How does the structure of pullulan alginate composites change in the biological environment?
Source abstract
Abstract
Alginate and pullulan are two polysaccharides with numerous applications in the field of biomedical sciences such as wound dressing, soft and hard tissue regeneration. These materials come into contact with the human body for various time intervals, depending on their intended use. In this study, alginate-pullulan composites were synthesized and assayed in vitro as follows: bioactivity, biodegradability, swelling ratio, and biocompatibility. After 2 weeks of immersion in simulated body fluid, calcium oxalate appeared on the surface of the composites near the apatite layer. The in vitro biocompatibility assay using human fibroblastic and osteoblastic cell lines showed encouraging results; therefore, the polymeric composite proved to be non-toxic and safe for further in vivo testing. This was also reinforced by cell proliferation, necrosis, apoptosis, and surface adhesion tests. The most promising results were obtained with the composite that was prepared using an alginate: pullulan weight ratio of 1:0.75. Applying this ratio caused cellular growth on the surface of the biomaterial. The applicability of composites was limited by the appearance of calcium oxalate. However, this phenomenon could be prevented by introducing an inorganic component into the alginate-pullulan composites, such as bioactive glass.[GRAPHICS].
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Koons GL, Diba M, Mikos AG (2020) Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater 5:584–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0204-210.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
2. Kashirina A, Yao Y, Liu Y, Leng J (2019) Biopolymers as bone substitutes: a review. Biomater Sci 7:3961–3983. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9bm00664h10.1039/c9bm00664h ↗
3. Venkatesan J, Bhatnagar I, Manivasagan P, Kang KH, Kim SK (2015) Alginate composites for bone tissue engineering: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 72:269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.00810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.008 ↗
4. Singh RS, Kaur N, Hassan M, Kennedy JF (2021) Pullulan in biomedical research and development—a review. Int J Biol Macromol 166:694–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.22710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.227 ↗
5. Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2012) Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Progress Polymer Sci (Oxford) 37:106–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 ↗
6. Coltelli MB, Danti S, de Clerk K, Lazzeri A, Morganti P (2020) Pullulan for advanced sustainable body- and skin-contact applications. J Funct Biomater, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb11010020.10.3390/jfb11010020 ↗
7. Hurtado A, Aljabali AAA, Mishra V, Tambuwala MM, Serrano-Aroca Á (2022) Alginate: enhancement strategies for advanced applications. Int J Mol Sci 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094486.10.3390/ijms23094486 ↗
8. Hernández-González AC, Téllez-Jurado L, Rodríguez-Lorenzo LM (2020) Alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering, from injectables to bioprinting: a review, Carbohydr Polym. 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115514.10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115514 ↗
9. Sahoo DR, Biswal T (2021) Alginate and its application to tissue engineering. SN Appl Sci, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04096-w.10.1007/s42452-020-04096-w ↗
10. Varaprasad K, Jayaramudu T, Kanikireddy V, Toro C, Sadiku ER (2020) Alginate-based composite materials for wound dressing application: a mini review. Carbohydr Polym, 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116025.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116025 ↗
11. Kim HL, Jung GY, Yoon JH, Han JS, Park YJ, Kim DG, Zhang M, Kim DJ (2015) Preparation and characterization of nano-sized hydroxyapatite/alginate/chitosan composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 54:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.04.03310.1016/j.msec.2015.04.033 ↗
12. Zhao F, Zhang W, Fu X, Xie W, Chen X (2016) Fabrication and characterization of bioactive glass/alginate composite scaffolds by a self-crosslinking processing for bone regeneration. RSC Adv 6:91201–91208. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra18309c10.1039/c6ra18309c ↗
13. Popescu RA, Magyari K, Taulescu M, Vulpoi A, Berce C, Bogdan S, Lelescu C, Dreancă A, Tudoran O, Papuc I, Baia L (2018) New alginate–pullulan–bioactive glass composites with copper oxide for bone tissue regeneration trials. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12:2112–2121. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.274610.1002/term.2746 ↗
14. Place ES, Rojo L, Gentleman E, Sardinha JP, Stevens MM (2011) Strontium-and zinc-alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 17:2713–2722. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.005910.1089/ten.tea.2011.0059 ↗
15. Singh RS, Kaur N, Rana V, Kennedy JF (2016) Recent insights on applications of pullulan in tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 153:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.11810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.118 ↗
16. Cheng KC, Demirci A, Catchmark JM (2011) Pullulan: Biosynthesis, production, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3477-y10.1007/s00253-011-3477-y ↗
17. Farris S, Unalan IU, Introzzi L, Fuentes-Alventosa JM, Cozzolino CA (2014) Pullulan-based films and coatings for food packaging: present applications, emerging opportunities, and future challenges. J Appl Polym Sci, 131. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40539.10.1002/app.40539 ↗
