journal article·2022-02

Effect of additive and coagulation bath temperature on structure and properties of HDPE membranes via thermally induced phase separation

Shulin Yang, Changfa Xiao, Yan Huang, Dawei Ji, Kaikai Chen

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Membrane separation technology as an effective and energy-saving method is playing an important role in solving water crisis. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) with excellent comprehensive performance is an ideal material for the preparation of separation membrane. However, it is susceptible to fouling during separation process owing to its inherent hydrophobicity and is difficult to prepare HDPE porous membranes with uniform pore size distribution. In this work, HDPE membranes with improved hydrophilicity and uniform pore size distribution were successfully prepared via thermally induced phase separation with white oil as diluent. Meanwhile, ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG20000) as hydrophilic polymer additives were added, while silica nanoparticles (SiO2) or multilayer graphene oxide were used as hydrophilic inorganic additives respectively. In particular, the influence of additives and coagulation bath temperatures on the properties of the membranes were investigated in detail. The hydrophilicity of the HDPE membranes was improved, and the thickness of the dense skin layer decreased effectively with the addition of 5% EVA, 5% PEG20000 and 2% SiO2. The pure water flux (407.63 L·m–2·h–1) was about 7.65 times higher than the pure HDPE membrane. In particular, the appropriate increase in the coagulation bath temperature was conducive to crystal growth and diluent aggregation. Furthermore, the mean pore size, porosity, and pure water flux all increased significantly, while the BSA rejection ratio decreased slightly. The prepared HDPE membranes showed high rejection ratio (> 99.9%) for the carbon ink particles, long-term and cyclic filtration stability, and excellent corrosion resistance to the aggressive chemical solutions.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Capodaglio AG (2020) Fit-for-purpose urban wastewater reuse: analysis of issues and available technologies for sustainable multiple barrier approaches. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 1:1–48
2. Boretti A, Rosa L (2019) Reassessing the projections of the world water development report. NPJ Clean Water 2(1):1–610.1038/s41545-019-0039-9 ↗
3. Figoli A, Criscuoli A. 2017. Sustainable membrane technology for water and wastewater treatment. Springer10.1007/978-981-10-5623-9 ↗
4. Ismail N, Salleh W, Ismail A, Hasbullah H, Yusof N, Aziz F et al (2020) Hydrophilic polymer-based membrane for oily wastewater treatment: a review. Sep Purif Technol 233:11600710.1016/j.seppur.2019.116007 ↗
5. Song N, Gao X, Ma Z, Wang X, Wei Y, Gao C (2018) A review of graphene-based separation membrane: materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination 437:59–7210.1016/j.desal.2018.02.024 ↗
6. Jafarzadeh Y, Yegani R, Tantekin-Ersolmaz S (2015) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on structure and properties of high density polyethylene membranes prepared by thermally induced phase separation method. Polym Adv Technol 26(4):392–39810.1002/pat.3466 ↗
7. Matsuyama H, Hayashi K, Maki T, Teramoto M, Kubota N (2004) Effect of polymer density on polyethylene hollow fiber membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation. J Appl Polym Sci 93(1):471–47410.1002/app.20461 ↗
8. Yegani R, Tavakoli A, Jafarzadeh Y, Mohammadzadeh S, Anarjani S. 2014. Functionalization of high density polyethylene (HDPE) microporous membranes using various oxidizing agents
9. Fonouni M, Yegani R, Anarjani S, Tavakoli A (2017) Anti-fouling behaviors of surface functionalized high density polyethylene membrane in microfiltration of bovine serum albumin protein. Polyolefins J. 4(1):13–26
10. Xi Zy XuYY, Zhu LP, Du CH, Bk Z (2008) Effect of stretching on structure and properties of polyethylene hollow fiber membranes made by melt-spinning and stretching process. Polym Adv Technol 19(11):1616–162210.1002/pat.1177 ↗
11. Luo D-J, Wei F-J, Shao H-J, Zhang K-Z, Cui Z-Y, Yu J et al (2019) Effects of cooling ways on the structure of polypropylene hollow fiber membranes prepared by stretching. Int Polym Proc 34(2):172–18110.3139/217.3638 ↗
12. Cui Z, Pan J, Wang Z, Frappa M, Drioli E, Macedonio F (2020) Hyflon/PVDF membranes prepared by NIPS and TIPS: comparison in MD performance. Sep Purif Technol 247:11699210.1016/j.seppur.2020.116992 ↗
13. Matsuyama H, Okafuji H, Maki T, Teramoto M, Kubota N (2003) Preparation of polyethylene hollow fiber membrane via thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 223(1–2):119–12610.1016/S0376-7388(03)00314-4 ↗
