Investigating the fatigue behavior of 3D-printed bone scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
Bone scaffolds are a type of tissue engineering constructs that are used for the regeneration and repair of bone tissue. These scaffolds serve as a temporary or permanent support structure for the growth of new bone tissue in areas where bone has been lost due to injury or disease. As such, the fatigue behavior of them, which is affected by several factors, including the scaffold’s material properties, design, and fabrication method, is a vital consideration for their effectiveness and long-term durability. Some commonly used materials for bone scaffolds include metals, ceramics, and polymers, where the properties of these materials, such as their elastic modulus, strength, and toughness, can influence the fatigue behavior of the scaffold. In addition, a scaffold’s architecture, porosity, and pore size can affect its mechanical performance as well as its ability to facilitate bone tissue regeneration. To evaluate the fatigue behavior of bone scaffolds, researchers use various experimental techniques, such as mechanical testing under cyclic loading conditions. Regarding the fact that 3D printing is one of the most commonly used techniques in preparing bone scaffolds, investigating the fatigue behavior of 3D-printed scaffolds could be of interest. Understanding the fatigue behavior of 3D-printed bone scaffolds is essential for developing safe and effective scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. This review discusses the effective parameters for the fatigue behavior of 3D-printed bone constructs and tries to gather the models and evaluations used in fatigue assessments.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Mesenchymal stem cell research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Huh JT, Yoo JJ, Atala A, Lee SJ (2020) Chapter 74—three-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering. In: Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti JP, Atala A (eds) Principles of tissue engineering, 5th edn. Academic Press, pp 1391–141510.1016/B978-0-12-818422-6.00076-9 ↗
2. Chae S, Cho D-W (2022) Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering. Acta Biomater10.2139/ssrn.4072547 ↗
3. Beheshtizadeh N, Asgari Y, Nasiri N, Farzin A, Ghorbani M, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Azami M (2021) A network analysis of angiogenesis/osteogenesis-related growth factors in bone tissue engineering based on in-vitro and in-vivo data: a systems biology approach. Tissue Cell 72:10155310.1016/j.tice.2021.101553 ↗
4. Mota RCAG, da Silva EO, de Lima FF, de Menezes LR, Thiele ACS (2016) 3D printed scaffolds as a new perspective for bone tissue regeneration: literature review. Mater Sci Appl 7(8):430–452
5. Monfared MH, Nemati A, Loghman F, Ghasemian M, Farzin A, Beheshtizadeh N, Azami M (2022) A deep insight into the preparation of ceramic bone scaffolds utilizing robocasting technique. Ceram Int 48(5):5939–595410.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.268 ↗
6. Beheshtizadeh N, Azami M, Abbasi H, Farzin A (2021) Applying extrusion-based 3D printing technique accelerates fabricating complex biphasic calcium phosphate-based scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Adv Res10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.012 ↗
7. Charbe NB, Tambuwala M, Palakurthi SS, Warokar A, Hromić-Jahjefendić A, Bakshi H, Zacconi F, Mishra V, Khadse S, Aljabali AA (2023) Biomedical applications of three-dimensional bioprinted craniofacial tissue engineering. Bioeng Transl Med 8(1):e1033310.1002/btm2.10333 ↗
8. Janmohammadi M, Nazemi Z, Salehi AOM, Seyfoori A, John JV, Nourbakhsh MS, Akbari M (2023) Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery. Bioact Mater 20:137–16310.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.018 ↗
9. Guo AXY, Cheng L, Zhan S, Zhang S, Xiong W, Wang Z, Wang G, Cao SC (2022) Biomedical applications of the powder-based 3D printed titanium alloys: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 125:252–26410.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.084 ↗
10. Li X-F, Cheng S-L, Yang H-Y, Yan Q, Wang B, Sun Y-T, Ding Q, Yan H, Han H-G, Zhao Q-X, Xin Y-J (2023) Bandgap tuning and in-plane wave propagation of chiral and anti-chiral hybrid metamaterials with assembled six oscillators. Phys A 615:12860010.1016/j.physa.2023.128600 ↗
