Inverse design of aluminium alloys using multi-targeted regression
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The traditional design process for aluminium alloys has primarily relied upon iterative alloy production and testing, which can be time intensive and expensive. Machine learning has recently been demonstrated to have promise in predicting alloy properties based on the inputs of alloy composition and alloy processing conditions. In the search for optimal alloy concentrations that meet desired properties, as the search space expands, the optimisation process can become more time intensive and computationally expensive, depending on the methodology used. We propose a faster workflow for inverse alloy design by using multi-target machine-learning models. We train a random forest regressor to predict the concentration of alloying elements and a random forest classifier to determine the processing condition. We further analysed the inverse model and validated findings against alloys reported in the literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Warner T (2006) Recently-Developed Aluminium Solutions For Aerospace Applications. Mater Sci Forum 519–521:1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.127110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1271 ↗
2. Hirsch J (2014) Recent development in aluminium for automotive applications. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 24:1995–200210.1016/S1003-6326(14)63305-7 ↗
3. J Hirsch, Automotive Trends in Aluminium - The European Perspective, (n.d.).
4. Holroyd NJH, Scamans GM (2016) Environmental degradation of marine aluminum alloys—Past, present, and future. Corrosion 72:136–143. https://doi.org/10.5006/192710.5006/1927 ↗
5. European Aluminium, Vision 2050: European aluminium’s contribution to the EU’s mid-century low-carbon roadmap, (2019).
6. Lu K (2010) The future of metals. Science 328:319–320. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.118586610.1126/science.1185866 ↗
7. Wang Z, Liu X, Zhu C, Xue J, Guo Z, Zhang Y, Li X (2023) Influence of the interaction between Si and Sc on the microstructure and tensile properties of as casted Al-Si-Sc alloys. J Alloy Compd 932:167650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16765010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167650 ↗
8. N Gaudence, (2019) University of Rwanda Effect of Fe, Mn and Sr on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Secondary Al-Si-Cu-Mg Cast Alloys, IJERT, https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV8IS050281.10.17577/IJERTV8IS050281 ↗
9. Zhang W, Yuan X, Jia Z, Yang X, Qing L, Zhu C (2014) Effect of minor Sc and Zr addition on microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 24:3866–387110.1016/S1003-6326(14)63544-5 ↗
10. Macchi C, Somoza A, Ferragut R, Dupasquier A, Polmear IJ (2009) Ageing processes in Al-Cu-Mg alloys with different Cu/Mg ratios. Phys Status Solidi C 6:2322–2325. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.20098210110.1002/pssc.200982101 ↗
11. Røyset J, Ryum N (2005) Scandium in aluminium alloys. Int Mater Rev 50:19–44. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328005X1431110.1179/174328005X14311 ↗
12. Polmear IJ, Couper MJ (1988) Design and development of an experimental wrought aluminum alloy for use at elevated temperatures. Metall Mater Trans A 19:1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0262838710.1007/BF02628387 ↗
13. E Tan, BO Gel, Influence of Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of AA6066 Alloy, (n.d.).
14. Hu M, Tan Q, Knibbe R, Wang S, Li X, Wu T, Jarin S, Zhang M-X (2021) Prediction of mechanical properties of wrought aluminium alloys using feature engineering assisted machine learning approach. Metall Mater Trans A 52:2873–2884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-021-06279-510.1007/s11661-021-06279-5 ↗
15. Liao H, Zhao B, Suo X, Wang Q (2019) Prediction models for macro shrinkage of aluminum alloys based on machine learning algorithms. Mater Today Commun 21:100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10071510.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100715 ↗
16. Ward L, O’Keeffe SC, Stevick J, Jelbert GR, Aykol M, Wolverton C (2018) A machine learning approach for engineering bulk metallic glass alloys. Acta Mater 159:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.00210.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.002 ↗
17. Masood Chaudry U, Hamad K, Abuhmed T (2021) Machine learning-aided design of aluminum alloys with high performance. Mater Today Commun. 26:10189710.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101897 ↗
18. Dey S, Sultana N, Kaiser MS, Dey P, Datta S (2016) Computational intelligence based design of age-hardenable aluminium alloys for different temperature regimes. Mater Des 92:522–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.07610.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.076 ↗
