Rational design of hierarchical C–MgO@ZnO nanofiber as sulfur host for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of sulfur cathode materials for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries has significant technical challenges owing to poor conductivity and “shuttle effect” of the polysulfide dissolution. In recently, many efforts have been made to improve the electrochemical performance of cathode materials for Li–S batteries. In the present investigation, MgO-doped and nitrogen-rich carbon nanofibers have been prepared via electrospinning technology under carbonization treatment. Ultrathin ZnO nanolayer is further coated on the surface of the carbon nanofiber by atomic layer deposition and then sulfur is loaded inside the nanofibers to achieve a C–MgO/S@ZnO composite. This composite was used as cathode material in Li–S batteries. They are exhibited maximum rate capabilities of 1066.08 and 846.75 mA h g−1 at 0.5 and 2 C, respectively. Moreover, the discharge capacity is 812.67 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles at 2 C and the capacity decay after 100 cycles is as small as 0.04% per cycle. The excellent electrochemical performance of C–MgO/S@ZnO nanofibers could be ascribed by the rational design due to the structure and composition of sulfur host.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu R, Belharouak I, Zhang X et al (2014) Insight into sulfur reactions in Li–S batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(24):21938–2194510.1021/am504763p ↗
2. Manthiram A, Fu Y, Su YS (2013) Challenges and prospects of lithium–sulfur batteries. Acc Chem Res 46(5):1125–113410.1021/ar300179v ↗
3. Zhang J, Cai Y, Wu J, Yao J (2015) Graphene oxide-confined synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 microspheres as high-performance anodes for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 165:422–42910.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.016 ↗
4. Zhang J, Cai Y, Zhong Q et al (2015) Porous nitrogen-doped carbon derived from silk fibroin protein encapsulating sulfur as a superior cathode material for high-performance lithiu. Nanoscale 7(42):17791–1779710.1039/C5NR04768D ↗
5. Li Y, Cai Y, Cai Z et al (2018) Sulfur-in filtrated yeast-derived nitrogen-rich porous carbon microspheres@reduced graphene cathode for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 285:317–32510.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.222 ↗
6. Huang JQ, Huang J, Chong WG et al (2019) Graphene/RuO2 nanocrystal composites as sulfur host for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Energy Chem 35:204–21110.1016/j.jechem.2019.03.017 ↗
7. Guo J, Xu Y, Wang C (2011) Sulfur-impregnated disordered carbon nanotubes cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 11(10):4288–429410.1021/nl202297p ↗
8. Lin T, Tang Y, Wang Y et al (2013) Scotch-tape-like exfoliation of graphite assisted with elemental sulfur and graphene-sulfur composites for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 6(4):1283–129010.1039/c3ee24324a ↗
9. Cao J, Chen C, Zhao Q et al (2016) A flexible nanostructured paper of a reduced graphene oxide–sulfur composite for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries with unconventional configurations. Adv Mater 28(43):9629–963610.1002/adma.201602262 ↗
10. Wang D, Li F, Liu M et al (2008) 3D aperiodic hierarchical porous graphitic carbon material for high-rate electrochemical capacitive energy storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(2):373–37610.1002/anie.200702721 ↗
11. Mao Y, Li G, Guo Y et al (2017) Foldable interpenetrated metal-organic frameworks/carbon nanotubes thin film for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 8:1–810.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 ↗
12. Yang W, Yang W, Song A et al (2018) 3D interconnected porous carbon nanosheets/carbon nanotubes as a polysulfide reservoir for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 10(2):816–82410.1039/C7NR06805K ↗
