journal article·2020-01

Revealing working hardening behavior and substructure evolutions of ultrahigh strength and enhanced wear resistance Fe–25Mn–7Al–1C steel treated by explosion processing

Qinan Ba, Renbo Song, Naipeng Zhou, Zhongzheng Pei, Yifan Feng, Renfeng Song

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The substructural evolution and working hardening behavior of Fe–25Mn–7Al–1C steel after explosion processing were investigated in the present study. After solution treatment at 1100 °C for 2 h and aging treatment at 550 °C for 2 h, the wear surface of the steel was treated by explosion processing. The results showed that the hardening surface exhibited an excellent combination of mechanical properties including ultimate tensile strength of 999.1 ± 9.3 MPa, yield strength of 900.5 ± 7.9 MPa, total elongation of 13.8 ± 0.4% and hardness of 400 HB. Under the impact energy of 1 J, 2 J and 4 J, the morphologies of worn surface consisted of the furrow, delaminated crater and press-in abrasive. The hardness, strength and decreased gradually with the increase in hardening depth. The deformation characteristic was the typical planar glide due to glide plane softening. In the process of hardening, microband, Taylor lattice and a large number of slip bands were orderly formed. These dislocation substructures interacted with dislocations and hindered dislocation motion, leading to the surface hardening and the improvement of hardness, strength and wear resistance. It is worth noting that microband increased the work hardening rate, but the width and density of it played a small role in improving the strain hardening capacity. In addition, with the strain increasing, microband had different effects on strain hardening rate of the steels with different initial dislocation densities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Karaman I, Sehitoglu H, Gall K et al (2000) Deformation of single crystal Hadfield steel by twinning and slip. Acta Mater 48(6):1345–135910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00383-3 ↗
2. Zhang FC, Lv B, Wang TS et al (2010) Explosion hardening of Hadfield steel crossing. Mater Sci Technol 26(2):223–22910.1179/174328408X363263 ↗
3. Hu X, Shen Z, Liu Y et al (2013) Influence of explosive density on mechanical properties of high manganese steel explosion hardened. J Appl Phys 114(21):21350710.1063/1.4837617 ↗
4. Abbasi M, Kheirandish S, Kharrazi Y et al (2010) On the comparison of the abrasive wear behavior of aluminum alloyed and standard Hadfield steels. Wear 268(1):202–20710.1016/j.wear.2009.07.010 ↗
5. Peng SG, Song RB, Tan ZD et al (2016) Abrasive wear behaviors of light-weight austenitic Fe–24Mn–7Al–1C steel and Mn13Cr2 steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 23(8):857–86610.1016/S1006-706X(16)30131-5 ↗
6. Abbasi M, Kheirandish S, Kharrazi Y et al (2009) The fracture and plastic deformation of aluminum alloyed Hadfield steels. Mater Sci Eng A 513–514(11):72–7610.1016/j.msea.2009.02.023 ↗
7. Canadinc D, Sehitoglu H, Maier HJ (2007) The role of dense dislocation walls on the deformation response of aluminum alloyed hadfield steel polycrystals. Mater Sci Eng A 454(16):662–66610.1016/j.msea.2006.11.122 ↗
8. Zuidema BK, Subramanyam DK, Leslie WC (1987) The effect of aluminum on the work hardening and wear resistance of hadfield manganese steel. Metall Trans A 18(9):1629–163910.1007/BF02646146 ↗
9. Acselrad O, Souza ARD, Kalashnikov IS et al (2004) A first evaluation of the abrasive wear of an austenitic FeMnAlC steel. Wear 257(9–10):999–100510.1016/j.wear.2004.07.004 ↗
10. Zhang M, Lv B, Zhang F et al (2012) Explosion deformation and hardening behaviors of hadfield steel crossing. ISIJ Int 52(11):2093–209510.2355/isijinternational.52.2093 ↗
