Relationship between hot workability and texture evolution in an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy under hot compressive stress mode
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Heinz A, Haszler A, Keidel C, Moldenhauer S, Benedictus R, Miller WS (2000) Recent development in aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. Mater Sci Eng A 280(1):102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00674-710.1016/S0921-5093(99)00674-7 ↗
2. Starke EA Jr, Staely JT (1996) Application of modern aluminum alloys to aircraft. Prog Aeronaut Sci 32(2–3):131–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-610.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-6 ↗
3. Staley JT (2012) Aluminum alloys–contemporary research and applications. In: Vasudevan AK, Doherty RD (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-341831-9.50006-110.1016/B978-0-12-341831-9.50006-1 ↗
4. Sarkar B, Marek M, Starke EA (1981) The effect of copper content and heat treatment on the stress corrosion characteristics of Ai-6Zn-2Mg-X Cu alloys. Metall Trans A 12(11):1939–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264380610.1007/BF02643806 ↗
5. Peng GS, Chen KH, Chen SY, Fang HC (2012) Effect of the deformation on the stress–corrosion cracking of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Mater Corros 63(3):254–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20100573210.1002/maco.201005732 ↗
6. Wu YL, Froes FH, Alvarez A, Li CG, Liu J (1997) Microstructure and properties of a new super-high-strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy C912. Mater Des 18(4–6):211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00084-810.1016/S0261-3069(97)00084-8 ↗
7. Huo WT, Shi JT, Hou LG, Zhang JS (2017) An improved thermo-mechanical treatment of high-strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy for effective grain refinement and ductility modification. J Mater Process Technol 239:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.027 ↗
8. Wang H, Wang C, Mo Y, Wang H, Xu J (2019) Hot deformation and processing maps of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy under coupling-stirring casting. J Mater Res Technol 8(1):1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.08.00910.1016/j.jmrt.2018.08.009 ↗
9. Lin YC, Li L-T, Xia Y-C, Jiang Y-Q (2013) Hot deformation and processing map of a typical Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 550:438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.11410.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.114 ↗
10. Jeong HT, Kim WJ (2019) Comparison of hot deformation behavior characteristics between as-cast and extruded Al-Zn-Mg-Cu (7075) aluminum alloys with a similar grain size. Materials 12(23):3807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1223380710.3390/ma12233807 ↗
11. Zhao J, Deng Y, Tang J, Zhang J (2019) Influence of strain rate on hot deformation behavior and recrystallization behavior under isothermal compression of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 809:151788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15178810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151788 ↗
12. F. Habashi, Handbook of Aluminum: Volume 2: Alloy Production and Materials Manufacturing, ed. G.E. Totten and D.S. MacKenzie, (CRC press, Boca Raton, 2003) pp.1–45. https://doi.org/10.1201/978020391260710.1201/9780203912607 ↗
13. Divecha AP, Fishman SG, Karmarkar SD (1981) Silicon carbide reinforced aluminum—a formable composite. JOM 33(9):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0333948710.1007/BF03339487 ↗
14. Prasad YVRK, Gegel HL, Doraivelu SM, Malas JC, Morgan JT, Lark KA, Barker DR (1984) Modeling of dynamic material behavior in hot deformation: forging of Ti-6242. Metall Trans A 15(10):1883–1892. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0266490210.1007/BF02664902 ↗
15. Quan G-Z, Wang Y, Yu C-T, Zhou J (2013) Hot workability characteristics of as-cast titanium alloy Ti–6Al–2Zr–1Mo–1V: a study using processing map. Mater Sci Eng A 564:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.07010.1016/j.msea.2012.11.070 ↗
16. Srinivasan N, Prasad YVRK, Rao PR (2008) Hot deformation behaviour of Mg–3Al alloy—a study using processing map. Mater Sci Eng A 476(1–2):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.10310.1016/j.msea.2007.04.103 ↗
17. Wen D-X, Lin YC, Li HB, Chen X-M, Deng J, Li L-T (2014) Hot deformation behavior and processing map of a typical Ni-based superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 591:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.04910.1016/j.msea.2013.09.049 ↗
18. Leffers T, Pedersen OB (2002) The activation energy for the fcc rolling-texture transition as related to the activation energy for cross slip. Scr Mater 46(10):741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00065-910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00065-9 ↗
19. El-Danaf E, Kalidindi SR, Doherty RD, Necker C (2000) Deformation texture transition in brass: critical role of micro-scale shear bands. Acta Mater 48(10):2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00050-110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00050-1 ↗
20. Duckham A, Knutsen RD, Engler O (2001) Influence of deformation variables on the formation of copper-type shear bands in Al–1Mg. Acta Mater 49(14):2739–2749. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00166-510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00166-5 ↗
21. Wenk H-R, Houtte PV (2004) Texture and anisotropy. Rep Prog Phys 67(8):1367. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R0210.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R02 ↗
22. Paul SK, Manikandan G, Verma RK (2013) Prediction of entire forming limit diagram from simple tensile material properties. J Strain Anal 48(6):386–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/030932471348888610.1177/0309324713488886 ↗
