Developing a multiscale approach for damage analysis of functionalized-GNP/PET nanocomposite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Ajayan PM, Stephan O, Colliex C, Trauth D (1994) Aligned carbon nanotube arrays formed by cutting a polymer resin—nanotube composite. Science 265:1212–1214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5176.121210.1126/science.265.5176.1212 ↗
2. Thostenson ET, Li C, Chou T-W (2005) Nanocomposites in context. Compos Sci Technol 65:491–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
3. Hu K, Kulkarni DD, Choi I, Tsukruk VV (2014) Graphene-polymer nanocomposites for structural and functional applications. Prog Polym Sci 39:1934–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.001 ↗
4. Potts JR, Dreyer DR, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2011) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 52:5–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.04210.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 ↗
5. Kim J, Cha J, Chung B, Ryu S, Hong SH (2020) Fabrication and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy nanocomposites containing high loadings of noncovalently functionalized graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol 192:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10810110.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108101 ↗
6. Karataş MA, Gökkaya H (2018) A review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials. Def Technol 14:318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.00110.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001 ↗
7. A de Oliveira, C Beatrice (2018) Polymer nanocomposites with different types of nanofiller. Nanocomposites—recent evolutions, IntechOpen.chapter 6, London UK
8. Omanović-Mikličanin E, Badnjević A, Kazlagić A, Hajlovac M (2020) Nanocomposites: a brief review. Heal Technol 10:51–5910.1007/s12553-019-00380-x ↗
9. Ngo T-D (2020) Composite and nanocomposite materials—from knowledge to industrial applications. IntechOpen, London UK10.5772/intechopen.80186 ↗
10. Rajak DK, Pagar DD, Menezes PL, Linul E (2019) Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: manufacturing, properties, and applications. Polymers 11:166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
11. Bilisik K, Karaduman NS, Sapanci E (2019) Flexural characterization of 3D prepreg/stitched carbon/epoxy/multiwalled carbon nanotube preforms and composites. J Compos Mater 53:563–57710.1177/0021998318787861 ↗
12. Bilisik K, Erdogan G, Sapancı E (2018) Flexural behavior of 3D para-aramid/phenolic/nano (MWCNT) composites. RSC Adv 8:7213–722410.1039/C7RA13437A ↗
13. Bilisik K, Karaduman NS, Sapanci E (2019) Tensile properties of nanoprepreg/nanostitched 3D carbon/epoxy MWCNTs composites. Mech Mater 128:11–2310.1016/j.mechmat.2018.10.002 ↗
14. Bilisik K, Sapanci E (2018) Experimental determination of fracture toughness properties of nanostitched and nanoprepreg carbon/epoxy composites. Eng Fract Mech 189:293–30610.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.033 ↗
15. Tang L-C, Zhao L, Guan L-Z (2017) Graphene/polymer composite materials: processing, properties and applications. Advanced composite materials: properties and applications. De Gruyter, Poland, pp 349–41910.1515/9783110574432-007 ↗
16. Li B, Zhong W-H (2011) Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 46:5595–5614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5572-y10.1007/s10853-011-5572-y ↗
17. Bortz DR, Heras EG, Martin-Gullon I (2012) Impressive fatigue life and fracture toughness improvements in graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Macromolecules 45:238–24510.1021/ma201563k ↗
18. Saravanan N, Rajasekar R, Mahalakshmi S, Sathishkumar T, Sasikumar K, Sahoo S (2014) Graphene and modified graphene-based polymer nanocomposites—a review. J Reinf Plast Compos 33:1158–117010.1177/0731684414524847 ↗
19. Lawal AT (2019) Graphene-based nano composites and their applications. A review. Biosens Bioelectron 141:111384–11140110.1016/j.bios.2019.111384 ↗
20. Tang B, Hu G, Gao H, Hai L (2015) Application of graphene as filler to improve thermal transport property of epoxy resin for thermal interface materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf 85:420–42910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.141 ↗
21. Pawlik M, Le H, Lu Y (2019) Effects of the graphene nanoplatelets reinforced interphase on mechanical properties of carbon fibre reinforced polymer–a multiscale modelling study. Compos Part B Eng 177:107097–10709710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107097 ↗
