Development of printable nanoengineered composite hydrogels based on human amniotic membrane for wound healing application
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, decellularized amniotic membranes (dAM) have attracted significant interest as a valuable source for the development of shear-thinning hydrogels and bioinks. However, the inferior rheological behavior and weak mechanical durability restrict the printability of the hydrogels and their stability after three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Therefore, a chemical or physical modification with biocompatible components is necessary to improve dAM-derived hydrogels’ properties. The present study proposes a strategy to fabricate printable dAM-derived hydrogels (DAMHs) supplemented with sodium alginate and Laponite nanoplatelets. Rheological experiments determined the key role of Laponite nanoplatelets in tailoring the shear-thinning behavior of the DAMHs. The dynamic mechanical modulus of the hydrogel was significantly enhanced (up to 16 folds, for example, storage modulus increased from ~ 0.5 to 8.4 kPa by adding 1% Laponite), which facilitated 3D printing of free-standing constructs without compromising biological properties. Meanwhile, excess agglomeration of the nanoplatelets in an ion-containing medium leading to nozzle clogging was observed at high Laponite concentrations ( $$ge$$ 2%). Microstructural evaluations also revealed nanoplatelet-induced changes in the pore structures of the hydrogel, i.e., a finer pore structure was obtained. In vitro biological assays affirmed the biocompatibility of the nanoengineered hydrogels, while wound healing experiments revealed the positive effect of Laponite on fibroblast cell migration, as evidenced by ~ 30% enhancement in the wound healing rate after 36 h. Generally, the results obtained in this study demonstrate that the developed nanoengineered hydrogel provides suitable structural integrity and biocompatibility, highlighting its potential for therapeutic applications, particularly tissue engineering.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Smandri A, Nordin A, Hwei NM, Chin K-Y, Abd Aziz I, Fauzi MB (2020) Natural 3D-printed bioinks for skin regeneration and wound healing: a systematic review. Polymers 12:1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1208178210.3390/polym12081782 ↗
2. Wallace ER, Yue Z, Dottori M, Wood FM, Fear M, Wallace GG, Beirne S (2023) Point of care approaches to 3D bioprinting for wound healing applications. Progress in Biomedical Engineering 5:023002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/acceeb10.1088/2516-1091/acceeb ↗
3. He P, Zhao J, Zhang J, Li B, Gou Z, Gou M, Li X (2018) Bioprinting of skin constructs for wound healing. Burns Trauma 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0104-x10.1186/s41038-017-0104-x ↗
4. Kim H, Kang B, Cui X, Lee SH, Lee K, Cho DW, Hwang W, Woodfield TB, Lim KS, Jang J (2021) Light-activated decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for volumetric tissue analogs at the centimeter scale. Adv Funct Mater 31:2011252. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20201125210.1002/adfm.202011252 ↗
5. Antezana PE, Municoy S, Álvarez-Echazú MI, Santo-Orihuela PL, Catalano PN, Al-Tel TH, Kadumudi FB, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Orive G, Desimone MF (2022) The 3D bioprinted scaffolds for wound healing. Pharmaceutics 14:464. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1402046410.3390/pharmaceutics14020464 ↗
6. Lian Q, Jiao T, Zhao T, Wang H, Yang S, Li D (2021) 3D bioprinted skin substitutes for accelerated wound healing and reduced scar. J Bionic Eng 18:900–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-0053-810.1007/s42235-021-0053-8 ↗
7. Kim BS, Das S, Jang J, Cho D-W (2020) Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for engineering tissue-and organ-specific microenvironments. Chem Rev 120:10608–10661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0080810.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00808 ↗
8. Daikuara LY, Chen X, Yue Z, Skropeta D, Wood FM, Fear MW, Wallace GG (2022) 3D bioprinting constructs to facilitate skin regeneration. Adv Func Mater 32:2105080. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210508010.1002/adfm.202105080 ↗
