Babilotte J, Martin B, Guduric V et al (2021) Development and characterization of a PLGA-HA composite material to fabricate 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11133410.1016/j.msec.2020.111334 ↗
3. Nemani SK, Annavarapu RK, Mohammadian B et al (2018) Surface Modification of polymers: methods and applications. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1801247. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20180124710.1002/admi.201801247 ↗
4. Sun X, Xu C, Wu G et al (2017) Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid): applications and future prospects for periodontal tissue regeneration. Polymers (Basel) 9:189. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym906018910.3390/polym9060189 ↗
5. Chen W, Tucker L, Teer L, Priddy LB (2020) Dopamine-assisted nano-hydroxyapatite coating on 3d printed poly ( lactic-co-glycolic acid ) scaffolds. Biomed Sci Instrum 56:939527
6. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ (2011) Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel) 3:1377–1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym303137710.3390/polym3031377 ↗
7. Zhang X, Xiao Y, Lang M (2013) Synthesis and degradation behavior of miktoarm poly(ε-caprolactone) 2 -b-poly(L-lactone) 2 microspheres. Polym J 45:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2012.16610.1038/pj.2012.166 ↗
8. Laurencin CT, Attawia M, Borden MD (1999) Advancements in tissue engineered bone substitutes: current opinion in orthopaedics. Curr Opin Orthop 10:445–45110.1097/00001433-199912000-00005 ↗
9. Kofron MD, Griswold A, Kumbar SG et al (2009) The implications of polymer selection in regenerative medicine: a comparison of amorphous and semi-crystalline polymer for tissue regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 19:1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20080132710.1002/adfm.200801327 ↗
10. Rizzi SC, Heath DJ, Coombes AGA et al (2001) Biodegradable polymer/hydroxyapatite composites: surface analysis and initial attachment of human osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 55:475–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20010615)55:4%3c475::AID-JBM1039%3e3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/1097-4636(20010615)55:4<475::AID-JBM1039>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
11. Chen W, Tucker L, Bennett J et al (2019) Effects of alkali treatment time on nano- hydroxyapatite coating of 3d printed poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds. Bioceramics 31:21–29
12. Dhert WJA, Klein CPAT, Wolke JGC et al (1991) Student research award in the graduate degree candidate category, 17th annual meeting of the society for biomaterials, scottsdale, AZ may 1–5, 1991. A mechanical investigation of fluorapatite, magnesiumwhitlockite, and hydroxylapatite plasma-sprayed coatings in goats. J Biomed Mater Res 25:1183–1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.82025100210.1002/jbm.820251002 ↗
13. Tian Q, Rivera-Castaneda L, Liu H (2017) Optimization of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) coatings on magnesium substrates using one-step electrophoretic deposition. Mater Lett 186:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.07210.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.072 ↗
14. Zhu J, Tang D, Lu Z et al (2020) Ultrafast bone-like apatite formation on highly porous poly(L-lactic acid)-hydroxyapatite fibres. Mater Sci Eng C 116:111168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11116810.1016/j.msec.2020.111168 ↗
15. Chien C-Y, Tsai W-B (2013) Poly(dopamine)-assisted immobilization of Arg-Gly-Asp peptides, hydroxyapatite, and bone morphogenic protein-2 on titanium to improve the osteogenesis of bone marrow stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/am401071f10.1021/am401071f ↗
16. Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB (2007) Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science (80- ) 318:426–430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
17. Ryu JH, Messersmith PB, Lee H (2018) Polydopamine surface chemistry: a decade of discovery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:7523–754010.1021/acsami.7b19865 ↗
18. Liu Y, Ai K, Lu L (2014) Polydopamine and its derivative materials: Synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem Rev 114:5057–511510.1021/cr400407a ↗
19. Yan J, Yang L, Lin M-F et al (2013) Polydopamine spheres as active templates for convenient synthesis of various nanostructures. Small 9:596–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20120106410.1002/smll.201201064 ↗
20. Ko E, Yang K, Shin J, Cho S-W (2013) Polydopamine-assisted osteoinductive peptide immobilization of polymer scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration by human adipose-derived stem cells. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400834310.1021/bm4008343 ↗
21. Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB (2007) Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318:426–430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
22. Shin YM, Bin LY, Shin H (2011) Time-dependent mussel-inspired functionalization of poly(l-lactide-co-e{open}-caprolactone) substrates for tunable cell behaviors. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.05.00410.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.05.004 ↗