22. Chen L, Jin H, Xu Z et al (2014) A design of gradient interphase reinforced by silanized graphene oxide and its effect on carbon fiber/epoxy interface. Mater Chem Phys 145:186–19610.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.001 ↗
23. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu Z-Z, Koratkar N (2009) Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano 3:3884–389010.1021/nn9010472 ↗
24. Wei J, Atif R, Vo T, Inam F (2015) Graphene nanoplatelets in epoxy system: dispersion, reaggregation, and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. J Nanomater 2015:1–12
25. Rohini R, Katti P, Bose S (2015) Tailoring the interface in graphene/thermoset polymer composites: a critical review. Polymer 70:A17–A3410.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.016 ↗
26. De Cicco D, Taheri F (2019) Effect of functionalized graphene nanoplatelets on the delamination-buckling and delamination propagation resistance of 3D fiber-metal laminates under different loading rates. Nanomaterials 9:1482–150510.3390/nano9101482 ↗
27. Palacios JA, Ganesan R (2019) Reliability evaluation of Carbon-Nanotube-Reinforced-Polymer composites based on multiscale finite element model. Compos Struct 229:111381–11139310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111381 ↗
28. Namilae S, Chandra N (2005) Multiscale model to study the effect of interfaces in carbon nanotube-based composites. J Eng Mater Technol 127:222–23210.1115/1.1857940 ↗
29. Aghadavoudi F, Golestanian H, Zarasvand KA (2019) Elastic behaviour of hybrid cross-linked epoxy-based nanocomposite reinforced with GNP and CNT: experimental and multiscale modelling. Polym Bull 76:4275–429410.1007/s00289-018-2602-9 ↗
30. Zeng Q, Yu A, Lu G (2008) Multiscale modeling and simulation of polymer nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 33:191–26910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.09.002 ↗
31. Yang B, Shin H, Lee H-K, Kim H (2013) A combined molecular dynamics/micromechanics/finite element approach for multiscale constitutive modelling of nanocomposites with interface effects. Appl Phys Lett 103:241903–241903-410.1063/1.4819383 ↗
32. Gates T, Odegard G, Frankland S, Clancy T (2005) Computational materials: multi-scale modeling and simulation of nanostructured materials. Compos Sci Technol 65:2416–243410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.009 ↗
33. Huang J, Wu Y, Huang L (2021) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of graphene-based nanocomposites incorporating a graded interphase based on isoparametric graded finite element model. Compos Interfaces 28:543–57510.1080/09276440.2020.1794164 ↗
34. Zhao X, Gui Z, Chen X et al (2021) Finite element analysis and experiment study on the elastic properties of randomly and controllably distributed carbon fiber-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites. Ceram Int 47:12613–12622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.12010.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.120 ↗
35. Rémond Y, Ahzi S, Baniassadi M, Garmestani H (2016) Applied RVE reconstruction and homogenization of heterogeneous materials. Wiley, New York USA10.1002/9781119307563 ↗
36. Baghani M, Baniassadi M, Rémond Y (2023) Computational Modeling of Intelligent Soft Matter: Shape Memory Polymers and Hydrogels. Elsevier, Amsterdam Netherlands
37. Montazeri A, Rafii-Tabar H (2011) Multiscale modeling of graphene-and nanotube-based reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Phys Lett A 375:4034–404010.1016/j.physleta.2011.08.073 ↗
38. Alian A, Kundalwal S, Meguid S (2015) Multiscale modeling of carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Polymer 70:149–16010.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.004 ↗
39. Zaccardi F, Santonicola MG, Laurenzi S (2021) Role of interface bonding on the elastic properties of epoxy-based nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes using multiscale analysis. Compos Struct 255:113050–11306010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113050 ↗
40. Yang S (2022) Interface and interphase of nanocomposites tailored by covalent grafting of carbon nanotube: hierarchical multiscale modelling. Int J Mech Sci 220:107160–107177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10716010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107160 ↗
41. Liu F, Hu N, Ning H et al (2017) Investigation on the interfacial mechanical properties of hybrid graphene-carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites. Carbon 115:694–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.03910.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.039 ↗
