An elastic and lamellar piezoresistive graphene/MXene aerogel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen W, Gui X, Liang B et al (2017) Structural engineering for high sensitivity, ultrathin pressure sensors based on wrinkled graphene and anodic aluminum oxide membrane. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:24111–24117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0551510.1021/acsami.7b05515 ↗
2. Chen Z, Zhuo H, Hu Y et al (2020) Wood-derived lightweight and elastic carbon aerogel for pressure sensing and energy storage. Adv Funct Mater 30:1910292. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20191029210.1002/adfm.201910292 ↗
3. Gao H-L, Zhu Y-B, Mao L-B et al (2016) Super-elastic and fatigue resistant carbon material with lamellar multi-arch microstructure. Nat Commun 7:12920. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1292010.1038/ncomms12920 ↗
4. Hu Y, Chen Z, Zhuo H et al (2019) Advanced compressible and elastic 3D monoliths beyond hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater 29:1904472. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190447210.1002/adfm.201904472 ↗
5. Jiang W, Yao C, Chen W et al (2020) A super-resilient and highly sensitive graphene oxide/cellulose-derived carbon aerogel. J Mater Chem A 8:18376–18384. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta05310d10.1039/d0ta05310d ↗
6. Kim K-H, Oh Y, Islam MF (2012) Graphene coating makes carbon nanotube aerogels superelastic and resistant to fatigue. Nat Nanotechnol 7:562–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.11810.1038/nnano.2012.118 ↗
7. Wang X, Lu L-L, Yu Z-L et al (2015) Scalable template synthesis of resorcinol-formaldehyde/graphene oxide composite aerogels with tunable densities and mechanical properties. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54:2397–2401. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20141066810.1002/anie.201410668 ↗
8. Ren R-P, Wang Z, Ren J et al (2018) Highly compressible polyimide/graphene aerogel for efficient oil/water separation. J Mater Sci 54:5918–5926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03238-110.1007/s10853-018-03238-1 ↗
9. Xiang C, Wang C, Guo R et al (2018) Synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose-reduced graphene oxide aerogel for efficient removal of organic liquids and dyes. J Mater Sci 54:1872–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2900-510.1007/s10853-018-2900-5 ↗
10. Yuan D, Dou Y, Tian Y et al (2021) Robust pseudocapacitive sodium cation intercalation induced by cobalt vacancies at atomically Thin Co1-x Se2/graphene heterostructure for sodium-ion batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 60:18830–18837. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20210685710.1002/anie.202106857 ↗
11. Liu M, Zhang P, Qu Z et al (2019) Conductive carbon nanofiber interpenetrated graphene architecture for ultra-stable sodium ion battery. Nat Commun 10:3917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11925-z10.1038/s41467-019-11925-z ↗
12. Wang Z, Wei R, Gu J et al (2018) Ultralight, highly compressible and fire-retardant graphene aerogel with self-adjustable electromagnetic wave absorption. Carbon 139:1126–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.01410.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.014 ↗
13. Yuan D, Dou Y, Wu Z et al (2022) Atomically thin materials for next-generation rechargeable batteries. Chem Rev 122:957–999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0063610.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00636 ↗
14. Huang C-B, Witomska S, Aliprandi A et al (2019) Molecule-graphene hybrid materials with tunable mechanoresponse: highly sensitive pressure sensors for health monitoring. Adv Mater 31:e1804600. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180460010.1002/adma.201804600 ↗
15. Peng X, Wu K, Hu Y et al (2018) A mechanically strong and sensitive CNT/rGO–CNF carbon aerogel for piezoresistive sensors. J Mater Chem A 6:23550–23559. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta09322a10.1039/c8ta09322a ↗
16. Zhuo H, Hu Y, Tong X et al (2018) A supercompressible, elastic, and bendable carbon aerogel with ultrasensitive detection limits for compression strain, pressure, and bending angle. Adv Mater 30:e1706705. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170670510.1002/adma.201706705 ↗
17. Zhu C, Han T-Y, Duoss EB et al (2015) Worsley, Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices. Nat Commun 6:6962. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms796210.1038/ncomms7962 ↗
18. Qian Y, Ismail I-M, Stein A (2014) Ultralight, high-surface-area, multifunctional graphene-based aerogels from self-assembly of graphene oxide and resol. Carbon 68:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.08210.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.082 ↗
19. Shi L, Chen K, Du R et al (2016) Scalable seashell-based chemical vapor deposition growth of three-dimensional graphene foams for oil–water separation. J Am Chem Soc 138:6360–6363. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b0226210.1021/jacs.6b02262 ↗
20. Sylvain D, Eduardo S, Nalla RK, Tomsia AP (2006) Freezing as a path to build complex composites. Science 311:515–518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.112093710.1126/science.1120937 ↗
21. Deville S (2008) Freeze-casting of porous ceramics: a review of current achievements and issues. Adv Eng Mater 10:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20070027010.1002/adem.200700270 ↗
22. Huang H, Chen P, Zhang X, Lu Y, Zhan W (2013) Edge-to-edge assembled graphene oxide aerogels with outstanding mechanical performance and superhigh chemical activity. Small 9:1397–1404. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20120296510.1002/smll.201202965 ↗