23. Kord Forooshani P, Polega E, Thomson K et al (2019) Antibacterial properties of mussel-inspired polydopamine coatings prepared by a simple two-step shaking-assisted method. Front Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.0063110.3389/fchem.2019.00631 ↗
24. Liu Y, Xu C, Gu Y et al (2019) Polydopamine-modified poly(L-lactic acid) nanofiber scaffolds immobilized with an osteogenic growth peptide for bone tissue regeneration. RSC Adv 9:11722–11736. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra08828d10.1039/c8ra08828d ↗
25. Li Y, Yang W, Li X et al (2015) Improving osteointegration and osteogenesis of three-dimensional porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds by polydopamine-assisted biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:5715–5724. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0033110.1021/acsami.5b00331 ↗
26. Luo R, Tang L, Wang J et al (2013) Improved immobilization of biomolecules to quinone-rich polydopamine for efficient surface functionalization. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 106:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.03310.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.033 ↗
27. Ho CC, Ding SJ (2014) Structure, properties and applications of mussel-inspired polydopamine. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10:3063–308410.1166/jbn.2014.1888 ↗
28. Huang S, Liang N, Hu Y et al (2016) Polydopamine-assisted surface modification for bone biosubstitutes. Biomed Res Int 2016:2389895. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/238989510.1155/2016/2389895 ↗
29. Jiang J, Huang Y, Wang Y et al (2017) Mussel-inspired dopamine and carbon nanotube leading to a biocompatible self-rolling conductive hydrogel film. Mater (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1008096410.3390/ma10080964 ↗
30. Wang H, Qin Z, Liu Y et al (2017) Design and preparation of porous polymer particles with polydopamine coating and selective enrichment for biomolecules. RSC Adv 7:45311–45319. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra08175h10.1039/c7ra08175h ↗
31. Holten-Andersen N, Mates TE, Toprak MS et al (2009) Metals and the integrity of a biological coating: the cuticle of mussel byssus. Langmuir 25:3323–3326. https://doi.org/10.1021/la802701210.1021/la8027012 ↗
32. Jia L, Han F, Wang H et al (2019) Polydopamine-assisted surface modification for orthopaedic implants. J Orthop Transl 17:82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.04.00110.1016/j.jot.2019.04.001 ↗
33. Ryu J, Ku SH, Lee H, Park CB (2010) Mussel-inspired polydopamine coating as a universal route to hydroxyapatite crystallization. Adv Funct Mater 20:2132–2139. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20090234710.1002/adfm.200902347 ↗
34. Xu Y, Li H, Wu J et al (2018) Polydopamine-induced hydroxyapatite coating facilitates hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 implant osteogenesis: An in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomed 13:8179–8193. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S18113710.2147/IJN.S181137 ↗
35. Zhou Z, Zheng B, Gu Y et al (2020) New approach for improving anticorrosion and biocompatibility of magnesium alloys via polydopamine intermediate layer-induced hydroxyapatite coating. Surf Interfaces 19:100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10050110.1016/j.surfin.2020.100501 ↗
36. Zhang M, Zhang J, Ban L et al (2020) Polydopamine regulated hydroxyapatite microspheres grown in the three-dimensional honeycomb-like mollusk shell-derived organic template for osteogenesis. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8f2010.1088/1758-5090/ab8f20 ↗
37. Wang Z, Li P, Jiang Y et al (2017) Mussel-inspired nanostructured coatings assembled using polydopamine nanoparticles and hydroxyapatite nanorods for biomedical applications. Biosurface Biotribol 3:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BSBT.2017.01.00110.1016/J.BSBT.2017.01.001 ↗
38. Jo S, Kang SM, Park SA et al (2013) Enhanced adhesion of preosteoblasts inside 3DPCL scaffolds by polydopamine coating and mineralization. Macromol Biosci 13:1389–1395. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20130020310.1002/mabi.201300203 ↗
39. Kasemset S, Lee A, Miller DJ et al (2012) Effect of polydopamine deposition conditions on fouling resistance, physical properties, and permeation properties of reverse osmosis membranes in oil/water separation. J Memb Sci 425–426:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.04910.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.049 ↗
40. Huang Z, Wu Z, Ma B et al (2018) Enhanced in vitro biocompatibility and osteogenesis of titanium substrates immobilized with dopamine-assisted superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for hBMSCs. R Soc Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.17203310.1098/rsos.172033 ↗
41. Chen S, Chen Y, Lei Y, Yin Y (2009) Novel strategy in enhancing stability and corrosion resistance for hydrophobic functional films on copper surfaces. Electrochem Commun 11:1675–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2009.06.02110.1016/j.elecom.2009.06.021 ↗
