Unraveling the temperature-dependent plastic deformation mechanisms of polycrystalline Ta implants through numerical analysis of grain boundary dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nanostructured tantalum (Ta)-based dental implants have recently attracted significant attention thanks to their superior biocompatibility and bioactivity as compared to their titanium-based counterparts. While the biological and chemical aspects of Ta implants have been widely studied, their mechanical features have been investigated more rarely. Additionally, the mechanical behavior of these implants and, more importantly, their plastic deformation mechanisms are still not fully understood. Accordingly, in the current research, molecular dynamics simulation as a powerful tool for probing the atomic-scale phenomena is utilized to explore the microstructural evolution of pure polycrystalline Ta samples under tensile loading conditions. Various samples with an average grain size of 2–10 nm are systematically examined using various crystal structure analysis tools to determine the underlying deformation mechanisms. The results reveal that for the samples with an average grain size larger than 8 nm, twinning and dislocation slip are the main sources of any plasticity induced within the sample. For finer-grained samples, the activity of grain boundaries—including grain elongation, rotation, migration, and sliding—are the most important mechanisms governing the plastic deformation. Finally, the temperature-dependent Hall–Petch breakdown is thoroughly examined for the nanocrystalline samples via identification of the grain boundary dynamics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Shivaram A, Dasgupta N, Bose S (2019) Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration. Addit Manuf 28:259–266
2. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM (2012) Craig’s restorative dental materials-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam
3. Paganias CG, Tsakotos GA, Koutsostahis SD, Macherasm GA (2014) The process of porous tantalum implants osseous integration a review. Current Res Med 5:63–7210.3844/amjsp.2014.63.72 ↗
4. Soro N, Attar H, Brodie E, Veidt M, Molotnikov A, Dargusch MS (2019) Evaluation of the mechanical compatibility of additively manufactured porous Ti–25Ta alloy for load-bearing implant applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 97:149–15810.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.019 ↗
5. Shi L-Y, Wang A, Zang F-Z, Wang J-X, Pan X-W, Chen H-J (2017) Tantalum-coated pedicle screws enhance implant integration. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 160:22–3210.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.08.059 ↗
6. Sagherian BH, Claridge RJ (2019) The use of tantalum metal in foot and ankle surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 50:119–12910.1016/j.ocl.2018.08.006 ↗
7. Misch CE (2004) Dental implant prosthetics-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam
8. Mi ZR, Shuib S, Hassan A, Shorki A, Ibrahim M (2007) Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant designs: a review. J Med Sci 7:460–46710.3923/jms.2007.460.467 ↗
9. Balla VK, Bodhak S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2010) Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties. Acta Biomater 6:3349–335910.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.046 ↗
10. Balla VK, Bose S, Davies NM, Bandyopadhyay A (2010) Tantalum—a bioactive metal for implants. JOM J Mineral Metals Mater Soc 62:61–6410.1007/s11837-010-0110-y ↗
11. Villapún VM, Dover LG, Cross A, González S (2016) Antibacterial metallic touch surfaces. Materials 9:73610.3390/ma9090736 ↗
12. Hsieh JH, Yeh TH, Li C, Chiu CH, Huang CT (2013) Antibacterial properties of TaN–(Ag, Cu) nanocomposite thin films. Vacuum 87:160–16310.1016/j.vacuum.2012.02.016 ↗