9. Gholipourmalekabadi M, Samadikuchaksaraei A, Seifalian AM, Urbanska AM, Ghanbarian H, Hardy JG, Omrani MD, Mozafari M, Reis RL, Kundu SC (2018) Silk fibroin/amniotic membrane 3D bi-layered artificial skin. Biomed Mater 13:035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aa999b10.1088/1748-605X/aa999b ↗
10. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian AM (2008) Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater 15:88–99. https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm10.22203/ecm ↗
11. Nasiry D, Khalatbary AR, Abdollahifar M-A, Amini A, Bayat M, Noori A, Piryaei A (2021) Engraftment of bioengineered three-dimensional scaffold from human amniotic membrane-derived extracellular matrix accelerates ischemic diabetic wound healing. Arch Dermatol Res 313:567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02137-310.1007/s00403-020-02137-3 ↗
12. Kafili G, Tamjid E, Niknejad H, Simchi A (2022) Development of injectable hydrogels based on human amniotic membrane and polyethyleneglycol-modified nanosilicates for tissue engineering applications. Eur Polym J 179:111566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11156610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111566 ↗
13. Ryzhuk V, Zeng X-X, Wang X, Melnychuk V, Lankford L, Farmer D, Wang A (2018) Human amnion extracellular matrix derived bioactive hydrogel for cell delivery and tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 85:191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.02610.1016/j.msec.2017.12.026 ↗
14. Zhang Q, Chang C, Qian C, Xiao W, Zhu H, Guo J, Meng Z, Cui W, Ge Z (2021) Photo-crosslinkable amniotic membrane hydrogel for skin defect healing. Acta Biomater 125:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.04310.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.043 ↗
15. Deus IA, Santos SC, Custódio CA, Mano JF (2022) Designing highly customizable human based platforms for cell culture using proteins from the amniotic membrane. Biomater Adv 134:112574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.11257410.1016/j.msec.2021.112574 ↗
16. Lee JY, Kim H, Ha DH, Shin JC, Kim A, Ko HS, Cho DW (2018) Amnion-analogous medical device for fetal membrane healing: a preclinical long-term study. Adv Healthcare Mater 7:1800673. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180067310.1002/adhm.201800673 ↗
17. Toniato TV, Stocco TD, Martins DDS, Santanna LB, Tim CR, Marciano FR, SilvaFilho EC, Campana-Filho SP, Lobo ADO (2020) Hybrid chitosan/amniotic membrane-based hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering application. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 69:961–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2019.163624910.1080/00914037.2019.1636249 ↗
18. Peng X, Wang X, Cheng C, Zhou X, Gu Z, Li L, Liu J, Yu X (2020) Bioinspired artificial, small-diameter vascular grafts with selective and rapid endothelialization based on an amniotic membrane-derived hydrogel. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6:1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0149310.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01493 ↗
19. Lei X, Wu Y, Peng X, Zhao Y, Zhou X, Yu X (2020) Research on alginate-polyacrylamide enhanced amnion hydrogel, a potential vascular substitute material. Mater Sci Eng C 115:111145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11114510.1016/j.msec.2020.111145 ↗
20. Lee J, Hong J, Kim W, Kim GH (2020) Bone-derived dECM/alginate bioink for fabricating a 3D cell-laden mesh structure for bone tissue engineering. Carbohyd Polym 250:116914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11691410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116914 ↗
21. Rastogi P, Kandasubramanian B (2019) Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering. Biofabrication 11:042001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e ↗
22. Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, Li W, Zheng L, Zhao J (2018) Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng, C 83:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.00210.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002 ↗
23. Gao G, Lee JH, Jang J, Lee DH, Kong JS, Kim BS, Choi YJ, Jang WB, Hong YJ, Kwon SM (2017) Tissue engineered bio-blood-vessels constructed using a tissue-specific bioink and 3D coaxial cell printing technique: a novel therapy for ischemic disease. Adv Func Mater 27:1700798. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20170079810.1002/adfm.201700798 ↗