23. Evans RW, Scharning PJ (2001) Axisymmetric compression test and hot working properties of alloys. Mater Sci Technol 17(8):995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1179/02670830110151084310.1179/026708301101510843 ↗
24. Obiko J (2021) Friction correction of flow stress-strain curve in the upsetting process. IOP SciNotes 2:014401. https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-1357/abdd9610.1088/2633-1357/abdd96 ↗
25. Sidor JJ, Petrov RH, Kestens LAI (2011) Modeling the crystallographic texture changes in aluminum alloys during recrystallization. Acta Mater 59(14):5735–5748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.05010.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.050 ↗
26. Prasad YVRK (1996) Dynamic materials model: Basis and principles-Reply. Metall Mater Trans A 27(1):235–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264776510.1007/BF02647765 ↗
27. H. Ziegler, E.T. Hochschule, Some extremum principles in irreversible thermodynamics, with application to continuum mechanics, (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, 1963) pp. 93–193
28. Sakai T, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R, Miura H, Jonas JJ (2014) Dynamic and post-dynamic recrystallization under hot, cold and severe plastic deformation conditions. Prog Mater Sci 60:130–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.002 ↗
29. Zhao J, Deng Y, Xu F, Zhang J (2019) Effects of Initial Grain Size of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy on the recrystallization behavior and recrystallization mechanism in isothermal compression. Metals 9:110. https://doi.org/10.3390/met902011010.3390/met9020110 ↗
30. Field DP, Bradford LT, Nowell MM, Lillo TM (2007) The role of annealing twins during recrystallization of Cu. Acta Mater 55(12):4233–4241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02110.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.021 ↗
31. Kumar A, Dawson PR (2000) Computational modeling of FCC deformation textures over Rodrigues’ space. Acta Mater 48(10):2719–2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00044-610.1016/S1359-6454(00)00044-6 ↗
32. Taylor GI (1938) Plastic strain in metals. J Inst Metals 62:307–324
33. Han S-H, Choi S-H, Choi J-K, Seong H-G, Kim I-B (2010) Effect of hot-rolling processing on texture and r-value of annealed dual-phase steels. Mater Sci Eng. A 527(7–8):1686–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.01610.1016/j.msea.2009.11.016 ↗
34. Beausir B, Scharnweber J, Jaschinski J, Brokmeier H-G, Oertel C-G, Skrotzki W (2010) Plastic anisotropy of ultrafine grained aluminium alloys produced by accumulative roll bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 527(13–14):3271–3278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.00610.1016/j.msea.2010.02.006 ↗
35. Leffers T, Ray RK (2009) The brass-type texture and its deviation from the copper-type texture. Prog Mater Sci 54(3):351–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.09.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.09.002 ↗
36. Zhu R, Liu Q, Li J, Xiang S, Chen Y, Zhang X (2015) Dynamic restoration mechanism and physically based constitutive model of 2050 Al–Li alloy during hot compression. J Alloys Compd 650:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.18210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.182 ↗
37. Lee DN (1995) The evolution of recrystallization textures from deformation textures. Scripta Metall Mater 32(10):1689–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(95)00256-U10.1016/0956-716X(95)00256-U ↗
38. Ye C, Liu G, Chen K, Liu J, Hu J, Yu Y, Mao Y, Shen Y (2023) Strain-rate dependent crystal model and aluminum softening/hardening transition. Comput Mater Sci 222:112108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11210810.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112108 ↗
39. Barnett MR, Hodgson PD (2001) Metal forming (hot): microstructural aspects. In: Buschow KHJ, Cahn RW, Flemings MC, Ilschner B, Kramer EJ, Mahajan S, Veyssière P (eds) Encyclopedia of materials science and technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
40. Cho C-H, Son H-W, Hyun S-K (2020) Effect of Mg content on shear texture evolution at variable processing conditions in Al–Mg alloys. J Alloys Compd 825:153927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15392710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153927 ↗
41. Cho C-H, Son K-T, Lee J-C, Kim SK, Yoon Y-O, Hyun S-K (2020) Effect of the Mg contents on the annealing mechanism and shear texture of Al–Mg alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 786:139471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13947110.1016/j.msea.2020.139471 ↗
42. Li S, Zhao Q, Liu Z, Li F (2018) A Review of texture evolution mechanisms during deformation by rolling in aluminum alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 27(7):3350–3373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3439-y10.1007/s11665-018-3439-y ↗
43. Rakshit R, Sarkar A, Panda SK, Mandal S (2021) Influence of out-of-plane stretch forming induced different strain paths on micro-texture evolution, slip system activity and Taylor factor distribution in Al–Li alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 830:142267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14226710.1016/j.msea.2021.142267 ↗
44. Choe SH, Jo JH (1998) Behavior of initial texture during deep drawing of AA1050 sheets. Trans Mater Process 7(6):570–574
45. Liu Q, Hansen N (1995) Deformation microstructure and orientation of fcc crystals. Phys Status Solidi A 149(1):187–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.221149011310.1002/pssa.2211490113 ↗
46. Chin GY, Hosford WF, Mendorf DR (1969) Accommodation of constrained deformation in fcc metals by slip and twinning. Proc R Soc London Ser A 309(1499):433–456. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1969.005110.1098/rspa.1969.0051 ↗