11. Drobnjak D, Parr JG (1970) Deformation substructure and strain-hardening characteristics of metastable Fe–Mn austenites. Metall Trans 1(4):759–76510.1007/BF02811751 ↗
12. Dastur YN, Leslie WC (1981) Mechanism of work hardening in Hadfield manganese steel. Metall Mater Trans A 12(5):749–75910.1007/BF02648339 ↗
13. Abler PH, Olson GB, Owen WS (1986) Strain hardening of Hadfield manganese steel. Metall Mater Trans A 17(10):1725–173710.1007/BF02817271 ↗
14. Yang F, Song R, Li Y et al (2015) Tensile deformation of low density duplex Fe–Mn–Al–C steel. Mater Des 76:32–3910.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.043 ↗
15. Ha MC, Koo JM, Lee JK et al (2013) Tensile deformation of a low density Fe–27Mn–12Al–0.8C duplex steel in association with ordered phases at ambient temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 586:276–28310.1016/j.msea.2013.07.094 ↗
16. Ding H, Han D, Zhang J et al (2016) Tensile deformation behavior analysis of low density Fe–18Mn–10Al–xC steels. Mater Sci Eng A 652:69–7610.1016/j.msea.2015.11.071 ↗
17. Hutchinsion B, Ridley N (2006) On dislocation accumulation and work hardening in Hadfield steel. Scripta Mater 55(4):299–30210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.002 ↗
18. Astafurova EG, Tukeeva MS, Zakharova GG et al (2011) The role of twinning on microstructure and mechanical response of severely deformed single crystals of high-manganese austenitic steel. Mater Charact 62(6):588–59210.1016/j.matchar.2011.04.010 ↗
19. Lu ZL, Zhou YX, Rao QC et al (2001) An investigation of the abrasive wear behavior of ductile cast iron. J Mater Process Technol 116(2–3):176–18110.1016/S0924-0136(01)01013-5 ↗
20. Talonen J, Hnninen H (2007) Formation of shear bands and strain- induced martensite during plastic deformation of metastable austenitic stainless steels. Acta Mater 55(18):610810.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.015 ↗
21. Hirth JP (1970) Thermodynamics of stacking faults. Metall Trans 1(9):2367–237410.1007/BF03038365 ↗
22. Allain S, Chateau JP, Bouaziz O et al (2004) Correlations between the calculated stacking fault energy and the plasticity mechanisms in Fe–Mn–C alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 387:158–16210.1016/j.msea.2004.01.059 ↗
23. Pierce DT, Jiménez JA, Bentley J et al (2015) The influence of stacking fault energy on the microstructural and strain-hardening evolution of Fe–Mn–Al–Si steels during tensile deformation. Acta Mater 100:178–19010.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.030 ↗
24. Park KT, Jin KG, Sang HH et al (2010) Stacking fault energy and plastic deformation of fully austenitic high manganese steels: effect of Al addition. Mater Sci Eng A 527(16):3651–366110.1016/j.msea.2010.02.058 ↗
25. Olson GB, Cohen M (1982) Stress-assisted isothermal martensitic transformation: application to TRIP steels. Metall Mater Trans A 13(11):1907–191410.1007/BF02645934 ↗
26. Byun TS (2003) On the stress dependence of partial dislocation separation and deformation microstructure in austenitic stainless steels. Acta Mater 51(11):3063–307110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00117-4 ↗
27. Park KT (2013) Tensile deformation of low-density Fe–Mn–Al–C austenitic steels at ambient temperature. Scripta Mater 68(6):375–37910.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.031 ↗
28. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf D (2001) Q: Dislocations structures—how far from equilibrium? A: Very close indeed. Mater Sci Eng A 315(1–2):211–21610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01204-7 ↗
29. Yoo JD, Park KT (2008) Microband-induced plasticity in a high Mn–Al–C light steel. Mater Sci Eng A 496(1):417–42410.1016/j.msea.2008.05.042 ↗