journal article·2024-01

Evaluating shock sensitivity and decomposition of energetic materials by ReaxFF molecular dynamics

Jun Jiang, Qi-Ying Xia, Si-Yu Xu, Feng-Qi Zhao, Xue-Hai Ju

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Amorphous models of locally ordered molecular packing were constructed to replace crystals and predict the shock sensibility and safety of energetic materials (EMs) using reactive molecular dynamics. We analyzed the simulation of shock-induced decomposition of EMs, comparing the effects of two different shock modes: the multiscale shock technique (MSST) and quantum-bath-coupled MSST (QBMSST). The rate of temperature rise and decomposition speed differ between these two modes. The critical initiation pressure in EMs is determined when the number of trigger bonds decreases by 15%. The values of the initial pressure for PETN, RDX, TNT, and TATB using QBMSST are 18.44, 24.51, 32.00, and 40.59 GPa, respectively, which are lower than those obtained using MSST. The shock wave sensitivities of these EMs in descending order are PETN, RDX, TNT, and TATB under these two shock modes, which is consistent with experiments. TATB has the highest bulk modulus obtained under both shock modes, followed by TNT, RDX, and PETN. This work demonstrated that the amorphous models like crystal models in the previous literature can be applicable to predict the sensitivity of EMs and could expected to be applicable in mixed or composite systems, including but not limited to shock sensitivities.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Peiris SM, Piermarini GJ (2008) Static Compression of Energetic Materials. Springer10.1007/978-3-540-68151-9 ↗
2. Cao DY (2023) Strengthening the interphase of thermoplastic sandwich composites by interleaving carbon nanotube yarns. Materials Today Communications 36:10665510.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106655 ↗
3. Li G, Zhang C (2020) Review of the molecular and crystal correlations on sensitivities of energetic materials. J Hazard Mater 398:12291010.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122910 ↗
4. Zhang C (2018) Origins of the energy and safety of energetic materials and of the energy & safety contradiction. Wiley, pp 855–856
5. Van Duin AC, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA (2001) ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J Phys Chem A 105:9396–940910.1021/jp004368u ↗
6. Liu L, Liu Y, Zybin SV, Sun H, Goddard WA III (2011) ReaxFF-lg: Correction of the ReaxFF reactive force field for London dispersion, with applications to the equations of state for energetic materials. J Phys Chem A 115:11016–1102210.1021/jp201599t ↗
7. Mortazavi B, Novikov IS, Podryabinkin EV, Roche S, Rabczuk T, Shapeev AV, Zhuang XY (2020) Exploring phononic properties of two-dimensional materials using machine learning interatomic potentials. Appl Mater Today 20:10
8. Mortazavi B, Podryabinkin EV, Novikov IS, Roche S, Rabczuk T, Zhuang XY, Shapeev AV (2020) Efficient machine-learning based interatomic potentialsfor exploring thermal conductivity in two-dimensional materials. Journal of Physics-Materials 3:1010.1088/2515-7639/ab7cbb ↗
9. Willman JT, Nguyen-Cong K, Williams AS, Belonoshko AB, Moore SG, Thompson AP, Wood MA, Oleynik II (2022) Machine learning interatomic potential for simulations of carbon at extreme conditions. Phys Rev B 106:610.1103/PhysRevB.106.L180101 ↗
10. Budzien J, Thompson AP, Zybin SV (2009) Reactive molecular dynamics simulations of shock through a single crystal of pentaerythritol tetranitrate. J Phys Chem B 113:13142–1315110.1021/jp9016695 ↗
11. Shan TR, Wixom RR, Mattsson AE, Thompson AP (2013) Atomistic simulation of orientation dependence in shock-induced initiation of pentaerythritol tetranitrate. J Phys Chem B 117:928–93610.1021/jp310473h ↗
