Cancer cell membrane as gate keeper of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and photothermal-triggered membrane fusion to release the encapsulated anticancer drug
Source abstract
Abstract
The cancer cell membrane (CCM) is widely used for nanomedicine encapsulation to improve their tumor-targeting ability. However, few researches are focused on drug release process and mechanism of these composite. Cell membrane fusion (two separate lipid membranes merge into a single continuous bilayer), one of the most fundamental processes in biology could be promoted by heating. Thus, in this manuscript, CCM was exploited as the gate keeper and tumor-targeting moiety of anticancer drug-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN). In addition, the drug release process and mechanism based on cell membrane fusion were studied. The loaded drugs included indocyanine green (ICG), a FDA-approved near-infrared photothermal agent for clinical applications, and doxorubicin (DOX), a chemotherapy drug. By coating CCM on drug-loaded MSN, the keeper could prevent unexpected drug leaking during the circulation and provide tumor targeting based on its specific recognition function. After arriving tumor tissue post-tail vein injection, the tumor position is irradiated by 808 nm light to trigger light–thermal conversion process of ICG to heat the composite (DOX-ICG@MSN@CCM) and promote cell membrane fusion between the encapsulated CCM and targeted tumor cell membrane. Such process can enhance the uptake efficacy of DOX-ICG@MSN@CCM to tumor cells. Furthermore, ICG could provide a synergistic photothermal therapy activity with DOX.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Extracellular vesicles in disease
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang Q, Wang XL, Li PZ et al (2014) Biocompatible, uniform, and redispersible mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer- targeted drug delivery in vivo. Adv Funct Mater 24:2450–246110.1002/adfm.201302988 ↗
2. Zhang K, Xu LL, Jiang JG et al (2013) Facile large-scale synthesis of monodisperse mesoporous silica nanospheres with tunable pore structure. J Am Chem 135:2427–243010.1021/ja3116873 ↗
3. Slowing II, Vivero-Escoto JL, Wu CW, Lin VSY (2008) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1278–128810.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012 ↗
4. Xiao D, Jia HZ, Zhang J, Liu CW, Zhuo RX, Zhang XZ (2014) A dual-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticle for tumor-triggered targeting drug delivery. Small 10:591–59810.1002/smll.201301926 ↗
5. Tarn D, Ferris DP, Barnes JC, Ambrogio MW, Stoddart JF, Zink JI (2014) A reversible light-operated nanovalve on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale 6:3335–334310.1039/c3nr06049g ↗
6. Chen CE, Pu F, Huang ZZ, Liu Z, Ren JS, Qu XG (2011) Stimuli-responsive controlled-release system using quadruplex DNA-capped silica nanocontainers. Nucleic Acids Res 39:1638–164410.1093/nar/gkq893 ↗
7. Chen Z, Li Z, Lin Y, Yin M, Ren J, Qu X (2013) Bioresponsive hyaluronic acid-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Chem Eur J 19:1778–178310.1002/chem.201202038 ↗
8. Sun H, Su J, Meng Q et al (2017) Cancer cell membrane-coated gold nanocages with hyperthermia-triggered drug release and homotypic target inhibit growth and metastasis of breast cancer. Adv Funct Mater 27(3):160430010.1002/adfm.201604300 ↗
9. Zhu J-Y, Zheng D-W, Zhang M-K et al (2016) Preferential cancer cell self-recognition and tumor self-targeting by coating nanoparticles with homotypic cancer cell membranes. NanoLett 16:5895–590110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02786 ↗
10. Balasubramanian V, Correia A, Zhang HB et al (2017) Biomimetic engineering using cancer cell membranes for designing compartmentalized nanoreactors with organelle-like functions. Adv Mater 29:160537510.1002/adma.201605375 ↗
11. Chen WS, Zeng K, Liu H et al (2017) Cell membrane camouflaged hollow prussian blue nanoparticles for synergistic photothermal-/chemotherapy of cancer. Adv Funct Mater 27:160579510.1002/adfm.201605795 ↗
12. Liu T, Shi C, Duan L et al (2018) A highly hemocompatible erythrocyte membrane-coated ultrasmall selenium nanosystem for simultaneous cancer radiosensitization and precise antiangiogenesis. J Mater Chem B 6:4756–476410.1039/C8TB01398E ↗
13. Chen Z, Zhao PF, Luo ZY et al (2016) Cancer cell membrane-biomimetic nanoparticles for homologous-targeting dual-modal imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 10:10049–1005710.1021/acsnano.6b04695 ↗
14. Guo X, Zhang Y, Liu J et al (2016) Red blood cell membrane-mediated fusion of hydrophobic quantum dots with living cell membranes for cell imaging. J Mater Chem B 4:4191–419710.1039/C6TB01067A ↗
15. Jahn R, Lang T, Südhof TC (2003) Membrane fusion. Cell 112:519–53310.1016/S0092-8674(03)00112-0 ↗
16. Wilschut J, Duzgunes N, Hoekstra D, Papahadjopoulos D (1985) Modulation of membrane fusion by membrane fluidity: temperature dependence of divalent cation induced fusion of phosphatidylserine vesicles. Biochem 24:8–1410.1021/bi00322a002 ↗
17. Wang T, Li S, Zou Z et al (2018) A zeolitic imidazolate framework-8-based indocyanine green theranostic agent for infrared fluorescence imaging and photothermal therapy. J Mater Chem B 6:3914–392110.1039/C8TB00351C ↗
18. Shemesh CS, Hardy CW, Yu DS, Fernandez B, Zhang H (2014) Indocyanine green loaded liposome nanocarriers for photodynamic therapy using human triple negative breast cancer cells. Photodiagn Photodyn 11:193–20310.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.02.001 ↗
19. Ran M, Tianyue J, Zhen G (2014) Enhanced anticancer efficacy by ATP-mediated liposomal drug delivery. Angew Chem 126:5925–593010.1002/ange.201400268 ↗
20. Mizutani H (2007) Mechanism of DNA damage and apoptosis induced by anticancer drugs through generation of reactive oxygen species. Yakugaku Zasshi 127:1837–184210.1248/yakushi.127.1837 ↗