11. Riyar RL, Bhowmik S (2023) Fatigue behaviour of plain and reinforced concrete: a systematic review. Theor Appl Fract Mech 125:10386710.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103867 ↗
12. Li X-F, Cheng S-L, Yang H-Y, Yan Q, Wang B, Xin Y-J, Sun Y-T, Ding Q, Yan H, Li Y-J, Zhao Q-X (2023) Integrated analysis of bandgap optimization regulation and wave propagation mechanism of hexagonal multi-ligament derived structures. Eur J Mech A Solids 99:10495210.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104952 ↗
13. Li X-F, Cheng S-L, Yang H-Y, Yan Q, Wang B, Sun Y-T, Ding Q, Yan H, Han H-G, Zhao Q-X, Xin Y-J (2023) Optimization of vibration characteristics and directional propagation of plane waves in branching ligament structures of wind models. Results Phys 47:10634510.1016/j.rinp.2023.106345 ↗
14. Liu N, Liang G, Li L, Zhou H, Zhang L, Song X (2021) An eyelid parameters auto-measuring method based on 3D scanning. Displays 69:10206310.1016/j.displa.2021.102063 ↗
15. Cao Y, Zuo D, Zhao Y, Cao Z, Zhi J, Zheng G, Tay T (2021) Experimental investigation on bearing behavior and failure mechanism of double-lap thin-ply composite bolted joints. Compos Struct 261:11356510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113565 ↗
16. Pérez-Sánchez A, Yánez A, Cuadrado A, Martel O, Nuño N (2018) Fatigue behaviour and equivalent diameter of single Ti-6Al-4V struts fabricated by Electron Bean Melting orientated to porous lattice structures. Mater Des 155:106–11510.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.066 ↗
17. Polley C, Radlof W, Hauschulz F, Benz C, Sander M, Seitz H (2022) Morphological and mechanical characterisation of three-dimensional gyroid structures fabricated by electron beam melting for the use as a porous biomaterial. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 125:10488210.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104882 ↗
18. Liu S, Huang P, Zhou Y, Zhang S, Wang Y (2023) A review of the different fabrication techniques of porous Mg structures considering the effect of manufacturing parameters on corrosion rate and mechanical properties in the bio application. J Mater Sci 58:6556–657910.1007/s10853-023-08400-y ↗
19. Wang Z, Zhang M, Liu Z, Wang Y, Dong W, Zhao S, Sun D (2022) Biomimetic design strategy of complex porous structure based on 3D printing Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration. Mater Des 218:11072110.1016/j.matdes.2022.110721 ↗
20. Zeng Q, Bie B, Guo Q, Yuan Y, Han Q, Han X, Chen M, Zhang X, Yang Y, Liu M, Liu P, Deng H, Zhou X (2020) Hyperpolarized Xe NMR signal advancement by metal-organic framework entrapment in aqueous solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117(30):17558–1756310.1073/pnas.2004121117 ↗
21. Ataee A, Li Y, Wen C (2019) A comparative study on the nanoindentation behavior, wear resistance and in vitro biocompatibility of SLM manufactured CP–Ti and EBM manufactured Ti64 gyroid scaffolds. Acta Biomater 97:587–59610.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.008 ↗
22. Macek W, Tomczyk A, Branco R, Dobrzyński M, Seweryn A (2023) Fractographical quantitative analysis of EN-AW 2024 aluminum alloy after creep pre-strain and LCF loading. Eng Fract Mech 282:10918210.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109182 ↗
23. Li Z, Chen Z, Chen X, Zhao R (2022) Modular-based gradient scaffold design and experimental studies for tissue engineering: enabling customized structures and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci 57(36):17398–17415
24. Su Z, Meng J, Su Y (2023) Application of SiO2 nanocomposite ferroelectric material in preparation of trampoline net for physical exercise. Adv Nano Res 14:355–362
25. Chen L-Y, Liang S-X, Liu Y, Zhang L-C (2021) Additive manufacturing of metallic lattice structures: unconstrained design, accurate fabrication, fascinated performances, and challenges. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 146:10064810.1016/j.mser.2021.100648 ↗
26. Zheng Y, Chen X, Zhang Z, Shi S, Chen G, Li B (2022) Multiaxial low cycle fatigue behavior and life prediction method of 316LN stainless steel at 550 °C. Int J Fatigue 156:10663710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106637 ↗
27. Kashyzadeh KR, Ghorbani S (2023) Comparison of some selected time-domain fatigue failure criteria dedicated for multi input random non-proportional loading conditions in industrial components. Eng Fail Anal 143:10690710.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106907 ↗