13. Sharma A, Chaudhari BK, Shrestha B, Suwal P, Parajuli PK, Singh R, Niraula SR (2019) Knowledge and perception about dental implants among undergraduate dental students. BDJ open 5:1–510.1038/s41405-018-0009-1 ↗
14. Frost HM (1994) Wolff’s Law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 64:175–188
15. Zhao X, Lu C, Tieu AK, Zhan L, Pei L, Huang M (2018) Deformation mechanisms and slip-twin interactions in nanotwinned body-centered cubic iron by molecular dynamics simulations. Comput Mater Sci 147:34–4810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.054 ↗
16. Chowdhury P, Sehitoglu H (2018) Atomistic energetics and critical twinning stress prediction in face and body centered cubic metals: recent progress. J Eng Mater Technol 140:02080110.1115/1.4038673 ↗
17. Ruestes CJ, Bringa EM, Stukowski A, Rodrígue Znieva JF, Tang Y, Meyers MA (2014) Plastic deformation of a porous bcc metal containing nanometer sized voids. Comput Mater Sci 88:92–10210.1016/j.commatsci.2014.02.047 ↗
18. Wang ZQ, Beyerlein IJ (2011) An atomistically-informed dislocation dynamics model for the plastic anisotropy and tension–compression asymmetry of BCC metals. Int J Plast 27:1471–148410.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.011 ↗
19. Hahn EN, Meyers MA (2015) Grain-size dependent mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals. Mater Sci Eng, A 646:101–13410.1016/j.msea.2015.07.075 ↗
20. Weinberger CR, Tucker GJ (2016) Multiscale materials modeling for nanomechanics. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-33480-6 ↗
21. Pan Z, Li Y, Wei Q (2008) Tensile properties of nanocrystalline tantalum from molecular dynamics simulations. Acta Mater 56:3470–348010.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.025 ↗
22. Sun H, Kumar A, Singh CV (2019) Deformation behavior of BCC tantalum nanolayered composites with modulated layer thicknesses. Mater Sci Eng A 761:138037
23. Huang C, Peng X, Zhao Y, Weng S, Yang B, Fu T (2018) Flow strength limit of nanocrystalline tantalum predicted with molecular dynamics simulations. Mater Sci Eng A 738:1–910.1016/j.msea.2018.09.053 ↗
24. Tang Y, Bringa EM, Meyers MA (2013) Inverse Hall–Petch relationship in nanocrystalline tantalum. Mater Sci Eng A 580:414–42610.1016/j.msea.2013.05.024 ↗
25. Smith L, Zimmerman JA, Hale LM, Farkas D (2014) Molecular dynamics study of deformation and fracture in a tantalum nano-crystalline thin film. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 22:04501010.1088/0965-0393/22/4/045010 ↗
26. Li J, Lu B, Zhou H, Tian C, Xian Y, Hu G, Xia R (2019) Molecular dynamics simulation of mechanical properties of nanocrystalline platinum: grain-size and temperature effects. Phys Lett A 383:1922–192810.1016/j.physleta.2018.10.053 ↗
27. Ono N, Nowak R, Miura S (2004) Effect of deformation temperature on Hall–Petch relationship registered for polycrystalline magnesium. Mater Lett 58:39–4310.1016/S0167-577X(03)00410-5 ↗
28. Naik SN, Walley SM (2020) The Hall–Petch and inverse Hall–Petch relations and the hardness of nanocrystalline metals. J Mater Sci 55:2661–2681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04160-w10.1007/s10853-019-04160-w ↗
29. Rycroft CH (2009) VORO++: a three-dimensional Voronoi cell library in C++, Chaos: an interdisciplinary. J Nonlinear Sci 19:041111
30. Falco S, Jiang J, Cola FD, Petrinic N (2017) Generation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures with a conditioned Laguerre–Voronoi tessellation technique. Comput Mater Sci 136:20–2810.1016/j.commatsci.2017.04.018 ↗
31. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
