Understanding the doping mechanism of Sn in TiO2 nanorods toward efficient photoelectrochemical performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR, Boettcher SW, Mi Q, Santori EA, Lewis NS (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
2. Li Y, Takata T, Cha D, Takanabe K, Minegishi T, Kubota J, Domen K (2013) Vertically aligned Ta3N5 nanorod arrays for solar-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Mater 25:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120258210.1002/adma.201202582 ↗
3. Hu X, Lu S, Tian J, Wei N, Song X, Wang X, Cui H (2019) The selective deposition of MoS2 nanosheets onto (101) facets of TiO2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets and their enhanced photocatalytic H2 production. Appl Catal B 241:329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.05110.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.051 ↗
4. Shen S, Chen J, Wang M, Sheng X, Chen X, Feng X, Mao SS (2018) Titanium dioxide nanostructures for photoelectrochemical applications. Prog Mater Sci 98:299–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.07.00610.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.07.006 ↗
5. Trung TN, Seo D-B, Quang ND, Kim D, Kim E-T (2018) Enhanced photoelectrochemical activity in the heterostructure of vertically aligned few-layer MoS2 flakes on ZnO. Electrochim Acta 260:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.08910.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.089 ↗
6. Volokh M, Peng G, Barrio J, Shalom M (2019) Carbon nitride materials for water splitting photoelectrochemical cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 58:6138–6151. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20180651410.1002/anie.201806514 ↗
7. Seo D-B, Trung TN, Kim D-O et al (2020) Plasmonic Ag-decorated few-layer MoS2 nanosheets vertically grown on graphene for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano-Micro Lett 12:172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00512-310.1007/s40820-020-00512-3 ↗
8. Kang JS, Kim J, Lee MJ et al (2017) Electrochemical synthesis of nanoporous tungsten carbide and its application as electrocatalysts for photoelectrochemical cells. Nanoscale 9:5413–5424. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR00216E10.1039/C7NR00216E ↗
9. Seo D-B, Kim M-S, Trung TN, Kim E-T (2020) Controllable low-temperature growth and enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting of vertical SnS2 nanosheets on graphene. Electrochim Acta 364:137164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13716410.1016/j.electacta.2020.137164 ↗
10. Tian J, Zhao Z, Kumar A, Boughton RI, Liu H (2014) Recent progress in design, synthesis, and applications of one-dimensional TiO2 nanostructured surface heterostructures: a review. Chem Soc Rev 43:6920–6937. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00180j10.1039/c4cs00180j ↗
11. Ge M, Cao C, Huang J et al (2016) A review of one-dimensional TiO2 nanostructured materials for environmental and energy applications. J Mater Chem A 4:6772–6801. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09323F10.1039/C5TA09323F ↗
12. Seo D-B, Kim S, Trung TN, Kim D, Kim E-T (2019) Conformal growth of few-layer MoS2 flakes on closely-packed TiO2 nanowires and their enhanced photoelectrochemical reactivity. J Alloy Compd 770:686–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.15110.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.151 ↗
13. Ghoreishian SM, Ranjith KS, Lee H et al (2021) Tuning the phase composition of 1D TiO2 by Fe/Sn co-doping strategy for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performances. J Alloy Compd 851:156826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15682610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156826 ↗
14. Basavarajappa PS, Patil SB, Ganganagappa N, Reddy KR, Raghu AV, Reddy CV (2020) Recent progress in metal-doped TiO2, non-metal doped/codoped TiO2 and TiO2 nanostructured hybrids for enhanced photocatalysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:7764–7778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.24110.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.241 ↗
15. Ali N, Ali F, Khurshid R et al (2020) TiO2 nanoparticles and epoxy-TiO2 nanocomposites: a review of synthesis, modification strategies, and photocatalytic potentialities. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 30:4829–4846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01668-610.1007/s10904-020-01668-6 ↗
16. Feng H, Zhang M-H, Yu LE (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic performance of metal-ions doped TiO2. Appl Catal A 413–414:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.11.01410.1016/j.apcata.2011.11.014 ↗
17. Adyani SM, Ghorbani M (2018) A comparative study of physicochemical and photocatalytic properties of visible light responsive Fe, Gd and P single and tri-doped TiO2 nanomaterials. J Rare Earths 36:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2017.06.01210.1016/j.jre.2017.06.012 ↗
18. Xu M, Da P, Wu H, Zhao D, Zheng G (2012) Controlled Sn-doping in TiO2 nanowire photoanodes with enhanced photoelectrochemical conversion. Nano Lett 12:1503–1508. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204296810.1021/nl2042968 ↗
19. Long R, Dai Y, Huang B (2009) Geometric and electronic properties of Sn-doped TiO2 from first-principles calculations. J Phys Chem C 113:650–653. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp804370810.1021/jp8043708 ↗