28. Li H, Li J, Li T, Wu C, Zhang W (2022) Macroporous polyvinyl alcohol-tannic acid hydrogel with high strength and toughness for cartilage replacement. J Mater Sci 57(17):8262–827510.1007/s10853-022-07209-5 ↗
29. Wang L, Kolios A, Liu X, Venetsanos D, Rui C (2022) Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: a state-of-the-art review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 161:11225010.1016/j.rser.2022.112250 ↗
30. Gorguluarslan RM, Ozay AI (2023) Fatigue life prediction of lattice structures using a strain-life method based on an equivalent solid model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 237:14644207221148854
31. Gan Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Schlangen E, van Breugel K, Šavija B (2021) Experimental study of flexural fatigue behaviour of cement paste at the microscale. Int J Fatigue 151:10637810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106378 ↗
32. Pollak RD (2005) Analysis of methods for determining high cycle fatigue strength of a material with investigation of Ti-6Al-4V gigacycle fatigue behavior. Air Force Inst of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH School of Engineering
33. Apetre N, Arcari A, Dowling N, Iyyer N, Phan N (2015) Probabilistic model of mean stress effects in strain-life fatigue. Procedia Eng 114:538–54510.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.103 ↗
34. Zhang J, Teixeira JESL, Little DN, Kim Y-R (2020) Prediction of fatigue crack growth behavior of chemically stabilized materials using simple monotonic fracture test integrated with computational cohesive zone modeling. Compos B Eng 200:10836710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108367 ↗
35. Jones M, Main B, Maxfield K, Barter S, Das R (2023) Predicting fatigue crack growth through the small and long crack regimes for a military transport aircraft loading spectrum using FASTRAN. Int J Fatigue 171:10757610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107576 ↗
36. Duckworth J, Arahira T, Todo M (2020) Fracture characterization of novel bioceramic microbeads filled polymer composite. J Mater Sci 55(21):8954–896710.1007/s10853-020-04656-w ↗
37. Xiao W, Zaeem MA, Li G, Sonny Bal B, Rahaman MN (2017) Tough and strong porous bioactive glass-PLA composites for structural bone repair. J Mater Sci 52(15):9039–905410.1007/s10853-017-0777-3 ↗
38. Sysoev I, Gray JH, Fine S, Makini SP, Roy D (2022) Child-driven, machine-guided: automatic scaffolding of constructionist-inspired early literacy play. Comput Educ 182:10443410.1016/j.compedu.2022.104434 ↗
39. He J-C, Zhu S-P, Luo C, Niu X, Wang Q (2022) Size effect in fatigue modelling of defective materials: application of the calibrated weakest-link theory. Int J Fatigue 165:10721310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107213 ↗
40. Yang K, Qin N, Yu H, Zhou C, Deng H, Tian W, Cai S, Wu Z, Guan J (2022) Correlating multi-scale structure characteristics to mechanical behavior of Caprinae horn sheaths. J Market Res 21:2191–2202
41. Wang M, Yang X, Wang W (2022) Establishing a 3D aggregates database from X-ray CT scans of bulk concrete. Constr Build Mater 315:12574010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125740 ↗
42. Kunzelmann B, Rycerz P, Xu Y, Arakere NK, Kadiric A (2023) Prediction of rolling contact fatigue crack propagation in bearing steels using experimental crack growth data and linear elastic fracture mechanics. Int J Fatigue 168:10744910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107449 ↗
43. Hendrikson WJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Rouwkema J, Moroni L (2017) The use of finite element analyses to design and fabricate three-dimensional scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 510.3389/fbioe.2017.00030 ↗
44. Chauvin SW (2015) Applying educational theory to simulation-based training and assessment in surgery. Surg Clin 95(4):695–715
45. Vyavahare S, Mahesh V, Mahesh V, Harursampath D (2022) Additively manufactured meta-biomaterials: a state-of-the-art review. Compos Struct 305:11649110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116491 ↗
46. Zhang S, Vijayavenkataraman S, Lu WF, Fuh JY (2019) A review on the use of computational methods to characterize, design, and optimize tissue engineering scaffolds, with a potential in 3D printing fabrication. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 107(5):1329–135110.1002/jbm.b.34226 ↗