42. Kang K, Choi IS, Nam Y (2011) A biofunctionalization scheme for neural interfaces using polydopamine polymer. Biomaterials 32:6374–6380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.028 ↗
43. Sheng WB, Li W, Zhang GX et al (2015) Study on the UV-shielding and controlled-release properties of a polydopamine coating for avermectin. New J Chem 39:2752–2757. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj01744g10.1039/c4nj01744g ↗
44. Chien C-Y, Liu T-Y, Kuo W-H et al (2013) Dopamine-assisted immobilization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and RGD peptides to improve the osteoconductivity of titanium. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 101A:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3437610.1002/jbm.a.34376 ↗
45. Yu X, Walsh J, Wei M (2013) Covalent immobilization of collagen on titanium through polydopamine coating to improve cellular performances of MC3T3-E1 cells. RSC Adv 4:7185–7192. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA44137G10.1039/C3RA44137G ↗
46. Gao X, Song J, Ji P et al (2016) Polydopamine-templated hydroxyapatite reinforced polycaprolactone composite nanofibers with enhanced cytocompatibility and osteogenesis for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:3499–3515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1241310.1021/acsami.5b12413 ↗
47. Lee JS, Yi JK, An SY, Heo JS (2014) Increased osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells on polydopamine film occurs via activation of integrin and PI3K signaling pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem 34:1824–1834. https://doi.org/10.1159/00036638110.1159/000366381 ↗
48. Lee DJ, Tseng HC, Wong SW et al (2015) Dopaminergic effects on in vitro osteogenesis. Bone Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2015.2010.1038/boneres.2015.20 ↗
49. Wang CX, Ge XY, Wang MY et al (2020) Dopamine D1 receptor-mediated activation of the ERK signaling pathway is involved in the osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 11:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1529-x10.1186/s13287-019-1529-x ↗
50. Wang L, Han L, Xue P et al (2021) Dopamine suppresses osteoclast differentiation via cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway. Cell Signal 78:10984710.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109847 ↗
51. Zhou J, Guo X, Zheng Q et al (2017) Improving osteogenesis of three-dimensional porous scaffold based on mineralized recombinant human-like collagen via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of BMP-2-derived peptide. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 152:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.12.04110.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.12.041 ↗
52. Kaushik N, Nguyen LN, Kim JH et al (2020) Strategies for using polydopamine to induce biomineralization of hydroxyapatite on implant materials for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 21:1–1910.3390/ijms21186544 ↗
53. Park J, Lee SJ, Jung TG et al (2021) Surface modification of a three-dimensional polycaprolactone scaffold by polydopamine, biomineralization, and BMP-2 immobilization for potential bone tissue applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 199:111528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11152810.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111528 ↗
54. Chen W, Nichols L, Brinkley F et al (2020) Alkali treatment facilitates functional nano-hydroxyapatite coating of 3D printed polylactic acid scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11168610.1016/j.msec.2020.111686 ↗
55. Alippilakkotte S, Sreejith L (2018) Benign route for the modification and characterization of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) scaffolds for medicinal application. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4605610.1002/app.46056 ↗
56. Hejazi I, Seyfi J, Hejazi E et al (2015) Investigating the role of surface micro/nano structure in cell adhesion behavior of superhydrophobic polypropylene/nanosilica surfaces. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 127:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.05410.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.054 ↗
57. Li C, Zhang J, Han J, Yao B (2021) A numerical solution to the effects of surface roughness on water–coal contact angle. Sci Rep 11:459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80729-910.1038/s41598-020-80729-9 ↗
58. Latifi SM, Shankar R, Donahue HJ (2020) Polydopamine coating on titanium affects osteoblastic differentiation to a greater degree than does surface roughness. Adv Mater Phys Chem 10:339–349. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2020.101202710.4236/ampc.2020.1012027 ↗
59. Ito S (2003) A chemist’s view of melanogenesis. Pigment Cell Res 16:230–236. https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0749.2003.00037.X10.1034/J.1600-0749.2003.00037.X ↗
60. Ball V (2018) Polydopamine films and particles with catalytic activity. Catal Today 301:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.01.03110.1016/j.cattod.2017.01.031 ↗