20. Zhu X, Pei L, Zhu R, Jiao Y, Tang R, Feng W (2018) Preparation and characterization of Sn/La co-doped TiO2 nanomaterials and their phase transformation and photocatalytic activity. Sci Rep 8:12387. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30050-310.1038/s41598-018-30050-3 ↗
21. Wategaonkar SB, Parale VG, Mali SS et al (2021) Influence of Tin doped TiO2 nanorods on dye sensitized solar cells. Materials (Basel) 14:6282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1421628210.3390/ma14216282 ↗
22. Hohenberg P, Kohn W (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 136:B864–B871. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
23. Kohn W, Sham LJ (1965) Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 140:A1133–A1138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
24. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
25. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
26. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
27. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3688. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
28. Dudarev SL, Botton GA, Savrasov SY, Humphreys CJ, Sutton AP (1998) Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys Rev B 57:1505–1509. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
29. Bocquet AE, Mizokawa T, Morikawa K et al (1996) Electronic structure of early 3d-transition-metal oxides by analysis of the 2p core-level photoemission spectra. Phys Rev B 53:1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.116110.1103/PhysRevB.53.1161 ↗
30. Morgan BJ, Watson GW (2009) A density functional theory + U study of oxygen vacancy formation at the (110), (100), (101), and (001) surfaces of rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem C 113:7322–7328. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp811288n10.1021/jp811288n ↗
31. Morgan BJ, Watson GW (2007) A DFT+U description of oxygen vacancies at the TiO2 rutile (110) surface. Surf Sci 601:5034–5041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2007.08.02510.1016/j.susc.2007.08.025 ↗
32. Tezuka Y, Shin S, Ishii T, Ejima T, Suzuki S, Sato S (1994) Photoemission and bremsstrahlung isochromat spectroscopy studies of TiO2 (rutile) and SrTiO3. J Phys Soc Jpn 63:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.63.34710.1143/JPSJ.63.347 ↗
33. Chiodo L, García-Lastra JM, Iacomino A, Ossicini S, Zhao J, Petek H, Rubio A (2010) Self-energy and excitonic effects in the electronic and optical properties of TiO2 crystalline phases. Phys Rev B 82:045207. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.04520710.1103/PhysRevB.82.045207 ↗
34. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2003) Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 118:8207–8215. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.156406010.1063/1.1564060 ↗
35. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2006) Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)]. The J Chem Phys 124: 219906. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.220459710.1063/1.2204597 ↗
36. Shannon RD (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr A 32:751–767. https://doi.org/10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
37. Mazza T, Barborini E, Piseri P et al (2007) Raman spectroscopy characterization of TiO2 rutile nanocrystals. Phys Rev B 75:045416. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.04541610.1103/PhysRevB.75.045416 ↗
38. Swamy V, Muddle BC, Dai Q (2006) Size-dependent modifications of the Raman spectrum of rutile TiO2. Appl Phys Lett 89:163118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.236412310.1063/1.2364123 ↗
39. Zhang Y, Harris CX, Wallenmeyer P, Murowchick J, Chen X (2013) Asymmetric lattice vibrational characteristics of rutile TiO2 as revealed by laser power dependent Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 117:24015–24022. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp406948e10.1021/jp406948e ↗
40. Wang C, Chen Z, Jin H, Cao C, Li J, Mi Z (2014) Enhancing visible-light photoelectrochemical water splitting through transition-metal doped TiO2 nanorod arrays. J Mater Chem A 2:17820–17827. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04254A10.1039/C4TA04254A ↗
41. Li J, Zeng HC (2006) Preparation of monodisperse Au/TiO2 nanocatalysts via self-assembly. Chem Mater 18:4270–4277. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm060362r10.1021/cm060362r ↗
42. Li J, Xu X, Liu X, Yu C, Yan D, Sun Z, Pan L (2016) Sn doped TiO2 nanotube with oxygen vacancy for highly efficient visible light photocatalysis. J Alloy Compd 679:454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.08010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.080 ↗
43. Long R, Dai Y, Meng G, Huang B (2009) Energetic and electronic properties of X- (Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) doped TiO2 from first-principles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:8165–8172. https://doi.org/10.1039/B903298C10.1039/B903298C ↗
44. Yong Z, Linghu J, Xi S et al (2018) Ti1-xSnxO2 nanofilms: layer-by-layer deposition with extended Sn solubility and characterization. Appl Surf Sci 428:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.13510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.135 ↗
