Hydrogen-trapping mechanisms of TIG-welded 316L austenitic stainless steels
Source abstract
Abstract
The interaction of hydrogen with various tungsten-inert-gas-welded austenitic stainless steels’ (AUSS) microstructure is studied by means of desorption/absorption analysis and microstructure observations. One of the limitations of welding is created by the presence of hydrogen in the weld, which can shorten the steel’s service life. The local hydrogen concentration, trapping, and its distribution along the welded samples were studied by thermal desorption spectrometry and were supported by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electronic microstructural observations. Hydrogen content demonstrated a dependence on the welding zone. It was found that hydrogen distribution, and accepted microstructure during welding, played a significant role in the trapping mechanism of 316L AUSS. XRD analysis revealed residual stresses which were caused due to the presence of hydrogen in γ-phase. It was shown that the austenite microconstituents inside 316L can have a crucial effect in preventing hydrogen-assisted cracking phenomenon. The effects of AUSS microstructure on hydrogen absorption and desorption behavior are discussed in detail.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Davis JR (1999) Stainless steels, 3rd edn. ASM international, Ohaio
2. Lacombe P, Baroux B, Beranger G (1993) Stainless steels, 1st edn. Les éditions de physique
3. Kou S (2003) Welding metallurgy, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
4. Tal-Gutelmacher E, Eliezer D, Boellinghaus T (2007) Hydrogen behavior in GTA welded Ti–6Al–4V and Beta-21S aerospace applicative titanium alloys. Mater Sci Forum 546–549:1413–142010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.1413 ↗
5. Tusek J, Suban M (2000) Experimental research of the effect of hydrogen in argon as a shielding gas in arc welding of high-alloy stainless steel. Int J Hydrog Energy 25:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(99)00033-610.1016/S0360-3199(99)00033-6 ↗
6. Robertson IM, Sofronis P, Nagao A et al (2015) Hydrogen embrittlement understood. Metall Mater Trans B 46:1085–110310.1007/s11663-015-0325-y ↗
7. Dayal RK, Parvathavarthini N (2003) Hydrogen embrittlement in power plant steels. Sadhana 28:431–45110.1007/BF02706442 ↗
8. Silverstein R, Eliezer D (2017) Mechanisms of hydrogen trapping in austenitic, duplex, and super martensitic stainless steels. J Alloys Compd 720:451–45910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.286 ↗
9. Presouyre GM (1980) Trap theory of hydrogen embrittlement. Acta Metall 28:895–91110.1016/0001-6160(80)90106-6 ↗
10. Mcnabb A, Foster PK (1963) A new analysis of the diffusion of hydrogen in iron and ferritic steels. Trans Metall Soc AIME 227:618–627
11. Maroef I, Olson DL, Eberhart M, Edwards GR (2002) Hydrogen trapping in ferritic steel weld metal. Int Mater Rev 47:191–223. https://doi.org/10.1179/09506600222500654810.1179/095066002225006548 ↗
12. Silverstein R, Eliezer D, Glam B et al (2015) Evaluation of hydrogen trapping mechanisms during performance of different hydrogen fugacity in a lean duplex stainless steel. J Alloys Compd 648:601–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.02910.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.029 ↗
13. Silverstein R, Eliezer D (2015) Hydrogen trapping mechanism of different duplex stainless steels alloys. J Alloys Compd 644:280–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.17610.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.176 ↗
14. Silverstein R, Eliezer D (2016) Hydrogen trapping energy levels and hydrogen diffusion at high and low strain rates (~105 s−1 and 10−7 s−1) in lean duplex stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 674:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.01910.1016/j.msea.2016.08.019 ↗
15. Eliezer D, Nissim Y, Kannengießer T (2010) Effects of shielding with various hydrogen-argon mixtures on supermartensitic stainless steel TIG welds. Mater Test Join Technol 52:306–31510.3139/120.110135 ↗
16. Boellinghaus T, Eliezer D (2016) Hydrogen trapping in supermartensitic stainless steel TIG wleds. In: Boellinghaus T, Lippold JC, Cross CE (eds) Cracking phenomena in welds IV. pp 457–47210.1007/978-3-319-28434-7_20 ↗
17. Park YD, Maroef IS, Landau A, Olson DL (2002) Retained austenite as a hydrogen trap in steel welds. Weld J 81:27–35
18. Lensing CA, Park YD, Maroef IS, Olson DL (2004) Yttrium hydrogen trapping to manage hydrogen in HSLA steel welds. Weld J 83:254–255
19. Maroef I, Olson DL (2000) Fundamental study of hydrogen trapping in steel weld metal. In: Joining of advanced and specialty materials II. ASM International, pp 227–235
20. Rietveld HM (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 2:65–7110.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