18. Salesa B, Llorens-Gámez M, Serrano-Aroca Á (2020) Study of 1D and 2D carbon nanomaterial in alginate films. Nanomaterials 10:206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1002020610.3390/nano10020206 ↗
19. Rekha MR, Sharma CP (2007) Pullulan as a promising biomaterial for biomedical applications: a perspective. Trends Biomater. Artif Organs. 20:111–116
20. Magyari K, Baia L, Vulpoi A, Simon S, Popescu O, Simon V (2015) Bioactivity evolution of the surface functionalized bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3320310.1002/jbm.b.33203 ↗
21. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19:485–502. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
22. Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
23. Tomuleasa CI, Foris V, Soriţǎu O, Páll E, Fischer-Fodor E, Lung-Illes V, Brie I, Virág P, Perde-Schrepler M, Postescu ID, Cherecheş G, Barbos O, Tatomir C (2008) Effects of 60Co γ-rays on human osteoprogenitor cells. Roman J Morphol Embryol 50:349–355
24. Dreanca A, Muresan-Pop M, Taulescu M, Tóth ZR, Bogdan S, Pestean C, Oren S, Toma C, Popescu A, Páll E, Sevastre B, Baia L, Magyari K (2021) Bioactive glass-biopolymers-gold nanoparticle based composites for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112006.10.1016/j.msec.2021.112006 ↗
25. Gray SR, Peretti SW, Lamb HH (2013) Article real-time monitoring of high-gravity corn mash fermentation using in situ Raman Spectroscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:1654–1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.2484910.1002/bit.24849 ↗
26. Soni SR, Bhunia BK, Kumari N, Dan S, Mukherjee S, Mandal BB, Ghosh A (2018) Therapeutically effective controlled release formulation of pirfenidone from nontoxic biocompatible carboxymethyl pullulan-poly(vinyl alcohol) interpenetrating polymer networks. ACS Omega 3:11993–12009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0080310.1021/acsomega.8b00803 ↗
27. Mangolim CS, Thaiane T, Fenelon VC, Koga LN, Barbosa S, Ferreira DS, Bruschi ML, Matioli G (2017) Description of recovery method used for curdlan produced by Agrobacterium sp . IFO 13140 and its relation to the morphology and physicochemical and technological properties of the polysaccharide. PLoS One, pp 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171469.10.1371/journal.pone.0171469 ↗
28. Schmid T, Messmer A, Yeo BS, Zhang W, Zenobi R (2008) Towards chemical analysis of nanostructures in biofilms II: Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of alginates. Anal Bioanal Chem. 391:1907–1916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2101-110.1007/s00216-008-2101-1 ↗
29. Torres DI, Villanueva ME, Lázaro-Martínez JM, Copello GJ, Campo Dall’ Orto V (2018) Calcium alginate beads reinforced with synthetic oligomers, linear polyethylenimine and Cu(II): structural stability and potential applications. Cellulose 25:1657–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1684-8.10.1007/s10570-018-1684-8 ↗
30. Riyajan SA, Nuim J (2013) Interaction of green polymer blend of modified sodium alginate and carboxylmethyl cellulose encapsulation of turmeric extract. Int J Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/364253.10.1155/2013/364253 ↗
31. Rapacz-Kmita A, Paluszkiewicz C, Ślósarczyk A, Paszkiewicz Z (2005) FTIR and XRD investigations on the thermal stability of hydroxyapatite during hot pressing and pressureless sintering processes. J Mol Struct 744–747:653–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.11.07010.1016/j.molstruc.2004.11.070 ↗
32. Sekkoum K, Cheriti A, Taleb S, Belboukhari N (2016) FTIR spectroscopic study of human urinary stones from El Bayadh district (Algeria). Arab J Chem 9:330–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.10.01010.1016/j.arabjc.2011.10.010 ↗
33. Tsujihata M (2008) Mechanism of calcium oxalate renal stone formation and renal tubular cell injury. Int J Urol 15:115–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01953.x10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01953.x ↗
34. Yamaguchi S, Wiessner JH, Hasegawa AT, Hung LY, Mandel GS, Mandel NS (2005) Study of a rat model for calcium oxalate crystal formation without severe renal damage in selected conditions. Int J Urol 12(3):290-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01038.x10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01038.x ↗
35. Popescu RA, Tăbăran FA, Bogdan S, Fărcăsanu A, Purdoiu R, Magyari K, Vulpoi A, Dreanca A, Sevastre B, Simon S, Papuc I, Baia L (2020) Bone regeneration response in an experimental long bone defect orthotopically implanted with alginate-pullulan-glass-ceramic composite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 108:1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3446410.1002/jbm.b.34464 ↗
36. Xu M, Qin M, Cheng Y, Niu X, Kong J, Zhang X, Huang D, Wang H (2021) Alginate microgels as delivery vehicles for cell-based therapies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Carbohydr Polym, 266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118128.10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118128 ↗
37. Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
38. Koutsopoulos S (2002) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite crystals: a review study on the analytical methods. J Biomed Mater Res 62:600–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1028010.1002/jbm.10280 ↗
39. Aguiar H, Serra J, González P, León B (2009) Structural study of sol-gel silicate glasses by IR and Raman spectroscopies. J Non Cryst Solids 355:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.01010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.010 ↗