New insight in predicting martensite start temperature in steels
Source abstract
Abstract
Martensite start temperature (MS) plays an important role in the chemical composition and heat treatment designs of advanced high-strength steels. To improve the performance of MS prediction model trained using machine learning methods, dataset augmentation strategy and the addition of new features play a key role. In the present work, the effects of new features related to atomic parameters on the performance of the prediction model trained using an machine learning algorithm were studied and discussed by using the datasets obtained from the literature and industrial companies. In addition, the effects of the interaction between carbon and alloying elements on martensite start temperature are studied. The results revealed that the new features related to electronegativity difference between the alloying elements and C, the number of covalent electrons and the lattice constant of austenite grains considerably improved the prediction performance of the trained model. Moreover, Si–C interaction intensified the role of C in reducing martensite start temperature, whereas V–C, Ni–C, N–C, Mo–C, Cr–C and Al–C interactions weakened the role of C.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Barbier D (2014) Extension of the Martensite transformation temperature relation to larger alloying elements and contents. Adv Eng 16(1):122–127
2. Kim H, Inoue J, Okada M, Nagata K (2017) Prediction of Ac3 and martensite start temperatures by a data driven model selection approach. ISIJ Int 57(12):2229–223610.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2017-212 ↗
3. Park J, Shim JH, Lee SJ (2017) New equation for prediction of martensite start temperature in high carbon ferrous alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 49A(2):450–45410.1007/s11661-017-4436-8 ↗
4. Kaar S, Steineder K, Schneider R, Krizan D, Sommitsch C (2021) New Ms-formula for exact microstructural prediction of modern 3rd generation AHSS chemistries. Scripta Mater 200:11392310.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113923 ↗
5. Lee SJ, Jung M (2021) Prediction of martensite start temperatures of highly alloyed steels. Arch Metall Mater 66(1):107–111
6. Stormvinter A, Borgenstam A, Agren J (2012) Thermodynamically based prediction of the martensite start temperature for commercial steels. Metall Mater Trans A 43A:3870–387910.1007/s11661-012-1171-z ↗
7. Seifert M, Theisen W (2016) Modeling hardenable stainless steels using calculated martensite start temperatures in thermodynamic equilibrium calculations. Metall Mater Trans A 47A:5953–595910.1007/s11661-016-3805-z ↗
8. Plat J, Leitner H, Turk C, Schnitzer R (2020) Determination of Martensite start temperature of high speed steels based on thermodynamic calculations. Steel Res Int 91:20000063
9. Luo Q, Chen HC, Chen W, Wang CC, Xu W, Li Q (2020) Thermodynamic prediction of martensitic transformation temperature in Fe-Ni-C system. Scripta Mater 187:413–41710.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.062 ↗
10. Chen HC, Xu W, Luo Q, Li Q, Zhang Y, Wang JJ, Chou KC (2022) Thermodynamic prediction of martensitic transformation temperature in Fe-C-X (X=Ni, Mn, Si, Cr) systems with dilatational coefficient model. J Mater Sci Technol 112:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.06010.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.060 ↗
11. Rahaman M, Mu WZ, Odqvist J, Hedstrom P (2019) Machine learning to predict the martensite start temperature in steels. Metall Mater Trans A 50:2081–209110.1007/s11661-019-05170-8 ↗
12. Lu Q, Liu SL, Li W, Jin XJ (2020) Combination of thermodynamic knowledge and multilayer feed forward neural networks for accurate prediction of MS temperature in steels. Mater Des 192:10869610.1016/j.matdes.2020.108696 ↗
13. Xiong B, Zhao XP, Hu YF, Huang HY, Liu Y, Su YJ (2021) Machine learning assisted empirical formula augmentation. Mater Des 210:11003710.1016/j.matdes.2021.110037 ↗
14. Vermeulen WG, Morri PF, Weijer AP, Zwaag SVD (1996) Prediction of martensite start temperature using artificial neural networks. Ironmak Steelmak 23(5):433–437
15. Peet M (2014) Prediction of martensite start temperature. Mater Sci Technol 31(11):1370–137510.1179/1743284714Y.0000000714 ↗
16. Sourmail T, Garcia-Mateo C (2005) Critical assessment of models for predicting the Ms temperature of steels. Comput Mater Sci 34:323–33410.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.002 ↗
17. Materials Algorithms Project (MAP) https://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/map/data/data-index.html#neural. Accessed 1 June 2017