23. Barr SA, Luijten E (2010) Structural properties of materials created through freeze casting. Acta Mater 58:709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.05010.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.050 ↗
24. Hu H, Zhao Z, Wan W, Gogotsi Y, Qiu J (2013) Ultralight and highly compressible graphene aerogels. Adv Mater 25:2219–2223. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120453010.1002/adma.201204530 ↗
25. Qiu L, Liu J-Z, Chang S-L, Wu Y, Li D (2012) Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths. Nat Commun 3:1241. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms225110.1038/ncomms2251 ↗
26. Zeng Z, Wang C, Zhang Y et al (2018) Ultralight and highly elastic graphene/lignin-derived carbon nanocomposite aerogels with ultrahigh electromagnetic interference shielding performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:8205–8213. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1942710.1021/acsami.7b19427 ↗
27. Sun H, Xu Z, Gao C (2013) Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv Mater 25:2554–2560. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120457610.1002/adma.201204576 ↗
28. Wang X, Lu L-L, Yu Z-L et al (2015) Scalable template synthesis of resorcinol-formaldehyde/graphene oxide composite aerogels with tunable densities and mechanical properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:2397–2401. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20141066810.1002/anie.201410668 ↗
29. Song F, Li G, Zhu Y et al (2020) Rising from the horizon: three-dimensional functional architectures assembled with MXene nanosheets. J Mater Chem A 8:18538–18559. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA06222G10.1039/D0TA06222G ↗
30. Naguib M, Mochalin VN, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y (2014) 25th anniversary article: MXenes: a new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv Mater 26:992–1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130413810.1002/adma.201304138 ↗
31. Naguib M, Kurtoglu M, Presser V et al (2011) Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3 AlC2. Adv Mater 23:4248–4253. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110230610.1002/adma.201102306 ↗
32. Yang J, Li H, Cheng J et al (2021) Nanocellulose intercalation to boost the performance of MXene pressure sensor for human interactive monitoring. J Mater Sci 56:13859–13873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05909-y10.1007/s10853-021-05909-y ↗
33. Song F, Hu J, Li G et al (2021) Room-temperature assembled mxene-based aerogels for high mass-loading sodium-ion storage. Nanomicro Lett 14:37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00781-610.1007/s40820-021-00781-6 ↗
34. He H, Chen Y, Yang C et al (2022) Constructing 3D interweaved MXene/graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets/graphene nanoarchitectures for promoted electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Energy Chem 67:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.01910.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.019 ↗
35. Zhuo H, Hu Y, Chen Z et al (2019) A carbon aerogel with super mechanical and sensing performances for wearable piezoresistive sensors. J Mater Chem A 7:8092–8100. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta00596j10.1039/c9ta00596j ↗
36. Chen Z, Hu Y, Zhuo H et al (2019) Compressible, elastic, and pressure-sensitive carbon aerogels derived from 2D titanium carbide nanosheets and bacterial cellulose for wearable sensors. Chem Mater 31:3301–3312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0025910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00259 ↗
37. Shi Y, Sun M, Liu C et al (2022) Lightweight, amphipathic and fire-resistant prGO/MXene spherical beads for rapid elimination of hazardous chemicals. J Hazard Mater 423:127069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12706910.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127069 ↗
38. Zhao S, Zhang H-B, Luo J-Q et al (2018) Highly electrically conductive three-dimensional Ti3C2T x MXene/reduced graphene oxide hybrid aerogels with excellent electromagnetic interference shielding performances. ACS Nano 12:11193–11202. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0573910.1021/acsnano.8b05739 ↗
39. Ma Y, Yue Y, Zhang H et al (2018) 3D synergistical MXene/reduced graphene oxide aerogel for a piezoresistive sensor. ACS Nano 12:3209–3216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b0690910.1021/acsnano.7b06909 ↗
40. Zhu M, Yue Y, Cheng Y et al (2019) Hollow MXene sphere/reduced graphene aerogel composites for piezoresistive sensor with ultra-high sensitivity. Adv Electron Mater 6:1901064. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.20190106410.1002/aelm.201901064 ↗
41. Paul P, Chakraborty P, Das T, Nafday D, Saha-Dasgupta T (2017) Properties at the interface of graphene and Ti2C MXene. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.03543510.1103/PhysRevB.96.035435 ↗
42. Li Y, Meng F, Mei Y et al (2020) Electrospun generation of Ti3C2Tx MXene@graphene oxide hybrid aerogel microspheres for tunable high-performance microwave absorption. Chem Eng J 391:123512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12351210.1016/j.cej.2019.123512 ↗
43. Zhang J, Li M, Feng Z et al (2006) UV Raman spectroscopic study on TiO2. I. Phase transformation at the surface and in the bulk. J Phys Chem B 110:927–935. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp055247310.1021/jp0552473 ↗
44. Hu Y, Zhuo H, Luo Q et al (2019) Biomass polymer-assisted fabrication of aerogels from MXenes with ultrahigh compression elasticity and pressure sensitivity. J Mater Chem A 7:10273–10281. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta01448a10.1039/c9ta01448a ↗