Fe2V4O13 photoanode material: an interesting approach to non-enzymatic glucose oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of non-enzymatic material for the electrooxidation reaction of glucose is still a challenge to be overcome since these materials must have high sensitivity to glucose, high chemical stability and, if possible, be obtained quickly and with a low-cost process. In this context, iron vanadate (Fe2V4O13) was successfully synthesized using the easy and low-cost Successive Ionic Layer Adsorption and Reaction process and used as an interesting non-enzymatic photoanode material approach for the photoelectrochemical oxidation reaction of glucose. From the X-ray diffraction and Raman measurements, it was possible to observe that the monoclinic crystalline phase Fe2V4O13 was formed at 500 °C, without any secondary phases. The electrochemical characterization, performed by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), chronoamperometry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy techniques, under light condition, showed the remarkable photoelectrochemical activity of the FTO/Fe2V4O13 electrode, such as a high photocurrent density at + 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl (0.2 mA cm−2); good reproducibility under transient light condition; low charge transfer resistance; and flat band potential consistent with the LSV and typical value of this material (+ 0.45 V). The performance of the electrode as non-enzymatic glucose interaction, carried out by chronoamperometry technique, showed a remarkable performance in the photoelectrooxidation reaction of glucose, with linear behavior (R2 = 0.9975) of the analytical curve (glucose concentration from 0 to 10 mmol L−1), excellent reproducibility, a slight loss in photoelectrochemical signal after five successive reading cycles, good sensitivity (0.370 μA mM−1 cm−2) and limit of detection (52 µmol L–1). Besides, the analysis of interference species showed good electrode selectivity. Graphical abstract: Fe2V2O13 photoelectrode obtained by the Successive Ionic Layer Adsorption and Reaction (SILAR) process, and its use for glucose photoelectrocatalytic oxidation reaction [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR et al (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
2. Liu J, Li J, Li Y et al (2020) Photoelectrochemical water splitting coupled with degradation of organic pollutants enhanced by surface and interface engineering of BiVO4 photoanode. Appl Catal B Environ 278:119268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11926810.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119268 ↗
3. Tang D, Rettie AJE, Mabayoje O et al (2016) Facile growth of porous Fe2V4O13 films for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Mater Chem A 4:3034–3042. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA07877F10.1039/C5TA07877F ↗
4. Lewerenz HJ (1997) Surface scientific aspects in semiconductor electrochemistry. Chem Soc Rev 26:239. https://doi.org/10.1039/cs997260023910.1039/cs9972600239 ↗
5. Bariana M, Dwivedi P, Ranjitkar S et al (2017) Biological response of human suture mesenchymal cells to titania nanotube-based implants for advanced craniosynostosis therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 150:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.11.01910.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.11.019 ↗
6. Divyapriya G, Singh S, Martínez-Huitle CA et al (2021) Treatment of real wastewater by photoelectrochemical methods: an overview. Chemosphere 276:130188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13018810.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130188 ↗
7. Wang Y, He D, Chen H, Wang D (2019) Catalysts in electro-, photo- and photoelectrocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 40:117–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.02.00210.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.02.002 ↗
8. GuangLi W, JingJuan X, HongYuan C (2009) Progress in the studies of photoelectrochemical sensors. Sci China Ser B Chem 52:1789–180010.1007/s11426-009-0271-0 ↗
9. Xu H, Shang H, Liu Q et al (2021) Dual mode electrochemical-photoelectrochemical sensing platform for hydrogen sulfide detection based on the inhibition effect of titanium dioxide/bismuth tungstate/silver heterojunction. J Colloid Interface Sci 581:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.12010.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.120 ↗