12. Zhou TT, Zybin SV, Liu Y, Huang FL, Goddard WA (2012) Anisotropic shock sensitivity for beta-octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine energetic material under compressive-shear loading from ReaxFF-lg reactive dynamics simulations. J Appl Phys 111:12490410.1063/1.4729114 ↗
13. Zhang LZ, Zybin SV, Van Duin ACT, Goddard WA (2010) Modeling High rate impact sensitivity of perfect RDX and HMX crystals by ReaxFF reactive dynamics. J Energ Mater 28:92–12710.1080/07370652.2010.504682 ↗
14. Huang XN, Guo F, Yao KG, Lu ZP, Ma Y, Wen YS, Dai XG, Li M, Long XP (2020) Anisotropic hydrogen bond structures and orientation dependence of shock sensitivity in crystalline 1,3,5-tri-amino-2,4,6-tri-nitrobenzene (TATB). Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:11956–1196610.1039/C9CP06208D ↗
15. Qi T, Reed EJ (2012) Simulations of shocked methane including self-consistent semiclassical quantum nuclear effects. J Phys Chem A 116:10451–1045910.1021/jp308068c ↗
16. Hamilton BW, Kroonblawd MP, Islam MM, Strachan A (2019) Sensitivity of the shock initiation threshold of 1,3,5-Triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB) to nuclear quantum effects. J Phys Chem C 123:21969–2198110.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05409 ↗
17. Grilli N, Koslowski M (2019) The effect of crystal anisotropy and plastic response on the dynamic fracture of energetic materials. J Appl Phys 126:15510110.1063/1.5109761 ↗
18. Pravica M, Quine Z, Romano E, Bajar S, Yulga B, Yang W, Hooks D (2007) Anisotropic decomposition of energetic materials, In: Conference of the American-Physical-Society-Topical-Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, Waikoloa, HI, 2007, pp 111710.1063/1.2832914 ↗
19. Yang K, Chen L, Liu DY, Geng DS, Lu JY, Wu JY (2022) Quantitative prediction and ranking of the shock sensitivity of explosives via reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Defence Technol 18:843–85410.1016/j.dt.2022.01.002 ↗
20. Hardin DB, Rimoli JJ, Zhou M (2014) Analysis of thermomechanical response of polycrystalline HMX under impact loading through mesoscale simulations. AIP Adv 4:09713610.1063/1.4896699 ↗
21. Revil-Baudard B, Cazacu O (2022) Dynamic response of polycrystalline high energetic systems: constitutive modeling and application to impact. J Appl Phys 131:14510110.1063/5.0080848 ↗
22. Ambos A, Willot F, Jeulin D, Trumel H (2015) Numerical modeling of the thermal expansion of an energetic material. Int J Solids Struct 60–61:125–13910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.025 ↗
23. Benson DJ, Conley P (1999) Eulerian finite-element simulations of experimentally acquired HMX microstructures. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 7:33310.1088/0965-0393/7/3/304 ↗
24. Baer M (2002) Modeling heterogeneous energetic materials at the mesoscale. Thermochim Acta 384:351–36710.1016/S0040-6031(01)00794-8 ↗
25. Choi CS, Prince E (1972) The crystal structure of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine. Acta Crystallogr Sect B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem 28:2857–286210.1107/S0567740872007046 ↗
26. Cady HH, Larson A (1975) Pentaerythritol tetranitrate II: its crystal structure and transformation to PETN I; an algorithm for refinement of crystal structures with poor data. Acta Crystallogr Sect B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem 31:1864–186910.1107/S0567740875006383 ↗
27. Cady HH, Larson AC (1965) The crystal structure of 1, 3, 5-triamino-2, 4, 6-trinitrobenzene. Acta Crystallogr A 18:485–49610.1107/S0365110X6500107X ↗
28. Carper WR, Davis LP, Extine MW (1982) Molecular structure of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. ChemInform 13:459–462
29. Martinez L, Andrade R, Birgin EG, Martinez JM (2009) PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 30:2157–216410.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
30. Holian BL, Lomdahl PS (1998) Plasticity induced by shock waves in nonequilibrium molecular-dynamics simulations. Science 280:2085–208810.1126/science.280.5372.2085 ↗