24. De Santis MM, Alsafadi HN, Tas S, Bölükbas DA, Prithiviraj S, Da Silva IA, Mittendorfer M, Ota C, Stegmayr J, Daoud F (2021) Extracellular-matrix-reinforced bioinks for 3D bioprinting human tissue. Adv Mater 33:2005476. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200547610.1002/adma.202005476 ↗
25. Rathan S, Dejob L, Schipani R, Haffner B, Möbius ME, Kelly DJ (2019) Fiber reinforced cartilage ECM functionalized bioinks for functional cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater 8:1801501. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180150110.1002/adhm.201801501 ↗
26. Zandi N, Dolatyar B, Lotfi R, Shallageh Y, Shokrgozar MA, Tamjid E, Annabi N, Simchi A (2021) Biomimetic nanoengineered scaffold for enhanced full-thickness cutaneous wound healing. Acta Biomater 124:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.02910.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.029 ↗
27. Sheikhi A, Afewerki S, Oklu R, Gaharwar AK, Khademhosseini A (2018) Effect of ionic strength on shear-thinning nanoclay–polymer composite hydrogels. Biomaterials science 6:2073–2083. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00469B10.1039/C8BM00469B ↗
28. Dávila JL, d’Ávila MA (2017) Laponite as a rheology modifier of alginate solutions: Physical gelation and aging evolution. Carbohyd Polym 157:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.05710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.057 ↗
29. Xue C, Xie H, Eichenbaum J, Chen Y, Wang Y, van den Dolder FW, Lee J, Lee K, Zhang S, Sun W (2020) Synthesis of injectable shear-thinning biomaterials of various compositions of gelatin and synthetic silicate nanoplatelet. Biotechnol J 15:1900456. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.20190045610.1002/biot.201900456 ↗
30. Parchehbaf-Kashani M, Sepantafar M, Talkhabi M, Sayahpour FA, Baharvand H, Pahlavan S, Rajabi S (2020) Design and characterization of an electroconductive scaffold for cardiomyocytes based biomedical assays. Mater Sci Eng C 109:110603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11060310.1016/j.msec.2019.110603 ↗
31. Freeman FE, Kelly DJ (2017) Tuning alginate bioink stiffness and composition for controlled growth factor delivery and to spatially direct MSC fate within bioprinted tissues. Sci Rep 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17286-110.1038/s41598-017-17286-1 ↗
32. Li X, Deng Q, Wang S, Li Q, Zhao W, Lin B, Luo Y, Zhang X (2021) Hydroxyethyl cellulose as a rheological additive for tuning the extrusion printability and Scaffold properties. 3D Print Addit Manuf 8:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.016710.1089/3dp.2020.0167 ↗
33. Zmejkoski DZ, Marković ZM, Budimir MD, Zdravković NM, Trišić DD, Bugárová N, Danko M, Kozyrovska NO, Špitalský Z, Kleinová A (2021) Photoactive and antioxidant nanochitosan dots/biocellulose hydrogels for wound healing treatment. Mater Sci Eng C 122:111925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.11192510.1016/j.msec.2021.111925 ↗
34. Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, Naing MW (2018) Organ-derived decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink manufacturing? Trends Biotechnol 36:787–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.003 ↗
35. Kim BS, Kim H, Gao G, Jang J, Cho D-W (2017) Decellularized extracellular matrix: a step towards the next generation source for bioink manufacturing. Biofabrication 9:034104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e9810.1088/1758-5090/aa7e98 ↗
36. Dávila JL, d’Ávila MA (2019) Rheological evaluation of Laponite/alginate inks for 3D extrusion-based printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2876-y10.1007/s00170-018-2876-y ↗
37. Shin YJ, Shafranek RT, Tsui JH, Walcott J, Nelson A, Kim D-H (2021) 3D bioprinting of mechanically tuned bioinks derived from cardiac decellularized extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater 119:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.00610.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.006 ↗
38. Morariu S, Bercea M, Gradinaru LM, Rosca I, Avadanei M (2020) Versatile poly (vinyl alcohol)/clay physical hydrogels with tailorable structure as potential candidates for wound healing applications. Mater Sci Eng: C 109:110395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11039510.1016/j.msec.2019.110395 ↗