10. Neto NFA, de Jesus Pereira AL, Leite DMG et al (2021) Evaluation of ITO/TiO2/Co3O4 as a non-enzymatic heterojunction electrode to glucose electrooxidation. Ionics (Kiel) 27:1597–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-021-03933-110.1007/s11581-021-03933-1 ↗
11. Wang S, Li S, Wang W et al (2019) A non-enzymatic photoelectrochemical glucose sensor based on BiVO4 electrode under visible light. Sens Actuators B Chem 291:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.05710.1016/j.snb.2019.04.057 ↗
12. Liu H, Xu G, Wang J et al (2014) Photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2 nanotube arrays modified with BiOCl nanosheets. Electrochim Acta 130:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.00510.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.005 ↗
13. Tryk D, Fujishima A, Honda K (2000) Recent topics in photoelectrochemistry: achievements and future prospects. Electrochim Acta 45:2363–2376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00337-610.1016/S0013-4686(00)00337-6 ↗
14. Gouda A, Liu T, Byers JC et al (2021) Best practices in photoelectrochemistry. J Power Sources 482:228958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22895810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228958 ↗
15. Grätzel M (2001) Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/3510460710.1038/35104607 ↗
16. Si P, Huang Y, Wang T, Ma J (2013) Nanomaterials for electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. RSC Adv 3:3487. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra22360k10.1039/c2ra22360k ↗
17. Tsai T-W, Heckert G, Neves LF et al (2009) Adsorption of glucose oxidase onto single-walled carbon nanotubes and its application in layer-by-layer biosensors. Anal Chem 81:7917–7925. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900650r10.1021/ac900650r ↗
18. Cao L, Wang P, Chen L et al (2019) A photoelectrochemical glucose sensor based on gold nanoparticles as a mimic enzyme of glucose oxidase. RSC Adv 9:15307–15313. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA02088H10.1039/C9RA02088H ↗
19. Yoo E-H, Lee S-Y (2010) Glucose biosensors: an overview of use in clinical practice. Sensors 10:4558–4576. https://doi.org/10.3390/s10050455810.3390/s100504558 ↗
20. Shu J, Tang D (2020) Recent advances in photoelectrochemical sensing: from engineered photoactive materials to sensing devices and detection modes. Anal Chem 92:363–377. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0419910.1021/acs.analchem.9b04199 ↗
21. Tang J, Wang Y, Li J et al (2014) Sensitive enzymatic glucose detection by TiO2 nanowire photoelectrochemical biosensors. J Mater Chem A 2:6153–6157. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA14173J10.1039/C3TA14173J ↗
22. Chen D, Jiang D, Du X et al (2016) Engineering efficient charge transfer based on ultrathin graphite-like carbon nitride/WO3 semiconductor nanoheterostructures for fabrication of high-performances non-enzymatic photoelectrochemical glucose sensor. Electrochim Acta 215:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.11310.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.113 ↗
23. Zhang X, Xu F, Zhao B et al (2014) Synthesis of CdS quantum dots decorated graphene nanosheets and non-enzymatic photoelectrochemical detection of glucose. Electrochim Acta 133:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.08910.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.089 ↗
24. Fu Lin C, Haur Kao C, Yu Lin C et al (2020) The electrical and physical characteristics of Mg-doped ZnO sensing membrane in EIS (electrolyte–insulator–semiconductor) for glucose sensing applications. Results Phys 16:102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10297610.1016/j.rinp.2020.102976 ↗
25. Patil AS, Patil RT, Lohar GM, Fulari VJ (2021) Facile synthesis of CuO nanostructures for non-enzymatic glucose sensor by modified SILAR method. Appl Phys A 127:101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-04258-y10.1007/s00339-020-04258-y ↗
26. He L, Yang Z, Gong C et al (2021) The dual-function of photoelectrochemical glucose oxidation for sensor application and solar-to-electricity production. J Electroanal Chem 882:114912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11491210.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114912 ↗