47. Bagheri AB, Rouzi MD, Koohbanani NA, Mahoor MH, Finco M, Lee M, Najafi B, Chung J (2023) Potential applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) on diagnosis, treatment, outcome prediction to address health care disparities of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In: Seminars in vascular surgery, Elsevier.10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.06.003 ↗
48. Wang Y, Huang H, Jia G, Zeng H, Yuan G (2021) Fatigue and dynamic biodegradation behavior of additively manufactured Mg scaffolds. Acta Biomater 135:705–72210.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.040 ↗
49. Chen C, Chen J, Wu W, Shi Y, Jin L, Petrini L, Shen L, Yuan G, Ding W, Ge J, Edelman ER, Migliavacca F (2019) In vivo and in vitro evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium vascular stent designed by shape optimization strategy. Biomaterials 221:11941410.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119414 ↗
50. Ladner YD, Armiento AR, Kubosch EJ, Snedeker JG, Stoddart MJ (2022) Optimization of loading protocols for tissue engineering experiments. Sci Rep 12(1):509410.1038/s41598-022-08849-y ↗
51. Li Y, Hickman C, Zhang A, Armstrong TJ (2022) Hierarchical task analysis of ophthalmology clinical exam for identifying biomechanic risks. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.10.1177/1071181322661277 ↗
52. Yu J, Xia H, Ni Q-Q (2018) A three-dimensional porous hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold with shape memory effect for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 53(7):4734–474410.1007/s10853-017-1807-x ↗
53. Hu J, Wang JH, Wang R, Yu XB, Liu Y, Baur DA (2019) Analysis of biomechanical behavior of 3D printed mandibular graft with porous scaffold structure designed by topological optimization. 3D Print Med 5:1–1410.1186/s41205-019-0042-2 ↗
54. Zhao S, Li SJ, Hou WT, Hao YL, Yang R, Misra RDK (2016) The influence of cell morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 59:251–26410.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.034 ↗
55. Ataee A, Li Y, Fraser D, Song G, Wen C (2018) Anisotropic Ti-6Al-4V gyroid scaffolds manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) for bone implant applications. Mater Des 137:345–35410.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.040 ↗
56. Zhao L, Burguera EF, Xu HHK, Amin N, Ryou H, Arola DD (2010) Fatigue and human umbilical cord stem cell seeding characteristics of calcium phosphate–chitosan–biodegradable fiber scaffolds. Biomaterials 31(5):840–84710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.106 ↗
57. Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Stepashkin AA, Kaloshkin SD (2016) Low-cycle fatigue behavior of 3d-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. Compos B Eng 97:193–20010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.067 ↗
58. Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY, Maksimkin AV, Kaloshkin SD, Estrin YZ (2016) Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:139–14810.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.036 ↗
59. Averett RD, Realff ML, Jacob K, Cakmak M, Yalcin B (2011) The mechanical behavior of poly(lactic acid) unreinforced and nanocomposite films subjected to monotonic and fatigue loading conditions. J Compos Mater 45(26):2717–272610.1177/0021998311410464 ↗
60. Oriňaková R, Gorejová R, Králová ZO, Petráková M, Oriňak A (2021) Novel trends and recent progress on preparation methods of biodegradable metallic foams for biomedicine: a review. J Mater Sci 56(25):13925–1396310.1007/s10853-021-06163-y ↗
61. Putra T, Machmud M (2020) Predicting the fatigue life of an automotive coil spring considering road surface roughness. Eng Fail Anal 116:10472210.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104722 ↗
62. Bakkar MA, Saha R, Das D (2021) Low cycle fatigue performance and failure analysis of reinforcing bar. Met Mater Int 27:4952–496610.1007/s12540-020-00839-x ↗
63. Guo K, Gou G, Lv H, Shan M (2022) Jointing of CFRP/5083 aluminum alloy by induction brazing: processing, connecting mechanism, and fatigue performance. Coatings 12(10):155910.3390/coatings12101559 ↗
64. Pedrosa B, Correia JA, Rebelo CA, Veljkovic M (2020) Reliability of fatigue strength curves for riveted connections using normal and weibull distribution functions. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A: Civil Eng 6(3):0402003410.1061/AJRUA6.0001081 ↗