14. Li N, Lu Q, Yin W, Xiao C, Li J (2020) The structure and properties of poly (vinylidene fluoride)/ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene blend hollow fiber membranes via TIPS with mixed diluents. J Membr Sci 595:11752710.1016/j.memsci.2019.117527 ↗
15. Fan L-L, Quan J-Y, Zhang H, Yu J-R, Hu Z-M, Wang Y (2021) Preparation of hydrophilic UHMWPE hollow fiber membranes by chemically bounding silica nanoparticles. Chin J Polym Sci 39(2):189–20010.1007/s10118-021-2507-1 ↗
16. Akbari A, Yegani R, Pourabbas B (2016) Synthesis of high dispersible hydrophilic poly (ethylene glycol)/vinyl silane grafted silica nanoparticles to fabricate protein repellent polyethylene nanocomposite. Eur Polymer J 81:86–9710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.05.011 ↗
17. Nemani SK, Annavarapu RK, Mohammadian B, Raiyan A, Heil J, Haque MA et al (2018) Surface modification of polymers: methods and applications. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(24):180124710.1002/admi.201801247 ↗
18. Li J-H, Shao X-S, Zhou Q, Li M-Z, Zhang Q-Q (2013) The double effects of silver nanoparticles on the PVDF membrane: surface hydrophilicity and antifouling performance. Appl Surf Sci 265:663–67010.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.072 ↗
19. Sun H, Yang X, Zhang Y, Cheng X, Xu Y, Bai Y et al (2018) Segregation-induced in situ hydrophilic modification of poly (vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes via sticky poly (ethylene glycol) blending. J Membr Sci 563:22–3010.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.046 ↗
20. Otitoju TA, Ahmad AL, Ooi BS (2018) Recent advances in hydrophilic modification and performance of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane via additive blending. RSC Adv 8(40):22710–2272810.1039/C8RA03296C ↗
21. Ma C, Hu J, Sun W, Ma Z, Yang W, Wang L et al (2020) Graphene oxide-polyethylene glycol incorporated PVDF nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane with enhanced hydrophilicity, permeability, and antifouling performance. Chemosphere 253:12664910.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126649 ↗
22. Vatanpour V, Zoqi N (2017) Surface modification of commercial seawater reverse osmosis membranes by grafting of hydrophilic monomer blended with carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 396:1478–148910.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.195 ↗
23. Yang H, Gao CM, Liu SH, Ji SF, Chen HY, Chen JC (2020) Improving the hydrophilicity of polyethersulfone membrane by the combination of grafting technology and reverse thermally induced phase separation method. J Appl Polym Sci 137(43):4932710.1002/app.49327 ↗
24. Choudhury RR, Gohil JM, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2018) Antifouling, fouling release and antimicrobial materials for surface modification of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Mater. Chem A 6(2):313–33310.1039/C7TA08627J ↗
25. Zhao S, Wang Z (2017) A loose nano-filtration membrane prepared by coating HPAN UF membrane with modified PEI for dye reuse and desalination. J Membr Sci 524:214–22410.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.035 ↗
26. Fang S, Zhang Z, Yang H, Wang G, Gu L, Xia L et al (2020) Mussel-inspired hydrophilic modification of polypropylene membrane for oil-in-water emulsion separation. Surf Coat Technol 403:12637510.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126375 ↗
27. Van der Bruggen B (2009) Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: a review. J Appl Polym Sci 114(1):630–64210.1002/app.30578 ↗
28. Adib H, Raisi A (2020) Post-synthesis modification of polyethersulfone membrane by grafting hyperbranched polyethylene glycol for oily wastewater treatment. Res Chem Intermed 46(6):3227–324510.1007/s11164-020-04148-1 ↗
29. Khulbe KC, Matsuura T. 2021. Membrane modification. nanotechnology in membrane processes: Springer. 135–7010.1007/978-3-030-64183-2_4 ↗
30. Sun W, Liu J, Chu H, Dong B (2013) Pretreatment and membrane hydrophilic modification to reduce membrane fouling. Membranes 3(3):226–24110.3390/membranes3030226 ↗
31. Jin Yt HuD, Yk L, Shi L (2019) Hydrophilic modification of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane by blending amphiphilic copolymer via thermally induced phase separation. Polym Adv Technol 30(1):110–11910.1002/pat.4449 ↗
32. Susanto H, Roihatin A, Aryanti N, Anggoro D, Ulbricht M (2012) Effect of membrane hydrophilization on ultrafiltration performance for biomolecules separation. Mater Sci Eng, C 32(7):1759–176610.1016/j.msec.2012.04.036 ↗
33. Shi JL, Fang LF, Zhang H, Liang ZY, Zhu BK, Zhu LP (2013) Effects of the extractant on the hydrophilicity and performance of high-density polyethylene/polyethylene-b-poly (ethylene glycol) blend membranes prepared via a thermally induced phase separation process. J Appl Polym Sci 130(5):3816–382410.1002/app.39416 ↗
34. Amini M, Etemadi H, Akbarzadeh A, Yegani R (2017) Preparation and performance evaluation of high-density polyethylene/silica nanocomposite membranes in membrane bioreactor system. Biochem Eng J 127:196–20510.1016/j.bej.2017.08.015 ↗