27. Cao X, Wang N (2011) A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor modified with Fe2O3 nanowire arrays. Analyst 136:4241. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1an15367f10.1039/c1an15367f ↗
28. Liu F, Wang P, Zhang Q et al (2019) α-Fe2O3 film with highly photoactivity for non-enzymatic photoelectrochemical detection of glucose. Electroanalysis 31:1809–1814. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20190013310.1002/elan.201900133 ↗
29. Liu S, Yu B, Zhang T (2013) A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on NiO hollow spheres. Electrochim Acta 102:104–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.19110.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.191 ↗
30. Khun K, Ibupoto ZH, Liu X et al (2015) The ethylene glycol template assisted hydrothermal synthesis of Co3O4 nanowires; structural characterization and their application as glucose non-enzymatic sensor. Mater Sci Eng B 194:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2015.01.00110.1016/j.mseb.2015.01.001 ↗
31. Sen PK, Midya JK, Bysakh S, Pal B (2017) Kinetic and mechanistic studies on the oxidation of d -glucose by MnO2 nanoparticles. Effect of microheterogeneous environments of CTAB, Triton X-100 and Tween 20. Mol Catal 440:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.07.00910.1016/j.mcat.2017.07.009 ↗
32. Dharuman V, Chandrasekara Pillai K (2006) RuO2 electrode surface effects in electrocatalytic oxidation of glucose. J Solid State Electrochem 10:967–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-005-0033-710.1007/s10008-005-0033-7 ↗
33. Jang K, Park KR, Kim KM et al (2020) Synthesis of NiCo2O4 nanostructures and their electrochemial properties for glucose detection. Nanomaterials 11:55. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1101005510.3390/nano11010055 ↗
34. Gowthami K, Krishnakumar B, Thirunarayanan G et al (2020) Novel Fe2V4O13/ZnO nano-heterojunction: effective decomposition of methyl orange under solar light irradiation. Mater Today Proc 29:1199–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.43110.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.431 ↗
35. Gowthami K, Suppuraj P, Thirunarayanan G et al (2018) Fe2V4O13 assisted hetero-Fenton mineralization of methyl orange under UV-A light irradiation. Iran Chem Commun 6:97–108
36. Muthuvel I, Gowthami K, Thirunarayanan G et al (2019) Graphene oxide–Fe2V4O13 hybrid material as highly efficient hetero-Fenton catalyst for degradation of methyl orange. Int J Ind Chem 10:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40090-019-0173-810.1007/s40090-019-0173-8 ↗
37. Zhang YY, Deng JH, He C et al (2010) Application of Fe2V4O13 as a new multi-metal heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants. Environ Technol 31:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0959333090339775510.1080/09593330903397755 ↗
38. Li P, Zhou Y, Li H et al (2015) All-solid-state Z-scheme system arrays of Fe2V4O13/RGO/CdS for visible light-driving photocatalytic CO2 reduction into renewable hydrocarbon fuel. Chem Commun 51:800–803. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC08744E10.1039/C4CC08744E ↗
39. Li P, Zhou Y, Tu W et al (2013) Direct growth of Fe2V4O13 nanoribbons on a stainless-steel mesh for visible-light photoreduction of CO2 into renewable hydrocarbon fuel and degradation of gaseous isopropyl alcohol. ChemPlusChem 78:274–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.20120028910.1002/cplu.201200289 ↗
40. Marikkani S, Kumar JV, Muthuraj V (2019) Design of novel solar-light driven sponge-like Fe2V4O13 photocatalyst: a unique platform for the photoreduction of carcinogenic hexavalent chromium. Sol Energy 188:849–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.07510.1016/j.solener.2019.06.075 ↗
41. Adarakatti PS, Mahanthappa M, Eranjaneya H, Siddaramanna A (2018) Fe2V4O13 nanoparticles based electrochemical sensor for the simultaneous determination of guanine and adenine at nanomolar concentration. Electroanalysis 30:1971–1982. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20180012410.1002/elan.201800124 ↗
42. Yogeeshwari RT, Shreenivasa L, Hari Krishna R et al (2020) Synthesis of acid resistant Fe2V4O13-polypyrrole nanocomposite: its application towards the fabrication of disposable electrochemical sensor for the detection of As(III). Mater Res Express 6:126448. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab689610.1088/2053-1591/ab6896 ↗