18. MAP_DATA_STEEL_MS_2004: https://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/map/data/materials/Ms_data_2004.html. Accessed 1 June 2017
19. Ghosh G, Olson GB (1994) Kinetics of F.C.C.→B.C.C. heterogeneous martensitic nucleation –I. The critical driving force for athermal nucleation. Acta Metall Mater 42(10):3361–337010.1016/0956-7151(94)90468-5 ↗
20. Ghosh G, Olson GB (1994) Kinetics of F.C.C.→B.C.C. heterogeneous martensitic nucleation II. Thermal activation. Acta Metall Mater 42(10):3371–337910.1016/0956-7151(94)90469-3 ↗
21. Bohemen SMC, Morsdorf L (2017) Predicting the Ms temperature of steels with a thermodynamic based model including the effect of the prior austenite grain size. Acta Mater 125:401–41510.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.029 ↗
22. Morris JW, Lee CS, Guo Z (2003) The nature and consequences of coherent transformations in steel. ISIJ Int 43:410–41910.2355/isijinternational.43.410 ↗
23. Welchowski T, Maloney KO, Mitchell R, Schmid M (2021) Techniques to improve ecological interpretability of black-box machine learning models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 27:175–19710.1007/s13253-021-00479-7 ↗
24. Yan F, Song K, Liu Y, Chen S, Chen J (2020) Predictions and mechanism analyses of the fatigue strength of steel based on machine learning. J Mater Sci 55(31):15334–15349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05091-710.1007/s10853-020-05091-7 ↗
25. Ke GL, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang TF, Chen W et al (2017) LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Neural Inf Process Sys 31:3149–3157
26. Hao XC, Zhang ZP, Xu QQ et al (2022) Prediction of f-CaO content in cement clinker: a novel prediction method based on LightGBM and Bayesian optimization. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 220:10446110.1016/j.chemolab.2021.104461 ↗
27. Liu YN, Yu ZM, Chen C et al (2020) Prediction of protein crotonylation sites through LightGBM classifier based on SMOTE and elastic net. Anal Biochem 609:11390310.1016/j.ab.2020.113903 ↗
28. Chen C, Zhang QM, Ma Q, Yu B (2019) LightGBM-PPI: predicting protein-protein interactions through LightGBM with multi-information fusion. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 191:54–6410.1016/j.chemolab.2019.06.003 ↗
29. The first steel mills of Benxi Iron and Steel Company, Metal Materials Teaching and Research Group-Department of Mechanics-Tsinghua University (1978) Transition curves of overcooling austenite of steels. Benxi Iron and Steel Company
30. Lin HG, Fu DZ (1988) Austenite transition curves of steels: principle, testing and application. China Machine PRESS
31. Yang KG (1981) Isothermal transition curve of steels. Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House
32. Zhang SZ (1993) Atlas of transition curve diagrams of overcooling austenite of steels. Metallurgical Industry Press
33. Capdevila C, Caballero FG (2002) Determination of Ms temperature in steels: a Bayesian neural network model. ISIJ Int 42(8):894–90210.2355/isijinternational.42.894 ↗
34. Bohemen SMC (2012) Bainite and martensite start temperature calculated with exponential carbon dependence. Mater Sci Technol 28(4):487–49510.1179/1743284711Y.0000000097 ↗
35. Garcia-Mateo C, Peet M, Caballero FG, Bhadeshia HKDH (2004) Tempering of hard mixture of bainitic ferrite and Austenite. Mater Sci Technol 20(7):814–81810.1179/026708304225017355 ↗
36. Bennett KP, Demiriz A (1999) Semi-supervised support vector machines. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 11:368–374
37. Breiman L (2001) Random forest. Mach Learn 45(1):5–3210.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
38. Tranmer M, Murphy J, Elliot M et al (2020) Multiple linear regression, 2nd edn. Cathie Marsh Institute Working Paper
39. Wang JJ, Wolk PJ, Zwaag SVD (2000) Determination of martensite start temperature in engineering steels part I. Empirical relations describing the effect of steel chemistry. Mater Trans, JIM 41(7):761–76810.2320/matertrans1989.41.761 ↗
40. Wang JJ, Wolk PJ, Zwaag SVD (2000) Determination of martensite start temperature for engineering steels part II. Correlation between critical driving force and Ms temperature. Mater Trans JIM 41(7):769–77610.2320/matertrans1989.41.769 ↗
41. Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Bainite in steels, 2nd edn. IOM Communications, London
42. Xiong J, Zhang TY, Shi SQ (2020) Machine learning of mechanical properties of steels. Science China Technol Sci 63:1247–125510.1007/s11431-020-1599-5 ↗