21. Lee S, Lee J (1986) The trapping and transport phenomena of hydrogen in nickel. Metall Trans A 17:181–18710.1007/BF02643893 ↗
22. Silverstein R, Glam B, Eliezer D et al (2018) Dynamic deformation of hydrogen charged austenitic-ferritic steels: hydrogen trapping mechanisms, and simulations. J Alloys Compd 731:1238–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.14210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.142 ↗
23. Tal-Gutelmacher E, Eliezer D, Abramov E (2007) Thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS)—application in quantitative study of hydrogen evolution and trapping in crystalline and non-crystalline materials. Mater Sci Eng A 445–446:625–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.08910.1016/j.msea.2006.09.089 ↗
24. Mahajan S, Chin GY (1973) Formation of annealing twins in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Metall 21:1353–136310.1016/0001-6160(73)90085-0 ↗
25. Silverstein R, Eliezer D, Glam B et al (2014) Influence of hydrogen on microstructure and dynamic strength of lean duplex stainless steel. J Mater Sci 49:4025–4031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8075-910.1007/s10853-014-8075-9 ↗
26. Tal-Gutelmacher E, Eliezer D (2005) Hydrogen cracking in titanium-based alloys. J Alloys Compd 404–406:621–62510.1016/j.jallcom.2005.02.098 ↗
27. Yagodzinskyy Y, Todoshchenko O, Papula S, Ha H (2011) Hydrogen solubility and diffusion in austenitic stainless steels studied with thermal desorption spectroscopy. Steel Res Int 82:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20100022710.1002/srin.201000227 ↗
28. Turnbull A, Hutchings RB, Ferriss DH (1997) Modelling of thermal desorption of hydrogen from metals. Mater Sci Eng 238:317–32810.1016/S0921-5093(97)00426-7 ↗
29. Bar R, Dabah E, Eliezer D et al (2011) The influence of hydrogen on thermal desorption processes in structural materials. Procedia Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.60410.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.604 ↗
30. Silverstein R, Eliezer D, Glam B et al (2014) Dynamic strength of duplex steel in the presence of hydrogen. In: Steely hydrogen conference, pp 662–666
31. Kamilyan M, Silverstein R, Eliezer D (2017) Hydrogen trapping and hydrogen embrittlement of Mg alloys. J Mater Sci 52:11091–11100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1268-210.1007/s10853-017-1268-2 ↗
32. Silverstein R, Eliezer D, Glam B (2017) Hydrogen effect on duplex stainless steels at very high strain rates. Energy Procedia 107:199–20410.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.172 ↗
33. Silverstein R, Glam B, Eliezer D et al (2015) The influence of inclusions and hydrogen on the microstructure and dynamic strength of materials. In: AIP SCCM (shock compression of condensed matter)
34. Kim Y, Kim Y, Kim D et al (2011) Effects of hydrogen diffusion on the mechanical properties of austenite 316L steel at ambient temperature. Mater Trans 52:507–51310.2320/matertrans.M2010273 ↗
35. Silverstein R, Eliezer D (2016) Influences of hydrogen and textural anisotropy on the microstructure and mechanical properties of duplex stainless steel at high strain rate (~105 s−1). J Mater Sci 51:10442–10451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0264-210.1007/s10853-016-0264-2 ↗
36. Takasaki A, Furuya Y, Ojima K, Taneda Y (1995) Hydride dissociation and hydrogen evolution behavior of electrochemically charged pure titanium. J Alloys Compd 224:269–27310.1016/0925-8388(95)01565-5 ↗
37. Eliezer D, Tal-Gutelmacher E, Cross CE, Boellinghaus T (2006) Hydrogen trapping in?-21S titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 421:200–20710.1016/j.msea.2006.01.067 ↗
38. Silverstein R, Eliezer D (2017) Effects of residual stresses on hydrogen trapping in duplex stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng, A 684:64–7010.1016/j.msea.2016.12.041 ↗
39. Silverstein R, Sobol O, Boellinghaus T et al (2017) Hydrogen behavior in SAF 2205 duplex stainless steel. J Alloys Compd 695:2689–269510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.184 ↗
40. Ono K, Meshii M (1992) Hydrogen detrapping from grain boundaries and dislocations in high purity iron. Acta Metall Mater 40:1357–136410.1016/0956-7151(92)90436-I ↗
41. Sofronis P, Dadfarnia M, Novak P et al (2009) A combined applied mechanics/materials science approach toward quantifying the role of hydrogen on material degradation. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on fracture, pp 1–10
42. Eliezer D, Tal-Gutelmacher E, Cross CE, Boellinghaus T (2006) Hydrogen absorption and desorption in a duplex-annealed Ti-6Al-4V alloy during exposure to different hydrogen-containing environments. Mater Sci Eng, A 433:298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.08810.1016/j.msea.2006.06.088 ↗