43. Si Y, Zhao L, Yu Z et al (2012) A novel amorphous Fe2V4O13 as cathode material for lithium secondary batteries. Mater Lett 72:145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.10410.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.104 ↗
44. Lakkepally S, Kalegowda Y, Ganganagappa N, Siddaramanna A (2018) A new and effective approach for Fe2V4O13 nanoparticles synthesis: evaluation of electrochemical performance as cathode for lithium secondary batteries. J Alloys Compd 737:665–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.09610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.096 ↗
45. Li S-R, Yesibolati N, Qiao Y et al (2012) Electrostatic spray deposition of porous Fe2V4O13 films as electrodes for Li-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 520:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.09210.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.092 ↗
46. Patoux S, Richardson TJ (2007) Lithium insertion chemistry of some iron vanadates. Electrochem commun 9:485–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2006.10.00610.1016/j.elecom.2006.10.006 ↗
47. Šurca A, Orel B, Krašovec UO et al (2000) Electrochromic and structural studies of nanocrystalline Fe/V (1:2) oxide and crystalline Fe2V4O13 films. J Electrochem Soc 147:2358. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.139353710.1149/1.1393537 ↗
48. Crespo CT (2019) Electronic, magnetic, optical and solar energy absorption properties of the Fe2V4O13 vanadate. Sol Energy 183:345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.04110.1016/j.solener.2019.03.041 ↗
49. Pelissari MRDS, Azevedo Neto NF, Camargo LP, Dall’Antonia LH (2021) Characterization and photo-induced electrocatalytic evaluation for BiVO4 films obtained by the SILAR process. Electrocatalysis 12:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-021-00641-210.1007/s12678-021-00641-2 ↗
50. Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC et al (2017) Image J2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform 18:529. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
51. Zhang H, Cheng C (2017) Three-dimensional FTO/TiO2/BiVO4 composite inverse opals photoanode with excellent photoelectrochemical performance. ACS Energy Lett 2:813–821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0006010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00060 ↗
52. Huang L, Shi L, Zhao X et al (2014) Hydrothermal growth and characterization of length tunable porous iron vanadate one-dimensional nanostructures. CrystEngComm 16:5128–5133. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CE42608D10.1039/C3CE42608D ↗
53. Wang X, Heier KR, Stern CL, Poeppelmeier KR (1998) Structural comparison of iron tetrapolyvanadate Fe2V4O13 and iron polyvanadomolybdate Fe2V3.16Mo0.84O13.42: a new substitution mechanism of molybdenum(VI) for vanadium(V). Inorg Chem 37:6921–6927. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic980942t10.1021/ic980942t ↗
54. Vuk AŠ, Orel B, Dražič G, Colomban P (2002) Vibrational spectroscopy and analytical electron microscopy studies of Fe-V-O and In-V-O thin films. In: Hofmann H, Rahman Z, Schubert U (eds) Nanostructured materials. Springer, Vienna, pp 153–17210.1007/978-3-7091-6740-3_14 ↗
55. Seetharaman S, Bhat HL, Narayanan PS (1983) Raman spectroscopic studies on sodium metavanadate. J Raman Spectrosc 14:401–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.125014060810.1002/jrs.1250140608 ↗
56. Wood DL, Tauc J (1972) Weak absorption tails in amorphous semiconductors. Phys Rev B 5:3144–3151. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.5.314410.1103/PhysRevB.5.3144 ↗
57. Fu Y, Li J, Li J (2019) Metal/semiconductor nanocomposites for photocatalysis: fundamentals, structures, applications and properties. Nanomaterials 9:359. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano903035910.3390/nano9030359 ↗
58. Rajeshwar K, de Tacconi NR (2009) Solution combustion synthesis of oxide semiconductors for solar energy conversion and environmental remediation. Chem Soc Rev 38:1984. https://doi.org/10.1039/b811238j10.1039/b811238j ↗
59. Baccaro A, Gutz I (2017) Fotoeletrocatálise em semicondutores: dos princípios básicos até sua conformação à nanoescala. Quim Nova 41:326–339. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.2017017410.21577/0100-4042.20170174 ↗
60. Zheng M, Cui Y, Li X et al (2011) Photoelectrochemical sensing of glucose based on quantum dot and enzyme nanocomposites. J Electroanal Chem 656:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.11.03610.1016/j.jelechem.2010.11.036 ↗