19. Dey S, Dey P, Datta S (2017) Design of novel age-hardenable aluminium alloy using evolutionary computation. J Alloy Compd 704:373–38110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.027 ↗
20. Man KF, Tang KS, Kwong S (1996) Genetic algorithms: concepts and applications [in engineering design]. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 43:519–534. https://doi.org/10.1109/41.53860910.1109/41.538609 ↗
21. Li S, Barnard AS (2022) Inverse design of nanoparticles using multi-target machine learning. Adv Theory Simul 5:2100414. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20210041410.1002/adts.202100414 ↗
22. Li S, Ting JYC, Barnard AS (2022) The impact of domain-driven and data-driven feature selection on the inverse design of nanoparticle catalysts. J Computa Sci 65:101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.10189610.1016/j.jocs.2022.101896 ↗
23. Li S, Barnard AS (2022) Inverse design of MXenes for high-capacity energy storage materials using multi-target machine learning. Chem Mater 34:4964–4974. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0020010.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00200 ↗
24. Ninad Bhat, Amanda S. Barnard, Nick Birbilis, Aluminium alloy dataset for supervised learning, Mendeley Data. V1 (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.17632/b6br4yk6r3.1.10.17632/b6br4yk6r3.1 ↗
25. Ding Y, Gao K, Huang H, Wen S, Wu X, Nie Z, Guo S, Shao R, Huang C, Zhou D (2019) Nucleation and evolution of β phase and corresponding intergranular corrosion transition at 100–230 °C in 5083 alloy containing Er and Zr. Mater Des 174:10777810.1016/j.matdes.2019.107778 ↗
26. H. Shi, Development of Sensitisation Resistant 5XXX series Aluminium Alloys, Monash University, 2016.
27. Zhang R, Knight SP, Holtz RL, Goswami R, Davies CHJ, Birbilis N (2016) A survey of sensitization in 5xxx series aluminum alloys. Corrosion 72:144–15910.5006/1787 ↗
28. Bhat N, Barnard AS, Birbilis N (2023) Unsupervised machine learning discovers classes in aluminium alloys. Royal Soc Open Sci 10:220360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.22036010.1098/rsos.220360 ↗
29. Bhat N, Barnard AS, Birbilis N (2023) Improving the prediction of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy using data-driven class-based regression. Comput Mater Sci 228:112270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11227010.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112270 ↗
30. I. Guyon, A. Elisseeff, An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection, (n.d.) 26.
31. S Wang, J Tang, H Liu, (2017), Feature Selection, In: C. Sammut, G.I. Webb (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, Springer US, Boston, MA, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_101.10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_101 ↗
32. J Benesty, J Chen, Y Huang, I Cohen, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, In: I. Cohen, Y. Huang, J. Chen, J. Benesty (Eds.), Noise Reduction in Speech Processing, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2009), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5.10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5 ↗
33. Goyer RA (1993) Lead toxicity: current concerns. Environ Health Perspect 100:177–187. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9310017710.1289/ehp.93100177 ↗
34. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
35. L Breiman, J Friedman, R Olshen, C Stone, Classification and regression trees (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA), ISBN-13. (1984) 978–0412048418.
36. T Hastie, R Tibshirani, JH Friedman, JH Friedman, The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, Springer, 2009.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
37. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–3210.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
38. C Sammut, GI Webb (2010), eds., Mean Absolute Error. In: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer US, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_525.10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_525 ↗
39. C Sammut, GI Webb, eds., (2010) Mean Squared Error. In: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer US, Boston, MA, 653–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_528.10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_528 ↗
40. Machine learning in automated text categorization | ACM Computing Surveys, (n.d.). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1145/505282.505283?casa_token=M6CwEyF3hCIAAAAA:mKpUabpj8Xdf_wfkjQ0MuyrvPz9JXJBvN0fEkC9KPQD9mMUeX5fYd9q4ursFk4ZeQV1ojYbFhSQ2Sw (accessed September 14, 2023).10.1145/505282.505283?casa_token=M6CwEyF3hCIAAAAA:mKpUabpj8Xdf_wfkjQ0MuyrvPz9JXJBvN0fEkC9KPQD9mMUeX5fYd9q4ursFk4ZeQV1ojYbFhSQ2Sw ↗
41. Tsoumakas G, Katakis I (2007) Multi-label classification: an overview. IJDWM 3:1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdwm.200707010110.4018/jdwm.2007070101 ↗
