Molecular dynamics simulations of solid-state sintering in Fe35Ni alloy: understanding the process at the atomic scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical and Alloy Processes · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Gheisari K, Oh JT, Javadpour S (2011) The effect of heat treatment on the structure and magnetic properties of mechanically alloyed Fe–45%Ni nanostructured powders. J Alloys Compd 509:1020–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2010.09.15910.1016/J.JALLCOM.2010.09.159 ↗
2. Sato H, Nishiura T, Moritani T, Watanabe Y (2023) Atypical phase transformation behavior of Fe-33%Ni alloys induced by shot peening. Surf Coat Technol 462:129470. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2023.12947010.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2023.129470 ↗
3. Li Y, Cai X, Zhang G et al (2022) Optimization of electrodeposition nanocrytalline Ni-Fe alloy coatings for the replacement of Ni coatings. J Alloys Compd 903:163761. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2022.16376110.1016/J.JALLCOM.2022.163761 ↗
4. Hong LB, Fultz B (1998) Two-phase coexistence in Fe–Ni alloys synthesized by ball milling. J Appl Phys 79:3946–3955. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36182110.1063/1.361821 ↗
5. Qin F, Lu F, Chen Y et al (2018) Deformation induced elinvar behavior in Fe-Ni invar alloy. Sci Bull 63:1040–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.07.00610.1016/j.scib.2018.07.006 ↗
6. Moruzzi VL (1992) Theory of invar. Solid State Commun 83:739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(92)90155-310.1016/0038-1098(92)90155-3 ↗
7. Cao D (2023) Fusion joining of thermoplastic composites with a carbon fabric heating element modified by multiwalled carbon nanotube sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128:4443–4453. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-023-12202-6/TABLES/410.1007/S00170-023-12202-6/TABLES/4 ↗
8. Cao D (2023) Enhanced buckling strength of the thin-walled continuous carbon fiber–reinforced thermoplastic composite through dual coaxial nozzles material extrusion process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128:1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-023-12014-8/TABLES/610.1007/S00170-023-12014-8/TABLES/6 ↗
9. Cao D, Bouzolin D, Lu H, Griffith DT (2023) Bending and shear improvements in 3D-printed core sandwich composites through modification of resin uptake in the skin/core interphase region. Compos B Eng 264:110912. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2023.11091210.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2023.110912 ↗
10. Si PZ, Choi CJ (2018) High hardness nanocrystalline invar alloys prepared from Fe-Ni nanoparticles. Metals 8:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/met801002810.3390/met8010028 ↗
11. Jiang J, Chen P, Sun W (2020) Monitoring micro-structural evolution during aluminum sintering and understanding the sintering mechanism of aluminum nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics study. J Mater Sci Technol 57:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2020.03.06810.1016/J.JMST.2020.03.068 ↗
12. Wu R, Zhao X, Liu Y (2021) Atomic insights of Cu nanoparticles melting and sintering behavior in CuCu direct bonding. Mater Des 197:109240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2020.10924010.1016/J.MATDES.2020.109240 ↗
13. Alavi S, Thompson DL (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of the melting of aluminum nanoparticles. J Phys Chem A 110:1518–1523. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP053318S10.1021/JP053318S ↗
14. Li Y, Goyal A, Chernatynskiy A et al (2016) Nanoindentation of gold and gold alloys by molecular dynamics simulation. Mater Sci Eng A 651:346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2015.10.08110.1016/J.MSEA.2015.10.081 ↗
15. Gao Y, Ruestes CJ, Urbassek HM (2014) Nanoindentation and nanoscratching of iron: atomistic simulation of dislocation generation and reactions. Comput Mater Sci 90:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2014.04.02710.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2014.04.027 ↗
16. Wang W, Hua D, Luo D et al (2022) Molecular dynamics simulation of deformation mechanism of CoCrNi medium entropy alloy during nanoscratching. Comput Mater Sci 203:111085. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2021.11108510.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2021.111085 ↗
17. Song P, Wen D (2010) Molecular dynamics simulation of the sintering of metallic nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 12:823–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-009-9718-7/FIGURES/610.1007/S11051-009-9718-7/FIGURES/6 ↗
18. Liu ZJ, Cheng Q, Wang Y et al (2020) Sintering neck growth mechanism of Fe nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics simulation. Chem Eng Sci 218:115583. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CES.2020.11558310.1016/J.CES.2020.115583 ↗
19. Hu Y, Wang Y, Yao Y (2023) Molecular dynamics on the sintering mechanism and mechanical feature of the silver nanoparticles at different temperatures. Mater Today Commun 34:105292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.10529210.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.105292 ↗
20. Luo S, Luo J, Kang Q et al (2022) Molecular dynamics simulation and experimental verification of the crystallization behavior of a Ti–Zr–Ni alloy prepared by SPS low temperature liquid phase sintering. Vacuum 206:111491. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACUUM.2022.11149110.1016/J.VACUUM.2022.111491 ↗
21. Li X, Shi Y, Chen T et al (2022) Study on sintering mechanism and mechanical properties of Fe–Ni elastocaloric refrigeration alloy through molecular dynamics simulation. Mater Today Commun 32:103913. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.10391310.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.103913 ↗
22. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Lee WH, et al (2021) A multi-scale multi-physics modeling framework of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. 73:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MPRP.2018.01.00310.1016/J.MPRP.2018.01.003 ↗
23. Nandy J, Yedla N, Gupta P et al (2019) Sintering of AlSi10Mg particles in direct metal laser sintering process: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Mater Chem Phys 236:121803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12180310.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121803 ↗