31. Liao LJ, Wang XTY, Huang CG (2021) Molecular insights into shock responses of amorphous polyethylene. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 29:01500810.1088/1361-651X/abcd89 ↗
32. Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R, Bolintineanu DS, Brown WM, Crozier PS, in’t Veld PJ, Kohlmeyer A, Moore SG, Nguyen TD (2022) LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic meso and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun 271:10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
33. Harper LK, Shoaf AL, Bayse CA (2015) Predicting trigger bonds in explosive materials through Wiberg bond index analysis. ChemPhysChem 16:3886–389210.1002/cphc.201500773 ↗
34. Lu M, Zhu WH (2020) Theoretical predictions on pentaerythritol tetranitrate-based high energy density compounds. J Chin Chem Soc 67:1753–176210.1002/jccs.202000256 ↗
35. Jiang WC, Chen H, Zhang WB (2016) First-principles study of the phonon spectrum and heat capacity of TATB crystal. Acta Physica Sinica 65:12630110.7498/aps.65.126301 ↗
36. Liu H, He YH, Li JL, Zhou ZX, Ma ZX, Liu S, Dong X (2019) ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations of shock induced reaction initiation in TNT. AIP Adv 9:01520210.1063/1.5047920 ↗
37. Vinet P, Ferrante J, Rose JH, Smith JR (1987) Compressibility of solids. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 92:9319–932510.1029/JB092iB09p09319 ↗
38. Zheng ZY, Zhao JJ (2016) Unreacted equation of states of typical energetic materials under static compression: a review. Chin Phys B 25:07620210.1088/1674-1056/25/7/076202 ↗
39. Olinger B, Halleck P, Cady HH (1975) The isothermal linear and volume compression of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) to 10 GPa (100 kbar) and the calculated shock compression. J Chem Phys 62:4480–448310.1063/1.430355 ↗
40. Brand HV (2006) Periodic Hartree-Fock study of the elasticity of pentaerythritol tetranitrate. Chem Phys Lett 418:428–43210.1016/j.cplett.2005.11.026 ↗
41. Gan CK, Sewell TD, Challacomb M (2004) All-electron density-functional studies of hydrostatic compression of pentaerythritol tetranitrate C(CH2ONO2)(4). Phys Rev B 69:03511610.1103/PhysRevB.69.035116 ↗
42. Gee RH, Wu C, Maiti A (2006) Coarse-grained model for a molecular crystal. Appl Phys Lett 89:02191910.1063/1.2221878 ↗
43. Bowden PR, Chellappa RS, Dattelbaum DM, Manner VW, Mack NH, Liu Z (2013) The high-pressure phase stability of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), In: 18th Joint Int Conf of the APS Topical-Grp on Shock Compress of Condensed Matter / 24th Int Conf of the Int-Assoc-for-the-Advancement-of-High-Pressure-Sci-and-Technol, Iop Publishing Ltd, Seattle, WA10.1088/1742-6596/500/5/052006 ↗
44. Stevens LL, Velisavljevic N, Hooks DE, Dattelbaum DM (2008) The high-pressure phase behavior and compressibility of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene. Appl Phys Lett 93:08191210.1063/1.2973162 ↗
45. Haycraft JJ, Stevens LL, Eckhardt CJ (2006) The elastic constants and related properties of the energetic material cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (RDX) determined by Brillouin scattering. J Chem Phys 124:02471210.1063/1.2141958 ↗
46. Stevens LL, Velisavljevic N, Hooks DE, Dattelbaum DM (2008) Hydrostatic compression curve for triamino-trinitrobenzene determined to 13.0 GPa with powder X-ray diffraction. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 33:286–29510.1002/prep.200700270 ↗
47. Olinger BW, Cady HH (1976) Hydrostatic compression of explosives and detonation products to 10 GPa (100 kbars) and their calculated shock compression: results for PETN, TATB, CO2, and H2O, In: Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 1976, pp 224
48. Plisson T, Pineau N, Weck G, Bruneton E, Guignot N, Loubeyre P (2017) Equation of state of 1, 3, 5-triamino-2, 4, 6-trinitrobenzene up to 66 GPa. J Appl Phys 122:23590110.1063/1.4997851 ↗