DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2024-05

Textile waste-based cellulose composites: a review

Rashi Yadav, Zunjarrao Kamble

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 17
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Composites

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Kamble Z, Behera BK (2021) Upcycling textile wastes: challenges and innovations. Text Prog 53:65–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405167.2021.198696510.1080/00405167.2021.1986965 ↗
2. Shishoo R (2012) Introduction: trends in the global textile industry. In: the global textile and clothing industry: technological advances and future challenges. Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp 1–710.1533/9780857095626.1 ↗
3. Pensupa N, Leu S-YY, Hu Y et al (2017) Recent trends in sustainable textile waste recycling methods: current situation and future prospects. Top Curr Chem 375:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-017-0165-010.1007/s41061-017-0165-0 ↗
4. Sharma M, Dhiman R (2016) Determinants affecting Indian textile exports: a review. Biz Bytes J Manag Technol 6:193–199
5. Kamble Z, Behera BK (2021) Upcycling textile waste towards green nanocomposites. Integrated approaches towards solid waste management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 189–20110.1007/978-3-030-70463-6_18 ↗
6. Mishra S, Rath CC, Das AP (2019) Marine microfiber pollution: a review on present status and future challenges. Mar Pollut Bull 140:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.03910.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.039 ↗
7. Kamble Z, Behera BK (2021) Fabrication and performance evaluation of waste cotton and polyester fiber-reinforced green composites for building and construction applications. Polym Compos 42:3025–3037. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2603610.1002/pc.26036 ↗
8. Kamble Z, Behera BK, Mishra R, Behera PK (2021) Influence of cellulosic and non-cellulosic particle fillers on mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and thermogravimetric properties of waste cotton fibre reinforced green composites. Compos Part B Eng 207:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10859510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108595 ↗
9. Subramanian K, Chopra SS, Cakin E et al (2020) Environmental life cycle assessment of textile bio-recycling – valorizing cotton-polyester textile waste to pet fiber and glucose syrup. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:104989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10498910.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104989 ↗
10. Sulochani RMN, Jayasinghe RA, Fernando C, et al (2023) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a textile waste thermoplastic composite material for wall partitioning applications. In: international conference on sustainable built environment. pp 441–45010.1007/978-981-99-3471-3_31 ↗
11. Zhang J, Chevali VS, Wang H, Wang C-H (2020) Current status of carbon fibre and carbon fibre composites recycling. Compos Part B Eng 193:108053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10805310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108053 ↗
12. Meng F, McKechnie J, Turner TA, Pickering SJ (2017) Energy and environmental assessment and reuse of fluidised bed recycled carbon fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 100:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.008 ↗
13. Meng F, Olivetti EA, Zhao Y et al (2018) Comparing life cycle energy and global warming potential of carbon fiber composite recycling technologies and waste management options. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:9854–9865. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0102610.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01026 ↗
14. Evens T, Bex G-J, Yigit M et al (2019) The influence of mechanical recycling on properties in injection molding of fiber-reinforced polypropylene. Int Polym Process 34:398–407. https://doi.org/10.3139/217.377010.3139/217.3770 ↗
15. Li J, Nawaz H, Wu J et al (2018) All-cellulose composites based on the self-reinforced effect. Compos Commun 9:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2018.04.00810.1016/j.coco.2018.04.008 ↗
16. Suriani MJ, Ilyas RA, Zuhri MYM et al (2021) Critical review of natural fiber reinforced hybrid composites: processing, properties. Appl Cost Polym (Basel) 13:3514. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1320351410.3390/polym13203514 ↗
17. Yadav S, Kamble Z, Behera BK (2022) Advances in multifunctional textile structural power composites: a review. J Mater Sci 57:17105–17138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07713-810.1007/s10853-022-07713-8 ↗
18. Sinha AK, Bhattacharya S, Narang HK (2021) Abaca fibre reinforced polymer composites: a review. J Mater Sci 56:4569–4587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05572-910.1007/s10853-020-05572-9 ↗
19. Nishino T, Matsuda I, Hirao K (2004) All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules 37:7683–7687. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049300h10.1021/ma049300h ↗
20. Nishino T, Arimoto N (2007) All-cellulose composite prepared by selective dissolving of fiber surface. Biomacromol 8:2712–2716. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm070341610.1021/bm0703416 ↗
21. Baghaei B, Skrifvars M (2020) All-cellulose composites: a review of recent studies on structure. Propert Appl Mol 25:2836. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2512283610.3390/molecules25122836 ↗
22. Kalka S, Huber T, Steinberg J et al (2014) Biodegradability of all-cellulose composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 59:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.012 ↗
23. Zailuddin NLI, Osman AF, Rahman R (2020) Morphology, mechanical properties, and biodegradability of all-cellulose composite films from oil palm empty fruit bunch. SPE Polym 1:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.1000810.1002/pls2.10008 ↗