42. Xiao S, Hou W (2006) Fracture of vacancy-defected carbon nanotubes and their embedded nanocomposites. Phys Rev B 73:115406–115410. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.11540610.1103/PhysRevB.73.115406 ↗
43. Di J, Lei Z, Ren Z et al (2022) Interfacial characterization in defective graphene/PET substrate structure through traction separation models: a molecular dynamics study. Comput Mater Sci 211:111540–11155510.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111540 ↗
44. Yang D, Sun Y, Yang Z, Chen X, Wang C (2021) Multiscale modeling of unidirectional composites with interfacial debonding using molecular dynamics and micromechanics. Compos Part B Eng 219:108893–108907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10889310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108893 ↗
45. Pan D, Wang H, Zhu K, Tang Z, Hao X (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation and finite element method investigation of PTFE/carbon fiber composite tribological properties. Tribol Int 180:108241–108257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10824110.1016/j.triboint.2023.108241 ↗
46. A Fattahi, S Roozpeikar, N Ahmed (2018) FEM modelling based on molecular results for PE/SWCNT nanocomposites. Int J Eng Technol. www. sciencepubco. com/index. php/IJET 7: 110.1007/s42452-018-0022-y ↗
47. Lawrimore W, Paliwal B, Chandler M, Johnson K, Horstemeyer M (2016) Hierarchical multiscale modeling of polyvinyl alcohol/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polymer 99:386–39810.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.026 ↗
48. Karimi MR, Abrinia K, Hamdia KM, Hashemianzadeh SM, Baniassadi M (2022) Effects of functional group type and coverage on the interfacial strength and load transfer of graphene-polyethylene nanocomposites: a molecular dynamics simulation. Appl Phys A 128:341–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-05427-x10.1007/s00339-022-05427-x ↗
49. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
50. Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:015012–01502010.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
51. Sun H (1998) COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J Phys Chem B 102:7338–7364. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980939v10.1021/jp980939v ↗
52. Li Y, Seidel G (2014) Multiscale modeling of the effects of nanoscale load transfer on the effective elastic properties of unfunctionalized carbon nanotube–polyethylene nanocomposites. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 22:025023–02505210.1088/0965-0393/22/2/025023 ↗
53. L Melro, R Pyrz, LR Jensen (2016) IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, IOP publishing
54. Algar M (1997) Polymer science dictionary. Polym Test 3:299–1307
55. A Version (2011) Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.
56. Camanho PP, Davila CG, de Moura MF (2003) Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater 37:1415–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830303450510.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
57. Jin Y, Duan F, Mu X (2016) Functionalization enhancement on interfacial shear strength between graphene and polyethylene. Appl Surf Sci 387:1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.04710.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.047 ↗
58. Awasthi AP, Lagoudas DC, Hammerand DC (2008) Modeling of graphene–polymer interfacial mechanical behavior using molecular dynamics. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:015002–01503910.1088/0965-0393/17/1/015002 ↗
59. Choi JY, Zhang X, Nguyen HT et al (2021) Atomistic mechanisms of adhesion and shear strength in graphene oxide-polymer interfaces. J Mech Phys Solids 156:104578–104597104597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10457810.1016/j.jmps.2021.104578 ↗
60. Li W, Dichiara A, Bai J (2013) Carbon nanotube–graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 74:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.11.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.11.015 ↗
61. Reddy CD, Rajendran S, Liew K (2006) Equilibrium configuration and continuum elastic properties of finite sized graphene. Nanotechnology 17:864–87010.1088/0957-4484/17/3/042 ↗
62. Dasari A, Misra RDK (2003) On the strain rate sensitivity of high density polyethylene and polypropylenes. Mater Sci Eng A 358:356–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00330-710.1016/S0921-5093(03)00330-7 ↗
63. Safaei M, Sheidaei A, Baniassadi M, Ahzi S, Mashhadi MM, Pourboghrat F (2015) An interfacial debonding-induced damage model for graphite nanoplatelet polymer composites. Comput Mater Sci 96:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.03610.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.036 ↗