65. Luis E, Pan HM, Sing SL, Bastola AK, Goh GD, Goh GL, Tan HKJ, Bajpai R, Song J, Yeong WY (2019) Silicone 3D printing: process optimization, product biocompatibility, and reliability of silicone meniscus implants. 3D Print Addit Manuf 6(6):319–33210.1089/3dp.2018.0226 ↗
66. Heidari F, Tabatabaei FS, Razavi M, Lari RB, Tavangar M, Romanos GE, Vashaee D, Tayebi L (2020) 3D construct of hydroxyapatite/zinc oxide/palladium nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 31:1–1410.1007/s10856-020-06409-2 ↗
67. Mahmoud D, Al-Rubaie KS, Elbestawi MA (2021) The influence of selective laser melting defects on the fatigue properties of Ti6Al4V porosity graded gyroids for bone implants. Int J Mech Sci 193:10618010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106180 ↗
68. Wilkie D, Galasso C (2021) Gaussian process regression for fatigue reliability analysis of offshore wind turbines. Struct Saf 88:10202010.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102020 ↗
69. Gope PC, Mahar CS (2021) Evaluation of fatigue damage parameters for Ni-based super alloys Inconel 825 steel notched specimen using stochastic approach. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 44(2):427–44310.1111/ffe.13369 ↗
70. Zhang Z, Oeser M (2020) Residual strength model and cumulative damage characterization of asphalt mixture subjected to repeated loading. Int J Fatigue 135:10553410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105534 ↗
71. Li Y, Attallah MM, Coules H, Martinez R, Pavier M (2023) Fatigue of octet-truss lattices manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Int J Fatigue 170:10752410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107524 ↗
72. He L, Akebono H, Sugeta A, Hayashi Y (2020) Cumulative fatigue damage of stress below the fatigue limit in weldment steel under block loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 43(7):1419–143210.1111/ffe.13204 ↗
73. Jiang Z, Han Z, Li M (2022) A probabilistic model for low-cycle fatigue crack initiation under variable load cycles. Int J Fatigue 155:10652810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106528 ↗
74. Shanmugam V, Das O, Babu K, Marimuthu U, Veerasimman A, Johnson DJ, Neisiany RE, Hedenqvist MS, Ramakrishna S, Berto F (2021) Fatigue behaviour of FDM-3D printed polymers, polymeric composites and architected cellular materials. Int J Fatigue 143:10600710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 ↗
75. Kucko SK, Raeman SM, Keenan TJ (2022) Current advances in hydroxyapatite-and β-tricalcium phosphate-based composites for biomedical applications: a review. Biomed Mater Devices 1–1710.1007/s44174-022-00037-w ↗
76. Nouri A, Shirvan AR, Li Y, Wen C (2021) Additive manufacturing of metallic and polymeric load-bearing biomaterials using laser powder bed fusion: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 94:196–21510.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.058 ↗
77. Beheshtizadeh N, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Pazhouhnia Z, Hoseinpour M, Nafari M (2020) A review of 3D bio-printing for bone and skin tissue engineering: a commercial approach. J Mater Sci 55(9):3729–374910.1007/s10853-019-04259-0 ↗
78. Xu Y, Zhang F, Zhai W, Cheng S, Li J, Wang Y (2022) Unraveling of advances in 3D-printed polymer-based bone scaffolds. Polymers 14(3):56610.3390/polym14030566 ↗
79. Gutiérrez Púa LDC, Rincón Montenegro JC, Fonseca Reyes AM, Zambrano Rodríguez H, Paredes Méndez VN (2023) Biomaterials for orthopedic applications and techniques to improve corrosion resistance and mechanical properties for magnesium alloy: a review. J Mater Sci 58(9):3879–390810.1007/s10853-023-08237-5 ↗
80. Azadi M, Dadashi A, Dezianian S, Kianifar M, Torkaman S, Chiyani M (2021) High-cycle bending fatigue properties of additive-manufactured ABS and PLA polymers fabricated by fused deposition modeling 3D-printing. Forces Mech 3:10001610.1016/j.finmec.2021.100016 ↗
81. Yin Y, Mo J, Feng J (2020) Conductive fabric patch with controllable porous structure and elastic properties for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci 55(36):17120–1713310.1007/s10853-020-05219-9 ↗
82. Andrew JJ, Dhakal HN (2022) Sustainable biobased composites for advanced applications: recent trends and future opportunities—a critical review. Compos Part C Open Access 7:10022010.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100220 ↗