13. Fu Y, Zu C, Manthiram A (2013) In situ-formed Li2S in lithiated graphite electrodes for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc 135(48):18044–1804710.1021/ja409705u ↗
14. Ye J, He F, Nie J et al (2015) Sulfur/carbon nanocomposite-filled polyacrylonitrile nanofibers as a long life and high capacity cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3(4):7406–741210.1039/C4TA06976E ↗
15. Mi K, Jiang Y, Feng J et al (2016) Hierarchical carbon nanotubes with a thick microporous wall and inner channel as efficient scaffolds for lithium–sulfur Batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26(10):1571–157910.1002/adfm.201504835 ↗
16. Yuan L, Yuan H, Qiu X et al (2009) Improvement of cycle property of sulfur-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite cathode for lithium/sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 189(2):1141–114610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.149 ↗
17. Liu J, Qu W, Xie Y et al (2017) Thermal conductivity and annealing effect on structure of lignin-based microscale carbon fibers. Carbon 121:35–4710.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.066 ↗
18. Liang X, Zhang M, Kaiser MR et al (2015) Split-half-tubular polypyrrole@sulfur@polypyrrole composite with a novel three-layer-3D structure as cathode for lithium/sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 11:587–59910.1016/j.nanoen.2014.10.009 ↗
19. Xiao L, Cao Y, Xiao J et al (2012) A soft approach to encapsulate sulfur: polyaniline nanotubes for lithium–sulfur batteries with long cycle life. Adv Mater 24(9):1176–118110.1002/adma.201103392 ↗
20. Li Y, Shi B, Liu W et al (2018) Hollow polypyrrole@MnO2 spheres as nano-sulfur hosts for improved lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 260:912–92010.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.068 ↗
21. Liu X, Huang JQ, Zhang Q, Mai L (2017) Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 29(20):1601759–1–1601759–25
22. Choi YJ, Jung BS, Lee DJ et al (2007) Electrochemical properties of sulfur electrode containing nano Al2O3 for lithium/sulfur cell. Phys Scr T129:62–6510.1088/0031-8949/2007/T129/014 ↗
23. Zhou G, Yin LC, Wang DW et al (2013) Fibrous hybrid of graphene and sulfur nanocrystals for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 7(6):5367–537510.1021/nn401228t ↗
24. Seh ZW, Li W, Cha JJ et al (2013) Sulphur–TiO2 yolk-shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Commun 4:1–6
25. An D, Shen L, Lei D et al (2019) An ultrathin and continuous Li4Ti5O12 coated carbon nanofiber interlayer for high rate lithium sulfur battery. J Energy Chem 31:19–2610.1016/j.jechem.2018.05.002 ↗
26. Kong L, Chen X, Li BQ et al (2018) A bifunctional perovskite promoter for polysulfide regulation toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 30(2):1–710.1002/adma.201705219 ↗
27. Zhong M, Yang D, Xie C et al (2016) Yolk–shell MnO@ZnMn2O4/N–C nanorods derived from α-MnO2/ZIF-8 as anode materials for lithium ion Batteries. Small 12(40):5564–557110.1002/smll.201601959 ↗
28. Marichy C, Bechelany M, Pinna N (2012) Atomic layer deposition of nanostructured materials for energy and environmental applications. Adv Mater 24(8):1017–103210.1002/adma.201104129 ↗
29. Zhou T, Jiang Q, Wang L et al (2018) Facile preparation of nitrogen-enriched hierarchical porous carbon nanofibers by Mg(OAc)2-assisted electrospinning for flexible supercapacitors. Appl Surf Sci 456:827–83410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.214 ↗
30. Manthiram A, Fu Y, Chung S-H et al (2014) Rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Rev 114(23):11751–1178710.1021/cr500062v ↗
31. Zheng G, Yang Y, Cha JJ et al (2011) Hollow carbon nanofiber-encapsulated sulfur cathodes for high specific capacity rechargeable lithium batteries. Nano Lett 11(10):4462–446710.1021/nl2027684 ↗
32. Zheng Z, Guo H, Pei F et al (2016) High sulfur loading in hierarchical porous carbon rods constructed by vertically oriented porous graphene-like nanosheets for Li–S batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26(48):8952–895910.1002/adfm.201601897 ↗