39. Tao L, Zhonglong L, Ming X, Zezheng Y, Zhiyuan L, Xiaojun Z, Jinwu W (2017) In vitro and in vivo studies of a gelatin/carboxymethyl chitosan/LAPONITE® composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv 7:54100–54110. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06913H10.1039/C7RA06913H ↗
40. Bhattacharjee M, Ivirico JLE, Kan H-M, Bordett R, Pandey R, Otsuka T, Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2020) Preparation and characterization of amnion hydrogel and its synergistic effect with adipose derived stem cells towards IL1β activated chondrocytes. Sci Rep 10:18751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75921-w10.1038/s41598-020-75921-w ↗
41. Khoshnood N, Zamanian A (2022) Development of novel alginate-polyethyleneimine cell-laden bioink designed for 3D bioprinting of cutaneous wound healing scaffolds. J Appl Polym Sci 139:52227. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5222710.1002/app.52227 ↗
42. Yang H, Hua S, Wang W, Wang A (2011) Composite hydrogel beads based on chitosan and laponite: preparation, swelling, and drug release behaviour. Iran Polym J 20(6):479–490
43. Wang G, Maciel D, Wu Y, Rodrigues J, Shi X, Yuan Y, Liu C, Tomás H, Li Y (2014) Amphiphilic polymer-mediated formation of laponite-based nanohybrids with robust stability and pH sensitivity for anticancer drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:16687–16695. https://doi.org/10.1021/am503287410.1021/am5032874 ↗
44. Dong L, Bu Z, Xiong Y, Zhang H, Fang J, Hu H, Liu Z, Li X (2021) Facile extrusion 3D printing of gelatine methacrylate/Laponite nanocomposite hydrogel with high concentration nanoclay for bone tissue regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 188:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.19910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.199 ↗
45. Sousa I, Mendes A, Pereira RF, Bártolo PJ (2014) Collagen surface modified poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds with improved hydrophilicity and cell adhesion properties. Mater Lett 134:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.13210.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.132 ↗
46. Gao T, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, Pr AK, Seol Y-J, Atala A, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ (2018) Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach. Biofabrication 10:034106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc710.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7 ↗
47. Eslahi N, Simchi A, Mehrjoo M, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S (2016) Hybrid cross-linked hydrogels based on fibrous protein/block copolymers and layered silicate nanoparticles: tunable thermosensitivity, biodegradability and mechanical durability. RSC Adv 6:62944–62957. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA08563F10.1039/C6RA08563F ↗
48. Ordikhani F, Dehghani M, Simchi A (2015) Antibiotic-loaded chitosan–Laponite films for local drug delivery by titanium implants: Cell proliferation and drug release studies. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 26:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5606-010.1007/s10856-015-5606-0 ↗
49. Lokhande G, Carrow JK, Thakur T, Xavier JR, Parani M, Bayless KJ, Gaharwar AK (2018) Nanoengineered injectable hydrogels for wound healing application. Acta Biomater 70:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.04510.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.045 ↗
50. Pettinelli N, Rodriguez-Llamazares S, Bouza R, Barral L, Feijoo-Bandin S, Lago F (2020) Carrageenan-based physically crosslinked injectable hydrogel for wound healing and tissue repairing applications. Int J Pharm 589:119828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.11982810.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119828 ↗
51. Kiaee G, Mostafalu P, Samandari M, Sonkusale S (2018) A pH-mediated electronic wound dressing for controlled drug delivery. Adv Healthcare Mater 7:1800396. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180039610.1002/adhm.201800396 ↗
52. Pati F, Jang J, Ha D-H, Won Kim S, Rhie J-W, Shim J-H, Kim D-H, Cho D-W (2014) Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun 5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms493510.1038/ncomms4935 ↗