83. Li L, Liu W, Wang Y, Zhao Z (2023) Mechanical performance and damage monitoring of CFRP thermoplastic laminates with an open hole repaired by 3D printed patches. Compos Struct 303:11630810.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116308 ↗
84. Baptista R, Guedes M (2021) Porosity and pore design influence on fatigue behavior of 3D printed scaffolds for trabecular bone replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 117:10437810.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104378 ↗
85. Beheshtizadeh N, Gharibshahian M, Pazhouhnia Z, Rostami M, Zangi AR, Maleki R, Azar HK, Zalouli V, Rajavand H, Farzin A, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Sefat F, Azami M, Webster TJ, Rezaei N (2022) Commercialization and regulation of regenerative medicine products: promises, advances and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother 153:11343110.1016/j.biopha.2022.113431 ↗
86. Liu Z, Gong H, Gao J (2023) Enhancement in the fatigue resistances of triply periodic surfaces-based scaffolds. Int J Mech Sci 245:10811910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108119 ↗
87. Entezari A, Liu N-C, Zhang Z, Fang J, Wu C, Wan B, Swain M, Li Q (2023) Nondeterministic multiobjective optimization of 3D printed ceramic tissue scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 138:10558010.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105580 ↗
88. Niu X, Zhu S-P, He J-C, Liao D, Correia JA, Berto F, Wang Q (2022) Defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM materials: size effect and probabilistic prospects. Int J Fatigue 160:10688410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106884 ↗
89. Entezari A, Roohani-Esfahani S-I, Zhang Z, Zreiqat H, Dunstan CR, Li Q (2016) Fracture behaviors of ceramic tissue scaffolds for load bearing applications. Sci Rep 6(1):2881610.1038/srep28816 ↗
90. Ribeiro AM, Flores-Sahagun THS, Paredes RC (2016) A perspective on molybdenum biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity for applications in implants. J Mater Sci 51(6):2806–281610.1007/s10853-015-9664-y ↗
91. Hara K, Hellem E, Yamada S, Sariibrahimoglu K, Mølster A, Gjerdet NR, Hellem S, Mustafa K, Yassin MA (2022) Efficacy of treating segmental bone defects through endochondral ossification: 3D printed designs and bone metabolic activities. Mater Today Bio 14:10023710.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100237 ↗
92. Xiang C, Wang Z, Yang C, Yao X, Wang Y, Suo Z (2020) Stretchable and fatigue-resistant materials. Mater Today 34:7–1610.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.009 ↗
93. Zarrintaj P, Seidi F, Azarfam MY, Yazdi MK, Erfani A, Barani M, Chauhan NPS, Rabiee N, Kuang T, Kucinska-Lipka J (2023) Biopolymer-based composites for tissue engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng 258:11070110.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110701 ↗
94. Entezari A, Swain MV, Gooding JJ, Roohani I, Li Q (2020) A modular design strategy to integrate mechanotransduction concepts in scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 118:100–11210.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.012 ↗
95. Bahraminasab M (2020) Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds. Biomed Eng Online 19(1):6910.1186/s12938-020-00810-2 ↗
96. Bhatt S, Joshi D, Rakesh PK, Godiyal AK (2023) Advances in additive manufacturing processes and their use for the fabrication of lower limb prosthetic devices. Exp Rev Med Devices 20:17–2710.1080/17434440.2023.2169130 ↗
97. Putra RU, Basri H, Prakoso AT, Chandra H, Ammarullah MI, Akbar I, Syahrom A, Kamarul T (2023) Level of activity changes increases the fatigue life of the porous magnesium scaffold, as observed in dynamic immersion tests, over time. Sustainability 15(1):82310.3390/su15010823 ↗
98. Hou X, Chen Y, Chen F, Liu J, Wang T, Luo Y, Jia S, Wang P, Tan S, Lu B (2022) The hydroxyapatite microtubes enhanced GelMA hydrogel scaffold with inner “pipeline framework” structure for bone tissue regeneration. Compos B Eng 228:10939610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109396 ↗
99. Yu G, Li Z, Li S, Zhang Q, Hua Y, Liu H, Zhao X, Dhaidhai DT, Li W, Wang X (2020) The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: a compromise between mechanical properties and permeability. Mater Des 192:10875410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754 ↗
100. Dave K, Gomes VG (2019) Interactions at scaffold interfaces: Effect of surface chemistry, structural attributes and bioaffinity. Mater Sci Eng C 105:11007810.1016/j.msec.2019.110078 ↗