32. Purja Pun GP, Darling KA, Kecskes LJ, Mishin Y (2015) Angular-dependent interatomic potential for the Cu–Ta system and its application to structural stability of nano-crystalline alloys. Acta Mater 100:377–39110.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.052 ↗
33. Kale C, Srinivasan S, Hornbuckle BC, Koju RK, Darling K, Mishin Y, Solanki KN (2020) An experimental and modeling investigation of tensile creep resistance of a stable nanocrystalline alloy. Acta Mater 199:141–15410.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.020 ↗
34. Chen J, Tschopp MA, Dongare AM (2018) Role of nanoscale Cu/Ta interfaces on the shock compression and spall failure of nanocrystalline Cu/Ta systems at the atomic scales. J Mater Sci 53:5745–5765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1879-710.1007/s10853-017-1879-7 ↗
35. Chen J, Mathaudhu SN, Thadhani N, Dongare AM (2020) Unraveling the role of interfaces on the spall failure of Cu/Ta multilayered systems. Sci Rep 10:208
36. Darling KA, Srinivasan S, Koju RK, Hornbuckle BC, Smeltzer J, Mishin Y, Solanki KN (2021) Stress-driven grain refinement in a microstructurally stable nanocrystalline binary alloy. Scripta Mater 191:185–19010.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.09.041 ↗
37. Gunkelmann N, Bringa EM, Kang K, Ackland GJ, Ruestes CJ, Urbassek HM (2012) Polycrystalline iron under compression: plasticity and phase transitions. Phys Rev B 86:14411110.1103/PhysRevB.86.144111 ↗
38. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (2017) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 ↗
39. Wei J, Feng B, Ishikawa R, Yokoi T, Matsunaga K, Shibata N, Ikuhara Y (2021) Direct imaging of atomistic grain boundary migration. Nat Mater 20:951–95510.1038/s41563-020-00879-z ↗
40. Dremov VV, Chirkov PV, Karavaev AV (2021) Molecular dynamics study of the effect of extended ingrain defects on grain growth kinetics in nanocrystalline copper. Sci Rep 11:93410.1038/s41598-020-79861-3 ↗
41. Danilenko V, Bachurin D, Nazarov A (2018) Annealing-induced grain rotation in ultrafine-grained aluminum alloy. Rev Adv Mater Sci 55:69–7710.1515/rams-2018-0029 ↗
42. Larsen PM, Schmidt S, Schiøtz J (2016) Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 24:05500710.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007 ↗
43. Fan H, Liu S, Deng C, Wu X, Cao L, Liu Q (2018) Quantitative analysis: How annealing temperature influences recrystallization texture and grain shape in tantalum. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 72:244–25210.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.12.003 ↗
44. El Shawish S, Cizelj L (2016) Numerical investigation of grain misorientations at and close to the free surface of FCC polycrystalline metals. Comput Mater Sci 113:133–14210.1016/j.commatsci.2015.11.032 ↗
45. Ma Y, Zhang S, Xu Y, Liu X, Luo S-N (2020) Effects of temperature and grain size on deformation of polycrystalline copper–graphene nanolayered composites. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:4741–474810.1039/C9CP06830A ↗
46. Alcalá J, Očenášek J, Varillas J, El-Awady JA, Wheeler JM, Michler J (2020) Statistics of dislocation avalanches in FCC and BCC metals: dislocation mechanisms and mean swept distances across microsample sizes and temperatures. Sci Rep 10:1902410.1038/s41598-020-75934-5 ↗
47. Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:015012
48. Stukowski A, Albe K (2010) Extracting dislocations and non-dislocation crystal defects from atomistic simulation data. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:085001
49. Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B 58:11085–1108810.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
50. Fang T-H, Huang C-C, Chiang T-C (2016) Effects of grain size and temperature on mechanical response of nanocrystalline copper. Mater Sci Eng, A 671:1–610.1016/j.msea.2016.06.042 ↗