24. Abedini A, Montazeri A, Malti A, Kardani A (2022) Mechanical properties are affected by coalescence mechanisms during sintering of metal powders: case study of Al-Cu nanoparticles by molecular dynamics simulation. Powder Technol 405:117567. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POWTEC.2022.11756710.1016/J.POWTEC.2022.117567 ↗
25. Singh R, Sharma V (2021) Nano tungsten carbide interactions and mechanical behaviour during sintering: a molecular dynamics study. Comput Mater Sci 197:110653. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2021.11065310.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2021.110653 ↗
26. Ueno K, Shibuta Y (2020) Molecular dynamics study of composition dependence of solid-liquid interfacial energy of Fe-Ni binary alloy. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 861:012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/861/1/01206410.1088/1757-899X/861/1/012064 ↗
27. Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R et al (2022) LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun 271:108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPC.2021.10817110.1016/J.CPC.2021.108171 ↗
28. Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng 18:015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
29. Bonny G, Pasianot RC, Malerba L (2009) Fe-Ni many-body potential for metallurgical applications. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng 17:025010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/17/2/02501010.1088/0965-0393/17/2/025010 ↗
30. Feng J, Dai K, Zhou Q et al (2019) Formation of bonding interface in explosive welding—a molecular dynamics approach. J Phys Condens Matter 31:415403. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/AB30D710.1088/1361-648X/AB30D7 ↗
31. Sun W, Chen P (2020) Dynamic contact behaviours involving crystalline diamond nanospheres. Eur J Mech A Solids 80:103896. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUROMECHSOL.2019.10389610.1016/J.EUROMECHSOL.2019.103896 ↗
32. Chakraborty P, Zachariah MR (2014) Do nanoenergetic particles remain nano-sized during combustion? Combust Flame 161:1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2013.10.01710.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2013.10.017 ↗
33. Yang Z, Yang X, Xu Z (2008) Molecular dynamics simulation of the melting behavior of Pt-Au nanoparticles with core-shell structure. J Phys Chem C 112:4937–4947. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP711702Y/SUPPL_FILE/JP711702Y-FILE014.PDF10.1021/JP711702Y/SUPPL_FILE/JP711702Y-FILE014.PDF ↗
34. Sankaranarayanan SKRS, Bhethanabotla VR, Joseph B (2005) Molecular dynamics simulation study of the melting of Pd-Pt nanoclusters. Phy Rev B 71:195415. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.19541510.1103/PhysRevB.71.195415 ↗
35. Kingery WD, Berg M (1955) Study of the initial stages of sintering solids by viscous flow, evaporation-condensation, and self-diffusion. J Appl Phys 26:1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.172187410.1063/1.1721874 ↗
36. Sun W, Zeng Q, Yu A, Kendall K (2013) Calculation of normal contact forces between silica nanospheres. Langmuir 29:7825–7837. https://doi.org/10.1021/LA401087J/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/LA-2013-01087J_0018.JPEG10.1021/LA401087J/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/LA-2013-01087J_0018.JPEG ↗
37. Asoro MA, Kovar D, Shao-Horn Y et al (2009) Coalescence and sintering of Pt nanoparticles: in situ observation by aberration-corrected HAADF STEM. Nanotechnology 21:025701. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/2/02570110.1088/0957-4484/21/2/025701 ↗
38. Kolosov AY, Sokolov DN, Sdobnyakov NY et al (2017) Estimation of the dihedral angle between metal nanoparticles during their coalescence. J Nano- and Electron Phys 9:05042–05044. https://doi.org/10.21272/JNEP.9(5).0504210.21272/JNEP.9(5).05042 ↗
39. Delannay F (2015) Influence of dihedral angle and grain coordination on densification rate during intermediate and final sintering stages. J Am Ceram Soc 98:3469–3475. https://doi.org/10.1111/JACE.1357710.1111/JACE.13577 ↗
40. Kart HH, Yildirim H, Kart SO, Çagin T (2014) Physical properties of Cu nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics study. Mater Chem Phys 147:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.04.03010.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.04.030 ↗
41. Fang ZZ, Wang H (2010) Sintering of ultrafine and nanosized particles. In: Sintering of Advanced Materials. Elsevier 434–47310.1533/9781845699949.3.434 ↗
42. Seong Y, Kim Y, German R et al (2016) Dominant mechanisms of the sintering of copper nano-powders depending on the crystal misalignment. Comput Mater Sci 123:164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2016.06.01610.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2016.06.016 ↗
43. German RM (2014) Thermodynamic and Kinetic Treatments. Sintering: from Empirical Observations to Scientific Principles 183–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401682-8.00007-010.1016/B978-0-12-401682-8.00007-0 ↗
44. Silman GI (2012) Compilative FE - NI phase diagram with author’s correction. Met Sci Heat Treat 54:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11041-012-9463-x10.1007/s11041-012-9463-x ↗
45. Singh N, Parkash O, Kumar D (2018) Phase evolution, mechanical and corrosion behavior of Fe(100–x) Ni(x) alloys synthesized by powder metallurgy. J Phys Chem Solids 114:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.10.04510.1016/j.jpcs.2017.10.045 ↗
46. Chan TY, Lin ST (1997) Sintering of elemental carbonyl iron and carbonyl nickel powder mixtures. J Mater Sci 32:1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101853781420410.1023/A:1018537814204 ↗
47. Herring C (1950) Effect of change of scale on sintering phenomena. J Appl Phys 21:301–303. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.169965810.1063/1.1699658 ↗
48. Thümmler F, Thomma W (1967) The sintering process. Metall Rev 12:69–108. https://doi.org/10.1179/MTLR.1967.12.1.6910.1179/MTLR.1967.12.1.69 ↗
49. Cheng B, Ngan AHW (2013) The sintering and densification behaviour of many copper nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics study. Comput Mater Sci 74:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.01410.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.014 ↗