33. Luo C, Niu S, Zhou G et al (2016) Dual-functional hard template directed one-step formation of a hierarchical porous carbon-carbon nanotube hybrid for lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Commun 52(82):12143–1214610.1039/C6CC06680A ↗
34. Xiao Z, Yang Z, Wang L et al (2015) A lightweight TiO2/Graphene interlayer, applied as a highly effective polysulfide absorbent for fast, long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 27(18):2891–289810.1002/adma.201405637 ↗
35. Zhang YB, Yan Y, Xie JC et al (2018) Ionothermal synthesis of graphene-based microporous carbon for lithium–sulfur batteries. New J Chem 42(4):2483–249010.1039/C7NJ04294A ↗
36. Ma F, Liang J, Wang T et al (2018) Efficient entrapment and catalytic conversion of lithium polysulfides on hollow metal oxide submicro-spheres as lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. Nanoscale 10(12):5634–564110.1039/C7NR09216D ↗
37. Gu X, Tong CJ, Wen B et al (2016) Ball-milling synthesis of ZnO@sulphur/carbon nanotubes and Ni(OH)2@sulphur/carbon nanotubes composites for high-performance lithium–sulphur batteries. Electrochim Acta 196:369–37610.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.018 ↗
38. Zhou J, Qin J, Guo L et al (2016) Scalable synthesis of high-quality transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets and their application as sodium-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem A 4(44):17370–1738010.1039/C6TA07425A ↗
39. Guo Y, Wu H, Zhang Y et al (2017) Vesicle-like sulfur/reduced graphene oxide composites for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloy Compd 724:1007–101310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.276 ↗
40. Liu Y, Guo J, Zhang J et al (2015) Graphene-wrapped sulfur nanospheres with ultra-high sulfur loading for high energy density lithium–sulfur batteries. Appl Surf Sci 324:399–40410.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.176 ↗
41. Yu M, Ma J, Song H et al (2016) Atomic layer deposited TiO2 on a nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur electrode for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 9(4):1495–150310.1039/C5EE03902A ↗
42. Yang R, Du H, Lin Z et al (2019) ZnO nanoparticles filled tetrapod-shaped carbon shell for lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 141:258–26510.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.060 ↗
43. Zhu C, Kim C, Aoki Y, Habazaki H (2017) Nitrogen-Doped hierarchical porous carbon architecture incorporated with cobalt nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes as efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv Mater Interfaces 4(19):1700583–1–1700583–11
44. Wu J, Hu J, Song K et al (2017) Spirulina-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbon as carbon/S composite cathodes for high cyclability lithium–sulphur batteries. J Alloys Compd 704:1–610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.052 ↗
45. Xiang M, Wu H, Liu H et al (2017) A flexible 3D multifunctional MgO-decorated carbon foam@CNTs hybrid as self-supported cathode for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 27(37):1–13
46. Maffeis TGG, Penny MW, Castaing A et al (2012) XPS investigation of vacuum annealed vertically aligned ultralong ZnO nanowires. Surf Sci 606(1–2):99–10310.1016/j.susc.2011.09.007 ↗
47. Wu J, Li S, Yang P et al (2019) S@TiO2 nanospheres loaded on PPy matrix for enhanced lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloys Compd 783:279–28510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.316 ↗
48. Liang X, Hart C, Pang Q et al (2015) A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 6:1–8
49. Wei H, Rodriguez EF, Best AS et al (2017) Chemical bonding and physical trapping of sulfur in mesoporous magnéli Ti4O7 microspheres for high-performance Li–S battery. Adv Energy Mater 7(4):1601616–1–1601616–10
50. Zhao T, Ye Y, Peng X et al (2016) Advanced lithium–sulfur batteries enabled by a bio-inspired polysulfide adsorptive brush. Adv Funct Mater 26(46):8418–842610.1002/adfm.201604069 ↗