DC sputter deposited TiO2 layers on FTO: towards a maximum photoelectrochemical response of photoanodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, we examine the photoelectrochemical response of TiO2 layers prepared by reactive DC sputter deposition on conductive glass (FTO). We show that adequate conditioning of the FTO by a very thin (few nm thick) Ti interlayer and optimizing the sputter parameters, compact TiO2 anatase layers can be produced that reach incident photocurrent conversion efficiencies (IPCE) maxima peaking at 75%. This is outperforming many of the best titania photoanode structures (including high surface area 1D and 3D titania structures). The key role of the interlayer is to promote the crystallization of titania in the anatase form during the annealing process (as opposed to rutile in the interlayer-free case). Without this interlayer, an IPCE maxima of ≈43% is obtained for otherwise identically processed electrodes. The present work thus describes a most simple straightforward approach for fabricating compact, high-efficiency TiO2 (anatase) photoanodes. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Yao T, An X, Han H, Chen JQ, Li C (2018) Photoelectrocatalytic materials for solar water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 8:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20180021010.1002/aenm.201800210 ↗
2. Ozkan S, Yoo J, Nguyen NT, Mohajernia S, Zazpe R, Prikryl J, Macak JM, Schmuki P (2018) Spaced TiO2 nanotubes enable optimized Pt atomic layer deposition for efficient photocatalytic H2 generation. ChemistryOpen 7:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.20180017210.1002/open.201800172 ↗
3. Mohajernia S, Hejazi S, Mazare A, Nguyen T, Schmuki P (2017) Photoelectrochemical H2 generation from suboxide TiO2 nanotubes: visible-light absorption versus conductivity. Chem Eur J 23:12406–12411. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20170224510.1002/chem.201702245 ↗
4. Gebeyehu D, Brabec CJ, Sariciftci NS (2002) Solid-state organic/inorganic hybrid solar cells based on conjugated polymers and dye-sensitized TiO2 electrodes. Thin Solid Films 403–404:271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01580-210.1016/S0040-6090(01)01580-2 ↗
5. Gebeyehu D, Brabec CJ, Sariciftci NS, Vangeneugden D, Kiebooms R, Vanderzande D, Kienberger F, Schindler H (2001) Hybrid solar cells based on dye-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 electrodes and conjugated polymers as hole transport materials. Synth Met 125(3):279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00395-210.1016/S0379-6779(01)00395-2 ↗
6. Murugadoss G, Mizuta G, Tanaka S, Nishino H, Umeyama T, Imahori H, Ito S (2014) Light stability tests of methylammonium and formamidinium Pb-halide perovskites for solar cell applications. APL Mater 2:081511. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.54.08KF0810.7567/JJAP.54.08KF08 ↗
7. Roose B, Gödel KC, Pathak S, Sadhanala A, Baena JPC, Wilts BD, Snaith HJ, Wiesner U, Grätzel M, Steiner U, Abate A (2016) Enhanced efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells through Nd-doping of mesostructured TiO2. Adv Energy Mater 6:1501868. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20150186810.1002/aenm.201501868 ↗
8. Huang X, Hu Z, Xu J, Wang P, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2017) Low-temperature processed ultrathin TiO2 for efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. Electrochim Acta 231(77–84):0013–4686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.02810.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.028 ↗
9. Lynch RP, Ghicov A, Schmuki P (2010) A Photo-electrochemical investigation of self-organized TiO2 nanotubes. J Electrochem Soc 157:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.327645510.1149/1.3276455 ↗
10. Denisov N, Yoo J, Schmuki P (2019) Effect of different hole scavengers on the photoelectrochemical properties and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of pristine and Pt-decorated TiO2 nanotubes. Electrochim Acta 319:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.17310.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.173 ↗
11. Denisov N, Qin S, Cha G, Yoo J, Schmuki P (2020) Photoelectrochemical properties of “increasingly dark” TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Electroanal Chem, 114098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114098.10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114098 ↗
12. Rani S, Suri P, Mehra RM (2011) Mechanism of charge recombination and IPCE in ZnO dye-sensitized solar cells having I−/I3- and Br−/Br3- redox couple. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 19:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.101110.1002/pip.1011 ↗
13. Guo XZ, Luo YH, Zhang YD, Huang XC, Li DM, Meng QB (2010) Study on the effect of measuring methods on incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells by home-made setup. Rev Sci Instrum, 81. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3488456.10.1063/1.3488456 ↗
14. Trupke T, Würfel P, Uhlendorf I (2000) Dependence of the photocurrent conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells on the incident light intensity. J Phys Chem B 104:11484–11488. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp001392z10.1021/jp001392z ↗
15. Halme J, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A, Lund P (2008) spectral characteristics of light harvesting, electron injection, and steady-state charge collection in pressed TiO2 dye solar cells. J Phys Chem C 112:5623–5637. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp711245f10.1021/jp711245f ↗
16. Kruth A, Peglow S, Quade A, Pohl MM, Foest R, Brüser V, Weltmann KD (2014) Structural and Photoelectrochemical Properties of DC Magnetron-Sputtered TiO2 Layers on FTO. J Phys Chem C 118(43):25234–25244. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507487c10.1021/jp507487c ↗
17. He C, Li XZ, Graham N, Wang Y (2006) Preparation of TiO2/ITO and TiO2/Ti photoelectrodes by magnetron sputtering for photocatalytic application. Appl Catal A: Gen 305:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.05110.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.051 ↗