42. J Bergstra, Y Bengio, Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization, (n.d.) 25.
43. L.F. Mondolfo, Aluminum alloys: structure and properties, Elsevier, 2013.
44. KR Van Horn, Aluminium: Properties, physical metallurgy and phase diagrams, American Society for Metals, (1967).
45. Guinier A (1938) Un nouveau type de diagrammes de rayons X. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Seánces l’Academie Sciences 206:1641–1643
46. GD Preston, WL Bragg, (1997) The diffraction of X-rays by age-hardening aluminium copper alloys., In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 167: 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0152.10.1098/rspa.1938.0152 ↗
47. N.J. Kim, Designing with aluminum alloys, Handbook of Mechanical Alloy Design. (2004) 441–486.10.1201/9780203913307.ch9 ↗
48. S Li, JYC Ting, AS Barnard (2022), Optimization-Free Inverse Design of High-Dimensional Nanoparticle Electrocatalysts Using Multi-target Machine Learning, in: D. Groen, C. de Mulatier, M. Paszynski, V.V. Krzhizhanovskaya, J.J. Dongarra, P.M.A. Sloot (Eds.), Computational Science – ICCS 2022, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08754-7_39.10.1007/978-3-031-08754-7_39 ↗
49. Dursun T, Soutis C (1980) Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater Design 56(2014):862–871
50. I Polmear, D StJohn, JF Nie, M Qian, Light alloys: metallurgy of the light metals, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017.10.1016/B978-0-08-099431-4.00001-4 ↗
51. Meng C, Zhang D, Cui H, Zhuang L, Zhang J (2014) Mechanical properties, intergranular corrosion behavior and microstructure of Zn modified Al–Mg alloys. J Alloy Compd 617:925–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.09910.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.099 ↗
52. Pan Y, Zhang D, Liu H, Zhuang L, Zhang J (2021) Precipitation hardening and intergranular corrosion behavior of novel Al–Mg–Zn(-Cu) alloys. J Alloy Compd 853:157199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15719910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157199 ↗
53. Strengthening mechanism of age-hardenable Al–xMg–3Zn alloys, (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2019.1612590?src=getftr (accessed July 5, 2023).10.1080/02670836.2019.1612590?src=getftr ↗
54. Stemper L, Tunes MA, Dumitraschkewitz P, Mendez-Martin F, Tosone R, Marchand D, Curtin WA, Uggowitzer PJ, Pogatscher S (2021) Giant hardening response in AlMgZn(Cu) alloys. Acta Mater 206:116617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11661710.1016/j.actamat.2020.116617 ↗
55. Marlaud T, Deschamps A, Bley F, Lefebvre W, Baroux B (2010) Influence of alloy composition and heat treatment on precipitate composition in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Acta Mater 58:248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.00310.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.003 ↗
56. Zou Y, Wu X, Tang S, Zhu Q, Song H, Guo M, Cao L (2021) Investigation on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys with various Zn/Mg ratios. J Mater Sci Technol 85:106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.04510.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.045 ↗
57. Berg LK, Gjønnes J, Hansen V, Li XZ, Knutson-Wedel M, Waterloo G, Schryvers D, Wallenberg LR (2001) GP-zones in Al–Zn–Mg alloys and their role in artificial aging. Acta Mater 49:3443–3451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00251-810.1016/S1359-6454(01)00251-8 ↗
58. prepared by engineers (1967) scientists and metallurtists of Aluminum Company of America; edited by Kent R. Properties, physical metallurgy and phase diagrams, American Society for Metals, Van Horn
59. CF Tan, MR Said, Effect of Hardness Test on Precipitation Hardening Aluminium Alloy 6061-T6, Chiang Mai J. Sci. (n.d.).
60. Krishna Pal Singh Chauhan, FUTURE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, BAREILLY (U.P.), Influence of Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Alloys (6xxx Series): A Literature Review, IJERT. V6 (2017) IJERTV6IS030301. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV6IS030301.10.17577/IJERTV6IS030301 ↗
61. Fuller CB, Krause AR, Dunand DC, Seidman DN (2002) Microstructure and mechanical properties of a 5754 aluminum alloy modified by Sc and Zr additions. Mater Sci Eng, A 338:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00056-410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00056-4 ↗
62. Zhang Y-Y, Gao W, Chen S, Xiang H, Gong X-G (2015) Inverse design of materials by multi-objective differential evolution. Comput Mater Sci 98:51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.05410.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.054 ↗
63. G Louppe, Understanding Random Forests: From Theory to Practice, (2015). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.7502.10.48550/arXiv.1407.7502 ↗
64. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Computat 6:182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