24. Cao J, Sun X, Lu C et al (2016) Water-soluble cellulose acetate from waste cotton fabrics and the aqueous processing of all-cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 149:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.08610.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.086 ↗
25. Baghaei B, Compiet S, Skrifvars M (2020) Mechanical properties of all-cellulose composites from end-of-life textiles. J Polym Res 27:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02214-110.1007/s10965-020-02214-1 ↗
26. Baghaei B, Johansson B, Skrifvars M, Kadi N (2022) All-cellulose composites properties from pre-and post-consumer denim wastes: comparative study. J Compos Sci 6:130. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCS605013010.3390/JCS6050130 ↗
27. Temmink R, Baghaei B, Skrifvars M (2018) Development of biocomposites from denim waste and thermoset bio-resins for structural applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 106:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.011 ↗
28. de Oliveira Neto GC, Teixeira MM, Souza GLV et al (2022) Assessment of the eco-efficiency of the circular economy in the recovery of cellulose from the shredding of textile waste. Polymers (Basel) 14:1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1407131710.3390/polym14071317 ↗
29. Li X, Hu Y, Du C, Lin CSK (2019) Recovery of glucose and polyester from textile waste by enzymatic hydrolysis. Waste Biom Valorizat 10:3763–3772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0483-710.1007/s12649-018-0483-7 ↗
30. Fitzgerald A, Proud W, Kandemir A et al (2021) A life cycle engineering perspective on biocomposites as a solution for a sustainable recovery. Sustainability 13:1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1303116010.3390/su13031160 ↗
31. Zou Y, Reddy N, Yang Y (2011) Reusing polyester/cotton blend fabrics for composites. Compos Part B Eng 42:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.022 ↗
32. Taşdemir M, Koçak D, Usta I et al (2007) Properties of polypropylene composite produced with silk and cotton fiber waste as reinforcement. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 56:1155–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0091403070132375210.1080/00914030701323752 ↗
33. Kamble Z, Behera BK, Kimura T, Haruhiro I (2022) Development and characterization of thermoset nanocomposites reinforced with cotton fibres recovered from textile waste. J Ind Text 51:2026S-2052S. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372091353510.1177/1528083720913535 ↗
34. Halimi MT, Ben HM, Sakli F (2008) Cotton waste recycling: Quantitative and qualitative assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.00910.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.009 ↗
35. Kamble Z, Behera BK (2021) Mechanical and thermogravimetric properties of PP based thermoplastic composites reinforced with cotton and polyester waste under dry and wet conditions. J Nat Fibers 19:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.200277510.1080/15440478.2021.2002775 ↗
36. Kamble Z, Behera BK (2020) Mechanical properties and water absorption characteristics of composites reinforced with cotton fibres recovered from textile waste. J Eng Fiber Fabr 15:155892502090153. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892502090153010.1177/1558925020901530 ↗
37. Prado KS, Gonzales D, Spinacé MAS (2019) Recycling of viscose yarn waste through one-step extraction of nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 136:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.12410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.124 ↗
38. Wang Z, Yao ZJ, Zhou J, Zhang Y (2017) Reuse of waste cotton cloth for the extraction of cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 157:945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.04410.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.044 ↗
39. Yousef S, Tatariants M, Tichonovas M et al (2019) A new strategy for using textile waste as a sustainable source of recovered cotton. Resour Conserv Recycl 145:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.03110.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.031 ↗
40. Yousef S, Tatariants M, Tichonovas M et al (2020) Sustainable green technology for recovery of cotton fibers and polyester from textile waste. J Clean Prod 254:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12007810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120078 ↗
41. Haule LV, Carr CM, Rigout M (2016) Preparation and physical properties of regenerated cellulose fibres from cotton waste garments. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.08610.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.086 ↗
42. Haslinger S, Hummel M, Anghelescu-Hakala A et al (2019) Upcycling of cotton polyester blended textile waste to new man-made cellulose fibers. Waste Manag 97:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.04010.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.040 ↗
43. Capiati NJ, Porter RS (1975) The concept of one polymer composites modelled with high density polyethylene. J Mater Sci 10:1671–1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055492810.1007/BF00554928 ↗
44. Ward IM, Hine PJ (2004) The science and technology of hot compaction. Polymer (Guildf) 45:1413–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.11.05010.1016/j.polymer.2003.11.050 ↗
45. Santos RAM, Gorbatikh L, Swolfs Y (2021) Commercial self-reinforced composites: a comparative study. Compos Part B Eng 223:109108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10910810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109108 ↗
46. Gao C, Yu L, Liu H, Chen L (2012) Development of self-reinforced polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 37:767–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.005 ↗
47. Uusi-Tarkka E-K, Skrifvars M, Haapala A (2021) Fabricating sustainable all-cellulose composites. Appl Sci 11:10069. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11211006910.3390/app112110069 ↗