18. Shahvardanfard F, Cha G, Denisov N, Osuagwuaand B, Schmuk P (2021) Photoelectrochemical performance of facet-controlled TiO2 nanosheets grown hydrothermally on FTO. Nanoscale Adv 3:747–754. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA01017K10.1039/D0NA01017K ↗
19. Duan Y, Zhou S, Chen Z, Luo J, Zhang M, Wang F, Xu T, Wang C (2018) Hierarchical TiO2 nanowire/microflower photoanode modified with Au nanoparticles for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Catal Sci Technol 8:1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY02641B10.1039/C7CY02641B ↗
20. Cho I, Chen Z, Forman AJ, Kim D, Rao PM, Jaramillo TF, Zheng X (2011) Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nano Lett 11(11):4978–4984. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl202939210.1021/nl2029392 ↗
21. Denisov N, Zhou X, Cha G, Schmuki P (2021) Photocurrent conversion efficiency of TiO2 nanotube photoanodes in dependence of illumination intensity. Electrochim Acta 377:137988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13798810.1016/j.electacta.2021.137988 ↗
22. Wang X, Li Z, Shi J, Yu Y (2014) Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Chem Rev 114(19):9346–9384. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl202939210.1021/nl2029392 ↗
23. Chen Z, Dinh HN, Miller E (2013) Photoelectrochemical water splitting. standards, experimental methods, and protocols. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4614-8298-7 ↗
24. Butler MA (1977) Photoelectrolysis and physical properties of the semiconducting electrode WO2. J Appl Phys 48:1914. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.32394810.1063/1.323948 ↗
25. Gärtner WW (1959) Depletion-layer photoeffects in semiconductors. Phys Rev 116:84–87. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.8410.1103/PhysRev.116.84 ↗
26. Licklederer M, Mohammadi R, Nguyen NT, Park H, Hejazi S, Halik M, Vogel N, Altomare M, Schmuki P (2019) Dewetted Au Nanoparticles on TiO2 Surfaces: evidence of a size-independent plasmonic photoelectrochemical response. J Phys Chem C 123(27):16934–16942. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0276910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02769 ↗
27. Zhou X, Denisov N, Cha G, Hwang I, Schmuki P (2021) Photoelectrochemical performance of TiO2 photoanodes: nanotube versus nanoflake electrodes. Electrochem Commun 124:106937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2021.106937.10.1016/j.elecom.2021.106937 ↗
28. Monshi A, Foroughi M, Monshi M (2012) Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World J Nano Sci Eng 2(3):154–160. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnse.2012.2302010.4236/wjnse.2012.23020 ↗
29. Ng YH, Lightcap IV, Goodwin K, Matsumura M, Kamat PV (2010) To what extent do graphene scaffolds improve the photovoltaic and photocatalytic response of TiO2 nanostructured films? J Phys Chem 1(15):2222–2227. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz100728z10.1021/jz100728z ↗
30. Ma J, Wang X, Zong X, Li L, Sun H, He P, Yang Y, Ding Y, Han Y, Fan X (2021) Photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2/g-C3N4 composited electrodes fabricated by a co-electrodeposited method. J Phys D Appl Phys 54:145104. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-7395.10.1088/1361-6463/abd6ad ↗
31. Yang G, Yang B, Xiao T, Yan Z (2013) One-step solvothermal synthesis of hierarchically porous nanostructured CdS/TiO2 heterojunction with higher visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 283:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.12210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.122 ↗
32. Vahl A, Veziroglu S, Henkel B, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O, Aktas OC, Faupel F (2019) Pathways to Tailor photocatalytic performance of Tio2 thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 12(17):2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1217284010.3390/ma12172840 ↗
33. Rafieian D, Ogieglo W, Savenije T, Lammertink RGH (2015) Controlled formation of anatase and rutile TiO2 thin films by reactive magnetron sputtering. AIP Adv 5:097168. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493192510.1063/1.4931925 ↗
34. Wicaksana D, Tsujikawa T, Kobayashi A, Ono K, Kinbara A (1993) Ion bombardment effects on the growth of rutile phase of reactively sputtered TiO2 thin films. MRS Proc 311:233. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-311-23310.1557/PROC-311-233 ↗
35. Wicaksana D, Kobayashi A, Kinbara A (1992) Process effects on structural properties of TiO2 thin films by reactive sputtering. J Vac Sci Technol 10:1479–1482. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.57826910.1116/1.578269 ↗
36. Wang YH, Rahman KH, Wu CC, Chen KC (2020) A review on the pathways of the improved structural characteristics and photocatalytic performance of titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin films fabricated by the magnetron-sputtering technique. Catalysts 10:598. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1006059810.3390/catal10060598 ↗
37. Patterson AL (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56:978–982. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.97810.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
38. Langford J, Wilson A (1978) Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J Applied Crystallography 11:102–103. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188987801284410.1107/S0021889878012844 ↗
39. Hanaor DAH, Sorrell CC (2011) Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J Mater Sci 46:855–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5113-010.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 ↗
40. Ahn H, Yoon K, Kwak M, Park J, Jang J (2018) Boron doping of metal-doped hematite for reduced surface recombination in water splitting. ACS Catal 8(12):11932–11939. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b0318410.1021/acscatal.8b03184 ↗
41. M. Licklederer (2019) Internal Report, LKO, FAU.
42. Gondane V, Bhargava P (2016) Tuning flat band potential of TiO2 using an electrolyte additive to enhance open circuit voltage and minimize current loss in dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 209:293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.07910.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.079 ↗