61. Zhang Y, Zhao G, Shi H et al (2015) Photoelectrocatalytic glucose oxidation to promote hydrogen production over periodically ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays assembled of Pd quantum dots. Electrochim Acta 174:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.09410.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.094 ↗
62. Atchudan R, Muthuchamy N, Edison TNJI et al (2019) An ultrasensitive photoelectrochemical biosensor for glucose based on bio-derived nitrogen-doped carbon sheets wrapped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron 126:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.10.04910.1016/j.bios.2018.10.049 ↗
63. Liu X, Huo X, Liu P et al (2017) Assembly of MoS2 nanosheet-TiO2 nanorod heterostructure as sensor scaffold for photoelectrochemical biosensing. Electrochim Acta 242:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.03710.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.037 ↗
64. Gopalan A, Muthuchamy N, Lee K (2017) A novel bismuth oxychloride-graphene hybrid nanosheets based non-enzymatic photoelectrochemical glucose sensing platform for high performances. Biosens Bioelectron 89:352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.01710.1016/j.bios.2016.07.017 ↗
65. Zhang J, Tu L, Zhao S et al (2015) Fluorescent gold nanoclusters based photoelectrochemical sensors for detection of H2O2 and glucose. Biosens Bioelectron 67:296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.03710.1016/j.bios.2014.08.037 ↗
66. Zhai YJ, Li JH, Chu XY et al (2016) MoS2 microflowers based electrochemical sensing platform for non-enzymatic glucose detection. J Alloys Compd 672:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.13010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.130 ↗
67. Zhai Y, Li J, Chu X, et al (2016) Preparation of Au-MoS2 electrochemical electrode and investigation on glucose detection characteristics. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on manipulation, manufacturing and measurement on the nanoscale (3M-NANO). IEEE, pp 287–29010.1109/3M-NANO.2016.7824931 ↗
68. Zarei E, Ojani R (2017) Fundamentals and some applications of photoelectrocatalysis and effective factors on its efficiency: a review. J Solid State Electrochem 21:305–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3385-210.1007/s10008-016-3385-2 ↗
69. Fabrao RM, de Brito JF, da Silva JL et al (2016) Appraisal of photoelectrocatalytic oxidation of glucose and production of high value chemicals on nanotube Ti/TiO2 electrode. Electrochim Acta 222:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.16410.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.164 ↗
70. Li H, Guo C, Liu C et al (2020) Laser-induced graphene hybrid photoelectrode for enhanced photoelectrochemical detection of glucose. Analyst 145:4041–4049. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN00252F10.1039/D0AN00252F ↗
71. Burtis CA, Bruns DE (2015) Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics, 7th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
72. Kawasaki T, Akanuma H, Yamanouchi T (2002) Increased fructose concentrations in blood and urine in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:353–357. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.2.35310.2337/diacare.25.2.353 ↗
73. Gottås A, Ripel Å, Boix F et al (2015) Determination of dopamine concentrations in brain extracellular fluid using microdialysis with short sampling intervals, analyzed by ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 74:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2015.06.00210.1016/j.vascn.2015.06.002 ↗
74. Martinello F, da Silva EL (2003) Interferência do ácido ascórbico nas determinações de parâmetros bioquímicos séricos: estudos in vivo e in vitro. J Bras Patol e Med Lab 39:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-2444200300040001010.1590/S1676-24442003000400010 ↗
75. Ci S, Mao S, Huang T et al (2014) Enzymeless glucose detection based on CoO/Graphene microsphere hybrids. Electroanalysis 26:1326–1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20130064510.1002/elan.201300645 ↗
76. Chen L, Chen Y, Miao L et al (2020) Photocurrent switching effect on BiVO4 electrodes and its application in development of photoelectrochemical glucose sensor. J Solid State Electrochem 24:411–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-019-04469-110.1007/s10008-019-04469-1 ↗