45. Li B, Tang N (2022) Study on Zr, Sn, Pb, Si and Pt doped TiO2 photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells: the first-principles calculations. Chem Phys Lett 799:139636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2022.13963610.1016/j.cplett.2022.139636 ↗
46. Han X, Shao G (2011) Electronic properties of rutile TiO2 with nonmetal dopants from first principles. J Phys Chem C 115:8274–8282. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp110658610.1021/jp1106586 ↗
47. Filippatos P-P, Kelaidis N, Vasilopoulou M, Davazoglou D, Chroneos A (2020) Atomic structure and electronic properties of hydrogenated X (=C, Si, Ge, and Sn) doped TiO2: a theoretical perspective. AIP Adv 10:115316. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.003256410.1063/5.0032564 ↗
48. Li L, Li W, Zhu C, Mao L-F (2020) The dopant local effect on the stability of an oxygen vacancy and the reliability of a conductive filament in rutile titanium dioxide. Phys Status Solidi B 257:1900455. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20190045510.1002/pssb.201900455 ↗
49. Choudhury B, Choudhury A (2013) Oxygen vacancy and dopant concentration dependent magnetic properties of Mn doped TiO2 nanoparticle. Curr Appl Phys 13:1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2013.02.00710.1016/j.cap.2013.02.007 ↗
50. Khatun N, Tiwari S, Vinod CP, Tseng C-M, Liu SW, Biring S, Sen S (2018) Role of oxygen vacancies and interstitials on structural phase transition, grain growth, and optical properties of Ga doped TiO2. J Appl Phys 123:245702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.502767210.1063/1.5027672 ↗
51. Kumaravel V, Rhatigan S, Mathew S et al (2020) Mo doped TiO2: impact on oxygen vacancies, anatase phase stability and photocatalytic activity. J Phys Mater 3:025008. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ab749c10.1088/2515-7639/ab749c ↗
52. Labat F, Baranek P, Domain C, Minot C, Adamo C (2007) Density functional theory analysis of the structural and electronic properties of TiO2 rutile and anatase polytypes: performances of different exchange-correlation functionals. J Chem Phys 126:154703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.271716810.1063/1.2717168 ↗
53. Lee H-Y, Clark SJ, Robertson J (2012) Calculation of point defects in rutile TiO${}2$ by the screened-exchange hybrid functional. Phys Rev B 86:075209. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.07520910.1103/PhysRevB.86.075209 ↗
54. Li B, Wu S, Gao X (2020) Theoretical calculation of a TiO2-based photocatalyst in the field of water splitting: a review. Nanotechnol Rev 9:1080–1103. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-008510.1515/ntrev-2020-0085 ↗
55. Thatribud A (2019) Electronic and optical properties of TiO2 by first-principle calculation (DFT-GW and BSE). Mater Res Express 6:095021. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab2cad10.1088/2053-1591/ab2cad ↗
56. Becke AD, Edgecombe KE (1990) A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J Chem Phys 92:5397–5403. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45851710.1063/1.458517 ↗
57. Savin A, Jepsen O, Flad J, Andersen OK, Preuss H, von Schnering HG (1992) Electron localization in solid-state structures of the elements: the diamond structure. Angew Chem Int Ed 31:187–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.19920187110.1002/anie.199201871 ↗
58. Silvi B, Savin A (1994) Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 371:683–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/371683a010.1038/371683a0 ↗
59. Causà M, D’Amore M, Gentile F, Menendez M, Calatayud M (2015) Electron localization function and maximum probability domains analysis of semi-ionic oxides crystals, surfaces and surface defects. Comput Theor Chem 1053:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2014.11.00110.1016/j.comptc.2014.11.001 ↗
60. Koumpouras K, Larsson JA (2020) Distinguishing between chemical bonding and physical binding using electron localization function (ELF). J Phys Condens Matter 32:315502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/ab7fd810.1088/1361-648x/ab7fd8 ↗
61. Grin Y, Savin A, Silvi B (2014) The ELF perspective of chemical bonding. In: Frenking G, Shaik S (eds) The chemical bond. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527664696.ch1010.1002/9783527664696.ch10 ↗
62. Tantardini C, Oganov AR (2021) Thermochemical electronegativities of the elements. Nat Commun 12:2087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22429-010.1038/s41467-021-22429-0 ↗
63. Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G (2009) A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J Phys Condens Matter 21:084204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/08420410.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
64. Koch D, Manzhos S (2017) On the charge state of titanium in titanium dioxide. J Phys Chem Lett 8:1593–1598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0031310.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00313 ↗
65. Sun B, Shi T, Peng Z, Sheng W, Jiang T, Liao G (2013) Controlled fabrication of Sn/TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:462. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-46210.1186/1556-276X-8-462 ↗
66. Le Formal F, Sivula K, Grätzel M (2012) The transient photocurrent and photovoltage behavior of a hematite photoanode under working conditions and the influence of surface treatments. J Phys Chem C 116:26707–26720. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp308591k10.1021/jp308591k ↗