51. Huang C, Peng X, Fu T, Chen X, Xiang H, Li Q, Hu N (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation of BCC Ta with coherent twin boundaries under nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng, A 700:609–61610.1016/j.msea.2017.06.048 ↗
52. Thomas SL, Chen K, Han J, Purohit PK, Srolovitz DJ (2017) Reconciling grain growth and shear-coupled grain boundary migration. Nat Commun 8:176410.1038/s41467-017-01889-3 ↗
53. Jiang B, Tu A, Wang H, Duan H, He S, Ye H, Du K (2018) Direct observation of deformation twinning under stress gradient in body-centered cubic metals. Acta Mater 155:56–6810.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.061 ↗
54. Chen J, Dong F-T, Liu Z-Y, Wang G-D (2021) Grain size dependence of twinning behaviors and resultant cryogenic impact toughness in high manganese austenitic steel. J Market Res 10:175–187
55. Feng Y-X, Shang J-X, Qin S-J, Lu G-H, Chen Y (2018) Twin and dislocation mechanisms in tensile W single crystal with temperature change: a molecular dynamics study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:17727–1773810.1039/C8CP03241F ↗
56. Wang J, Zeng Z, Wen M, Wang Q, Chen D, Zhang Y, Wang P, Wang H, Zhang Z, Mao SX, Zhu T (2020) Anti-twinning in nanoscale tungsten. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay279210.1126/sciadv.aay2792 ↗
57. Altenbach H, Brünig M, Kowalewski Z (2020) Plasticity, Damage and fracture in advanced materials. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-030-34851-9 ↗
58. Zhang Z, Ódor É, Farkas D, Jóni B, Ribárik G, Tichy G, Nandam S-H, Ivanisenko J, Preuss M, Ungár T (2020) Dislocations in Grain Boundary Regions: the origin of heterogeneous microstrains in nanocrystalline materials. Metall Mater Trans A 51:513–53010.1007/s11661-019-05492-7 ↗
59. Li XY, Jin ZH, Zhou X, Lu K (2020) Constrained minimal-interface structures in polycrystalline copper with extremely fine grains. Science 370:831–83610.1126/science.abe1267 ↗
60. Shibuta Y, Sakane S, Miyoshi E, Okita S, Takaki T, Ohno M (2017) Heterogeneity in homogeneous nucleation from billion-atom molecular dynamics simulation of solidification of pure metal. Nat Commun 8:1010.1038/s41467-017-00017-5 ↗
61. Zhang L, Shibuta Y, Huang X, Lu C, Liu M (2019) Grain boundary induced deformation mechanisms in nanocrystalline Al by molecular dynamics simulation: From interatomic potential perspective. Comput Mater Sci 156:421–43310.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.021 ↗
62. Wang L, Teng J, Liu P, Hirata A, Ma E, Zhang Z, Chen M, Han X (2014) Grain rotation mediated by grain boundary dislocations in nanocrystalline platinum. Nat Commun 5:440210.1038/ncomms5402 ↗
63. Zhang L, Shibuta Y (2020) Inverse Hall–Petch relationship of high-entropy alloy by atomistic simulation. Mater Lett 274:128024
64. Zhao Y, Chen Z, Long J, Yang T (2014) Influence of temperature on the inverse Hall–Petch effect in nanocrystalline materials: phase field crystal simulation. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) 27:81–8610.1007/s40195-014-0027-5 ↗
65. Bulatov VV, Hsiung LL, Tang M, Arsenlis A, Bartelt MC, Cai W, Florando JN, Hiratani M, Rhee M, Hommes G, Pierce TG, de la Rubia TD (2006) Dislocation multi-junctions and strain hardening. Nature 440:1174–117810.1038/nature04658 ↗
66. Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Mukherjee AK, Gleiter H (2004) Deformation-mechanism map for nanocrystalline metals by molecular-dynamics simulation. Nat Mater 3:43–4710.1038/nmat1035 ↗
67. Fan H, Wang Q, El-Awady JA, Raabe D, Zaiser M (2021) Strain rate dependency of dislocation plasticity. Nat Commun 12:1845
68. Du J-P, Wang Y-J, Lo Y-C, Wan L, Ogata S (2016) Mechanism transition and strong temperature dependence of dislocation nucleation from grain boundaries: an accelerated molecular dynamics study. Phys Rev B 94:104110