Tensile testing of aged flexible unidirectional composite laminates for body armor
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible Unidirectional (UD) composite laminates are commonly being used for ballistic-resistant body armor. These laminates comprise UD layers, each constructed by laminating thin layers of high-performance fibers held in place using very low modulus binder resins, with the fibers in each layer oriented parallel to each other. As these materials are used in body armor, it is important to investigate their long-term reliability, particularly with regards to exposure to temperature and humidity as these are known causes of degradation in other commonly used body armor materials. This work investigates the tensile behavior of a poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide), or PPTA flexible UD laminate aged for up to 150 d at accelerated conditions of 70 °C and 76 % relative humidity (RH). Tests were performed at three different crosshead displacement rates and three different gauge lengths. The effect of ageing on the mechanical properties of the material resulted in less than 10 % degradation in tensile strength, with a more significant reduction in longer specimens when tested at slower rates.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. IACP/DUPONT™ KEVLAR® SURVIVORS’ CLUB®. http://www.dupont.com/products-and-services/personal-protective-equipment/body-armor/articles/the-kevlar-survivors-club.html . Accessed 17 Jan 2017
2. Chin J, Forster A, Clerici C et al (2007) Temperature and humidity aging of poly(p-phenylene-2,6-benzobisoxazole) fibers: chemical and physical characterization. Polym Degrad Stab 92:1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.03010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.030 ↗
3. Forster AL, Pintus P, Messin GHR et al (2011) Hydrolytic stability of polybenzobisoxazole and polyterephthalamide body armor. Polym Degrad Stab 96:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.10.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.10.004 ↗
4. National Institute of Justice (2008) Ballistic resistance of body armor. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington
5. Forster AL, Forster AM, Chin JW et al (2015) Long-term stability of UHMWPE fibers. Polym Degrad Stab 114:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.02810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.028 ↗
6. Tsinas Z, Forster AL, Al-Sheikhly M (2018) Oxidation reactions in kink banded regions of UHMMPE fiber-based laminates used in body armor: a mechanistic study. Polym Degrad Stab 154:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.05.03010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.05.030 ↗
7. Rice KD, Engelbrecht-Wiggans AE, Guigues E, Forster AL (2018) Evaluation of degradation models for high strength p-aramid fibres used in body armour. In: Proceedings of the personal armour systems symposium, Washington, DC
8. Park AD (1999) United States patent ballistic laminate structure in sheet form. Patent number 5,935,678
9. Mourtiz AP (2012) Manufacturing of fibre–polymer composite materials. In: Mourtiz AP (ed) Introduction to aerospace materials. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 303–337
10. Springer H, Obaid AABU, Prabawa AB, Hinrichsen G (1998) Influence of hydrolytic and chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of aramid and copolyaramid fibers. Text Res J 68:588–59410.1177/004051759806800807 ↗
11. Auerbach I (1989) Kinetics for the tensile strength degradation of Nylon and Kevlar yarns. J Appl Polym Sci 37:2213–2227. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1989.07037081310.1002/app.1989.070370813 ↗
12. Morgan R, Butler N (1992) Hydrolytic degradation mechanism of Kevlar 49 fibers when dissolved in sulfuric acid. Polym Bull 27:689–69610.1007/BF00297440 ↗
13. Derombise G, Vouyovitch Van Schoors L, Klop EA et al (2012) Crystallite size evolution of aramid fibres aged in alkaline environments. J Mater Sci 47:2492–2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6073-810.1007/s10853-011-6073-8 ↗
14. Arrieta C, David É, Dolez P, Vu-Khanh T (2011) Hydrolytic and photochemical aging studies of a Kevlar-PBI blend. Polym Degrad Stab 96:1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.05.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.05.015 ↗
15. Derombise G, Van Schoors LV, Davies P (2010) Degradation of aramid fibers under alkaline and neutral conditions: relations between the chemical characteristics and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 116:2504–251410.1002/app.31145 ↗
16. Guangming C, Haihua Y, Weidong W (2008) Evaluation of light and thermal aging performance of aramid fabric. In: Textile bioengineering and informatics symposium proceedings, pp 321–325
17. Obaid AA, Deitzel JM, Gillespie JW, Zheng JQ (2011) The effects of environmental conditioning on tensile properties of high performance aramid fibers at near-ambient temperatures. J Compos Mater 45:1217–123110.1177/0021998310381436 ↗
18. Zhang H, Zhang J, Chen J et al (2006) Effects of solar UV irradiation on the tensile properties and structure of PPTA fiber. Polym Degrad Stab 91:2761–276710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.03.025 ↗
19. Bourbigot S, Flambard X, Poutch F (2001) Study of the thermal degradation of high performance fibres—application to polybenzazole and p-aramid fibres. Polym Degrad Stab 74:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00159-810.1016/S0141-3910(01)00159-8 ↗
20. Obaid AA, Yarlagadda S, Gillespie JW (2016) Combined effects of kink bands and hygrothermal conditioning on tensile strength of polyarylate liquid crystal co-polymer and aramid fibers. J Compos Mater 50:339–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831557475410.1177/0021998315574754 ↗
21. Chin J, Byrd E, Clerici C et al (2007) Chemical and physical characterization of poly(p-phenylene-2,6-benzobisoxazole) fibers used in body armor: temperature and humidity aging. NISTIR 7373
22. Forster AL (2012) Long term stability and implications for performance of high strength fibers used in body armor. University of Maryland, College Park