35. Zhang C, Bai Y, Sun Y, Gu J, Xu Y (2010) Preparation of hydrophilic HDPE porous membranes via thermally induced phase separation by blending of amphiphilic PE-b-PEG copolymer. J Membr Sci 365(1–2):216–22410.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.007 ↗
36. Luyt AS. 2016. Polyolefin blends. Polyolefin compounds and materials. Springer. 107 15610.1007/978-3-319-25982-6_5 ↗
37. Tang N, Hua X, Li Z, Zhang L, Wang J, Xiang J et al (2019) Effect of ethylene vinyl acetate content on the performance of VMD using HDPE co-blending membrane. Chin J Chem Eng 27(5):1058–106610.1016/j.cjche.2018.12.004 ↗
38. Zhang M, Qiu Y-r (2014) Effects of coagulation bath temperature on structure and performance of poly (vinyl butyral) hollow fiber membranes via thermally induced phase separation. J. Central South Univ. 21:3057–306210.1007/s11771-014-2276-x ↗
39. Yang B, Ding M, Wu J, Chen Q, Zhao H, Yu Y et al (2020) In situ tailoring the hierarchical microstructures in polyethylene films fabricated by thermally induced phase separation via temperature gradient fields. J Mater Sci 55:10922–1094110.1007/s10853-020-04748-7 ↗
40. Zimmerman RW (2017) Pore volume and porosity changes under uniaxial strain conditions. Transp Porous Media 119(2):481–49810.1007/s11242-017-0894-0 ↗
41. Calvo JI, Bottino A, Prádanos P, Palacio L, Hernández A. 2013. Porosity. Encyclopedia of Membrane Science and Technology. 1–35.10.1002/9781118522318.emst065 ↗
42. Feng C, Wang R, Shi B, Li G, Wu Y (2006) Factors affecting pore structure and performance of poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro propylene) asymmetric porous membrane. J Membr Sci 277(1–2):55–6410.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.009 ↗
43. Rajabzadeh S, Maruyama T, Ohmukai Y, Sotani T, Matsuyama H (2009) Preparation of PVDF/PMMA blend hollow fiber membrane via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) method. Sep Purif Technol 66(1):76–8310.1016/j.seppur.2008.11.021 ↗
44. Passador FR, Ruvolo-Filho AC, Pessan LA (2013) Effects of different compatibilizers on the rheological, thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE blend-based nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 130(3):1726–173510.1002/app.39265 ↗
45. Li N, Xiao C, Zhang Z (2010) Effect of polyethylene glycol on the performance of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 117(2):720–72810.1002/app.30500 ↗
46. Zahir MH, Mohamed SA, Saidur R, Al-Sulaiman FA (2019) Supercooling of phase-change materials and the techniques used to mitigate the phenomenon. Appl Energy 240:793–81710.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.045 ↗
47. Moussa GS, Abdel-Raheem A, Abdel-Wahed T (2021) Effect of nanoclay particles on the performance of high-density polyethylene-modified asphalt concrete mixture. Polymers 13(3):43410.3390/polym13030434 ↗
48. Kivi MA, Alinia H, Jafarzadeh Y, Yegani R (2019) High-density polyethylene membranes embedded with carboxylated and polyethylene glycol-grafted nanodiamond to be used in membrane bioreactors. J Appl Polym Sci 136(35):4791410.1002/app.47914 ↗
49. Tang M, Qi F, Chen M, Sun Z, Xu Y, Chen X et al (2016) Synergistic effects of ammonium polyphosphate and red phosphorus with expandable graphite on flammability and thermal properties of HDPE/EVA blends. Polym Adv Technol 27(1):52–6010.1002/pat.3596 ↗
50. An Q, Qian J, Sun H, Wang L, Zhang L, Chen H (2003) Compatibility of PVC/EVA blends and the pervaporation of their blend membranes for benzene/cyclohexane mixtures. J Membr Sci 222(1–2):113–12210.1016/S0376-7388(03)00260-6 ↗
51. Sadeghi M, Khanbabaei G, Dehaghani AHS, Sadeghi M, Aravand MA, Akbarzade M et al (2008) Gas permeation properties of ethylene vinyl acetate–silica nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci 322(2):423–42810.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.077 ↗
52. Matsuyama H, Yuasa M, Kitamura Y, Teramoto M, Lloyd DR (2000) Structure control of anisotropic and asymmetric polypropylene membrane prepared by thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 179(1–2):91–10010.1016/S0376-7388(00)00506-8 ↗
53. Xi Z, Yang Y, Wang Y, Zhao H (2012) Effect of poly (ethylene glycol) on structure and properties of polypropylene membrane formed via thermally induced phase separation. Procedia Engineering 44:1636–163810.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.893 ↗
54. Amirilargani M, Sabetghadam A, Mohammadi T (2012) Polyethersulfone/polyacrylonitrile blend ultrafiltration membranes with different molecular weight of polyethylene glycol: preparation, morphology and antifouling properties. Polym Adv Technol 23(3):398–40710.1002/pat.1888 ↗
55. Fan Z, Xiao C, Liu H, Q. (2015) Huang. Preparation and performance of homogeneous braid reinforced cellulose acetate hollow fiber membranes. Cellulose 22(1):695–70710.1007/s10570-014-0466-1 ↗