53. Golafshan N, Rezahasani R, Esfahani MT, Kharaziha M, Khorasani S (2017) Nanohybrid hydrogels of laponite: PVA-Alginate as a potential wound healing material. Carbohyd Polym 176:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.070 ↗
54. Li H, Liu S, Lin L (2016) Rheological study on 3D printability of alginate hydrogel and effect of graphene oxide. Int J Bioprint 2:54–66. https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.02.00710.18063/IJB.2016.02.007 ↗
55. Chen Y, Xiong X, Liu X, Cui R, Wang C, Zhao G, Zhi W, Lu M, Duan K, Weng J (2020) 3D Bioprinting of shear-thinning hybrid bioinks with excellent bioactivity derived from gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate-based gels. J Mater Chem B 8:5500–5514. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB00060D10.1039/D0TB00060D ↗
56. Choi D, Heo J, Milan JA, Oreffo RO, Dawson JI, Hong J, Kim Y-H (2021) Structured nanofilms comprising Laponite® and bone extracellular matrix for osteogenic differentiation of skeletal progenitor cells. Mater Sci Eng: C 118:111440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11144010.1016/j.msec.2020.111440 ↗
57. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, Melchels F, Groll J, Jungst T (2017) Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication 9:044107. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd810.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
58. Ribeiro A, Blokzijl MM, Levato R, Visser CW, Castilho M, Hennink WE, Vermonden T, Malda J (2017) Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 10:014102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90e210.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2 ↗
59. Wang Y, Yuan X, Yao B, Zhu S, Zhu P, Huang S (2022) Tailoring bioinks of extrusion-based bioprinting for cutaneous wound healing. Bioact Mater 17:178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.02410.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.024 ↗
60. Alsharif SB, Wali R, Vanyo ST, Andreana S, Chen K, Sheth B, Swihart MT, Dziak R, Visser MB (2022) Strontium-loaded hydrogel scaffolds to promote gingival fibroblast function. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 111:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3743910.1002/jbm.a.37439 ↗
61. Ghadiri M, Chrzanowski W, Lee W, Rohanizadeh R (2014) Layered silicate clay functionalized with amino acids: wound healing application. RSC Adv 4:35332–35343. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA05216A10.1039/C4RA05216A ↗
62. Tomás H, Alves CS, Rodrigues J (2018) Laponite®: A key nanoplatform for biomedical applications?, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology. Biol Med 14:2407–2420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2017.04.01610.1016/j.nano.2017.04.016 ↗
63. Reffitt D, Ogston N, Jugdaohsingh R, Cheung H, Evans BAJ, Thompson R, Powell J, Hampson G (2003) Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Bone 32:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00950-X10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00950-X ↗
64. Orlando I, Basnett P, Nigmatullin R, Wang W, Knowles JC, Roy I (2020) Chemical modification of bacterial cellulose for the development of an antibacterial wound dressing. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8:557885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.55788510.3389/fbioe.2020.557885 ↗
65. Shi Z, Xu Y, Mulatibieke R, Zhong Q, Pan X, Chen Y, Lian Q, Luo X, Shi Z, Zhu Q (2020) Nanosilicate-reinforced and SDF-1α-loaded gelatin-methacryloyl hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed 15:9337. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S27068110.2147/IJN.S270681 ↗
66. Su D, Jiang L, Chen X, Dong J, Shao Z (2016) Enhancing the gelation and bioactivity of injectable silk fibroin hydrogel with laponite nanoplatelets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:9619–9628. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0089110.1021/acsami.6b00891 ↗
67. Gaharwar AK, Mihaila SM, Swami A, Patel A, Sant S, Reis RL, Marques AP, Gomes ME, Khademhosseini A (2013) Bioactive silicate nanoplatelets for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Mater 25:3329–3336. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130058410.1002/adma.201300584 ↗