23. ASTM E3110-18 standard test method for collection of ballistic limit data for ballistic-resistant torso body armor and shoot packs
24. Koh CP, Shim VPW, Tan VBC, Tan BL (2008) Response of a high-strength flexible laminate to dynamic tension. Int J Impact Eng 35:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.03.01310.1016/j.cancergen.2015.03.013 ↗
25. Russell BP, Karthikeyan K, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2013) The high strain rate response of ultra high molecular-weight polyethylene: from fibre to laminate. Int J Impact Eng 60:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.010 ↗
26. Czechowski L, Jankowski J, Kubiak T (2012) Experimental tests of a property of composite material assigned for ballistic products. Fibres Text East Eur 92:61–66
27. Levi-Sasson A, Mustacchi S, Amarilio I et al (2014) Experimental determination of linear and nonlinear mechanical properties of laminated soft composite material system. Compos Part B Eng 57:96–10410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.043 ↗
28. Chen L, Zheng K, Fang Q (2017) Effect of strain rate on the dynamic tensile behaviour of UHMWPE fibre laminates. Polym Test 63:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.07.03110.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.07.031 ↗
29. Mittelman A, Roman I (1991) Monitoring the tensile deformation in real unidirectional Kevlar–epoxy composites. NDT&E Int 24:85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8695(91)90822-K10.1016/0963-8695(91)90822-K ↗
30. Marais C, Feillard P (1992) Manufacturing and mechanical characterization of unidirectional composites. Compos Sci Technol 45:247–25510.1016/0266-3538(92)90086-I ↗
31. Chocron Benloulo IS, Rodríguez J, Martínez MA, Sánchez Gálvez V (1997) Dynamic tensile testing of aramid and polyethylene fiber composites. Int J Impact Eng 19:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(96)00017-610.1016/S0734-743X(96)00017-6 ↗
32. Rodriguez J, Chocron Benloulo IS, Martinez MA, Sanchez-Galvez V (1996) High strain rate properties of aramid and polyethylene woven fabric composites. Compos Part B Eng 27:147–15410.1016/1359-8368(95)00036-4 ↗
33. Cunniff PM (1999) Dimensionless parameters for optimization of textile-based armor systems. In: 18th international symposium on ballistics, San Antonio, TX, pp 1302–1310
34. Phoenix S, Porwal P (2003) A new membrane model for the ballistic impact response and V50 performance of multiply fibrous systems. Int J Solids Struct 40:6723–676510.1016/S0020-7683(03)00329-9 ↗
35. Engelbrecht-Wiggans AE, Krishnamurthy A, Burni F et al (2019) Cutting procedures, tensile testing, and ageing of flexible unidirectional composite laminates. J Vis Exp 146:e58991
36. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–29710.1115/1.4010337 ↗
37. Phoenix SL, Beyerlein IJ (2000) Statistical strength theory for fibrous composite materials. In: Kelly A, Zwgeben C (eds) Comprehensive composite materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 559–63910.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00056-5 ↗
38. Daniels HE (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads. I. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 183:405–435. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1945.001110.1098/rspa.1945.0011 ↗
39. Batdorf SB (1982) Tensile strength of unidirectionally reinforced composites—I. J Reinf Plast Compos 1:153–16410.1177/073168448200100206 ↗
40. Zweben C, Rosen BW (1970) A statistical theory of material strength with application to composite materials. J Mech Phys Solids 18:189–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(70)90023-210.1016/0022-5096(70)90023-2 ↗
41. Hedgepeth MJ (1961) Stress concentrations in filamentary structures. NASA Technical Note D-882 Langley Research Center, Langley Field, VA, pp 1–30
42. Hedgepeth JM, Van Dyke P (1967) Local stress concentrations in imperfect filamentary composite materials. J Compos Mater 1:294–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983670010030510.1177/002199836700100305 ↗
43. Bader MG, Priest AM (1982) Statistical aspects of fibre and bundle strength in hybrid composites. In: Hayashi T, Kawata S, Umekawa S (eds) Progress in science and engineering composites, ICCM-IV, pp 1129–1136
44. Harlow DG, Phoenix SL (1978) The chain-of-bundles probability model for the strength of fibrous materials II: a numerical study of convergence. J Compos Mater 12:314–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983780120030810.1177/002199837801200308 ↗
45. McCartney LN, Smith RL (1983) Statistical theory of the strength of fiber bundles. J Appl Mech 105:601–60810.1115/1.3167097 ↗
46. Newman WI, Phoenix SL (2001) Time-dependent fiber bundles with local load sharing. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 63:021507. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.02150710.1103/PhysRevE.63.021507 ↗
47. Phoenix SL, Newman WI (2009) Time-dependent fiber bundles with local load sharing. II. General Weibull fibers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 80:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.06611510.1103/PhysRevE.80.066115 ↗
48. Sutherland LS, Soares CG (1997) Review of probabilistic models of the strength of composite materials. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 56:183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00027-610.1016/S0951-8320(97)00027-6 ↗
49. Mishnaevsky L, Brøndsted P (2009) Micromechanical modeling of damage and fracture of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites: a review. Comput Mater Sci 44:1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.00410.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.004 ↗
50. Engelbrecht-Wiggans AE (2017) Analysis and test strategies for stress rupture in unidirectional continuous fiber composite structures. PhD dissertation, Cornell University
51. Engelbrecht-Wiggans A, Forster AL (2019) Aged and unaged flexible unidirectional composite laminate tensile testing for soft body armor applications, National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18434/M3207810.18434/M32078 ↗