61. Liebscher J, Mrówczyński R, Scheidt HA et al (2013) Structure of polydopamine: a never-ending story? Langmuir 29:10539–10548. https://doi.org/10.1021/la402028810.1021/la4020288 ↗
62. Hong S, Na YS, Choi S et al (2012) Non-covalent self-assembly and covalent polymerization co-contribute to polydopamine formation. Adv Funct Mater 22:4711–4717. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20120115610.1002/adfm.201201156 ↗
63. Li M, Liu X, Xu Z et al (2016) Dopamine modified organic-inorganic hybrid coating for antimicrobial and osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:33972–33981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0945710.1021/acsami.6b09457 ↗
64. Lim C, Huang J, Kim S et al (2016) Nanomechanics of poly(catecholamine) coatings in aqueous solutions. Angew Chemie Int Ed 55:3342–3346. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20151031910.1002/anie.201510319 ↗
65. Della Vecchia NF, Luchini A, Napolitano A et al (2014) Tris buffer modulates polydopamine growth, aggregation, and paramagnetic properties. Langmuir 30:9811–9818. https://doi.org/10.1021/la501560z10.1021/la501560z ↗
66. Lakshminarayanan R, Madhavi S, Sim CPC (2018) Oxidative polymerization of dopamine: a high-definition multifunctional coatings for electrospun nanofibers - an overview. In: Dopamine - Health and Disease10.5772/intechopen.81036 ↗
67. Chen L, Shao L, Wang F et al (2019) Enhancement in sustained release of antimicrobial peptide and BMP-2 from degradable three dimensional-printed PLGA scaffold for bone regeneration. RSC Adv 9:10494–10507. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra08788a10.1039/c8ra08788a ↗
68. Xu Z, Wang N, Liu P et al (2019) Poly(dopamine) coating on 3D-printed poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid/β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2423439710.3390/molecules24234397 ↗
69. Seo CH, Furukawa K, Montagne K et al (2011) The effect of substrate microtopography on focal adhesion maturation and actin organization via the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biomaterials 32:9568–9575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.07710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.077 ↗
70. Lu J, Rao MP, MacDonald NC et al (2008) Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. Acta Biomater 4:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.07.00810.1016/j.actbio.2007.07.008 ↗
71. M N, F E, S M, A K, (2012) Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. Biomaterials 33:5230–5246. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2012.03.07910.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2012.03.079 ↗
72. Wan T, Li L, Guo M et al (2019) Immobilization via polydopamine of dual growth factors on polyetheretherketone: improvement of cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteo-differentiation. J Mater Sci 54:11179–11196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03264-z10.1007/s10853-018-03264-z ↗
73. Tsai W-B, Chen W-T, Chien H-W et al (2011) Poly(dopamine) coating of scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 7:4187–4194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.02410.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.024 ↗
74. Ku SH, Ryu J, Hong SK et al (2010) General functionalization route for cell adhesion on non-wetting surfaces. Biomaterials 31:2535–2541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.020 ↗
75. Chien H-W, Kuo W-H, Wang M-J et al (2012) Tunable micropatterned substrates based on poly(dopamine) deposition via microcontact printing. Langmuir 28:5775–5782. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300147p10.1021/la300147p ↗
76. Alas GR, Agarwal R, Collard DM, García AJ (2017) Peptide-functionalized poly[oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate] brushes on dopamine-coated stainless steel for controlled cell adhesion. Acta Biomater 59:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.03310.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.033 ↗
77. Wu C, Zhang Y, Zhou Y et al (2011) A comparative study of mesoporous glass/silk and non-mesoporous glass/silk scaffolds: Physiochemistry and in vivo osteogenesis. Acta Biomater 7:2229–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.01910.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.019 ↗
78. Liu Z, Qu S, Zheng X et al (2014) Effect of polydopamine on the biomimetic mineralization of mussel-inspired calcium phosphate cement in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C 44:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.06310.1016/j.msec.2014.07.063 ↗
79. Kao CT, Lin CC, Chen YW et al (2015) Poly(dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 56:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.06.02810.1016/j.msec.2015.06.028 ↗
80. Deng Y, Yang WZ, Shi D et al (2019) Bioinspired and osteopromotive polydopamine nanoparticle-incorporated fibrous membranes for robust bone regeneration. NPG Asia Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-019-0139-510.1038/s41427-019-0139-5 ↗
81. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z et al (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng 110:442–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