48. Lu X, Zhang MQ, Rong MZ et al (2003) Self-reinforced melt processable composites of sisal. Compos Sci Technol 63:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00204-X10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00204-X ↗
49. Soykeabkaew N, Nishino T, Peijs T (2009) All-cellulose composites of regenerated cellulose fibres by surface selective dissolution. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.021 ↗
50. Huber T, Bickerton S, Müssig J et al (2012) Solvent infusion processing of all-cellulose composite materials. Carbohydr Polym 90:730–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.04710.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.047 ↗
51. Arévalo R, Picot O, Wilson RM et al (2010) All-cellulose composites by partial dissolution of cotton fibres. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 4:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2010.107710.1166/jbmb.2010.1077 ↗
52. Duchemin BJC, Newman RH, Staiger MP (2009) Structure-property relationship of all-cellulose composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.027 ↗
53. Pullawan T, Wilkinson AN, Zhang LN, Eichhorn SJ (2014) Deformation micromechanics of all-cellulose nanocomposites: Comparing matrix and reinforcing components. Carbohydr Polym 100:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.066 ↗
54. Abou-Yousef H, Kamel S (2023) Physico-mechanical properties of all-cellulose composites prepared by different approaches from micro-fibrillated bagasse pulp fibers. Mater Today Commun 35:105672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10567210.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105672 ↗
55. Austin PR (1976) Chitin solution. 1–4
56. Qin C, Soykeabkaew N, Xiuyuan N, Peijs T (2008) The effect of fibre volume fraction and mercerization on the properties of all-cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 71:458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.06.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2007.06.019 ↗
57. Davidson GF (1937) 4.—The dissolution of chemically modified cotton cellulose in alkaline solutions. Part 3—in solutions of sodium and potassium hydroxide containing dissolved zinc, beryllium and aluminium oxides. J Text Inst Trans 28:T27–T44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1944702370863178910.1080/19447023708631789 ↗
58. Yang Q, Lue A, Zhang L (2010) Reinforcement of ramie fibers on regenerated cellulose films. Compos Sci Technol 70:2319–2324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.012 ↗
59. Liu W, Budtova T, Navard P (2011) Influence of ZnO on the properties of dilute and semi-dilute cellulose-NaOH-water solutions. Cellulose 18:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9552-910.1007/s10570-011-9552-9 ↗
60. Yan L, Gao Z (2008) Dissolving of cellulose in PEG/NaOH aqueous solution. Cellulose 15:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9233-510.1007/s10570-008-9233-5 ↗
61. Célino A, Fréour S, Jacquemin F, Casari P (2014) The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. Front Chem 1:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2013.0004310.3389/fchem.2013.00043 ↗
62. Miner AR, Gallego RZ, Rojo PG, Mondragon I (2014) Nanocomposites based on matrices extracted from vegetable oils and bacterial cellulose. Cellul Based Compos New Green Nanomater 17:63–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527649440.ch410.1002/9783527649440.ch4 ↗
63. Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 83:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
64. Lee KY, Aitomäki Y, Berglund LA et al (2014) On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 105:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.032 ↗
65. Budtova T, Navard P (2016) Cellulose in NaOH–water based solvents: a review. Cellulose 23:5–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0779-810.1007/s10570-015-0779-8 ↗
66. Korhonen O, Sawada D, Budtova T (2019) All-cellulose composites via short-fiber dispersion approach using NaOH–water solvent. Cellulose 26:4881–4893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02422-z10.1007/s10570-019-02422-z ↗
67. Adak B, Mukhopadhyay S (2017) A comparative study on lyocell-fabric based all-cellulose composite laminates produced by different processes. Cellulose 24:835–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1149-x10.1007/s10570-016-1149-x ↗
68. Adak B, Mukhopadhyay S (2017) Effect of pressure on structure and properties of lyocell fabric-based all-cellulose composite laminates. J Text Inst 108:1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2016.120982710.1080/00405000.2016.1209827 ↗
69. Kamble Z, Mishra RK, Behera BK et al (2021) Design, development, and characterization of advanced textile structural hollow composites. Polymers (Basel) 13:3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1320353510.3390/polym13203535 ↗
70. Soykeabkaew N, Arimoto N, Nishino T, Peijs T (2008) All-cellulose composites by surface selective dissolution of aligned ligno-cellulosic fibres. Compos Sci Technol 68:2201–2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.023 ↗
71. Yousefi H, Nishino T, Shakeri A et al (2013) Water-repellent all -cellulose nanocomposite using silane coupling treatment. J Adhes Sci Technol 27:1324–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2012.69595410.1080/01694243.2012.695954 ↗
72. Gindl W, Keckes J (2005) All-cellulose nanocomposite. Polymer (Guildf) 46:10221–10225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.04010.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.040 ↗
73. Han D, Yan L (2010) Preparation of all-cellulose composite by selective dissolving of cellulose surface in PEG/NaOH aqueous solution. Carbohydr Polym 79:614–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.09.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2009.09.008 ↗
74. Fujisawa S, Saito T, Isogai A (2018) All-cellulose (cellulose-cellulose) green composites. Adv Green Compos 1:111–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119323327.ch610.1002/9781119323327.ch6 ↗